ISRAEL JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE WEST NILE VIRUS ENCEPHALITIS IN HORSES IN ISRAEL Vol. 57 (2) 2002 S. Perl1, L. Fiette2, D. Lahav1, N. Sheichat1, C.Banet3, U. Orgad1, Y. Stram4 and M. Malkinson3 1 Departments of Pathology, 3Avian Diseases and 4Virology, Kimron Veterinary Institute, 50250 Beit Dagan, Israel 2 Unit יde Recherche et d'Expertise en Histotechnologie et Pathologie, Institut Pasteur, 25, rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France Abstract West Nile (WN) virus is a mosquito-borne flavivirus that can cause a variety of neurological symptoms in mammals and birds. The virus is considered to be endemic in many parts of Asia, Africa and Europe, particularly in countries bordering the Mediterranean Sea, where outbreaks of disease occur from time to time. During August through November 2000, an outbreak of West Nile fever affected over 400 people in Israel with 29 fatalities. At the same time an outbreak of encephalomyelitis was diagnosed in the local equine population. We describe here the clinical, histopathological and virological findings of five terminally-affected equines presenting neurological signs that were submitted between August and October 2000. The animals (two males and three female) were 2 to 10 years old. Four of them were recumbent and all had paraplegia of various degrees. Histologically, four had encephalitis and two of these had WN viral antigen in sections of the brain and spinal cord with a sparse distribution of positive cells. WN virus was isolated from three of the horses. Introduction West Nile virus (WNV) is a flavivirus belonging to the Japanese encephalitis-St.Louis encephalitis serocomplex of the Flaviviridae family. The virus is transmitted by mosquitoes, usually Culex spp., from avian reservoir hosts to susceptible mammals, principally horses and man as well as to wild and domestic birds (1,2). WN disease is a zoonosis and when favorable ecological and climatic conditions are in synchrony, epidemics of encephalitis occur in humans with a case-mortality rate of up to 10%, while a fatality rate of 40% in young domestic geese has been encountered (3). Since its original isolation in Uganda in 1937 (4), WNV infections and fever have been recognized in humans in numerous countries in Europe, Africa, western Asia since the 1960s (5). Equine disease was first described in Egypt (6), France during the 1960s (7) and in Portugal in 1971(8). The disease was experimentally reproduced in equines as encephalomyelitis (6,9,10). West Nile disease has reemerged recently in man, horses and birds during the 1990s with mild to severe outbreaks of human encephalitis including mortality being reported in Algeria (11), Romania (12), Czech Republic (5), Volgograd, Russia (13) and the Congo (14). The virus was isolated for the first time in the New World in New York City in 1999 and has since caused illness in humans and equines throughout the eastern USA and southern Canada (15). Outbreaks affecting equines were also described in this decade in Morocco in 1996 (16), Italy in 1998 (17), France in 2000 (18). In Israel, outbreaks of WN fever in humans were first reported in the 1950s (19) and most recently in 2000 (20). WNV was recently isolated from domestic geese and various wild birds (2,3). Between August and October 2000, an unspecified number of horses from various regions of Israel were reported by veterinary practitioners as showing neurological signs of weakness and ataxia of the hind limbs (A.Steinman, personal communication). We describe here the clinical, virological and pathological findings of the disease affecting four horses and one pony. Materials and Methods The first equine case was referred to us on August 23,2000 and the last case on October 15. During this period five equines were submitted for post-mortem examination to the Pathology Department of the Kimron Veterinary Institute. A complete necropsy was carried out, and the brain and spinal cord from all five cases and samples of the viscera of two horses were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and processed routinely for histopathology. Samples of brain and spinal cord were also frozen and stored at -20oC for virological investigation. Histological sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Immunohistochemistry was performed on 5 µm sections of selected paraffin blocks using the standard peroxidase-anti-peroxidase method with amplification by the EnVision+ system (Dako) using paraffin sections. The primary antibody was an anti-WNV mouse monoclonal antibody. Virology Brain and spinal cord were collected from necropsies of all five animals.10% suspensions were prepared in PBS (pH 7.0), clarified and filtered through 0.22µ Millipore filters. Six well plates containing semi-confluent Vero cell monolayers were inoculated with filtrates. The plates were incubated at 370C in 5%CO2:95% air and inspected daily for seven days for cytopathic effect. Two blind passages were performed. RT-PCR RNA was extracted using QIAamp viral RNA kit (Qiagen). RT-PCR was conducted with primers WN132 and WN240 (21). The PCR product was 327 bp in size. Results Table 1: Summary of clinical, histopathological , immunohistochemical (IHC) and virological findings in five horses Hor se A ge No. (y rs) 1 2 M /F Clinical signs Duratio Histology IHC n isolati on of illness F