Dr. Sharon Armon-Lotem Sentence processing (922) Sentence processing - Serial and parallel models Readings Altman, G. T. M. 1998. Ambiguity in sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2 (4), 146-152 More background reading: Garman, M. 1990. Psycholinguistics. Cambridge University Press. Pp. 301-320 What does it mean to understand an utterance? What kind of information is used during processing? Understand the linguistic information: The linguistic message The linguistic context Introduce information which is not in the linguistic message or context Visual information General world knowledge Individual knowledge. How does the different aspects of understanding interact? Flowchart – serial processing Network – parallel processing, distributed memory Parsing Understanding a linguistic message with no linguistic context, visual information or other information – focusing on the hearer’s/reader's task. 1. 2. The horse [raced past the barn] fell The horse the donkey the girl liked raced won Top-Down or Bottom-up Top-Down: letter recognition is influenced by the lexical (higher) level of representation Parsing Principles (Kimball 1973) Top-down (from the highest level) - “Parsing in natural languages proceeds according to a top-down algorithm” 1 Dr. Sharon Armon-Lotem Sentence processing (922) The parser assumes that it builds a sentence using the rules: S NP VP VP V NP 3. 4. Right association (to non-terminal nodes) - “Terminal symbols optimally associate to the lowest non-terminal node” The girl took the job that was attractive The girl went to NY that was attractive New nodes (function words) – "The construction of a new node is signaled by the occurrence of a grammatical function word” How is this related to garden path sentences? 5. 6. Two sentences - “The constituents of no more than two sentences can be parsed at the same time” The horse [ the donkey [ the girl liked ] raced ] won Closure - “A phrase is closed as soon as possible, i.e., unless the next node parsed is an immediate constituent of the phrase”. Since Jay always walks a mile seems like a short distance to him Fixed structure (look ahead) – “When the last constituent of the phrase has been formed, and the phrase is closed, it is costly in terms of perceptual complexity ever to have to go back to reorganize the constituents of that phrase” 7. The girl pushed through the window cried (But: The girl thrown through the window cried) Processing (serial) - “When a phrase is closed it is pushed down into a syntactic (possibly semantic) processing stage and cleared from short term memory” This helps explain principle 6. Automatic or controlled? (Stroop test) 2 Dr. Sharon Armon-Lotem Sentence processing (922) Serial and parallel models How is parsing related to lexical access? There are three logical orders: 1. Parsing before lexical access 2. Lexical access before parser 3. Lexical access and parsing occur together Parsing before lexical access JABBERWOCKY It was brillig, and the slithy toves Did gyre and gimble in the wabe: All mimsy were the borogoves, And the mome raths outgrabe. (Through the Looking Glass, Lewis Carroll) Lexical access before parsing: Serial models Lexical processing > Storage of lexical items (Short term memory) > Parsing Miller (1956): The capacity of short-term memory is 7 items (plus or minus two) 8. I was reading this morning in the / paper about a man who is a / director of a big company in England / who was the world’s number one producer / of textiles who was great supporter of / the labor party over the last ten years. Sausage machine (Frazier and Fodor 1978): Lexical & phrasal nodes are assigned to short strings (roughly 6 words) > higher nodes are added creating a complete phrase marker. Minimal attachment – We do not open a new syntactic node unless we absolutely have to >>> we prefer to attach a new node to already present nodes. 9. Joe bought the book for Susan 10. Joe bought the book that I was trying to find for Susan 11. The burglar blew open the safe with the dynamite 3 Dr. Sharon Armon-Lotem Sentence processing (922) Lexical access and parsing occur together: Parallel models Word monitoring experiments – listen for a particular word in a list or a sentence. Listen for a word that sounds like the target (rhyme monitoring) Listen for a word that means the target (category monitoring) Marslen-Wilson and Tyler (1975): The target word is trout. 12. 13. Max, live, tea, clock, trout Mary likes to cook trout. Facilitation effect for category monitoring where there is a syntactic and semantic context >>> Parallel interactive model Lexical ambiguities BANK 14. 15. 16. The meeting at the bank was very romantic The sailors tied the boat to the bank The clerk left the money at the bank Automatic (spreading activation) Attentional processing (using conscious strategies). Altman, 1998 • • • • Syntactic processing cannot deal with multiple constraints Multiple meanings of an ambiguous word are activated briefly Frequency of meaning determines the activation Biasing context can activate one alternative over the other 17. 18. The horse raced past the burn fell The horse ridden past the burn fell 4