Contact Lens Spectrum
September 2002
Document #86
References
(p. 24) Modern Contact Lens Materials: A Clinical Performance Update, by Lyndon
Jones, PhD, FCOptom, FAAO
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Holden B, Sweeney D, Sanderson G: The minimum precorneal oxygen
tension to avoid corneal edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984; 25 476480.
Brennan N, Efron N, Lg C: Corneal oxygen availability during contact lens
wear: A comparison of methodologies. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988; 65
19-24.
Efron N: Intersubject variability in corneal swelling response to anoxia.
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1986; 64;3: 302-5.
Polse K, Brand R, Mandell R, Vastine D, Demartini D, Flom R: Age
differences in corneal hydration control. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989;
30;3: 392-399.
Fatt I: Now do we need `effective permeability'? Contax 1986;July: 6-23.
Ng C, Tighe B: Polymers in contact lens applications VI. The `dissolved'
oxygen permeability of hydrogel and the design of materials for use in
continuous wear lenses. Brit Polymer J 1976; 8 118-123.
Fatt I, Chaston J: Measurement of oxygen transmissibility and
permeability of hydrogel lenses and materials. Int Contact Lens Clin 1982;
9;2: 76-88.
Morgan PB, Efron N: The oxygen performance of contemporary hydrogel
contact lenses. Contact Lens & Ant Eye 1998; 21;1: 3-6.
Fatt I, Weissman B, Ruben C: Areal differences in oxygen supply to a
cornea wearing an optically powered hydrogel contact lens. CLAO J 1993;
19;4: 226-234.
Fatt I, Ruben C: The point-to-point variation of oxygen delivery to a cornea
covered by a hydrogel contact lens in the open eye. ICLC 1994;
21;March/April: 50-56.
Holden B, Mertz G: Critical oxygen levels to avoid corneal edema for daily
and extended wear contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1984; 25
1161-1167.
Harvitt DM, Bonanno JA: Re-evaluation of the oxygen diffusion model for
predicting minimum contact lens Dk/t values needed to avoid corneal
anoxia. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76;10: 712-9.
Larke J, Parrish S, Wigham C: Apparent human corneal oxygen uptake
rate. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1981; 58;10: 803-805.
Holden B, Mertz G, McNally J: Corneal swelling response to contact
lenses worn under extended wear conditions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
1983; 24;2: 218-226.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
Bonanno J, Polse K, Goldman M: Effect of soft lens power on peripheral
corneal edema. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1986; 63;7: 520-526.
La Hood D: Daytime edema levels with plus powered low and high water
content hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68;11: 877-880.
Holden B, Sweeney D, Seger R: Epithelial erosions caused by thin high
water content lenses. Clin Exp Optom 1986; 69;3: 103-107.
McNally J, Chalmers R, Seger R: Corneal epithelial disruption with
extremely thin hydrogel lenses. Clin Exp Optom 1986; 70 106 - 111.
Jones L: Whose profile is it anyway? Contact Lens J 1991; 19;7: 174-180.
Morgan P, Efron N, Woods C, Jones D, Tranoudis Y, van der Worp E,
Helland M: International contact lens prescribing. Contact Lens Spectrum
2002; 17;1: 42-45.
Barr J: The 1997 annual report on contact lenses. Spectrum 1998;1: 2333.
White P: A complete guide to contact lens materials. Spectrum 1994;11:
31-36.
Tighe B: Soft lens materials. in Contact Lens Practice, N. Efron, Editor.
Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann,2002, pp 71 - 84.
Kishi M, Tighe B: RGP materials: A review of the patent literature. Optician
1988; 195;5134: 21 - 28.
Tighe B: Contact lens materials. in Contact Lenses, A. Phillips and L.
Speedwell, Editors. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann,1997, pp 50 - 92.
Tighe B: Rigid lens materials. in Contact Lens Practice, N. Efron, Editor.
Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann,2002, pp 153 - 162.
Benjamin WJ, Cappelli QA: Oxygen permeability (Dk) of thirty-seven rigid
contact lens materials. Optom Vis Sci 2002; 79;2: 103-11.
RGP contact lens material and solution guide. 2001: RGP Lens Institute:
www.rgpli.org.
Pedley D, Skelly P, Tighe B: Hydrogels in biomedical applications. Brit
Polym J 1980; 12 99-110.
Corkhill P, Hamilton C, Tighe B: The design of hydrogels for medical
applications. Critical Reviews in Biocompatibility 1990; 5;4: 363-436.
