Review of the paper submitted to Polish Journal of Natural Sciences
Paper title:
Reviewer:
1. Mark the appropriate cell with the X.
YES +/-
Does the paper title match its contents?
Do the key words and the abstract characterize the contents of the paper sufficiently?
Was the objective of the paper formulated correctly?
Were the material and research methods presented appropriately and clearly?
Have the assumptions formulated in the objective been achieved?
NO
Do the data contained in tables and figures represent the appropriate, understandable documentation of the contents of the paper?
Is the discussion of results correct and sufficient?
Are the items of literature included in the paper sufficient and adequate to the subject of the paper?
Are the conclusions formulated correctly and justified by the contents and results of the study?
[] paper acceptable for publication with no objections
[] paper acceptable for publication with minor corrections
[] paper acceptable for publication after major revision according to the reviewer’s comments
[] paper rejected (negative reviewer’s opinion)

Notes/Comments/Suggestions: