DEP 4116: Infant Cognition Reference List
Infant Lab Research
Readings:
Bahrick, L. E. & Hollich, G. (in press). Intermodal perception. In M. Haith & J. Benson, (Eds.),
Encyclopedia of Infant and Early Childhood Development , Elsevier, Ltd.
Infant Lab Research & IRH
Readings:
Bahrick, L.E., Lickliter, R., & Flom, R. (2004). Intersensory redundancy guides infants’ selective attention, perceptual and cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological
Science, 13 , 99-102.
Bahrick, L. E., Lickliter, R., Vaillant, M., Shuman, M., & Castellanos, I. (2004, June). The development of face perception in dynamic,multimodal events: Predictions from the intersensory redundancy hypothesis. Fifth Annual Meeting of the
International Multisensory Research Forum, Barcelona, Spain.
Vaillant-Molina, M., Newell, L., Castellanos, I., Bahrick, L.E., & Lickliter, R. (2006, June).
Intersensory redundancy impairs face perception in early development. Presented at the
International Conference for Infant Studies , Kyoto, Japan.
Castellanos, I., Shuman, M., & Bahrick, L. E. (2004, May). Intersensory redundancy facilitates infants' perception of meaning in speech passages. International Conference on Infant
Studies , Chicago, IL.
General Issues in Face Processing
Readings:
Nelson, C.A. (2001). The development and neural bases of face recognition. Infant and Child
Development , 10 , 3-18.
Ramsey, J.L., & Langlois, J.H. (2002). How infants perceive faces. In M. Lewis & A. Slater
(Eds.), Introduction to infant development (pp. 167-191).
New York:Oxford University Press.
Newborn Face Perception
Presentations:
Bushnell, I. W. R. (2001). Mother’s face recognition in newborn infants: Learning and memory.
Infant and Child Development, 10 , 67-74.
Sai, F. Z. (2005). The role of the mother’s voice in developing mother’s face preference:
Evidence for intermodal perception at birth. Infant and Child Development, 14 , 29-50.
The Development of Expertise
Presentations:
Pascalis, O., de Haan, M., & Nelson, C. A. (2002). Is face processing species-specific during the first year of life? Science, 296 , 1321-1323.
Kelly, D.J., Quinn, P.C., Slater, A.M, Lee, K., Gibson, A., Smith, M., Ge, L., & Pascalis, O.

(2005). Three-month-olds, but not newborns, prefer own-race faces. Developmental
Science, 8 , F31-F36
Pezdek, K., Blandon-Gitlin, I., & Moore, C. (2003). Children’s face recognition memory: More evidencefor the cross-race effect. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 760-763.
Configurational vs Featural Processing
Presentations:
Mondloch, C., Leis, A., & Maurer, D. (2006). Recognizing the face of Johnny, Suzy, and me:
Insensitivity to the spacing among features at 4 years of age. Child Development, 77(1),
234-243.
Categorization, Typicality, Attractivenes
Presentation:
Rubenstein, A.J. (2005). Variation in perceived attractiveness. Psychological Science, 16(10),
759-762.
Slater, A., Bremner, G., Johnson, S.P., Sherwood, P., Hayes, R., & Brown, E. (2000). Newborn infants' preference for attractive faces: The role of internal and external facial features.
Infancy, 1 , 265-274.
Face Recognition
Presentation:
Bahrick, L.E., Moss, L., & Fadil, C. (1996). The development of visual self- recognition in infancy. Ecological Psychology, 8, 189-208.
(Lab Staff is away at SRCD)
Gibson & Pick, Ch 5 Communication
Perceiving Moving and Multimodal Faces
Presentations:
Bahrick, L.E., Gogate, L.J., & Ruiz, I. (2002). Attention and memory for faces and actions in infancy: The salience of actions over faces in dynamic events. Child Development, 73 ,
1629-1643.
Bahrick, L. E., Hernandez-Reif, M., & Flom, R. (2005). The development of infant learning about specific face-voice relations. Developmental Psychology, 41, 541-552.
Autism and Face Processing
TBA
Infant Lab Research