Psych 526B / Ed Psych 556B – Sentence Comprehension
Spring 2006, Thur 10-11:50 am, Room 608 Psychology
Adams, B. C., Clifton, C., & Mitchell, D. C. (1998). Lexical guidance in sentence processing. Psychonomic
Bulletin & Review, 5(2), 265-270.
Ahrens, K. (2003). Verbal integration: The interaction of participant roles and sentential argument structure.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(5), 497-516.
Ahrens, K., & Swinney, D. (1995). Participant roles and the processing of verbs during sentence
comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24(6), 533-547.
Ainsworth-Darnell, K., Shulman, H. G., & Boland, J. E. (1998). Dissociating brain responses to syntactic and
semantic anomalies: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language,
38, 112-130.
Allbritton, D. W., Mckoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1996). Reliability of prosodic cues for resolving syntactic
ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 22, 714-735.
Allefeld, C., Frisch, S., & Schlesewsky, M. (2005). Detection of early cognitive processing by event-related
phase synchronization analysis. Neuroreport, 16(1), 13-16.
Allen, M., Badecker, W., & Osterhout, L. (2003). Morphological analysis in sentence processing: An ERP
study. Language & Cognitive Processes, 18(4), 405-430.
Altmann, G., & Steedman, M. (1988). Interaction with context during human sentence processing. Cognition,
30, 191-238.
Altmann, G. T. (1998). Ambiguity in sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 146-152.
Altmann, G. T. M. (1994). Regression-contingent analyses of eye movements during sentence processing Reply to Rayner and Sereno. Memory & Cognition, 22(3), 286-290.
Altmann, G. T. M. (2001). The language machine: Psycholinguistics in review. British Journal of Psychology,
92(Part 1), 129-170.
Altmann, G. T. M., Garnham, A., & Dennis, Y. (1992). Avoiding the garden path: Eye movements in context.
Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 685-712.
Altmann, G. T. M., Garnham, A., & Henstra, J. (1994). Effects of syntax in human sentence parsing Evidence against a structure-based proposal mechanisim. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 209-216.
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (1999). Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of
subsequent reference. Cognition, 73(3), 247-264.
Altmann, G. T. M., van Nice, K. Y., Garnham, A., & Henstra, J.-A. (1998). Late closure in context. Journal of
Memory & Language, 38(4), May 1998, 1459-1484.
Anderson, J. E., & Holcomb, P. J. (2005). An electrophysiological investigation of the effects of coreference
on word repetition and synonymy. Brain & Language, 94(2), 200-216.
Angrilli, A., Penolazzi, B., Vespignani, F., De Vincenzi, M., Job, R., Ciccarelli, L., et al. (2002). Cortical
brain responses to semantic incongruity and syntactic violation in Italian language: An event-related
potential study. Neuroscience Letters, 322(1), 5-8.
Aoshima, S., Phillips, C., & Weinberg, A. (2004). Processing filler-gap dependencies in a head-final
language. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 23-54.
Arnold, J. E., Wasow, T., Asudeh, A., & Alrenga, P. (2004). Avoiding attachment ambiguities: The role of
constituent ordering. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 55-70.
Ashby, J., & Clifton Jr., C. (2005). The prosodic property of lexical stress affects eye movements during silent
reading. Cognition, 96(3), B89-B100.
Bader, M., & Meng, M. (1999). Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: An across-theboard comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(2), 121-143.
Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferreira, F. (2003). Disfluencies affect the parsing of garden-path sentences. Journal of
Memory and Language, 49(2), 183-200.
1
Balconi, C., & Pozzoli, U. (2005). Comprehending semantic and grammatical violations in Italian. N400 and
P600 comparison with visual and auditory stimuli. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34(1), 71-98.
Barber, H., & Carreiras, M. (2005). Grammatical gender and number agreement in Spanish: An ERP
comparison. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(1), 137-153.
Barr, D. J., & Keysar, B. (2002). Anchoring comprehension in linguistic precedents. Journal of Memory and
Language, 46(2), 391-418.
Bastiaansen, M. C. M., van Berkum, J. J. A., & Hagoort, P. (2002a). Event-related theta power increases in
the human EEG during online sentence processing. Neuroscience Letters, 323(1), 13-16.
Bastiaansen, M. C. M., van Berkum, J. J. A., & Hagoort, P. (2002b). Syntactic processing modulates the theta
rhythm of the human EEG. Neuroimage, 17(3), 1479-1492.
Bates, E., Devescovi, A., & D'Amico, S. (1999). Processing complex sentences: A cross-linguistic study.
Language & Cognitive Processes, 14(1), 69-123.
Bates, E., McNew, S., MacWhinney, B., Devescovi, A., & S.Smith. (1982). Functional constraints on
sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study. Cognition, 11, 245-299.
Baum, S. R., & Dwivedi, V. D. (2003). Sensitivity to prosodic structure in left-and right-hemisphere-damaged
individuals. Brain & Language, 87(2), 278-289.
Baumgaertner, A., Weiller, C., & Buchel, C. (2002). Event-related fMRI reveals cortical sites involved in
contextual sentence integration. Neuroimage, 16(3 Part 1), 736-745.
Bavelier, D., Corina, D., Jezzard, P., Padmanabhan, S., Clark, V. P., Karni, A., et al. (1997). Sentence reading
- A functional MRI study at 4 Tesla. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(5), 664-686.
Beach, C. M. (1991). The interpretation of prosodic patterns at points of syntactic structure ambiguity:
Evidence for cue trading relations. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 644-663.
Beckman, M. E. (1996). The parsing of prosody. Language & Cognitive Processes, 11(1-2), 17-67.
Bencini, G. M. L., & Goldberg, A. E. (2000). The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence
meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 640-651.
Ben-Shachar, M., Hendler, T., Kahn, I., Ben-Bashat, D., & Grodzinsky, Y. (2003). The neural reality of
syntactic transformations: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Psychological
Science, 14(5), 433-440.
Ben-Shachar, M., Palti, D., & Grodzinsky, Y. (2004). Neural correlates of syntactic movement: converging
evidence from two fMRI experiments. Neuroimage, 21(4), 1320-1336.
Besson, M., Faita, F., Czternasty, C., & Kutas, M. (1997). What's in a pause: Event-related potential analysis
of temporal disruptions in written and spoken sentences. Biological Psychology, 46(1), 3-23.
Bever, T. G., & McElree, B. (1988). Empty categories access their antecedents during comprehension.
Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 35-43.
Bever, T. G., & Townsend, D. J. (1979). Perceptual mechanisms and formal properties of main and
subordinate clauses. In W. E. C. E. C. T. Walker (Ed.), Sentence processing (pp. 159-226). Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Binder, K. S., Duffy, S. A., & Rayner, K. (2001). The effects of thematic fit and discourse context on
syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory & Language, 44(2), 297-324.
Birch, S., & Clifton, C. (1995). Focus, accent, and argument structure: Effects on language comprehension.
Language and Speech, 38, 365-391.
Birch, S., & Clifton, C. (2002). Effects of varying focus and accenting of adjuncts on the comprehension of
utterances. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(4), 571-588.
Blodgett, A., & Boland, J. E. (2004). Differences in the timing of implausibility detection for recipient and
instrument prepositional phrases. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(1), 1-24.
Bock, J. K., & Mazzella, J. R. (1983). Intonational marking of given and new information: Some
consequences for comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 11(1), Jan 1983, 1964-1976.
Boland, J. E. (1997). The relationship between syntactic and semantic processes in sentence comprehension.
Language & Cognitive Processes, 12(4), 423-484.
Boland, J. E. (2005). Visual arguments. Cognition, 95(3), 237-274.
2
Boland, J. E., & Boehmjernigan, H. (1998). Lexical constraints and prepositional phrase attachment. Journal
of Memory & Language, 39(4), 684-719.
Boland, J. E., & Cutler, A. (1996). Interaction with autonomy - multiple output models and the inadequacy of
the great divide. Cognition, 58, 309-320.
Bornkessel, I., McElree, B., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Multi-dimensional contributions to
garden path strength: Dissociating phrase structure from case marking. Journal of Memory and
Language, 51(4), 495-522.
Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Beyond syntax: Language-related positivities
reflect the revision of hierarchies. Neuroreport, 13(3), 361-364.
Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Grammar overrides frequency: evidence from the
online processing of flexible word order. Cognition, 85(2), B21-B30.
Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2003a). Contextual information modulates initial
processes of syntactic integration: The role of inter-versus intrasentential predictions. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29(5), 871-882.
Bornkessel, I., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2003b). Eliciting thematic reanalysis effects: The role of
syntax-independent information during parsing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 18(3), 269-298.
Bornkessel, I., Zysset, S., Friederici, A. D., von Cramon, D. Y., & Schlesewsky, M. (2005). Who did what to
whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension. Neuroimage, 26(1),
221-233.
Bornkessel, I. D., Fiebach, C. J., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). On the cost of syntactic ambiguity in human
language comprehension: an individual differences approach. Cognitive Brain Research, 21(1), 11-21.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering, M. J., & McLean, J. F. (2005). Priming prepositional-phrase attachment during
comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31(3), 468481.
Braze, D., Shankweiler, D., Ni, W. J., & Palumbo, L. C. (2002). Readers' eye movements distinguish
anomalies of form and content. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(1), 25-44.
Britt, M. A. (1994). The interaction of referential ambiguity and argument structure in the parsing of
prepositional phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 251-283.
Britt, M. A., Perfetti, C. A., Garrod, S., & Rayner, K. (1992). Parsing in discourse: Context effects and their
limits. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 293-314.
Brown, C. M., van Berkum, J. J. A., & Hagoort, P. (2000). Discourse before gender: An event-related brain
potential study on the interplay of semantic and syntactic information during spoken language
understanding. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(1), 53-68.
Brown-Schmidt, S., Byron, D. K., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2005). Beyond salience: Interpretation of personal
and demonstrative pronouns. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(2), 292-313.
Brysbaert, M., & Mitchell, D. C. (1996). Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A Human Experimental Psychology, 49A, 664695.
Capek, C. M., Bavelier, D., Corina, D., Newman, A. J., Jezzard, P., & Neville, H. J. (2004). The cortical
organization of audio-visual sentence comprehension: An fMRI study at 4 Tesla. Cognitive Brain
Research, 20(2), 111-119.
Caplan, D. (2001). Functional neuroimaging studies of syntactic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 30(3), 297-320.
Caplan, D., Alpert, N., & Waters, G. (1998). Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on
patterns of regional cerebral blood flow. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(4), 541-552.
Caplan, D., Vijayan, S., Kuperberg, G., West, C., Waters, G., Greve, D., et al. (2000). Localization of
syntactic processing in sentence comprehension by event-related fMRI. Brain & Language, 74(3),
400-402.
Caplan, D., Vijayan, S., Kuperberg, G., West, C., Waters, G., Greve, D., et al. (2002). Vascular responses to
syntactic processing: Event-related fMRI study of relative clauses. Human Brain Mapping, 15(1), 2638.
3
Caplan, D., & Waters, G. (1999). Issues regarding general and domain-specific resources. Behavioral & Brain
Sciences, 22(1), 114-126.
Caplan, D., & Waters, G. (2002). Working memory and connectionist models of parsing: A reply to
MacDonald and Christiansen (2002). Psychological Review, 109(1), 66-74.
Caplan, D., Waters, G., & Alpert, N. (2003). Effects of age and speed of processing on rCBF correlates of
syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 19(2), 112-131.
Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral &
Brain Sciences, 22(1), 77-+.
Carey, P. W., Mehler, J., & Bever, T. G. (1970). Judging the veracity of ambiguous sentences. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 243-254.
Carlson, K. (2001). The effects of parallelism and prosody in the processing of gapping structures. Language
& Speech, 44(Part 1), 1-26.
Carlson, K., Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (2001). Prosodic boundaries in adjunct attachment. Journal of Memory
& Language, 45(1), 58-81.
Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., Keller, T. A., Eddy, W. F., & Thulborn, K. R. (1999). Time course of fMRIactivation in language and spatial networks during sentence comprehension. Neuroimage, 10(2), 216224.
Carreiras, M., & Clifton, C. (1993). Relative clause interpretation preferences in Spanish and English.
Language and Speech, 36, 353-372.
Carreiras, M., & Clifton, C. (1999). Another word on parsing relative clauses: Eyetracking evidence from
Spanish and English. Memory & Cognition, 27(5), 826-833.
Casado, P., Martin-Loeches, M., Munoz, F., & Fernandez-Frias, C. (2005). Are semantic and syntactic cues
inducing the same processes in the identification of word order? Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3),
526-543.
Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., Eberhard, K. M., Filip, H., & Carlson, G. N. (2002). Circumscribing
referential domains during real-time language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language,
47(1), 30-49.
Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Magnuson, J. S. (2004). Actions and affordances in syntactic
ambiguity resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30(3),
687-696.
Chen, E., Gibson, E., & Wolf, F. (2005). Online syntactic storage costs in sentence comprehension. Journal of
Memory and Language, 52(1), 144-169.
Choi, Y., & Mazuka, R. (2003). Young children's use of prosody in sentence parsing. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 32(2), 197-217.
Christiansen, M. H., & Chater, N. (2001). Connectionist psycholinguistics: Capturing the empirical data.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5(2), 82-88.
Christianson, K., Hollingworth, A., Halliwell, J. F., & Ferreira, F. (2001). Thematic roles assigned along the
garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology, 42(4), 368-407.
Clahsen, H., & Featherston, S. (1999). Antecedent priming at trace positions: Evidence from German
scrambling. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(4), 415-437.
Clifton, C. (1991). Syntactic modularity in sentence comprehension. In R. R. H. D. S. Palermo (Ed.),
Cognition and the symbolic processes: Applied and ecological perspectives (pp. 95-113). Hillsdale,
NJ: LEA.
Clifton, C., & Duffy, S. A. (2001). Sentence and text comprehension: Roles of linguistic structures. Annual
Review of Psychology, 52, 167-196.
Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (1986). The use of syntactic information in filling gaps. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 15, 209-224.
Clifton, C., Frazier, L., & Connine, C. (1984). Lexical expectations in sentence comprehension. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 696-708.
4
Clifton, C., Kennison, S. M., & Albrecht, J. E. (1997). Reading the words "her", "his", "him": Implications for
parsing principles based on frequency and on structure. Journal of Memory & Language, 36(2), 276292.
Clifton, C., Speer, S., & Abney, S. P. (1991). Parsing arguments: Phrase structure and argument structure as
determinants of initial parsing decisions. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 251-271.
Clifton, C., .Traxler, M. J., Mohamed, M. T., Williams, R. S., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (2003). The use of
thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited. Journal of Memory and
Language, in press.
Constable, R. T., Pugh, K. R., Berroya, E., Mencl, W. E., Westerveld, M., Ni, W. J., et al. (2004). Sentence
complexity and input modality effects in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 22(1),
11-21.
Cooke, A., Grossman, M., DeVita, C., Gonzalez-Atavales, J., Moore, P., Chen, W., et al. (2006). Large-scale
neural network for sentence processing. Brain & Language, 96(1), 14-36.
Cooke, A., Zurif, E. B., DeVita, C., Alsop, D., Koenig, P., Detre, J., et al. (2002). Neural basis for sentence
comprehension: Grammatical and short-term memory components. Human Brain Mapping, 15(2), 8094.
Corbett, A. T., & Chang, F. R. (1983). Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential antecedents. Memory
and Cognition, 11, 283-294.
Cornish, F., Garnham, A., Cowles, H. W., Fossard, M., & Andre, V. (2005). Indirect anaphora in English and
French: A cross-linguistic study of pronoun resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(3), 363376.
Coulson, S., Federmeier, K. D., Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (2005). Right hemisphere sensitivity to wordand sentence-level context: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31(1), 129-147.
Coulson, S., King, J., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to
morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 21-58.
Crocker, M. W., & Brants, T. (2000). Wide-coverage probabilistic sentence processing. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 29(6), 647-669.
Cuetos, F., & Mitchell, D. (1988). Cross-linguistic differences in parsing: Restrictions on the use of the Late
Closure strategy in Spanish. Cognition, 30, 73-105.
Cupples, L. (2002). The structural characteristics and on-line comprehension of experiencer-verb sentences.
Language & Cognitive Processes, 17(2), 125-162.
Cutler, A. (1976). Beyond parsing and lexical look-up: An enriched description of auditory sentence
comprehension. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to language mechanisms (pp.
