TRIUMF
Document-0000
(File>Properties>
Custom)
Realignment of LEBT to GRIFFIN
Document Type:
SAS Gate-2 Review Report
Review Date:
Nov 26, 2014
Tracking #:
Release:
1
Release Date:
Presenter/Project
Leader:
Shaun Georges
Facility
Coordinator:
Name:
Panel Chair:
Rick Baartman
Panel Members:
Doug Preddy
SASP0280
Adam Garnsworthy
Friedhelm Ames
Signature:
Date:
Greg Hackman
Robert Laplante
Friedhelm Ames
Note: Before using a copy (electronic or printed) of this document you must ensure
that your copy is identical to the released document, which is stored on TRIUMF’s
document server.
20160212 171600 Template: Document-18187 Rel.3
Page 1 of 5
Document-0000
(File>Properties>Custom)
SAS Gate Review Objectives
Release No. 1
Release Date.:
History of Changes
Release
Number
Date
Description of Changes
20160212 171600 Template: Document-18187 Rel.3
Author(s)
Page 2 of 5
Document-0000
(File>Properties>Custom)
1
SAS Gate Review Objectives
Release No. 1
Release Date.:
Introduction
Brief summary of the project objective.
o To improve the alignment of the GIFFIN beam line to the delivery back
bone beam line to be consistent with requirements document TRI-DN-9711.
2
Referenced documents

3
List accompanying documents:
o Project Charter Sheet
 ?
o Requirements/Specifications
 TRI-DN-97-11.
o Design Notes
 TRI-BN-11-01
o Design Review report
 none
o ECO
 No changes to documents
o Gate Review presentation
 Shaun’s PPTX
o Resource loaded schedule
 Mark Keyzer TBD
o Layout/schematics/diagrams
 ILE2196D, see also TRI-BN-11-01
Scope of work

Is scope of work clearly identified? Not yet.
o Some mechanical disassembly and reassembly for access and set up,
mostly to be handled by GRSI technician Shaun Georges.
o Estimate of 2.5 weeks of work using 3 beam line technicians including
senior member Bruno Gasbarri. The use of 2 to 3 alignment devices which
are limited on site.
o It is not yet clear whether additional work will also be required to bring
existing (old) beamline backbone (ILE1) up to alignment spec. This will
involve mainly the bender boxes.
o Additionally, it is not known whether the ILE1B axis is within spec of 90
degrees compared with ILE1.
20160212 171600 Template: Document-18187 Rel.3
Page 3 of 5
Document-0000
(File>Properties>Custom)
4
SAS Gate Review Objectives
Release No. 1
Release Date.:
Technical solutions


5
Will proposed solutions meet technical specifications and requirements?
o Yes.
Are all the technical issues addressed?
o Not yet known..
Budget


6
Is available budget sufficient? Yes.
Are there any unidentified/underestimated expenses?
o The possibility of a new bellows is a possible cost in the $500 range, but it
won’t interfere with the alignment task.
Personnel

7
Are requested resources adequate and available?
o The people and tooling are within TRIUMF. Availability is dependent on
scheduling.
Schedule

8
Is there a (resource loaded) schedule?
o No
Constraints

9
Have possible constraints been identified and taken into account?
o Yes. If done outside of shutdown, project must occur within strict
timelines.
Project risks

Have project risks (delay in parts delivery, budget overrun, resource conflicts etc.)
been identified and addressed?
o The risks to delay the project are if unexpected alignment issues in back
bone are discovered.
20160212 171600 Template: Document-18187 Rel.3
Page 4 of 5
Document-0000
(File>Properties>Custom)
10
SAS Gate Review Objectives
Release No. 1
Release Date.:
Hazards

11
Are all the hazards assessed and mitigation measures established?
o High voltage lockout will be required. Swipe tests will be needed, but
likely after shutdown all experimental radiation should have decayed.
Conclusion


Any additional actions required to satisfy Gate-2 Review? Yes. There should be
an initial survey by the Alignment crew to determine the full extent of the
problem.
Can project proceed into execution phase? Project should proceed in two phases:
(1) Measurement, (2) Alignment.
20160212 171600 Template: Document-18187 Rel.3
Page 5 of 5