Southern Ocean mixing, seasonal sea ice, and glacialinterglacial CO2 variation. Abstract Several lines of evidence indicate that a change in the rate of stratification and mixing in the Southern Ocean, either near the surface or at depth (most probably, both), is a key factor in explaining glacial-to-interglacial atmospheric CO2 change. Here I discuss how the Southern Ocean is ventilated today, and propose how this may have been different in glacial time. Deep convection is confined to regions very close to the continent. The open ocean south of the Polar front is largely ventilated from below, with rapid mixing apparently driven by interaction of deep currents with topography driving high rates of mixing well up into the water column. Between the surface and ~1500m depth, the water column is ventilated from above, stabilized by a halocline that is due in part to sea ice formation and brine rejection, and probably dominated by the effects of storms. I propose that in glacial time, more copious sea ice formation towards the Antarctic continent, together with substantial seasonality and melting further out, resulted in denser bottom water formation and more fresh water near the surface. The greater stratification at depth caused lower mixing rates there while greater winter-time sea ice cover reduced mixing towards the surface. The increased stratification in the glacial deep ocean led to reduced ventilation of the deep ocean as a whole, allowing the build up there of biologically-transported carbon. This scenario is consistent with most proxies, including those on the extent of sea ice, the productivity and nutrient distribution in the Southern Ocean, and the distribution of 13C. I use a box model, similar to that of Toggweiler (1999) to illustrate that, (in conjunction with other mechanisms known to have influenced atmospheric CO2), this scenario can reconcile CO2 variation with current proxies. Specific tests are suggested that would help distinguish this “Southern Ocean seasonal sea ice” mechanism from others that have been suggested. Introduction The possibility that a change in the rate at which the deep sea is ventilated could lead to changes in atmospheric CO2 was first raised in 1984, when several papers were published pointing to the possible role of the high-latitude oceans as controllers of natural CO2 concentrations (Knox and McElroy 1984; Sarmiento and Toggweiler 1984; Siegenthaler and Wenk 1984). The box models on which these “Harvardton Bears” papers were based highlighted the dependence of atmospheric CO2 on a balance between biological productivity and ventilation between the surface and the deep in the Southern Ocean. Today, water at the surface of the Southern Ocean (and the North Pacific) contains non-zero mineral macro-nutrients (nitrate and phosphate), and correspondingly has a higher pCO2 than would be the case if these nutrients were more fully utilized. Much of the water in the the deep sea is ventilated from this region, and its “preformed” nutrient and CO2 is set at the surface of the Southern Ocean. Either increasing biological productivity, or decreasing the exchange of water between the surface and depth in this region, can cause atmospheric CO2 to be lower in this kind of model. 1 The results of these papers were initially interpreted in terms of increased biological export productivity in the polar waters. However, it has become increasingly clear that proxy evidence does not support the idea of an increased Southern Ocean productivity in glacial time. There is room for doubt because not all proxies seem to tell the same story, but a recent “multiproxy” compilation of LGM export production estimates (Bopp et al. 2003) suggests a coherent picture: an increase in productivity in the Subantarctic region, particularly in the Atlantic sector, in glacial time, but less export production from the region south of the (present position of) the Polar Front. An alternative possible explanation for lower glacial CO2 is that the rate of ventilation of the deep ocean was slower in glacial time. Recently, (Toggweiler 1999) has revived this idea as an important mechanism for causing lower atmospheric CO2. In fact, given the constraints put on the problem of atmospheric CO2 change by our present knowledge, we argue in this paper that the deep ocean must have been more slowly ventilated in glacial time. It is however not trivial to understand why this might have been the case. In view of this, it is important to fully understand how “Southern component” deep water ventilates the ocean today. Accordingly, much of this paper is concerned with reviewing and clarifying this using observations of the modern ocean. We then suggest why ventilation may have been different in glacial time. Some calculations using a box-type model are used to show that the