Wichterle O, Lim D: Hydrophilic gels for biological use. Nature 1960; 185
117 - 118.
Sweeney D: Silicone hydrogels. The rebirth of continuous wear contact
lenses. 2000, Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Gurland JE: Use of silicone lenses in infants and children. Ophthalmology
1979; 86;9: 1599-1604.
Rae S, Huff J: Studies on initiation of silicone elastomer lens adhesion in
vitro: binding before the indentation ring. CLAO J 1991; 17;3: 181-186.
Huth S, Wagner H: Identification and removal of deposits on
polydimethylsiloxane silicone elastomer lenses. Int Contact Lens Clin
1981;7/8: 19-26.
Tighe B: Silicone hydrogel materials - how do they work ? in Silicone
Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear Contact Lenses, D. Sweeney,
Editor. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann,2000, pp 1 - 21.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
Kunzler J, Ozark R. Hydrogels based on hydrophilic side chain siloxanes.
in The American Chemical Society Division of Polymeric Materials Science and Engineering Polym Mater Sci Eng Proc Acs Div, Polym Mater
Sci Eng, ACS. 1993. Chicago, Il, USA.
Nicolson PC, Vogt J: Soft contact lens polymers: an evolution.
Biomaterials 2001; 22;24: 3273-83.
Friends G, Kunzler J, Ozark R: Recent advances in the design of
polymers for contact lenses. Macromolecular Symposia 1995; 98 619-631.
Kunzler J: Silicone-based hydrogels for contact lens applications. Contact
Lens Spectrum 1999; 14;8 (supp): 9 - 11.
Court JL, Redman RP, Wang JH, Leppard SW, Obyrne VJ, Small SA,
Lewis AL, Jones SA, Stratford PW: A novel phosphorylcholine-coated
contact lens for extended wear use. Biomaterials 2001; 22;24: 3261-72.
Lopez-Alemany A, Compan V, Refojo MF: Porous structure of Purevision
versus Focus Night&Day and conventional hydrogel contact lenses. J
Biomed Mater Res (Appl Biomat) 2002; 63 319 - 325.
Alvord L, Court J, Davis T, Morgan CF, Schindhelm K, Vogt J, Winterton
L: Oxygen permeability of a new type of high Dk soft contact lens material.
Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75;1: 30-6.
Grobe G, Kunzler J, Seelye D, Salamone J: Silicone hydrogels for contact
lens applications. Polymeric Materials Science and Enginnering 1999; 80
108 - 109.
Fonn D, du Toit R, Simpson TL, Vega JA, Situ P, Chalmers RL:
Sympathetic swelling response of the control eye to soft lenses in the
other eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40;13: 3116-21.
Fonn D, MacDonald KE, Richter D, Pritchard N: The ocular response to
extended wear of a high Dk silicone hydrogel contact lens. Clin Exp
Optom 2002; 85;3: 176-82.
Dumbleton KA, Chalmers RL, Richter DB, Fonn D: Vascular response to
extended wear of hydrogel lenses with high and low oxygen permeability.
Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78;3: 147-51.
du Toit R, Simpson TL, Fonn D, Chalmers RL: Recovery from hyperemia
after overnight wear of low and high transmissibility hydrogel lenses. Curr
Eye Res 2001; 22;1: 68-73.
Covey M, Sweeney DF, Terry R, Sankaridurg PR, Holden BA: Hypoxic
effects on the anterior eye of high-Dk soft contact lens wearers are
negligible. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78;2: 95-9.
Sweeney D, Keay L, Jalbert I, Sankaridurg P, Holden B, Skotnitsky C,
Stephensen A, Covey M, Rao G: Clinical performance of silicone hydrogel
lenses. in Silicone hydrogels. The rebirth of continuous wear contact
lenses, D. Sweeney, Editor. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann,2000, pp 90
- 149.
Keay L, Sweeney DF, Jalbert I, Skotnitsky C, Holden BA: Microcyst
response to high Dk/t silicone hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci
2000; 77;11: 582-5.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
Dumbleton KA, Chalmers RL, Richter DB, Fonn D: Changes in myopic
refractive error with nine months' extended wear of hydrogel lenses with
high and low oxygen permeability. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76;12: 845-9.
Papas E: On the relationship between soft contact lens oxygen
transmissibility and induced limbal hyperaemia. Exp Eye Res 1998; 67;2:
125-131.
Papas E, Vajdic C, Austen R, Holden B: High oxygen-transmissibility soft
contact lenses do not induce limbal hyperaemia. Curr Eye Res 1997; 16;9:
942-948.