133-149). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Cutler, A., & Norris, D. (1979). Monitoring sentence comprehension. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker
(Eds.), Sentence processing (pp. 113-134). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dahan, D., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2004). Continuous mapping from sound to meaning in spoken-language
comprehension: Immediate effects of verb-based thematic constraints. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30(2), 498-513.
Dahan, D., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Chambers, C. G. (2002). Accent and reference resolution in spoken-language
comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(2), 292-314.
Dapretto, M., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (1999). Form and content: Dissociating syntax and semantics in sentence
comprehension. Neuron, 24(2), 427-432.
D'Arcy, R. C. N., Connolly, J. F., Service, E., Hawco, C. S., & Houlihan, M. E. (2004). Separating
phonological and semantic processing in auditory sentence processing: a high-resolution event-related
brain potential study. Human Brain Mapping, 22(1), 40-51.
De Vincenzi, M., Job, R., Di Matteo, R., Angrilli, A., Penolazzi, B., Ciccarelli, L., et al. (2003). Differences in
the perception and time course of syntactic and semantic violations. Brain & Language, 85(2), 280296.
5
De_Vincenzi, M. (1991). Filler-gap dependencies in a null subject language: Referential and non-referential
WHs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 197-214.
De_Vincenzi, M. (1996). Syntactic analysis in sentence comprehension: Effects of dependency types and
grammatical constraints. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(1), 117-133.
DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language
comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117-1121.
Desmet, T., & Gibson, E. (2003). Disambiguation preferences and corpus frequencies in noun phrase
conjunction. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(3), 353-374.
Deutsch, A., & Bentin, S. (2001). Syntactic and semantic factors in processing gender agreement in Hebrew:
Evidence from ERPs and eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(2), 200-224.
Dooling, D. J. (1974). Rhythm and syntax in sentence perception. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal
Behavior, 13, 255-264.
Dopkins, S., & Ngo, C. T. (2005). The role of recognition memory in anaphor identification. Journal of
Memory and Language, 53(2), 186-203.
Eberhard, K. M., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Sedivy, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1995). Eye movements as a
window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 409-436.
Eckstein, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Late interaction of syntactic and prosodic processes in sentence
comprehension as revealed by ERPs. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(1), 130-143.
Ehrlich, K., & Rayner, K. (1983). Pronoun assignment and semantic integration during reading: Eye
movements and immediacy of processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 7587.
Embick, D., Marantz, A., Miyashita, Y., O'Neil, W., & Sakai, K. L. (2000). A syntactic specialization for
Broca's area. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
97(11), 6150-6154.
Engle, R. W., Cantor, J., & Carullo, J. J. (1992). Individual differences in working memory and
comprehension: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
and Cognition, 18, 972-992.
Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2001). Meaning and modality: Influences of context, semantic memory
organization, and perceptual predictability on picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27(1), 202-224.
Federmeier, K. D., Mai, H., & Kutas, M. (2005). Both sides get the point: Hemispheric sensitivities to
sentential constraint. Memory & Cognition, 33(5), 871-886.
Ferreira, F. (2003). The misinterpretation of noncanonical sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 164-203.
Ferreira, F., Christianson, K., & Hollingworth, A. (2001). Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences:
Implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,
30(1), 3-20.
Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and
Language, 25, 348-368.
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1990). Use of verb information in syntactic parsing: Evidence from eye
movements and word-by-word self-paced reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition, 16, 555-568.
Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1991). Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of
Memory and Language, 30, 725-745.
Ferreira, V. S. (2003). The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying "that" is not
saying "that" at all. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(2), 379-398.
Ferretti, T. R., McRae, K., & Hatherell, A. (2001). Integrating verbs, situation schemas, and thematic role
concepts. Journal of Memory & Language, 44(4), 516-547.
Ferstl, E. C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). The role of coherence and cohesion in text comprehension: an
event-related fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 11(3), 325-340.
6
Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Syntactic working memory and the establishment
of filler-gap dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,
30(3), 321-338.
Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Separating syntactic memory costs and syntactic
integration costs during parsing: the processing of German WH-questions. Journal of Memory and
Language, 47(2), 250-272.
Fiebach, C. J., Schlesewsky, M., Lohmann, G., von Cramon, D. Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Revisiting the
role of Broca's area in sentence processing: Syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory.
Human Brain Mapping, 24(2), 79-91.
Fiebach, C. J., Vos, S. H., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Neural correlates of syntactic ambiguity in sentence
comprehension for low and high span readers. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(9), 1562-1575.
Filik, R., Paterson, K. B., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). Parsing with focus particles in context: Eye movements
during the processing of relative clause ambiguities. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(4), 473495.
Fodor, J. D., & Frazier, L. (1980). Is the human sentence parsing mechanism an ATN? Cognition, 8, 417-459.
Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (1995). Information-based parsing of Japanese. In R. Mazuka & N. Nagai (Eds.),
Japanese sentence processing (pp. 9-63). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Assoc.
Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (2000a). Garden path repair: Diagnosis and triage. Language & Speech, 43(Part 3),
261-271.
Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (2000b). Syntactic features in reanalysis: Positive and negative symptoms. Journal
of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(1), 25-36.
Ford, M. (1983). A method for obtaining measures of local parsing complexity throughout sentences. Journal
of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 203-218.
Ford, M. (1986). A computational model of human parsing processes. In N. E. Sharkey (Ed.), Advances in
cognitive science (pp. 259-275). Chichester: Ellis Horwood, Ltd.
Ford, M., Bresnan, J., & Kaplan, R. M. (1982). A competence-based theory of syntactic closure. In J. Bresnan
(Ed.), The mental representation of grammatical relations (pp. 727-796). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ford, M., & Dalrymple, M. (1988). A note on some psychological evidence and alternative grammars. Paper
presented at the Cognition.
Forster, K. I., & Olbrei, I. (1973). Semantic heuristics and syntactic analysis. Cognition, 2, 319-347.
Forster, K. I., & Stevenson, B. J. (1987). Sentence matching and well-formedness. Cognition, 26, 171-186.
Foss, D. J. (1969). Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of lexical item difficulty and
position upon decision times. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 457-462.
Foss, D. J., & R. H. Lynch, J. (1969). Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of surface
structure on decision times. Perception and Psychophysics, 5, 145-148.
Frauenfelder, U., Segui, J., & Mehler, J. (1980). Monitoring around the relative clause. Journal of Verbal
Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 328-337.
Frazier, L. (1995). Constraint satisfaction as a theory of sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 24, 437-468.
Frazier, L. (1998). Getting there (slowly). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(2), 123-146.
Frazier, L. (2001). The pronoun bias effect strikes again: A reply to Pynte and Colonna. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 30(6), 601-604.
Frazier, L., Carminati, M. N., Cook, A. E., Majewski, H., & Rayner, K. (2006). Semantic evaluation of
syntactic structure: Evidence from eye movements. Cognition, In Press, Corrected Proof.
Frazier, L., & Clifton, C. (1997). Construal - Overview, motivation, and some new evidence. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 26(3), 277-295.
Frazier, L., Clifton, C., & Randall, J. (1983). Filling gaps: Decision principles and structure in sentence
comprehension. Cognition, 13, 187-222.
Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291325.
7
Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye
movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178-210.
Frenck-Mestre, C., & Pynte, J. (1997). Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native
languages. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 119-148.
Friederici, A. D. (1995). The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based
on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language, 50, 259-281.
Friederici, A. D. (2001). Syntactic, prosodic, and semantic processes in the brain: Evidence from event-related
neuroimaging. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3), 237-250.
Friederici, A. D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 6(2), 78-84.
Friederici, A. D., & Frisch, S. (2000). Verb argument structure processing: The role of verb-specific and
argument-specific information. Journal of Memory & Language, 43(3), 476-507.
Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Temporal structure of syntactic parsing: Early and late
event-related brain potential effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &
Cognition, 22(5), 1219-1248.
Friederici, A. D., Hahne, A., & Saddy, D. (2002). Distinct neurophysiological patterns reflecting aspects of
syntactic complexity and syntactic repair. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(1), 45-63.
Friederici, A. D., & Jacobsen, T. (1999). Processing grammatical gender during language comprehension.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(5), 467-484.
Friederici, A. D., & Mecklinger, A. (1996). Syntactic parsing as revealed by brain responses: First-pass and
second-pass parsing processes. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(1), 157-176.
Friederici, A. D., Mecklinger, A., Spencer, K. M., Steinhauer, K., & Donchin, E. (2001). Syntactic parsing
preferences and their on-line revisions: A spatio-temporal analysis of event-related brain potentials.
Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 305-323.
Friederici, A. D., Meyer, M., & Yves von Cramon, D. (2000). Auditory language comprehension: An eventrelated fMRI study on the processing of syntactic and lexical information. Brain & Language, 74(2),
289-300.
Friederici, A. D., Pfeifer, E., & Hahne, A. (1993). Event-related brain potentials during natural speech
processing: Effects of semantic, morphological, and syntactic violations. Cognitive Brain Research, 1,
183-192.
Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., & Frisch, S. (1999). Lexical integration: Sequential effects of syntactic and
semantic information. Memory & Cognition, 27(3), 438-453.
Friederici, A. D., Wang, Y. H., Herrmann, C. S., Maess, B., & Oertel, U. (2000). Localization of early
syntactic processes in frontal and temporal cortical areas: A magnetoencephalographic study. Human
Brain Mapping, 11(1), 1-11.
Friederici, i. D., Steinhauer, K., Mecklinger, A., & Meyer, M. (1998). Working memory constraints on
syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses. Biological Psychology, 47,
193-221.
Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The reading span test and its predictive power for reading
comprehension ability. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 136-158.
Friedrich, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Semantic sentence processing reflected in the event-related
potentials of one- and two-year-old children. Neuroreport, 16(16), 1801-1804.
Frisch, S., Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Word category and verb-argument structure information in
the dynamics of parsing. Cognition, 91(3), 191-219.
Frisch, S., & Schlesewsky, M. (2001). The N400 reflects problems of thematic hierarchizing. Neuroreport,
12(15), 3391-3394.
Frisch, S., Schlesewsky, M., Saddy, D., & Alpermann, A. (2002). The P600 as an indicator of syntactic
ambiguity. Cognition, 85(3), B83-B92.
Frishkoff, G. A., Tucker, D. M., Davey, C., & Scherg, M. (2004). Frontal and posterior sources of eventrelated potentials in semantic comprehension. Cognitive Brain Research, 20(3), 329-354.
8
Frisson, S., Rayner, K., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). Effects of contextual predictability and transitional
probability on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, & Cognition, 31(5), 862-877.
Gennari, S. P. (2004). Temporal references and temporal relations in sentence comprehension. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30(4), 877-890.
Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68(1), 1-76.
Gibson, E., Desmet, T., Grodner, D., Watson, D., & Ko, K. (2005). Reading relative clauses in English.
Cognitive Linguistics, 16(2), 313-353.
Gibson, E., Hickok, G., & Schutze, C. T. (1994). Processing empty categories - A parallel approach. Journal
of Psycholinguistic Research, 23(5), 381-405.
Gibson, E., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (1998). Constraints on sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 2, 262-268.
Gibson, E., & Pearlmutter, N. J. (2000). Distinguishing serial and parallel parsing. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 29(2), 231-240.
Gibson, E., Schutze, C. T., & Salomon, A. (1996). The relationship between the frequency and the processing
complexity of linguistic structure. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(1), 59-92.
Gibson, E., & Thomas, J. (1999). Memory limitations and structural forgetting: The perception of complex
ungrammatical sentences as grammatical. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14(3), 225-248.
Gilboy, E., Sopena, J.-M., Cliftrn, J., Charles, & Frazier, L. (1995). Argument structure and association
preferences in Spanish and English complex NPs. Cognition, 54(2), 131-167.
Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2001). Memory interference during language processing.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27(6), 1411-1423.
Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2004). Effects of noun phrase type on sentence complexity.
Journal of Memory and Language, 51(1), 97-114.
Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Ledoux, K., & Yang, C. L. (1999). Processing of reference and the structure of
language: An analysis of complex noun phrases. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14(4), 353-379.
Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Levine, W. H. (2002). Memory-load interference in syntactic processing.
Psychological Science, 13(5), 425-430.
Gorrell, P. (1989). Establishing the loci of serial and parallel effects in syntactic processing. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 61-73.
Gorrell, P. (1996). Parsing theory and phrase-order variation in German V2 clauses. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 135-156.
Green, D. W. (1977). The immediate processing of sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
29, 135-146.
Grewe, T., Bornkessel, I., Zysset, S., Wiese, R., von Cramon, D. Y., & Schlesewsky, M. (2005). The
emergence of the unmarked: A new perspective on the language-specific function of Broca's area.
Human Brain Mapping, 26(3), 178-190.
Grodner, D., & Gibson, E. (2005). Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentenial
complexity. Cognitive Science, 29(2), 261-290.
Grodner, D., Gibson, E., Argaman, V., & Babyonyshev, M. (2003). Against repair-based reanalysis in
sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(2), 141-166.
Grodner, D., Gibson, E., & Tunstall, S. (2002). Syntactic complexity in ambiguity resolution. Journal of
Memory and Language, 46(2), 267-295.
Grodner, D., Gibson, E., & Watson, D. (2005). The influence of contextual contrast on syntactic processing:
evidence for strong-interaction in sentence comprehension. Cognition, 95(3), 275-296.
Grosjean, F. (1983). How long is the sentence? Prediction and prosody in the on-line processing of language.
Linguistics, 21, 501-529.
Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Concerning the automaticity of syntactic processing.
Psychophysiology, 36(1), 126-137.
Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Hahne, A. (1999). Brain responses during sentence reading: Visual input
affects central processes. Neuroreport, 10(15), 3175-3178.
9
Gunter, T. C., Friederici, A. D., & Schriefers, H. (2000). Syntactic gender and semantic expectancy: ERPs
reveal early autonomy and late interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 556-568.
Gunter, T. C., Stowe, L. A., & Mulder, G. (1997). When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology, 34(6),
660-676.
Haarmann, H. J., Cameron, K. A., & Ruchkin, D. S. (2002). Neural synchronization mediates on-line sentence
processing: EEG coherence evidence from filler-gap constructions. Psychophysiology, 39(6), 820-825.
Haarmann, H. J., Cameron, K. A., & Ruchkin, D. S. (2003). Short-term semantic retention during on-line
sentence comprehension. Brain potential evidence from filler-gap constructions. Cognitive Brain
Research, 15(2), 178-190.
Hagoort, P. (2003). Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of
combining syntactic and semantic violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(6), 883-899.
Hagoort, P., Brown, C., & Groothusen, J. (1993). The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of
syntactic processing. Language & Cognitive Processing, 8, 439-484.
Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Gender electrified: ERP evidence on the syntactic nature of gender
processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(6), 715-728.
Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2000). ERP effects of listening to speech compared to reading: The P600/SPS
to syntactic violations in spoken sentences and rapid serial visual presentation. Neuropsychologia, 38,
1531-1549.
Hagstrom, P., & Rhee, J. (1997). Differences between Korean and Japanese processing overload. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 189-206.
Hahne, A. (2001). What's different in second-language processing? Evidence from event-related brain
potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3), 251-266.
Hahne, A., Eckstein, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2004). Brain signatures of syntactic and semantic processes
during children's language development. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1302-1318.
Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early
automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(2), 194-205.
Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Differential task effects on semantic and syntactic processes as
revealed by ERPs. Cognitive Brain Research, 13(3), 339-356.
Hahne, A., & Jescheniak, J. D. (2001). What's left if the Jabberwock gets the semantics? An ERP
investigation into semantic and syntactic processes during auditory comprehension. Cognitive Brain
Research, 11(2), 199-212.
Hahne, A., Schroger, E., & Friederici, A. D. (2002). Segregating early physical and syntactic processes in
auditory sentence comprehension. Neuroreport, 13(3), 305-309.
Hakes, D. T. (1971). Does verb structure affect sentence comprehension? Perception and Psychophysics, 10,
229-232.
Hakes, D. T. (1972). Effects of reducing complement constructions on sentence comprehension. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 278-286.
Hakes, D. T., & Cairns, H. S. (1970). Sentence comprehension and relative pronouns. Perception and
Psychophysics, 8, 5-8.
Hakes, D. T., Evans, J. S., & Brannon, L. L. (1976). Understanding sentences with relative clauses. Memory
and Cognition, 4, 283-290.
Hakes, D. T., & Foss, D. J. (1970). Decision processes during sentence comprehension: Effects of surface
structure reconsidered. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, 413-416.
Hald, L. A., Bastiaansen, M. C. M., & Hagoort, P. (2006). EEG theta and gamma responses to semantic
violations in online sentence processing. Brain & Language, 96(1), 90-105.
