Review of the paper presented for: publication in the periodical - Olsztyn Economic Journal
Paper title:
Authors:
Reviewer:
1. Mark the appropriate cell with the X.
YES
+/-
NO
1) Does the paper title match its contents?
2) Do the key words and the abstract characterise the contents of
the paper sufficiently
3) Was the objective of the paper formulated correctly?
4)
Were
the
material
and
research
methods
presented
appropriately and sufficiently clearly?
5) Have the assumptions formulated in the objective been
achieved?
6) Do the data contained in tables and figures represent the
appropriate, understandable documentation of the contents of
the paper?
7) Is the discussion of results correct and sufficient?
8) Are the items of literature included in the paper sufficient and
adequate to the subject of the paper?
9) Are the conclusions formulated correctly and justified by the
contents and results of the study?
[] paper passed for publication with no objections
[] paper passed for publication with minor corrections
[] paper passed for publication on condition of correction according to the reviewer’s
comments
[] paper rejected (negative reviewer’s opinion)