Morgan PB, Efron N: Comparative clinical performance of two silicone
hydrogel contact lenses for continuous wear. Clin Exp Optom 2002; 85;3:
183-92.
Brennan NA, Coles ML, Comstock TL, Levy B: A 1-year prospective
clinical trial of balafilcon a (PureVision) silicone-hydrogel contact lenses
used on a 30-day continuous wear schedule. Ophthalmology 2002; 109;6:
1172-7.
Grobe GL, 3rd: Surface engineering aspects of silicone-hydrogel lenses.
Contact Lens Spectrum 1999; 14;8 (suppl): 14 - 17.
Weikart C, Matsuzawa Y, Winterton L, Yasuda H: Evaluation of plasma
polymer-coated contact lenses by electrochemical impedance
spectroscopy. J Biomed Mater Res 2001; 54 597 - 606.
Holden BA, Stephenson A, Stretton S, Sankaridurg PR, O'Hare N, Jalbert
I, Sweeney DF: Superior epithelial arcuate lesions with soft contact lens
wear. Optom Vis Sci 2001; 78;1: 9-12.
Jalbert I, Sweeney DF, Holden BA: Epithelial split associated with wear of
a silicone hydrogel contact lens. Clao J 2001; 27;4: 231-3.
O'Hare N, Naduvilath T, Sweeney D, Holden B: A clinical comparison of
limbal and paralimbal superior epithelial arcuate lesions (SEALs) in high
Dk EW. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42;4: s595.
Skotnitsky C, Sankaridurg PR, Sweeney DF, Holden BA: General and
local contact lens induced papillary conjunctivitis (CLPC). Clin Exp Optom
2002; 85;3: 193-7.
Jones L, Dumbleton K: Silicone hydrogel lenses: Fitting procedures and
in-practice protocols for continuous wear lenses. Optician 2002; 223;5840:
37 - 45.
Dumbleton KA, Jones L: Silicone hydrogel lenses: Follow-up and
management. Optician 2002; 223;5845: 34 - 43.
BSI: Contact lenses Part 2: Method of classifying contact lens materials.
1991.
BSI: Classification of contact lenses and contact lens materials. 1999.
Kerr C, Meyler J: The ISO system of contact lens materials classification.
in The ACLM Contact Lens Year Book, C. Kerr and J. Meyler, Editors.
Devizes, ACLM,2001, pp 7 - 8.
Orsborn G, Zantos S: Practitioner survey: Management of dry eye
symptoms in soft lens wearers. Contact Lens Spectrum 1989; 4;9: 23-26.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
Doughty MJ, Fonn D, Richter D, Simpson T, Caffery B, Gordon K: A
patient questionnaire approach to estimating the prevalence of dry eye
symptoms in patients presenting to optometric practices across Canada.
Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74;8: 624-31.
Weed K, Fonn D, Potvin R: Discontinuation of contact lens wear. Optom
Vis Sci 1993; 70;12s: 140.
Efron N, Brennan N: A survey of wearers of low water content hydrogel
contact lenses. Clin Exp Optom 1988; 71 86 - 90.
Pritchard N, Fonn D: Dehydration, lens movement and dryness ratings of
hydrogel contact lenses. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1995; 15;4: 281-286.
Fatt I, Chaston J: The effect of temperature on refractive index, water
content and central thickness of hydrogel contact lenses. Int Contact Lens
Clin 1980; 7 250 - 255.
Orsborn GN, Zantos SG: Corneal desiccation staining with thin high water
content contact lenses. CLAO J 1988; 14;2: 81-5.
Andrasko G, Schoessler J: The effect of humidity on the dehydration of
soft contact lenses on the eye. Int Contact Lens Clin 1980; 7;9/10: 30-33.
Brennan N, Efron N, Bruce A, Duldig D, Russo N: Dehydration of hydrogel
lenses: Environmental influences during normal wear. Am J Optom
Physiol Opt 1988; 65;4: 277-281.
Efron N, Brennan N, Bruce A, Duldig D, Russo N: Dehydration of hydrogel
lenses under normal wearing conditions. CLAO J 1987; 13;3: 152-156.
Efron N, Morgan P: Hydrogel contact lens dehydration and oxygen
transmissibility. CLAO J 1999; 25;3: 148 - 151.
Efron N, Brennan N: The clinical relevance of hydrogel lens water content.
J Brit Contact Lens Assoc Trans Ann Clin Conf 1987; 4 9-14.
