NAME:____________________________________________ 2009 Exam - Marine Ecology 108; page 1 Questions from reading and discussion section (10 points each) Reading - Hughes 1994 According to Hughes, what is the effect (direct or indirect) of heavy fishing in the Caribbean on the abundance of: 1) Diadema- 3 2) Algae- 3 3) Corals- 3 Fishing- direct reduction of fishes Fish eat algae (1), indirect positive (1) effect on algae (1pt) Algae compete with corals (1pt), indirect negative effects (1) on corals (1) Fish eat/compete with diadema (1), indirect positive effect (1) on urchins (1) What are two other factors (besides fishing) which may have affected the abundance of (any of) these populations? 1pts Eutrophication (.5) Disease (.5) Reading – Doherty 1983 Doherty manipulated the presence of the damselfish, P. wardi, on patch reefs and compared recruitment (density of recruits) of larval P. wardi to patch reefs with and without residents. What was the result of these manipulations? What did he conclude and what are the broader implications of these results in terms of what limits the size of reef fish populations? Manipulation 1: w/out residents, mostly replenished by larval recruitment P. wardi (2), no difference in recruitment, no difference in post-settlement mortality Manipulation 2: w/ residents, no difference in recruitment, no difference in post-settlement mortality For both manipulations (2) no difference in recruitment, (2) no difference in post-settlement mortality (2) Concluded that recruitment of P. wardi do not affect recruitment or moratlity of larval mortality Implication: (2) Recruitment limitation determine population size of coral reef fish Extra credit: (1) size of larval recruits was influenced by P.wardi NAME:____________________________________________ 2009 Exam - Marine Ecology 108; page 2 Reading- Ebert and Russell 1988 Ebert and Russell looked at the relationship between the size frequency distribution of purple sea urchin populations and the location of these populations along the coast. What was the pattern that they found and what was their explanation for this pattern? Pattern: 4PTS Higher proportion of small urchin (1) above headlands (1), Even size freq below headlands, and uneven size freq (1). above headlands (1) Explanation 6pts Advection of larvae (1) from areas above headlands (1), leads to episodic and lower recruitment (1) Eddies and retention of larvae (1) from area below headlands (1), have higher and consistent recruitment (1) Compare and Contrast (6 points each) - (should be able to define each term (can be graphical), give example of each and show how each member of the pair differs. 1) Replication vs. psuedoreplication 2) Proportional vs. switching vs. keystone predation 3) Species diversity vs. species richness 4) Closed vs. open populations NAME:____________________________________________ 2009 Exam - Marine Ecology 108; page 3 5) Settlement vs. recruitment 3pts a) settlement - the permanent transition from the pelagic environment to the benthic environment i.e. from the planktonic dispersive stage to the sessile/sedentary benthic stage 3 pts b) recruitment - broadly, the addition of individuals to a population Short Answer Questions (10 points each) 1. In theory, what is the relationship between diversity and disturbance? Describe the basis for the relationship. Give an example that supports the theory. 2 ways to answer this question IDH and the other is compensatory mortality IDH: intensity, frequency or time sense that relationship (6) Graph Example (4) OR compensatory mortality: description (6) mortality is disproportionately greater in competive dominat, simply because more abundant -frequency dependent -sources of mortality include predation and disturbance Example (4) 2. What is the logic of experimental controls? You may use examples to support your answer. 4pts Experimental control is a group of experimental subjects that is not exposed (2pts) to a treatment being investigated so that it can be compared (2pts) with experimental groups that are exposed to the treatment Experimental controls are used in scientific experiments to prevent factors other than those being studied from affecting the outcome. 2pts: example NAME:____________________________________________ 2009 Exam - Marine Ecology 108; page 4 3. Define stability in terms of resistance, resilience, elasticity and amplitude. 3pts resistance, community/population persist, unaltered when exposed to a source of perturbation 3pts resilience, community returns to equilibrium following perturbation 2pts elasticity, how fast a community returns to equilibrium 2pts amplitude, magnitude of perturbation that a community can return from 4. Describe the hypothetical general relationship between settlement and subsequent adult density. Indicate on your graph the regions that are dominated by density-dependent and density-independent processes. Graph (6pts) Description (4pts): 1. That # of adults is in large part determined by larval supply and the # of settlers( 2. If instead adult density is unrelated to larval supply/ settlement; then the most influential processes occur POSTsettlement, therefore decoupling local reproduction and subsequent local settlement is unimportant to regulate and stabilize ( NAME:____________________________________________ 2009 Exam - Marine Ecology 108; page 5 Question 4 Con’t (d-i) settlement is important and limiting but only to a certain point, where (d-d) postsettlement processes eventually overwhelm variability in settlement (i.e. increasing settlers has no affect on population size) 5. List one physical and one biological process that is important in the following life-history phases of marine organisms: Reproduction, transport, delivery, settlement, recruitment. 