mechanisms we propose, acting in combination with other effects that we know occurred, have the potential to change atmospheric CO2 by the right amount. This is not the first suggestion for mechanisms to change ocean ventilation, and we therefore end by comparing it with other recently proposed mechanisms, suggesting tests that may help to distinguish between the competing theories. Our uncertainty about the mechanisms causing glacial-interglacial CO2 change, even after more than 20 years of research, is sometimes cited as an illustration of our ignorance of fundamental processes in the Earth system. However, though there are differences in the detail, it is worth noting that all the viable theories are now convergent in their most important aspects. Plausible theories for lower glacial atmospheric CO2 all share a requirement for lower ventilation rates of the deep sea, obtained by one or more of: more sea ice cover, increased near-surface stratification of the Southern Ocean or a greater deep stratification. These changes serve to partition biologically fixed carbon into the deep sea and away from the atmosphere. The higher carbon concentration in deeper water also leads to an increased alkalinity of the ocean by “carbonate compensation”, since deep water would otherwise be more corrosive to carbonate in sediments, leading to an imbalance in the source and sink of ocean alkalinity. Both the increased efficiency of the carbon pumps and the increased alkalinity serve to decrease atmospheric pCO2 without requiring large increases in biological productivity. The global ocean overturning circulation Figure 1, adapted from (Toggweiler 1994) and (Sloyan and Rintoul 2001), shows a schematic of the global ocean overturning circulation. The deepest, densest waters of the world ocean are formed close to the Antarctic continent, where salty, cold waters from brine rejection linked to net sea ice formation are found. These transfer into the deep ocean by down-slope gravity currents and by convection. They mix with fresher circumpolar deep water as they do, to varying extents, resulting in a variety of distinct types of Antarctic bottom water (AABW) in the different basins of the polar Southern 2 Ocean (Orsi et al. 1999). North Atlantic Deep Water (NADW), less dense, warmer and saltier than AABW, is formed by sinking of water in the Northern North Atlantic, and penetrates southward. Intermediate waters, freshened by net precipitation and sea ice melt, are formed by the northward transport and subduction of Antarctic surface waters by Ekman drift under the influence of the westerly winds in the Southern Ocean. There are two contrasting views about the mechanics of the overturning circulation. The more classical view, articulated by (Munk 1966) and elaborated by (Munk and Wunsch 1998), is that the steady state circulation is governed by a balance between vertical advection and downward turbulent diffusion of buoyancy. In this “abyssal recipes” picture, the rate-limiting step is how fast buoyancy can mix downwards. The vertical mixing rate, represented by the turbulent vertical diffusivity κz, is highly variable with position in the ocean. Measurements show κz to be very low in the thermocline (Ledwell et al. 1998) and the interior of the oceans away from rough topography (Toole et al. 1994). However, internal waves and turbulence generated by currents interacting with bottom topography generate enhanced mixing which can extend up through the water column for kilometres (Polzin et al. 1997; Ledwell et al. 2000). These mixing “hot spots” are now thought to dominate the overall mixing of the oceans. The alternative view of the ocean overturning is that it is powered by wind-driven surface convergence and divergence, especially that associated with the westerlies in the Southern Ocean (Toggweiler and Samuels 1995, 1998). In this view, the surface Ekman drift associated with the zonal winds near the latitude of Drake Passage lifts water out of the deeper ocean. This in turn allows a compensatory sinking of water elsewhere, i.e in the North Atlantic. This wind-driven overturning is not dependent on interior diapycnal fluxes, and can proceed even as κz in the interior tends to zero. (However, as discussed below, it is dependent on surface buoyancy forcing.) Almost certainly, the real ocean is ventilated by a combination of both of these modes. Given that rates of diapycnal mixing are agreed to be low in the main thermocline, advective processes, ultimately wind-driven, will likely dominate vertical transport through the top kilometre or so of the water column over most of the world ocean. Some portion the NADW formation is probably wind-driven by Ekman suction in the Southern Ocean, see for instance (Webb and Suginohara 2001)). On the other hand, the ventilation of the densest