Brennan N, Efron N: Hydrogel lens dehydration: A material dependent
phenomenon ? Contact Lens Forum 1987; 12;4: 28 - 29.
Larsen D, Huff J, Holden B: Proton NMR relaxation in hydrogel contact
lenses: Correlation with in vivo lens dehydration data. Curr Eye Res 1990;
9 697 - 706.
Benz P, Ors J: New materials demand more accurate measurements of
performance. Spectrum 1997;7: 40-46.
Andrasko G: Hydrogel dehydration in various environments. Int Contact
Lens Clin 1983; 10 22 - 28.
Wechsler S, Johnson M, Businger U: In vivo hydration of hydrogel lenses the first hour. Int Contact Lens Clin 1983; 10;6: 349-351.
Brennan N, Lowe R, Efron N, Ungerer J, Carney L: Dehydration of
hydrogel lenses during overnight wear. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1987;
64;7: 534-539.
Fonn D, Situ P, Simpson T: Hydrogel lens dehydration and subjective
comfort and dryness ratings in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact
lens wearers. Optom Vis Sci 1999; 76;10: 700 - 704.
Brennan N, Lowe R, Efron N, Harris M: In vivo dehydration of disposable
(Acuvue) contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990; 67;3: 201-203.
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
102.
103.
104.
105.
Hall B, Jones S, Young G, Coleman S: The on-eye dehydration of proclear
compatibles lenses. CLAO J 1999; 25;4: 233-7.
Young G, Bowers R, Hall B, Port M: Clinical comparison of Omafilcon A
with four control materials. CLAO J 1997; 23;4: 249-258.
Lemp MA, Caffery B, Lebow K, Lembach R, Park J, Foulks G, Hall B,
Bowers R, McGarvey S, Young G: Omafilcon A (Proclear) soft contact
lenses in a dry eye population. CLAO J 1999; 25;1: 40-7.
Fonn D, Pritchard N, Dumbleton K: Factors affecting the success of
silicone hydrogels. in Silicone Hydrogels: The Rebirth of Continuous Wear
Contact Lenses, D. Sweeney, Editor. Oxford, UK, ButterworthHeinemann,2000, pp 214 - 234.
May C, Jones L, Nazar L, Simpson T: In vitro evaluation of the
dehydration characteristics of silicone-hydrogel and conventional hydrogel
contact lens materials. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77;12s: 215.
Tripathi R, Tripathi B, Silverman R: Morphology of lens deposits and
causative effects. in Contact Lens Practice, M. Ruben and M. Guillon,
Editors. London, Chapman & Hall,1994, pp 1099-1117.
Tighe B, Franklin V: Lens deposition and spoilation. in The Eye in Contact
Lens Wear, J. Larke, Editor. Oxford, Butterworth-Heinemann,1997, pp 49
- 100.
Brennan N, Coles M: Deposits and symptomatology with soft contact lens
wear. Int Contact Lens Clin 2000; 27;3: 75 - 100.
Pritchard N, Fonn D, Weed K: Ocular and subjective responses to
frequent replacement of daily wear soft contact lenses. CLAO J 1996;
22;1: 53-59.
Gellatly K, Brennan N, Efron N: Visual decrement with deposit
accumulation on HEMA contact lenses. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1988;
65;12: 937-941.
Mondino B, Salamon S, Zaidman G: Allergic and toxic reactions in soft
contact lens wearers. Surv Ophthalmol 1982; 26 337-344.
Baines M, Cai F, Backman H: Adsorption and removal of protein bound to
hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990; 67;11: 807-810.
Bohnert J, Horbett T, Ratner B, Royce F: Adsorption of proteins from
artificial tear solutions to contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
1988; 29;3: 362-373.
Bontempo AR, Rapp J: Protein-lipid interaction on the surface of a
hydrophilic contact lens in vitro. Curr Eye Res 1997; 16;8: 776-81.
Castillo E, Koenig J, Anderson J, Jentoft N: Protein adsorption on soft
contact lenses - III. Mucin. Biomaterials 1986; 7;1: 9-16.
Minarik L, Rapp J: Protein deposits on individual hydrophilic contact
lenses: Effects of water and ionicity. CLAO J 1989; 15;3: 185-188.
Fowler S, Korb D, Allansmith M: Deposits on soft contact lenses of various
water contents. CLAO J 1985; 11;2: 124-127.
Minno G, Eckel L, Groemminger S, Minno B, Wrzosek T: Quantitative
analysis of protein deposits on hydrophilic soft contact lenses: I.
