How To Write Gooder: Effective Diction and Imagery Specific Details & Descriptive Words English 10 Intensified: Burns Specific Details and Descriptive Words: your reader wasn’t there, but you have the power to convince her/him that s/he was. But, in order to do so, you need to offer precise coordinates; sending your reader to Ohio will not get him/her to Cleveland any more than suggesting the day was hot will cause droplets of sweat to form on his/her forehead. According to The Oxford English Dictionary, there are over 600,000 words in the English language, and according to essayist Bill Bryson, more than 200,000 words are in common use: try using some of them! Think about words that pin down precisely what you want to say: even though Mother Goose might disagree, mice, especially if they are blind, do not “run”—they scamper, or scatter, or, given their visual impairment, they might even stumble. Is blood really “red”? Is crimson, or scarlet, a more accurate adjective? Or is it really black? How long has it been there? How diffuse is the light? Does the color of the shirt the victim was wearing make it appear darker than it otherwise might be? Offer details that appeal to the five (human) senses. It is senses which activate memory; actually narrative is creating memory, but the narrative writer relies on accessing sensory data which we all share. Whitman’s “lilacs” are so powerfully aromatic that even an Arctic Explorer reading the poem in the midst of an ice floe might be tricked into inhaling a deep breath of spring. Again, your reader wasn’t there. Your reader might not even know what “there” is, let alone “what” or “who.” Details are not frivolous in narrative writing; details are narrative writing. Strip details from a narrative and you, the story teller, cease to exist (and once you disappear, you can’t really expect anyone to hang around listening to your story can you?) The passage which follows is the opening to Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World: A squat grey building of only thirty-four stories. Over the main entrance the words, CENTRAL LONDON HATCHERY AND CONDITIONING CENTRE, and, in a shield, the World State’s motto, COMMUNITY, IDENTITY, STABILITY. The enormous room on the ground floor faced towards the north. Cold for all the summer beyond the panes, for all the tropical heat of the room itself, a harsh thin light glared through the windows, hungrily seeking some draped lay figure, some pallid shape of academic gooseflesh, but finding only the glass and nickel and bleakly shining porcelain of a laboratory. Wintriness responded to wintriness. The overalls of the workers were white, their hands gloved with a pale corpse-coloured rubber. The light was frozen, dead, a ghost. Only from the yellow barrels of the microscopes did it borrow a certain rich and living substance, lying across the polished tubes like butter, streak after luscious streak down the work tables. We are introduced to the most unremarkable of buildings: “squat” and “grey.” Yet, Huxley’s specific detail “only” introduces us to what must be a remarkable city—34 stories is seen as “squat”? How tall must the surrounding buildings be to produce this qualifier? (Incidentally, and at the risk of turning this into a grammar assignment, why does Huxley choose to begin his narrative with a fragment?? What did his English Teacher say about this?!?) “north,” “cold,” “goose-flesh,” “wintriness,” “white” and “frozen” certainly offer meaningful details about the setting—you don’t need a weatherman to tell you it ain’t warm in the CLH/CC. However, what do these details tell you about the people who work there? What about “thin,” “draped,” “pallid,” “bleakly,” “pale,” “corpse-coloured,” “dead” and “ghost”? Lifeless workers in a lifeless building, right? But this building is a “hatchery,” responsible for producing LIFE. The supreme irony of this passage (and the novel as a whole) fails without detail. Exercise 1 (Accessing the Senses) The enormous room on the ground floor faced towards the north. Cold for all the summer beyond the panes, for all the tropical heat of the room itself, a harsh thin light glared through the windows, hungrily seeking some draped lay figure, some pallid shape of academic gooseflesh, but finding only the glass and nickel and bleakly shining porcelain of a laboratory. Wintriness responded to wintriness. The overalls of the workers were white, their hands gloved with a pale corpse-coloured rubber. The light was frozen, dead, a ghost. Only from the yellow barrels of the microscopes did it borrow a certain rich and living substance, lying across the polished tubes like butter, streak after luscious streak down the work tables. Re-consider the passage above in terms of how many of his readers’ five senses Huxley is able to access. You should include as many details from the passage as you are able. Some details can certainly be used to support more than one sense; I am not guaranteeing all five senses will be used. Sight: “a harsh thin light glared” through the window hungrily seeking” “bleakly shining porcelain” “the polished tubes” In this opening scene, Huxley provokes our sense of vision by portraying light shining, but only dimly. The reader is forced to react to this light because it is different from what is expected. Sound (Hearing): “Wintriness responded to wintriness.” “streak after luscious streak” “frozen, dead, a ghost” Through his careful employment of diction, Huxley presents a laboratory which is utterly, icily silent, save for the faint rhythm of “luscious streak[s]” across the microscope slides. Taste: Touch: “the tropical heat” Smell: Now that you have collected the data above, compose a statement that reveals how Huxley uses sensory diction to create imagery: In his introduction to Brave New World, Huxley How To Write Gooder: Narrative Writing Part III B: Specific Details & Descriptive Words English 10 ADV (Burns): Points Available (20) (10 points) Exercise 1 (Specific Details/Descriptive Words) A. 1. It was very windy. 2. The wind blew hard. 3. The wind screamed. 4. The wind screamed across the tops of trees, pelting the night. 5. The trees trembled in the screaming wind like helpless prey. 6. Trees threw up their useless arms to stop the screaming wind, branches breaking like barroom promises. Each of the six sentences above has been strengthened through the addition of specific details/descriptive words; however, the intent of the original sentence has not been lost. Follow this process for 2 of the 3 simple sentences below; each consecutive sentence should add, specify or modify a detail without losing the meaning of the original sentence. 1. He bled. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 2. I ran home. 3. The night was dark. 6.