Hanley, J. R. (1987). Semantic heuristics, syntactic analysis, and case-role assignment. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 329-334.
Hanna, J. E., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Trueswell, J. C. (2003). The effects of common ground and perspective on
domains of referential interpretation. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 43-61.
Hare, M., McRae, K., & Elman, J. L. (2003). Sense and structure: Meaning as a determinant of verb
subcategorization preferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 281-303.
10
Hare, M., McRae, K., & Elman, J. L. (2004). Admitting that admitting verb sense into corpus analyses makes
sense. Language & Cognitive Processes, 19(2), 181-224.
Hasegawa, M., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (2002). An fMRI study of bilingual sentence comprehension
and workload. Neuroimage, 15(3), 647-660.
Hayashi, R., Imaizumi, S., Mori, K., Niimi, S., Ueno, S., & Kiritani, S. (2001). Elicitation of N400m in
sentence comprehension due to lexical prosody incongruity. Neuroreport, 12(8), 1753-1756.
Herriot, P. (1968). The comprehension of sentences as a function of grammatical depth and order. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 7, 938-941.
Hirose, Y. (2002). Resolution of reanalysis ambiguity in Japanese relative clauses: Early use of thematic
compatibility information and incremental processing. In M. Nakayame (Ed.), Sentence processing in
East Asian Languages (pp. 31-52). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Hirose, Y. (2003). Recycling prosodic boundaries. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(2), 167-195.
Hirose, Y., & Chun, S. A. (1999). Attachment ambiguity in head final languages. Japanese and Korean
Linguistics, 7.
Hirose, Y., & Inoue, A. (1998). Ambiguity of reanalysis in parsing complex sentences in Japanese. Syntax and
Semantics, 31, 71-93.
Hoeks, J. C. J., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2002). Processing coordinated structures in context: The effect of
topic-structure on ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(1), 99-119.
Hoen, M., & Dominey, P. F. (2000). ERP analysis of cognitive sequencing: a left anterior negativity related to
structural transformation processing. Neuroreport, 11(14), 3187-3191.
Holmes, V. M. (1973). Order of main and subordinate clauses in sentence perception. Journal of Verbal
Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12(3), 285-293.
Holmes, V. M. (1979). Some hypotheses about syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. In W. E.
Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence processing (pp. 227-247). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Holmes, V. M. (1984). Parsing strategies and discourse context. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13,
237-257.
Holmes, V. M., & Forster, K. I. (1972). Perceptual complexity and underlying sentence structure. Journal of
Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11(2), 148-156.
Holmes, V. M., Kennedy, A., & Murray, W. S. (1987). Syntactic structure and the garden path. Quarterly
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 277-293.
Holmes, V. M., Stowe, L., & Cupples, L. (1989). Lexical expectations in parsing complement-verb sentences.
Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 668-689.
Homae, F., Hashimoto, R., Nakajima, K., Miyashita, Y., & Sakai, K. L. (2002). From perception to sentence
comprehension: The convergence auditory and visual information of language in the left inferior
frontal cortex. Neuroimage, 16(4), 883-900.
Homae, F., Yahata, N., & Sakai, K. L. (2003). Selective enhancement of functional connectivity in the left
prefrontal cortex during sentence processing. Neuroimage, 20(1), 578-586.
Hoover, M. L. (1992). Sentence processing strategies in Spanish and English. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 21, 275-300.
Hopf, J. M., Bader, M., Meng, M., & Bayer, J. (2003). Is human sentence parsing serial or parallel? Evidence
from event-related brain potentials. Cognitive Brain Research, 15(2), 165-177.
Hopf, J.-M., Bayer, J., Bader, M., & Meng, M. (1998). Event-related brain potentials and case information in
syntactic ambiguities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(2), Mar 1998, 1264-1280.
Hsiao, F., & Gibson, E. (2003). Processing relative clauses in Chinese. Cognition, 90(1), 3-27.
Humphries, C., Love, T., Swinney, D., & Hickok, G. (2005). Response of anterior temporal cortex to
syntactic and prosodic manipulations during sentence processing. Human Brain Mapping, 26(2), 128138.
Humphries, C., Willard, K., Buchsbaum, B., & Hickok, G. (2001). Role of anterior temporal cortex in
auditory sentence comprehension: An fMRI study. Neuroreport, 12(8), 1749-1752.
Hyona, J., & Hujanen, H. (1997). Effects of case marking and word order on sentence parsing in Finnish: An
eye fixation analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 841-858.
11
Igoa, J. M., Carreiras, M., & Meseguer, E. (1998). A study on late closure in Spanish: Principle-grounded vs.
frequency-based accounts of attachment preferences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
51A, 561-592.
Indefrey, P., Hagoort, P., Herzog, H., Seitz, R. J., & Brown, C. M. (2001). Syntactic processing in left
prefrontal cortex is independent of lexical meaning. Neuroimage, 14(3), 546-555.
Inui, T., Otsu, Y., Tanaka, S., Okada, T., Nishizawa, S., & Konishi, J. (1998). A functional MRI analysis of
comprehension processes of Japanese sentences. Neuroreport, 9, 3325-3328.
Isel, F., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Influence of prosodic information on the processing of split
particles: ERP evidence from spoken German. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(1), 154-167.
Jennings, F., Randall, B., & Tyler, L. K. (1997). Graded effects of verb subcategory preferences on parsing:
Support for constraint-satisfaction models. Language & Cognitive Processes, 12(4), 485-504.
Jescheniak, J. D., Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (1998). Brain activity patterns suggest prosodic influences on
syntactic parsing in the comprehension of spoken sentences. Music Perception, 16, 55-62.
Johnson, B. W., & Hamm, J. P. (2000). High-density mapping in an N400 paradigm: evidence for bilateral
temporal lobe generators. Clinical Neurophysiology, 111(3), 532-545.
Juffs, A. (1998). Some effects of first language argument structure and morphosyntax on second language
sentence processing. Second Language Research, 14(4), 406-424.
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1995). Parsing effects in second language sentence processing: Subject and
object asymmetries in "Wh"-extraction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(4), 483-516.
Juffs, A., & Harrington, M. (1996). Garden path sentences and error data in second language sentence
processing. Language Learning, 46(2), 283-326.
Jun, S. A. (2003). Prosodic phrasing and attachment preferences. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(2),
219-249.
Jurafsky, D. (1996). A probabilistic model of lexical and syntactic access and disambiguation. Cognitive
Science, 20, 137-194.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in
working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122-149.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Keller, T. A. (1996). The capacity theory of comprehension: New frontiers of
evidence and arguments. 103, 773-780.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., Keller, T. A., Eddy, W. F., & Thulborn, K. R. (1996). Brain activation
modulated by sentence comprehension. Science, 274, 114-116.
Just, M. A., Cherkassky, V. L., Keller, T. A., & Minshew, N. J. (2004). Cortical activation and
synchronization during sentence comprehension in high-functioning autism: evidence of
underconnectivity. Brain, 127(Part 8), 1811-1821.
Just, M. A., Newman, S. D., Keller, T. A., McEleney, A., & Carpenter, P. A. (2004). Imagery in sentence
comprehension: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 21(1), 112-124.
Kaan, E. (2001). Effects of NP type on the resolution of word-order ambiguities. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 30(5), 529-547.
Kaan, E. (2002). Investigating the effects of distance and number interference in processing subject-verb
dependencies: An ERP study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(2), 165-193.
Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration
difficulty. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15(2), 159-201.
Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003a). Electrophysiological evidence for serial sentence processing: a comparison
between non-preferred and ungrammatical continuations. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(3), 621-635.
Kaan, E., & Swaab, T. Y. (2003b). Repair, revision, and complexity in syntactic analysis: An
electrophysiological differentiation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(1), 98-110.
Kaan, E., Wijnen, F., & Swaab, T. Y. (2004). Gapping: Electrophysiological evidence for immediate
processing of "missing" verbs in sentence comprehension. Brain & Language, 89(3), 584-592.
Kaiser, E., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order
language. Cognition, 94(2), 113-147.
12
Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental
sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language,
49(1), 133-156.
Kamide, Y., & Mitchell, D. C. (1997). Relative clause attachment: Non-determinism in Japanese parsing.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 247-254.
Kamide, Y., & Mitchell, D. C. (1999). Incremental pre-head attachment in Japanese parsing. Language &
Cognitive Processes, 14, 631-662.
Kamide, Y., Scheepers, C., & Altmann, G. T. M. (2003). Integration of syntactic and semantic information in
predictive processing: Cross-linguistic evidence from German and English. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), 37-55.
Kang, A. M., Constable, R. T., Gore, J. C., & Avrutin, S. (1999). An event-related fMRI study of implicit
phrase-level syntactic and semantic processing. Neuroimage, 10(5), 555-561.
Kaschak, M. P., & Glenberg, A. M. (2000). Constructing meaning: The role of affordances and grammatical
constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 43(3), 508-529.
Kaschak, M. P., Madden, C. J., Therriault, D. J., Yaxley, R. H., Aveyard, M., Blanchard, A. A., et al. (2005).
Perception of motion affects language processing. Cognition, 94(3), B79-B89.
Katayama, J., Miyata, Y., & Yagi, A. (1987). Sentence verification and event-related brain potentials.
Biological Psychology, 25, 173-185.
Keller, T. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (2001). The neural bases of sentence comprehension: A fMRI
examination of syntactic and lexical processing. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 223-237.
Kemmer, L., Coulson, S., De Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M. (2004). Syntactic processing with aging: An eventrelated potential study. Psychophysiology, 41(3), 372-384.
Kennedy, A., & Murray, W. S. (1984). Inspection times for words in syntactically ambiguous sentence under
three presentation conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 10, 833-849.
Kennedy, A., Murray, W. S., Jennings, F., & Reid, C. (1989). Parsing complements: Comments on the
generality of the principle of minimal attachment. Language & Cognitive Processes, 4(SI51-SI76).
Kennison, S. M. (1999). American English usage frequencies for noun phrase and tensed sentence
complement-taking verbs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(2), 165-177.
Kennison, S. M. (2000). Two assessments of American usage frequencies for ninety-seven sentence
complement-taking nouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(3), 249-264.
Kennison, S. M. (2001). Limitations on the use of verb information during sentence comprehension.
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(1), 132-138.
Kennison, S. M. (2002). Comprehending noun phrase arguments and adjuncts. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 31(1), 65-81.
Kennison, S. M. (2003). Comprehending the pronouns her, him, and his: Implications for theories of
referential processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(3), 335-352.
Kennison, S. M. (2005). Different time courses of integrative semantic processing for plural and singular
nouns: implications for theories of sentence processing. Cognition, 97(3), 269-294.
Kiehl, K. A., Laurens, K. R., & Liddle, P. F. (2002). Reading anomalous sentences: An event-related fMRI
study of semantic processing. Neuroimage, 17(2), 842-850.
Kim, A., & Osterhout, L. (2005). The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from
event-related potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 205-225.
Kimball, J. P. (1973). Seven principles of surface structure parsing in natural language. Cognition, 2, 15-47.
King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1995). Who did what and when? Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor
working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7, 376-395.
Kjelgaard, M. M., & Speer, S. R. (1999). Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary
syntactic closure ambiguity. Journal of Memory & Language, 40(2), 153-194.
Klin, C. M., Guzman, A. E., Weingartner, K. M., & Ralano, A. S. (2006). When anaphor resolution fails:
Partial encoding of anaphoric inferences. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(1), 131-143.
13
Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993a). Bridging the gap: Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded
dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 196-214.
Kluender, R., & Kutas, M. (1993b). Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive
Processes, 8, 573-633.
Knoeferle, P., Crocker, M. W., Scheepers, C., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). The influence of the immediate
visual context on incremental thematic role-assignment: evidence from eye-movements in depicted
events. Cognition, 95(1), 95-127.
Knosche, T. R., Maess, B., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Processing of syntactic information monitored by brain
surface current density mapping based on MEG. Brain Topography, 12(2), 75-87.
Koenig, J.-P., Mauner, G., & Bienvenue, B. (2003). Arguments for adjuncts. Cognition, 89(2), 67-103.
Koh, S. (1997). The resolution of the dative NP ambiguity in Korean. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,
26, 265-273.
Kolk, H. H. J., Chwilla, D. J., van Herten, M., & Oor, P. J. W. (2003). Structure and limited capacity in verbal
working memory: A study with event-related potentials. Brain & Language, 85(1), 1-36.
Konieczny, L. (2000). Locality and parsing complexity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(6), 627645.
Konieczny, L., Hemforth, B., Scheepers, C., & Strube, G. (1997). The role of lexical heads in parsing:
Evidence from German. Language & Cognitive Processes, 12(2-3), 307-348.
Koornneef, A. W., & Van Berkum, J. J. A. (2006). On the use of verb-based implicit causality in sentence
comprehension: Evidence from self-paced reading and eye tracking. Journal of Memory and
Language, In Press, Corrected Proof.
Kraljic, T., & Brennan, S. E. (2005). Prosodic disambiguation of syntactic structure: For the speaker or for the
addressee? Cognitive Psychology, 50(2), 194-231.
Kuperberg, G. R., McGuire, P. K., Bullmore, E. T., Brammer, M. J., Rabe-Hesketh, S., Wright, I. C., et al.
(2000). Common and distinct neural substrates for pragmatic, semantic, and syntactic processing of
spoken sentences: An fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 321-341.
Kuperberg, G. R., Sitnikova, T., Caplan, D., & Holcomb, P. J. (2003). Electrophysiological distinctions in
processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(1), 117129.
Kurtzman, H. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (1993). Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities. Cognition, 48,
243-279.
Kutas, M. (1997). Views on how the electrical activity that the brain generates reflects the functions of
different language systems. Psychophysiology, 34, 383-398.
Kutas, M., & Kluender, R. (1991). What is who violating? A reconsideration of linguistic violations in light of
event-related potentials. CRL Newsletter, 6, 3-19.
Langford, J., & Holmes, V. M. (1979). Syntactic presupposition in sentence comprehension. Cognition, 7,
363-383.
Lapata, M., Keller, F., & Walde, S. S. I. (2001). Verb frame frequency as a predictor of verb bias. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 30(4), 419-435.
Lau, E. F., & Ferreira, F. (2005). Lingering effects of disfluent material on comprehension of garden path
sentences. Language & Cognitive Processes, 20(5), 633-666.
Lee, M. W. (2004). Another look at the role of empty categories in sentence processing (and grammar).
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(1), 51-73.
Lehiste, I. (1973). Phonetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity. Glossa, 7, 107-122.
Lelekov, T., Dominey, P. F., & Garcia-Larrea, L. (2000). Dissociable ERP profiles for processing rules vs
instances in a cognitive sequencing task. Neuroreport, 11(5), 1129-1132.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1978). A survey of studies in sentence perception: 1970-1976. In W. J. M. Levelt & G. B.
Flores_d'Arcais (Eds.), Studies in the perception of language (pp. 1-74). New York: John Wiley &
Sons.
Lewis, R. L., & Vasishth, S. (2005). An activation-based model of sentence processing as skilled memory
retrieval [Review]. Cognitive Science, 29(3), 375-419.
14
Li, P., Bates, E., & Liu, H. (1992). Cues as functional constraints on sentence processing in Chinese. In H. C.
Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 207-234): Elsevier.
Li, P., Bates, E., & MacWhinney, B. (1993). Processing a language without inflections: A reaction time study
of sentence interpretation in Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 169-192.
Limber, J. (1976). Syntax and sentence interpretation. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New approaches to
language mechanisms (pp. 151-181). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Lipka, S. (2002). Reading sentences with a late closure ambiguity: Does semantic information help?
Language & Cognitive Processes, 17(3), 271-298.
Liversedge, S. P., Paterson, K. B., & Clayes, E. L. (2002). The influence of only on syntactic processing of
"long" relative clause sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A, 55, 225-240.
Liversedge, S. P., Pickering, M. J., Branigan, H. P., & van Gompel, R. P. G. (1998). Processing arguments
and adjuncts in isolation and context: The case of by-phrase ambiguities in passives. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24(2), Mar 1998, 1461-1475.
Liversedge, S. P., Pickering, M. J., Clayes, E. L., & Branigan, H. P. (2003). Thematic processing of adjuncts:
Evidence from an eye-tracking experiment. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(3), 667-675.
Lonzi, L., & Zanobio, M. E. (1983). Syntactic component in language responsible cognitive structure:
Neurological evidence. Brain and Language, 18, 177-191.
Love, T., & Swinney, D. (1996). Co-reference processing and levels of analysis in object-relative
constructions: Demonstration of antecedent reactivation with the cross-modal priming paradigm.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 5-24.
Luka, B. J., & Barsalou, L. W. (2005). Structural facilitation: Mere exposure effects for grammatical
acceptability as evidence for syntactic priming in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language,
52(3), 436-459.
Luke, K.-K., Liu, H.-L., Wai, Y.-Y., Wan, Y.-L., & Tan, L. H. (2002). Functional anatomy of syntactic and
semantic processing in language comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 16, 133-145.
MacDonald, M. C. (1993). The interaction of lexical and semantic ambiguity. Journal of Memory and
Language, 32, 692-715.
MacDonald, M. C. (1997). Lexical representations and sentence processing: An introduction. Language &
Cognitive Processes, 12(2-3), 121-136.
MacDonald, M. C., & Christiansen, M. H. (2002). Reassessing working memory: Comment on Just and
Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996) [Review]. Psychological Review, 109(1), 35-54.
MacDonald, M. C., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing
syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 56-98.
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994a). The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity
resolution. Psychological Review, 101, 676-703.
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994b). Syntactic ambiguity resolution as lexical
ambiguity resolution. In J. C. Clifton, L. Frazier & K. Rayner (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence
processing (pp. 123-153). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
MacWhinney, B. (1988). The processing of restrictive relative clauses in Hungarian. Cognition, 29, 95-141.
Mak, W. M., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2002). The influence of animacy on relative clause processing.
Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 50-68.
Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Tyler, L. K., Warren, P., Grenier, P., & Lee, C. S. (1992). Prosodic effects in
minimal attachment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 73-88.
Martin-Loeches, M., Casado, P., Hinojosa, J. A., Carretie, L., Munoz, F., & Pozo, M. A. (2005). Higher-order
activity beyond the word level: Cortical dynamics of simple transitive sentence comprehension. Brain
& Language, 92(3), 332-348.
Martin-Loeches, M., Munoz, F., Casado, P., Melcon, A., & Ferstl, E. C. (2004). Are the anterior negativities
to grammatical violations indexing working memory? Psychophysiology, 42, 508-519.
Mason, R. A., Just, M. A., Keller, T. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (2003). Ambiguity in the brain: What brain
imaging reveals about the processing of syntactically ambiguous sentences. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29(6), 1319-1338.
15
Matzke, M., Mai, H., Nager, W., Russeler, J., & Munte, T. (2002). The costs of freedom: an ERP - study of
non-canonical sentences. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(6), 844-852.
Mauner, G., & Koenig, J. P. (2000). Linguistic vs. conceptual sources of implicit agents in sentence
comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 43(1), 110-134.
Mauner, G., Melinger, A., Koenig, J.-P., & Bienvenue, B. (2002). When is schematic participant information
encoded? Evidence from eye-monitoring. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(3), 386-406.
Mauner, G., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Carlson, G. N. (1995). Implicit arguments in sentence processing. Journal
of Memory and Language, 34, 357-382.
Mazuka, R. (1991). Processing of empty categories in Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20,
215-232.
Mazuka, R., & Itoh, K. (1995). Can Japanese speakers be led down the garden path? In R. M. N. Nagai (Ed.),
Japanese sentence processing (pp. 295-329). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, Assoc.
Mazuka, R., Itoh, K., & Kondo, T. (1997). Processing down the garden path in Japanese: Processing of
sentences with lexical homonyms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 207-228.
McClelland, J. L. (1987). The case for interactionism in language processing. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention
and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 3-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
McDonald, J. L. (1987). Assigning linguistic roles: The influence of conflicting cues. Journal of Memory and
Language, 26, 100-117.
McElree, B. (1993). The locus of lexical preference effects in sentence comprehension: A time-course
analysis. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 536-?
McElree, B. (2000). Sentence comprehension is mediated by content-addressable memory structures. Journal
of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(2), 111-123.
McElree, B., Foraker, S., & Dyer, L. (2003). Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension.
Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 67-91.
McElree, B., & Griffith, T. (1995). Syntactic and thematic processing in sentence comprehension: Evidence
for a temporal dissociation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition,
21, 134-157.
McElree, B., & Griffith, T. (1998). Structural and lexical constraints on filling gaps during sentence
comprehension: A time-course analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &
Cognition, 24(2), Mar 1998, 1432-1460.
McElree, B., Traxler, M. J., Pickering, M. J., Seely, R. E., & Jackendoff, R. (2000). Reading time evidence
for enriched composition. Cognition, 78, B17-B25.
McKinnon, R., & Osterhout, L. (1996). Constraints on movement phenomena in sentence processing:
Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Language & Cognitive Processes, 11(5), 495-523.
McKoon, G., & Macfarland, T. (2002). Event templates in the lexical representations of verbs. Cognitive
Psychology, 45(1), 1-44.
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1994). Sentential context and on-line lexical decision. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1239-1243.
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (1998). Memory-based language processing: Psycholinguistic research in the
1990s. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 25-42.
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (2003). Meaning through syntax: Language comprehension and the reduced
relative clause construction. Psychological Review, 110(3), 490-525.
McKoon, G., & Ratcliff, R. (2005). "Meaning through syntax" in sentence production and comprehension:
Reply to McRae et al. (2005). Psychological Review, 112(4), 1032-1039.
McRae, K., Ferretti, T. R., & Amyote, L. (1997). Thematic roles as verb-specific concepts. Language &
Cognitive Processes, 12(2-3), 137-176.
McRae, K., Hare, M., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2005). Meaning through syntax is insufficient to explain
comprehension of sentences with reduced relative clauses: Comment on McKoon and Ratcliff (2003).
Psychological Review, 112(4), 1022-1031.
16
McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and
other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 38(3), 283312.
Mecklinger, A., Schriefers, H., Steinhauer, K., & Friederich, A. D. (1995). Processing relative clauses varying
on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory and
Cognition, 23, 477-494.
Mehler, J., & Carey, P. (1967). Role of surface and base structure in the perception of sentences. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 335-338.
Mehler, J., Segui, J., Pittet, M., & Barriere, M. (1978). Strategies for sentence perception. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 7, 3-16.
Meng, M., & Bader, M. (2000a). Mode of disambiguation and garden-path strength: An investigation of
subject-object ambiguities in German. Language & Speech, 43(Part 1), 43-74.
Meng, M., & Bader, M. (2000b). Ungrammaticality detection and garden path strength: Evidence for serial
parsing. Language & Cognitive Processes, 15(6), 615-666.
Merlo, P. (1994). A corpus-based analysis of verb continuation frequencies for syntactic processing. Journal
of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 435-457.
Meseguer, E., Carreiras, M., & Jr, C. C. (2002). Overt reanalysis strategies and eye movements during the
reading of mild garden path sentences. Memory & Cognition, 30, 551-561.
Metzing, C., & Brennan, S. E. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects on the
comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(2), 201-213.
Meyer, M., Alter, K., Friederici, A. D., Lohmann, G., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2002). FMRI reveals brain
regions mediating slow prosodic modulations in spoken sentences. Human Brain Mapping, 17(2), 7388.
Meyer, M., Alter, K., Friederici, A. D., & von_Cramen, D. Y. (2000). Different hemodynamic responses to
sentence-level syntactic and prosodic processing. Neuroimage, 11, 281.
Meyer, M., Friederici, A. D., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2000). Neurocognition of auditory sentence
comprehension: Event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands.
Cognitive Brain Research, 9(1), 19-33.
Meyer, M., Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., Friederici, A. D., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2004). Brain activity varies
with modulation of dynamic pitch variance in sentence melody. Brain & Language, 89(2), 277-289.
Michael, E. B., Keller, T. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (2001). fMRI investigation of sentence
comprehension by eye and by ear: Modality fingerprints on cognitive processes. Human Brain
Mapping, 13(4), 239-252.
Miller, G. A. (1962). Some psychological studies of grammar. American Psychologist, 17, 748-762.
Miller, J. R. (1981). Effects of semantic and syntactic focus on text production and comprehension.
Millis, K. K., & Just, M. A. (1994). The influence of connectives on sentence comprehension. Journal of
Memory and Language, 33, 128-147.
Milsark, G. L. (1983). On length and structure in sentence parsing. Cognition, 13, 129-134.
