Visualization of Transboundary Air Pollutant Transport to the US

advertisement
Proposal for a supplemental
Cooperative Research Agreement
CX 825834
Project Period: May 1, 1998- April 30, 2001
Ozone and PM Air Quality Analysis in Support of Public
Needs
Budget period August 1, 2000-April 30, 2001
Project Officer: Lara Autry OAQPS, MD-19 USEPA
Sub- Project:
Visualization of transboundary air pollutant
transport to the US
Principal Investigator:
Rudolf B. Husar
Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA)
Washington University
St. Louis, MO 63130-4899
$30,000 Budget Supplement
Budget period August 1, 2000-April 30, 2001
Submitted to Project Officer:
Angela L. Bandemehr
USEPA Headquarters
Ariel Rios Building
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W.
Washington, DC 20460
July 6, 2000
Visualization of Transboundary Air Pollutant Transport
to the US
Background.
Anthropogenic and natural pollutants generated in one country are regularly transported
to other countries adding to their air quality burden. This is particularly true for Persistent
Organic Pollutants (POP) that reside in the atmosphere for days or weeks.
The transboundary transport affects the seasonal and yearly average concentrations in the
US by elevating the ‘background’ levels. Local emissions are then superimposed on this
elevated background, leaving less margin for homegrown contributions. Transboundary
transport is also episodic, i.e. highly non-uniform in time.
This is a continuation of work conducted under the project: "Investigation of Regional
and Global Transport and Deposition of Persistent Organic Pollutants", a collaborative
research projected between the North Carolina Supercomputing Center (NCSC) and the
Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA). The results of the
CAPITA contribution to that project are available at the webpage:
(http://capita.wustl.edu/CAPITA/CapitaReports/POPs/AMH_anal/NAM_AMH_Spr99.ht
m)
Goal of the Project
Overall goal of the work is to create visualizations of transboundary airmass transport to
the United States. The visualizations need to be suitable for presentation to national and
international policy analysts.
Specific Objectives of this Work
The previous analysis examined the probable airmass pathways to 9 receptor sites during
the spring of 1999. This proposed projected will expand on the previous work in three
ways:
1. Airmass history residence time analysis will be conducted for 12 receptor sites
including two sites in Alaska.
2. Airmass transport probabilities for the West Coast will be aggregated
3. Airmass transport pathways will be derived for all four seasons of 1999 as well as
the yearly average.
Approach
Residence time analysis will be used to estimate the probable airmass transport pathways
to the US border for each season as well as for the entire year of 1999. The residence
time analysis uses back trajectories to estimate the fraction of time airmasses reside over
a given region prior to impacting the receptor. By placing a uniform grid over a region
and calculating the fraction of residence time for each cell residence time probability
maps can be constructed. The most probable airmass pathways are then the regions with
the highest airmass residence probability.
This analysis will use an airmass history database consisting of ten day airmass histories
for receptor sites space ~ 100 km apart along the boundaries of the conterminous US and
Alaska. The airmass histories will be calculated every 6 hours over the year 1999 using
the CAPITA Monte Carlo Model driven by the FNL global meteorological data. The
FNL data will be obtained from the Air Resource Laboratories READY website and be
reprocessed for suitable input into the Monte Carlo Model.
Residence time probability fields will be calculated for each receptor site in the database
for a winter, spring, summer and fall seasons of 1999, where the winter season is
comprised of the months December, January, and February. The residence time analysis
for West Coast, will be conducted by integrating the residence time analyses for each
receptor along the West Coast.
Fig. 1. Location of US receptor sites
Output of the Work
The main product of this work will be seasonal and yearly maps of airmass transport
probabilities to each of the receptor site as well as to the West Coast. The general map
layout is illustrated below.
We will also explore additional displays including animations and 3D rendering of
transport.
Schedule
The work will be conducted during August, 2000 – April, 2001. Intermediate
visualization outputs will be discussed with the Project Officer, Angela L. Bandemehr.
Budget
The budget for the project is $30,000. The detailed budget is listed in the attachment. The
project will be conducted through incremental funding to the Cooperative Agreement CX
825834 between EPA and CAPITA “Ozone and PM Air Quality Analysis in Support of
Public Needs”
Personnel
The project will be conducted by Professor Rudolf B. Husar, director of the Center for
Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis. He will be assisted by one or two graduate
students. Dr. Bret Schichtel will serve as a consultant to the project regarding the
trajectory computations.
PROJECT TITLE: OZONE AND PM AIR QUALITY ANALYSIS IN SUPPORT OF PUBLIC NEEDS
PROJECT PERIOD: 05/01/1998 - 04/30/2001
EPA ASSISTANCE ID NO. CX 825834-01-2
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR: RUDOLF HUSAR
SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING REQUEST
Visualization of transboundary air pollutant transport to the US
BUDGET PERIOD: 08/01/2000- 04/30/2001
Salaries
Rudolf B. Husar, PI
Graduate Research Assistant
Undergraduate Lab Asst.
EPA
WU
TOTAL
10,360
2,250
413
858
11,218
2,250
413
13,022
858
13,880
2,047
170
2,217
15,069
1,028
16,097
450
0
450
1,031
0
1,031
501
0
501
2,700
0
2,700
Total Direct Costs
19,751
1,028
20,779
Total Indirect Cost Base @56.0%
Total Indirect Cost Base @ 54.5%
Indirect Cost @56.0% MTDC, current
Indirect Cost @54.5% MTDC, effective 7/1/00
Total Indirect Costs
3,120
15,600
1,747
8,502
171
857
96
467
3,291
16,456
1,843
8,969
Total Direct and Indirect Costs
30,000
1,591
31,591
Total Salaries
Fringe Benefits
Total Salaries and Fringe Benefits
Travel
1 person trip to a technical meeting
partial charge
Equipment
1 pentium grade computer and peripheral equipment
partial charge
Other Expenses
Software library charges
Telephone long distance / fax charges
Computer network charges
Publication charges
Consulting
Bret A. Schichtel
Bryan Van Hook
Download