Ataxia, fever, Virus 4 days No lesions 3 days, Encephali tis Negati ve + A few + paresis, recumbency 2 (pon y) 8 F Ataxia, paraplegia hind legs, fever, recumbenc y euthaniz ed positiv e cells 3 10 F Ataxia, quadripleg ia, 2 days, euthaniz ed Very discrete Negati ve - A few + encephalit is recumbenc y 4 10 M Ataxia, 7 days quadripleg ia, Encephali tis positiv e cells circling, fever 5 7 M Ataxia, paresis, 2 days Encephali tis Negati ve - recumbenc y Clinical findings: The clinical findings are summarized in Table 1. All five horses were ataxic and became recumbent in the final s horses (case nos. 1 and 2) only the hind limbs were affected while quadriplegia was present in the other three ho illness ranged from 2 to 7 days and two horses had to be euthanized 2 and 3 days after they became recumbent. Macroscopical findings In one horse (case no.1) there were multifocal subcutaneous haemorrhages in the subcutis and endocardium. In horse no.3, a granulomatous focal lesion in the mandible was noted and focal dark areas in the gray matter of the lumbo-sacral region of the spinal cord were seen (Fig.1). In horse no.4 we observed a few haemorrhagic infarcts and edema was seen in the lungs, multifocal haemorrhages on the epicardium and endocardium, and multifocal dark areas in the gray matter of the lumbar-sacral region of the spinal cord. In horse no.5, only the head was submitted for pathological examination and no pathological changes were visible Figure 1. Lumbar spinal cord; horse. Multif matter. Microscopical findings In 4 of the 5 horses a non-suppurative, moderate to severe polio-encephalomyelitis was observed. The lesions were located mainly in the lumbar-sacral region of the spinal cord and in the brain stem. Multifocal perivascular to diffuse haemorrhages were present in some of the cases in the gray matter of the spinal cord. (Fig.2). In other cases perivascular mononuclear cell infiltrations were present in the gray matter. These were composed of lymphocytes, plasmocytes and macrophages (Fig. 3). The lesions were symmetrical and bilateral and involved the gray matter and particularly the ventral horns of the spinal cord. Figure 2. Lumbar spinal cord. Multifocal an gray matter. H&E. x5. Slight inflammation and edema of the meninges and spinal cord were also present in some horses. No significant histopathological lesions were detected in the lung, heart muscle, liver, spleen and kidney of any of the horses. Viral antigen: We found viral antigen in two cases (Nos.2 and 4). Positive cells were very sparse and associated with foci of inflammation in the gray matter. They had the morphology of pyramidal neurons in the ventral horns (Fig.4). In addition, we saw labeled cellular debris in the neuropil or microglial cells (Fig.5). Virological findings Three WNV isolates were made from the brain and spinal cord (horse no. 1, 2 and 4). The isolates were identified by RT-PCR on Vero cell supernatants and mouse brain (Banet, personal communication ). Partial sequence analysis of the E gene showed that the isolates were 99.8% homologous with WNVISR98 isolated from a goose (22). Figure 3. Lumbar spinal cord; severe lymph H&E. x20. Figure 4. Spinal cord: Immunoperoxidase-staining of WN viral antigen in the cytoplasm of a neuron and multifocal glial cell proliferation (gliosis). x20. Figure 5. Spinal cord: Immunoperoxidase-s glial cells. x40. . Discussion In the five equine cases described here, the clinical and histopathological findings are similar to those that have been described previously in spontaneous or experimental WNV infection of horses and ponies. In the majority of affected horses, WNV infection usually causes a sub-clinical illness, associated with the appearance of specific serum antibodies. Only a small number of infected horses develop acute neurological signs varying from 20% to 40% in different studies, with a mortality rate of about 45% (1). Ataxia, weakness, paresis, paraplegia or tetraplegia are the most consistent signs; while fever is not (9,11,17,18). Lesions induced by WNV are limited to the central nervous system. They consist of a moderate to severe meningo-encephalitis associated with haemorrhages. They are preferentially observed in the brain stem and ventral horns of the lumbo-sacral spinal cord, whereas the brain and cerebellum show few changes. The preferential location and microscopic appearance has to be considered in the differential diagnosis of equine viral encephalitides, and it is essential to examine the spinal cord where WNV is suspected. West Nile disease has then to be confirmed by appropriate tests, e.g. MAC-ELISA and RT-PCR. As described previously in cases from Italy and New York (23,24), viral antigen is detected in the gray matter in morphologically normal or degenerate neurons or fibers, and in glial cells. In our cases, immunohistochemistry was positive only in two cases so this method is not very sensitive. In our series, we used IHC and virus isolation in parallel. Three cases were positive by both methods, in one case (No.1), the virus was isolated but lesions were not found in the samples, while in horse no.4 we observed inflammatory lesions similar to the other cases but virus isolation was negative. Considering the low level of antigen that was found, immunohistochemistry does not seem to be the most reliable method to confirm the diagnosis of WNV References 1.