waters in the world ocean must be largely diapycnally driven. This seems inevitable, because this water has no surface outrcrop of significant area – it is formed in a few special places, in dense but areally restricted plumes due to shelf processes or convection. There is no known mechanism to return it to the surface where it can be destroyed by air-sea flux processes in similarly highly restricted regions, so its return must involve modification to less dense water in the interior. On tracing the path of this water away from the Antarctic, it becomes clear ({Mantyla, 1983 #211} also as described further below) that it is so modified, its properties being altered in the deep sea, well away from the surface, implying large interior diapycnal fluxes. Therefore, if ventilation of the deepest ocean was slower in glacial than interglacial time, as Toggweiler (1999) has suggested, this is likely to be largely a question of changing diapycnal mixing rates. This presents a theoretical challenge. Why should deep ocean mixing be slower in glacial time? Recently, (Munk and Wunsch 1998) have pointed out that the energy required to drive the abyssal circulation is of the same order as the total energy available from wind and tidally generated currents in the deep sea. Plausibly therefore, the overall control on the rate at which the deep MOC turns is one of energy limitation. The 3 power required to maintain the diabatic abyssal circulation is readily calculated. From a scale analysis, the rate at which potential energy must be added to raise bottom water being formed with a volume flux of Q is W ~ Qgh , where is the density difference between the initial and final densities of the water, g the acceleration due to gravity and h is the scale height of the density change. If the available power supply is constant, then, other things being equal, Q might be expected to be inversely related to , with the total buoyancy flux Q remaining constant. Similarly, scale analysis of the steady-state advective-diffusive balance (e.g. that employed by (Munk 1966)) gives us the relation Q ~ A z / h between the overturning rate, the area A over which upwelling occurs, the vertical mixing rate and the scale height. Substituting for Q in the first relation we obtain W ~ A z g , showing that if the power is indeed constant, then vertical mixing rates should be inversely proportional to density difference. Recent papers by Nilsson and colleagues (Nilsson et al. 2003, 2004) have explored in greater detail the implications of an energy-limited overturning for the modern day circulation with conceptual and numerical models. Here we simply note that there is some reason to believe that mixing and overturning rates may decrease as density anomaly increases. Suppose then, that in glacial time the density contrast between the deepest waters and those overlying them was greater than it is today, this might help explain why the deep sea was apparently less well ventilated at LGM. What do we know about stratification of the deep ocean in glacial time? Figure 2, from the work of (Adkins et al. 2002), shows estimates of the temperature and salinity in the deep ocean at LGM from measurements on pore waters, compared with present day conditions. Contours of potential density referenced to 4000m are also shown. The difference between the stratification of the glacial and modern ocean is striking. Salinities are greater everywhere, which is to be expected because the greater volume of fresh water bound up in icecaps in glacial time resulted in a saltier ocean. However, whereas the modern abyssal ocean is largely stratified by temperature differences, the density differences in the deep glacial ocean are mostly due to salinity. Temperatures are close to freezing at all the sites in the glacial ocean, but the deep Southern Ocean shows as much saltier than the other locations. The density anomaly between the Southern Ocean site and the others is about three times larger than it is today, and a crude application of the above (much over-simplified) reasoning might then suggest that the mixing between this Southern component and the overlying waters was three times slower at LGM. Mixing and ventilation of the modern-day Southern Ocean, Diapycnal mixing and ventilation from below: In recent years a good deal of new information has become available relating to rates of diapycnal mixing in the Southern Ocean. In the near-surface there have been several direct measurements using tracer releases (Law et al. 2003), Goldson, 2004). In the region of the Scotia Sea, studies making use of new techniques using lowered acoustic doppler current profilers have suggested very high mixing rates in the region of the Scotia Sea (Heywood et al. 2002; Garabato et al. 2004). Estimates using CFCs in the broad plume of bottom water