Who Killed the College Dean? A Logical Murder Mystery Christopher La Barbera, Ph.D. Department of Humanities, Colby-Sawyer College Subject Areas: Logic, Philosophy Course level: 100 Quantitative concepts/skills: Deductive reasoning from premises to conclusion (logical necessity and inference), logical argumentation with statement-based logic, formal argument patterns (statement and predicate based), symbolic logic. Overview: This assignment is used in my class as an application of formal argument patterns to a “real world” mystery. Students are asked to infer the location, weapon and suspect in a murder from a variety of statements about the crime scene. Background: Students in PHI 110 (Introduction to Logic) are taught a general competency in formal logic, including statement-based and predicate-based patterns. This activity tests their comprehension of some common argument patterns, including modus ponens, modus tollens, disjunctive arguments, hypothetical arguments, predicate instantiation and universal syllogisms. While the students in the course are familiar with the formal versions of these argument patterns, general “informal” logical deductions may also be used to solve the activity. Outcomes or learning goals: The goal of this activity is for students to apply logical deductive principles to solve a murder mystery with various pieces of evidence. In the process, the students use the evidence by choosing the relevant statements, in order to show which conclusions are logically necessary. The students must also eliminate and not be confused by statements that are not relevant to the deductions necessary to solve the murder. The students apply deductive reasoning skills to infer which of the locations, weapons and suspects is logically necessitated by the evidence. Attached materials: Main activity, solution.