Comparison to visual methods of analysis. II. Deposit variation among
FDA lens material groups. Optom Vis Sci 1991; 68;11: 865-872.
106. Sack R, Jones B, Antignani A, Libow R, Harvey H: Specificity and
biological activity of the protein deposited on the hydrogel surface. Invest
Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1987; 28;5: 842-849.
107. Jones L, Mann A, Evans K, Franklin V, Tighe B: An in vivo comparison of
the kinetics of protein and lipid deposition on group II and group IV
frequent-replacement contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 2000; 77;10: 503-10.
108. Jones L, Franklin V, Evans K, Sariri R, Tighe B: Spoilation and clinical
performance of monthly vs three monthly disposable contact lenses.
Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73;1: 16-21.
109. Garrett Q, Chatelier RC, Griesser HJ, Milthorpe BK: Effect of charged
groups on the adsorption and penetration of proteins onto and into
carboxymethylated poly(HEMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 1998; 19;23:
2175-86.
110. Garrett Q, Garrett RW, Milthorpe BK: Lysozyme sorption in hydrogel
contact lenses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999; 40;5: 897-903.
111. Garrett Q, Laycock B, Garrett RW: Hydrogel lens monomer constituents
modulate protein sorption. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41;7: 1687-95.
112. Leahy C, Mandell R, Lin S: Initial in vivo tear protein deposition on
individual hydrogel contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1990; 67;7: 504-511.
113. Jones L, Evans K, Sariri R, Franklin V, Tighe B: Lipid and protein
deposition of N-vinyl pyrrolidone containing group II and group IV frequent
replacement contact lenses. CLAO J 1997; 23;2: 122-126.
114. Maissa C, Franklin V, Guillon M, Tighe B: Influence of contact lens
material surface characteristics and replacement frequency on protein and
lipid deposition. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75;9: 697-705.
115. McKenney C, Becker N, Thomas S, Castillo-Krevolin C, Grant T: Lens
deposits with a high Dk hydrophilic soft lens. Optom Vis Sci 1998; 75;12s:
276.
116. Jones L, Senchyna M, Louie D, Schickler J: A comparative evaluation of
lysozyme and lipid deposition on Etafilcon, Balafilcon and Lotrafilcon
contact lens materials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001; 42;4: s593 #3186.
117. Louie D, Senchyna M, Jones L, May C, Schubert N, Dumbleton K:
Lysozyme deposition and removal from a high Dk silicone-hydrogel
contact lens material: A comparison of 7 day vs 30 day wear. Invest
Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2000; 41;4: s71 #369.
118. McNally J, McKenney CD: A clinical look at a silicone hydrogel extended
wear lens. Contact Lens Spectrum 2002; 17;1: 38 - 41.
119. Jones L, Woods CA, Efron N: Life expectancy of rigid gas permeable and
high water content contact lenses. CLAO J 1996; 22;4: 258-61.
120. Jones L: Daily wear high water content lenses - current status and future
developments (part two). Optician 1990; 199;5240: 15-23.
121. Haig-Brown G: A clinical study of high water content contact lenses in the
daily wear regime. J Brit Contact Lens Assoc Trans
1. Ann Clin Conf 1985 12-16.
122.
123.
124.
125.
126.
127.
128.
129.
130.
131.
132.
133.
134.
135.
136.
137.
138.
Woods C, Efron N: Regular replacement of daily wear rigid gas permeable
contact lenses. J BCLA 1996; 19;3: 83-89.
Woods C, Efron N: Regular replacement of extended wear rigid gas
permeable contact lenses. CLAO J 1996; 22;3: 172-178.
Martin D, Holden B: Variations in tear fluid osmolality, chord diameter and
movement during wear of high water content hydrogel contact lenses. Int
Contact Lens Clin 1983; 10;6: 332-341.
Brennan NA, Lindsay RG, McCraw K, Young L, Bruce AS, Golding TR:
Soft lens movement: Temporal characteristics. Optom Vis Sci 1994; 71;6:
359-63.
Golding TR, Harris MG, Smith RC, Brennan NA: Soft lens movement:
Effects of humidity and hypertonic saline on lens settling. Acta Ophthalmol
Scand 1995; 73;2: 139-44.
Little S, Bruce A: Osmotic determinants of postlens tear film morphology
and hydrogel lens movement. Ophthal Physiol Opt 1995; 15;2: 117-124.
Little SA, Bruce AS: Hydrogel (Acuvue) lens movement is influenced by
the postlens tear film. Optom Vis Sci 1994; 71;6: 364-70.