originating from the Weddell Sea and flowing towards the Indian Ocean have indicated high rates of mixing between this and the overlying water (Haine et al. 1998). These estimates are drawn together in Table I. There is a considerable range of values, particularly in the deep ocean, reflecting the huge influence of topography. However, a consistent picture emerges: in the upper water column, mixing across and below the summer-time seasonal pycnocline is ~10-5 m2s-1, 4 though with evidence of rates that are several times higher during passage of storms (Goldson, 2004). In the deep Southern Ocean however rates are ~10-3 m2 s-1, ranging higher still immediately over rough topography. Results of inverse models constrained with hydrographic data can also be used to infer diapycnal fluxes, but in the Southern Ocean, these broad averages are difficult to separate into fluxes due to air-sea interaction and those due to interior mixing (Ganachaud and Wunsch 2000; Sloyan and Rintoul 2001). Table I: Estimates of diapycnal mixing rates in the Southern Ocean method Depth Location Value (10-4m2s-1) (Law et al. 2003) SF6 tracer release 50-100m 61S, 0.11 0.2 Goldson. (2004) SF6 tracer release 50-100m (Garabato et al. 2004) LADCP shear + hydrography 0-200m Scotia Sea, Drake Passage 0.1 – 0.3 (Haine et al. 1998) CFC budget > 3500 m Abyssal S. Ocean - 52 (Heywood et al. 2002) LADCP and basin budget > 3500m Scotia Sea 39 (Garabato et al. 2004) LADCP shear + hydrography > 2000m Scotia Sea 5 – 100 West Drake Passage 10 – 1000 Atlantic and Indian sector, - ~10 Source Upper water column ? Deep water This paper CFC budget > 2000m As shown, for example, by (Haine et al. 1998) chlorofluorocarbon concentrations can be useful for illuminating the processes of ventilation from the surface to the interior of the Southern Ocean. Figure 3 shows a compilation of CFC-11 concentrations on five WOCE sections from Drake passage through the Atlantic and Indian Ocean sectors.. The concentration scale has been adjusted so that concentrations below 1 pmol kg-1 are highlighted. Deep waters at Drake Passage show almost undetectable CFCs. Concentrations are also low north of about 50S. However, the deep outflow of recently ventilated bottom water from the Weddell Sea is clearly seen as a core at about 60S in both the Atlantic Ocean sections. The section through the Eastern Scotia Sea shows relatively high concentrations throughout the 5 water column, due perhaps to mixing of this deep outflow up through much of the water. Likewise, all the other sections show enhanced concentrations in the deepest waters south of 60S, and easily measurable concentrations right up through the water column. The more easterly sections also show evidence for extensive “local” deep water formation close to the Antarctic continent, not associated with the Weddell or Ross Sea outflows. Figure 4. shows the means of the CFC concentrations from the Atlantic sections, averaged south of 50S. The concentrations were averaged along surfaces of constant 4, and are plotted as a function of depth after transforming into depth coordinates, using the average depth vs 4 relationship. The profiles south of 50S reinforce the impression of a CFC sourced at the bottom that mixes up through the water column to depths ~1000m, especially by the very intense mixing in the Scotia Sea. If the bottom water is the origin of the mid-depth CFC, a simple scale analysis can be used to estimate the order of magnitude of the vertical mixing that must be responsible, as follows: CFCs have a time scale for rising in the atmosphere of order 20 years. The profiles in Fig. 4 have length scales of order 1000m or more. From these scales, a mixing rate of order z ~ (length scale)2/(2 x time scale) ~ 10-3 m2s-1 follows. This is broadly compatible with the deep mixing rates obtained by other workers, as summarized in Table 1. We can approximately calculate the upwelling It is probable that not all the mid-water CFC content in Figs 3 and 4 comes from up-mixing from the bottom source. Newly formed water of less extreme density probably joins the circumpolar waters at the Weddell-Scotia confluence and contributes to the mid-depth concentrations. The source of this water is also ice-shelf interaction, and it too has been subject to intensive mixing. While the above calculation of diaypcnal mixing would tend to overestimate due to the neglect of this source, the model of (Haine et al. 1998) for the outflow from the Weddell Sea considered only data from east of the prime meridian, and still found similarly high mixing rates. The effect of this rapid mixing on the properties of newly formed AABW are substantial. The densest waters are not found north of the ACC. In the process of transiting away from the continent, they are mixed to lighter densities. For example, according to