1pt for each example physical Reproduction Transport Delivery Settlement recruitment Temporal/seasonal Large scale current Advection: CA current, EL Nino, La Nina Turbulence, current speed, Space availability Larval behavior Biogenic habitat Timing location Internal waves Current speed biological Sexual maturation Open vs closed Density dependent Larval size fecundity Larval duration Windward, Leeward Internal waves Vertical distributionontpgeny, Ecological filters Stratified in water Competition Predation NAME:____________________________________________ 2009 Exam - Marine Ecology 108; page 6 Essay Questions (20 points each) 1) Menge and Sutherland have proposed a set of rules for the importance of various factors in determining the structure of intertidal communities along a gradient of environmental harshness. These rules can be represented graphically. In the figure below: (1) label the x and y axes (2pts) and indicate direction of scale(2pts) (e.g. does the scale of the x axis increase as you move from left to right), (2) label (2pts) each of the three lines. Describe (14pts) (i.e. write) the basis of these rules in the space below the figure. label the x and y axes (4pts) indicate direction of scale(1pts) label (3pts) each of the three lines Describe (12pts) 3pts A) In habitats with relatively benign physical environments (1) – predation (2) structures communities 3pts B) With increasing environmental harshness - predation efficiency is decreased and competition becomes a major process structuring (3) 3pts C) With even greater environmental harshness - importance of competition decreases and physical processes become more important (3) 3pts D) Local escapes from predation (in benign environments) or physical stress (in harsh environments) cause patchiness in the community (3) From the Experiment Different processes are important at exposed and protected sites: a) at exposed sites, predation/grazing unimportant - competition is the primary organizing force in the system. 1) Predators are generally uncommon 2) Mussels are competitively dominant (over algae and barnacles) b) at protected sites, predation important 1) with predation barnacles dominate if Fucus is removed 2) without predation mussels out-compete barnacles and algae 3) predation keeps competition from occurring with mussels (mussel abundance is kept low). What about competition between barnacles and Fucus? c) Importance of predation varies with exposure; at exposed sites predators are uncommon, their feeding ability is reduced because they have to spend more time hanging on and not feeding (is this because they are snail predators and grazers?) NAME:____________________________________________ 2009 Exam - Marine Ecology 108; page 7 Essay Questions (20 points each) 2) For each of the following four hypotheses generated to explain the maintenance of species diversity (i.e., coexistence of competitors), (1) explain the hypothesis, (2) describe its assumptions, and (3) describe its predictions. Niche Diversification (5pts) 1 pt for description, 2 pt assumptions, 2 pts predictions - Disturbance interrupts successional sequence by creating patches of different ages � different states of succession. In absence of disturbance, succession leads to climax community characterized by monospecific stand of competitive dominant (or a few) / low diversity. But, at extremely high levels of disturbance, nothing or only a few species of rapid colonizers (or disturbance tolerant species) would persist ,low diversity. Recall that competitively superior species typically have poor colonizing capabilities. Assumptions: a) competition based (assumes resources are limiting) b) resource partitioning (each species is a superior competitor for particular resources or within particular niche) c) for test, assume perturbation does not alter resource availability, only diminishes species abundances Predictions: a) total number of individuals and total number of species limited by resources, ⇒ assemblage-wide carrying capacity (K) b) relative abundance of spp. determined by relative niche availability ⇒ specific carrying capacity for each species c) predictable composition and relative abundance Lottery Hypothesis (5pts) 1 pt for description, 2 pt assumptions, 2 pts predictions Space on the reef is limiting, until it open unpredictably. Where upon larvae from an abundant, diverse larval pool would settle in the open patch strictly by chance. Assumptions: • competition based (resource limitation) • larval pool saturates resource (space) • no resource partitioning (all species equal competitors) • likelihood of creating and acquiring resource (space) due to random chance (deaths and larval settlement unpredictable) • equal likelihood of settlement from larval pool Predictions: • unpredictable as to what species will recruit to any location or at any time • maximum total abundance across species (K) • relative abundance of species fluctuates unpredictably • including after perturbation Storage Effect (5pts) 1 pt for description, 2 pt assumptions, 2 pts predictions attempts to explain that the temporal recruitment fluctuations among species can lead to stable coexistence of competitors. Coexistence will occur when there are constant or varying environments. Three essential conditions that would permit patterns of stable coexistence in systems where recruitment was space limited: (1) early vital rates and larval supply among species is variable across years; (2) adults survive over long periods of poor recruitments; and (3) episodic recruitments (high rates of settlement) are matched by generation time. NAME:____________________________________________ 2009 Exam - Marine Ecology 108; page 8 Assumptions: • competition based (resource limitation) • same assumptions as lottery hypothesis, but • relative recruitment success of species changes through time (akin to “gradual change” hypothesis) • variable success due to variation in larval production, planktonic conditions, settlement conditions • species persist through bad recruitment periods and “store” recruitment events in extended lifetime (age classes) of adults Predictions: same as Lottery Hypothesis but different mechanism Recruitment Limitation (5pts) 1 pt for description, 2 pt assumptions, 2 pts predictions Larval supply limits recruitment below that which is required to saturate resources Assumptions: • Assumes high mortality of pelagic larvae limits number of recruits to benthic populations • Larval supply limits recruitment below that which is required to saturate resources • No competition so mortality is density-independent Predictions: • total numbers and relative abundance fluctuates with variable larval supply