Harris M, Gan C, Long D, Cushing L: The pH of over-the-counter
hydrogen peroxide in soft lens disinfection systems. Optom Vis Sci 1989;
66;12: 839-842.
McCarey B, Wilson L: pH, osmolarity and temperature effects on the water
content of hydrogel contact lenses. Contact Intraoc Lens Med J 1982; 8;3:
158-167.
Harris M, Brennan N, Lowe R, Efron N: Hydration changes of Acuvue
disposable contact lenses during disinfection. Clin Exp Optom 1989; 72;5:
159-162.
Jones L, Davies I, Jones D: Effect of hydrogen peroxide neutralisation on
the fitting characteristics of group IV disposable contact lenses. J Brit
Contact Lens Assoc 1993; 16;4: 135-140.
Nairn J, Jiang T. Measurement of the friction and lubricity properties of
contact lenses. in The 53rd Annual Technical Conference. 1995. Boston,
MA: Soc of Plastics Engineers.
Boswall GJ, Ehlers WH, Luistro A, Worrall M, Donshik PC: A comparison
of conventional and disposable extended wear contact lenses. Clao J
1993; 19;3: 158-65.
Marshall E, Begley C, Nguyen C: Frequency of complications among
wearers of disposable and conventional soft contact lenses. Int Contact
Lens Clin 1992; 19;3/4: 55-59.
Poggio E, Abelson M: Complications and symptoms with disposable daily
wear contact lenses and conventional soft daily wear contact lenses.
CLAO J 1993; 19;2: 95-102.
Jones L, Jones D, Langley C, Houlford M: Subjective responses of 100
consecutive patients to daily disposables. Optician 1996; 211;5536: 28-32.
Nilsson S, Soderqvist M: Clinical performance of a daily disposable
contact lens: a 3-month prospective study. J Brit Contact Lens Assoc
1995; 18;3: 81-86.
139.
140.
141.
142.
143.
144.
145.
146.
147.
148.
149.
150.
151.
152.
Nason RJ, Boshnick EL, Cannon W, Dubow B, Freeman M, Kame R,
Lanier J, Lopanik R, Quinn T, Rigel L, Sherrill D, Solomon D, Stiegemeier
M, Teiche R, Zigler L, Yi F: Multisite comparison of contact lens
modalities. Daily disposable wear vs. conventional daily wear in
successful contact lens wearers. J Am Optom Assoc 1994; 65 774-780.
Patel S, Thomson A, Raj S: Tear film stability with planned replacement
soft lenses. Optician 1996; 212;5558: 28-30.
Holly F: Basic aspects of contact lens biocompatibility. Colloids and
Surfaces 1984; 10 343-350.
Guillon M, McGrogan L, Guillon J, Styles E, Maissa C: Effect of material
ionicity on the performance of daily disposable contact lenses. Contact
Lens & Anterior Eye 1997; 20;1: 3-8.
Jones L, Jones D, Langley C, Houlford. M: The influence of solution
regimes on the in vivo wettability of Group II and Group IV frequent
replacement lenses. Contact Lens & Ant Eye 1997; 20 171.
Jones L, Sariri R, Evans K, Franklin V, Tighe B: A comparison of the
effects of solution regimes on the deposition profiles of group II and group
IV disposable contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73;12s: 164.
Forster H, Fisher J: The influence of continuous sliding and subsequent
surface wear on the friction of articular cartilage. Proc Instn Mech Engrs
Part H 1999; 213 329 - 345.
Ateshian G: A theoretical formulation for boundary friction in articular
cartilage. J Biomech Eng 1997; 119 81 - 86.
Williams III P, Powel G, LaBerge M: Sliding friction analysis of
phosphatidylcholine as a boundary lubricant for articular cartilage. Proc
Instn Mech Engrs Part H 1993; 207 59 - 66.
Pickard J, Fisher J, Ingham E, Egan J: Investigation into the effects of
proteins and lipids on the frictional properties of articular cartilage.
Biomaterials 1998; 19 1807-1812.
Swann D, Radin E: The molecular basis of articular lubrication. J Biol
Chem 1972; 247 8069.
Little T, Freeman M, Swanson S: Experiments on friction in the human hip
joint. in Lubrication and Wear, V. Wright, Editor. London, Sector,1969, pp
110 - 114.
Hills B, Butler B: Surfactants identified in synovial fluid and their ability to
act as boundary lubricants. Ann Rheum Dis 1984; 43 641 - 648.
Dumbleton K: In vivo lens wettability. Data on file 2002.