the measurements of Haine et al., the Weddell sea water has a transit time to the Crozet-Kerguelen region of only ~40 years, but this is long enough for its temperature to rise from < -0.4 C to about 0.5C. Thus the AABW which forms the bottom water for most of the world’s oceans is substantially less dense than the water which first sinks to the bottom in the Southern Ocean. Meridional circulation: Figure 5 shows a schematic of the stream function of meridonal circulation of the Southern Ocean, averaged zonally. Furthest to the south is the dense water produced on the continental shelves and sinking to the bottom of the ocean, penetrating northward and being recirculated by the intense mixing. Above it lies the circumpolar deep water. The streamfunction here is redrawn from {Karsten, 2002 #87} The upper water column in the Southern ocean is today largely stratified by a halocline. The surface water is relatively fresh, and the Ekman flux drives this water to the north until it is subducted under the warmer and saltier waters north of the 6 Subantarctic front to form Antarctic intermediate water. There are two potential sources for the freshening that converts salty upwelling circumpolar water into fresh AAIW. One is meteoric water -- net precipitation minus evaporation, and the other is fresh water formed from ice melt, for which the associated salt has been removed from the mixed layer by brine rejection processes. It is of interest to calculate the order of magnitude of each of these processes today. Observationally-derived records such as COADS are unreliable in the sparsely monitored Southern Ocean, so we use the long-term averages of NCEP re-analysis data to examine the precipitation minus evaporation (P-E) balance. Figure 6 shows NCEP annual, zonally-summed net freshwater, accumulated northward from 85S. The net P-E flux between 85S and 60S is 0.32 Sv, while between 85S and 50S it is 0.68 Sv. To find the amount of fresh water produced by fractionation of sea water in the formation of sea ice, we estimate the volume of fresh water incorporated into sea ice annually, as V = Ahr where A is the area covered by seasonal sea ice, h is its draft, and r is the ratio of the densities of fresh water and ice (about 0.9). The area A is well documented from satellite observations, and is about 1.5 x 107 km2 (Zwally et al. 2002). Relatively few observations of ice thickness have been made. We need to be careful also, to ensure that we count only ice formed from freezing of sea water, and not the additional accumulation of snow on top of this. The observations of (Worby et al. 1996) in the Bellingshausen and Amundsen seas suggest an average h ~ 0.5m for this ice thickness. The work of (Harms et al. 2001) suggests total drafts of ~ 0.3m for sea ice measured at moorings on the Greenwich meridian, with thicker ice (one to two meters) in the Weddell Sea. If we assume that on average the ice is 0.5 m thick, using the area above we derive a figure of 0.22 Sv for the annual average rate of fresh water production due to Southern Ocean seasonal sea ice formation. Thus we estimate that today, ice formation contributes about 40% of the net fresh water budget of the surface ocean south of 60S, and about 22% of the budget south of 50S. There is large uncertainty on these figures, but it is clear that the contribution from sea ice is important. In glacial time, when the hydrological cycle was weaker (there was less evaporation because sea surface temperatures were lower) but the area covered seasonally by sea ice was about twice as great, ice would likely have been the dominant contributor to the fresh water budget south of the Polar front. Role of: Temperature, salinity, growth of terrestrial biosphere, Proxy evidence: salty deep water near the freezing point, low Antarctic productivity Del13C The need for a ventilation-related mechanism The need for slower ventilation of the deep ocean. – a puzzle Energy-limited mixing of the deep ocean ventilation. How can deep ocean in glacial References Adkins, J. F., K. McIntyre, et al. (2002). "The salinity, temperature, and delta O-18 of the glacial deep ocean." Science 298(5599): 1769-1773. 7 Bopp, L., K. E. Kohfeld, et al. (2003). "Dust impact on marine biota and atmospheric CO2 during glacial periods." Paleoceanography 18(2): art. no.-1046. Ganachaud, A. and C. Wunsch (2000). "Improved estimates of global ocean circulation, heat transport and mixing from hydrographic data." Nature 408(6811): 453-457. Garabato, A. C. N., K. L. Polzin, et al. (2004). "Widespread intense turbulent mixing in the Southern Ocean." Science 303(5655): 210-213. Haine, T. W. N., A. J. Watson, et al. (1998). "The flow of Antarctic bottom water to the southwest Indian Ocean estimated using CFCs." Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans 103(C12): 27637-27653. Harms, S., E. Fahrbach, et al. (2001). "Sea ice transports in the Weddell Sea." Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans 106(C5): 9057-9073. Heywood, K. J., A. C. N. Garabato, et al. (2002). "High mixing rates in the abyssal Southern Ocean." Nature 415(6875): 1011-1014. Knox, F. and M. B. McElroy (1984). "Changes In Atmospheric Co2 - Influence Of the Marine Biota At High- Latitude." Journal Of Geophysical ResearchAtmospheres 89: 4629-4637. Law, C. S., E. R. Abraham, et al. (2003). "Vertical eddy diffusion and nutrient supply to the surface mixed layer of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current." Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans 108(C8): art. no.-3272. Ledwell, J. R., E. T. Montgomery, et al. (2000). "Evidence for enhanced mixing over rough topography in the abyssal ocean." Nature 403(6766): 179-182. Ledwell, J. R., A. J. Watson, et al. (1998). "Mixing of a tracer in the pycnocline." Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans 103(C10): 21499-21529. Munk, W. and C. Wunsch (1998). "Abyssal recipes II: energetics of tidal and wind mixing." Deep-Sea Research Part I-Oceanographic Research Papers 45(12): 1977-2010. Munk, W. H. (1966). "Abyssal recipies." Deep Sea Research 13: 707-730. Nilsson, J., G. Brostrom, et al. (2003). "The thermohaline circulation and vertical mixing: Does weaker density stratification give stronger overturning?" Journal of Physical Oceanography 33(12): 2781-2795. Nilsson, J., G. Brostrom, et al. (2004). "On the spontaneous transition to asymmetric thermohaline circulation." Tellus Series a-Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography 56(1): 68-78. Orsi, A. H., G. C. Johnson, et al. (1999). "Circulation, mixing, and production of Antarctic Bottom Water." Prog. Oceanogr. 43(1): 55-109. Polzin, K. L., J. M. Toole, et al. (1997). "Spatial variability of turbulent mixing in the abyssal ocean." Science 276(5309): 93-96. Sarmiento, J. L. and J. R. Toggweiler (1984). "A New Model For the Role Of the Oceans In Determining Atmospheric Pco2." Nature 308: 621-624. Siegenthaler, U. and T. Wenk (1984). "Rapid Atmospheric Co2 Variations and Ocean Circulation." Nature 308: 624-626. Sloyan, B. M. and S. R. Rintoul (2001). "Circulation, renewal, and modification of Antarctic mode and intermediate water." Journal of Physical Oceanography 31(4): 1005-1030. Toggweiler, J. R. (1994). "The Oceans Overturning Circulation." Physics Today 47: 45-50. Toggweiler, J. R. (1999). "Variation of atmospheric CO2 by ventilation of the ocean's deepest water." Paleoceanography 14(5): 571-588. 8 Toggweiler, J. R. and B. Samuels (1995). "Effect Of Drake Passage On the Global Thermohaline Circulation." Deep-Sea Research Part I-Oceanographic Research Papers 42: 477-500. Toggweiler, J. R. and B. Samuels (1998). "On the ocean's large-scale circulation near the limit of no vertical mixing." Journal of Physical Oceanography 28(9): 1832-1852. Toole, J. M., K. L. Polzin, et al. (1994). "Estimates of Diapycnal Mixing in the Abyssal Ocean." Science 264(5162): 1120-1123. Webb, D. J. and N. Suginohara (2001). "Oceanography - Vertical mixing in the ocean." Nature 409(6816): 37-37. Worby, A. P., M. O. Jeffries, et al. (1996). "The thickness distribution of sea ice and snow cover during late winter in the Bellingshausen and Amundsen Seas, Antarctica." Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans 101(C12): 2844128455. Zwally, H. J., J. C. Comiso, et al. (2002). "Variability of Antarctic sea ice 19791998." Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans 107(C5): art. no.-3041. 9 Figure 1: Potential temperature-salinities of deep waters at the LGM derived from porewater measurements at four ODP sites by Adkins et al., 2002. The modern values at these sites are also shown. Contours are of 4. The open arrow shows the modern mean ocean salinity, while the filled arrow is the average salinity adjusted for a 125m drop in eustatic sea level, similar to that at the LGM. The inset shows the locations of the four sets of measurements, with the depths in metres written by each symbol. 10 Cumulative, area integrated net freshwater (Sv from 85°S) 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 -0.2 -0.4 -0.6 -0.8 -1.0 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Latitude (° S) Figure . Net precipitation – evaporation for the southern hemisphere, integrated zonally and between 85S and the latitude on the abscissa. Values at 50S and 60S are highlighted by the dotted lines. The calculation used the time-average of the NCEP re-analyses results from 1968-1996 (available from the NOAA-CIRES Climate Diagnostics Center, www.cdc.noaa.gov). 11 0 2 1 1000 3 45.60 45.80 45.90 5 2000 46.00 4 Depth (m) 4 4 3000 46.10 5 3 4000 46.15 2 5000 0 0.2 1 0.4 0.6 CFC-11 concentration (pmol kg-1) 0.8 1 12