Misono, Y., Mazuka, R., Kondo, T., & Kiritani, S. (1997). Effects and limitations of prosodic and semantic
biases on syntactic disambiguation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(2), 229-245.
Mitchell, D. C. (1984). An evaluation of subject-paced reading tasks and other methods for investigating
immediate processes in reading. In D. E. Kieras & M. Just (Eds.), New methods in reading
comprehension research (pp. 69-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mitchell, D. C. (1987). Reading and syntactic analysis. In J. R. B. A. M. Colley (Ed.), Cognitive approaches
to reading (pp. 87-112). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Mitchell, D. C., & Corley, M. M. B. (1994). Immediate biases in parsing: Discourse effects of experimental
artifacts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 217-222.
Mitchell, D. C., Corley, M. M. B., & Garnham, A. (1992). Effects of context in human sentence parsing:
Evidence against a discourse-based proposal mechanism. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 69-88.
17
Mitchell, D. C., Cuetos, F., Corley, M. M. B., & Brysbaert, M. (1995). Exposure-based models of human
parsing: Evidence for the use of coarse-grained (nonlexical) statistical records. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 469-488.
Mitchell, D. C., & Holmes, V. M. (1985). The role of specific information about the verb in parsing sentences
with local structural ambiguity. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 542-559.
Miyake, A., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1994). A capacity approach to syntactic comprehension
disorders: Making normal adults perform like aphasic patients. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11, 671717.
Miyamoto, E. T. (2002). Case markers as clause boundary inducers in Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 31, 307-347.
Miyamoto, E. T., Gibson, E., Pearlmutter, N. J., Aikawa, T., & Miyagawa, S. (1999). A U-shaped relative
clause attachment preference in Japanese.
Miyamoto, E. T., & Takahashi, S. (2001). Sources of difficulty in processing scrambling in Japanese. In M.
Nakayama (Ed.), Sentence processing in East-Asian languages (pp. in press?). Palo Alto, CA: CSLI
Publications.
Mo, L., Liu, H. L., Jin, H., & Yang, Y. L. (2005). Brain activation during semantic judgment of Chinese
sentences: A functional MRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 24(4), 305-312.
Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2005). Processing semantic anomalies in two languages: an electrophysiological
exploration in both languages of Spanish-English bilinguals. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(2), 205220.
Moro, A., Tettamanti, M., Perani, D., Donati, C., Cappa, S. F., & Fazio, F. (2001). Syntax and the brain:
Disentangling grammar by selective anomalies. Neuroimage, 13(1), 110-118.
Morris, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2005). Event-related potentials to violations of inflectional verb morphology in
English. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(3), 963-981.
Muller, H. M., King, J. W., & Kutas, M. (1997). Event-related potentials elicited by spoken relative clauses.
Cognitive Brain Research, 5(3), 193-203.
Muller, J. L., Hahne, A., Fujjj, Y., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Native and nonnative speakers' processing of a
miniature version of Japanese as revealed by ERPs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(8), 12291244.
Muller, R.-A., Rothermel, R. D., Behen, M. E., Muzik, O., Mangner, T. J., & Chugani, H. T. (1997).
Receptive and expressive language activations for sentences: A PET study. NeuroReport, 8, 37673770.
Munte, T. F., Anvari, E., Matzke, M., & Johannes, S. (1995). Brain potential correlates of number errors in
the Turkish language. Neuroscience Letters, 199(1), 57-60.
Munte, T. F., Heinze, H.-J., & Mangun, G. R. (1993). Dissociation of brain activity related to syntactic and
semantic aspects of language. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 335-344.
Munte, T. F., Heinze, H.-J., Matzke, M., Wieringa, B. M., & Johannes, S. (1998). Brain potentials and
syntactic violations revisited: No evidence for specificity of the syntactic positive shift.
Neuropsychologia, 36(3), 217-226.
Munte, T. F., Matzke, M., & Johannes, S. (1997). Brain activity associated with syntactic incongruities in
words and pseudo-words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 318-329.
Munte, T. F., Schiltz, K., & Kutas, M. (1998). When temporal terms belie conceptual order. Nature, 395, 7173.
Munte, T. F., Szentkuti, A., Wieringa, B. M., Matzke, M., & Johannes, S. (1997). Human brain potentials to
reading syntactic errors in sentences of different complexity. Neuroscience Letters, 235(3), 105-108.
Nagata, H. (1990). Speaker's sensitivity to rule violations in sentences. Psychologia: an International Journal
of Psychology in the Orient, 33(3), Sep 1990, 1179-1184.
Nagata, H. (1991). On-line judgments of grammaticality of sentences involving rule violations. Psychologia:
an International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 34(3), Sep 1991, 1171-1176.
Nagata, H. (1991). Temporal course of activation of the antecedent by the reflexive in syntactically
ambiguous sentences in Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 501-520.
18
Nagata, H. (1993). Unimmediate construction of syntactic structure for garden path sentences in Japanese.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, 365-382.
Nagata, H. (1997). Anchoring effects in judging grammaticality of sentences violating the subjacency
condition. Psychologia, 40(3), 163-171.
Nagata, H. (2003). Judgments of grammaticality of Japanese sentences violating the principle of full
interpretation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(6), 693-709.
Nagel, H. N., Shapiro, L. P., & Nawy, R. (1994). Prosody and the processing of filler-gap sentences. Journal
of Psycholinguistic Research, 23, 473-485.
Nagel, H. N., Shapiro, L. P., Tuller, B., & Nawy, R. (1996). Prosodic influences on the resolution of
temporary ambiguity during on-line sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(2),
319-344.
Nakai, T., Matsuo, K., Kato, C., Matsuzawa, M., Okada, T., Glover, G. H., et al. (1999). A functional
magnetic resonance imaging study of listening comprehension of languages in human at 3 tesla:
Comprehension level and activation of the language areas. Neuroscience Letters, 263(1), 33-36.
Nakano, Y., Felser, C., & Clahsen, H. (2002). Antecedent priming at trace positions in Japanese long-distance
scrambling. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31(5), 531-571.
Nakayama, M. (1999). Sentence processing. In N. Tsujimura (Ed.), The handbook of Japanese linguistics (pp.
398-424). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Neville, H., Nicol, J. L., Barss, A., Forster, K. I., & Garrett, M. F. (1991). Syntactically based sentence
processing classes: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,
3, 151-165.
Newman, A. J., Pancheva, R., Ozawa, K., Neville, H. J., & Ullman, M. T. (2001). An event-related fMRI
study of syntactic and semantic violations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3), 339-364.
Ni, W., Constable, R. T., Mencl, W. E., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Shaywitz, S. E., et al. (2000). An eventrelated neuroimaging study distinguishing form and content in sentence processing. Journal of
Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(1), 120-133.
Ni, W., Fodor, J. D., Crain, S., & Shankweiler, D. (1998). Anomaly detection: Eye movement patterns.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27(5), Sep 1998, 1515-1539.
Nicol, J. L. (1996). What can prosody tell a parser? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(2), 179-192.
Nicol, J. L., Fodor, J. D., & Swinney, D. (1994). Using cross-modal lexical decision tasks to investigate
sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20,
1229-1238.
Noguchi, Y., Takeuchi, T., & Sakai, K. L. (2002). Lateralized activation in the inferior frontal cortex during
syntactic processing: Event-related optical topography study. Human Brain Mapping, 17(2), 89-99.
Noppeney, U., & Price, C. J. (2004). An fMRI study of syntactic adaptation. Journal of Cognitive
Neuroscience, 16(4), 702-713.
Nordlie, J., Dopkins, S., & Johnson, M. (2001). Words in a sentence become less accessible when an anaphor
is resolved. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 355-362.
Oberecker, R., Friedrich, M., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Neural correlates of syntactic processing in twoyear-olds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(10), 1667-1678.
Osterhout, L. (1997). On the brain response to syntactic anomalies: Manipulations of word position and word
class reveal individual differences. Brain & Language, 59(3), 494-522.
Osterhout, L., & Hagoort, P. (1999). A superficial resemblance does not necessarily mean you are part of the
family: Counterarguments to Coulson, King and Kutas (1998) in the P600/SPS-P300 debate.
Language & Cognitive Processes, 14(1), 1-14.
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992). Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal
of Memory and Language, 31, 785-806.
Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P. J., & Swinney, D. A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences:
Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 786-803.
19
Osterhout, L., McKinnon, R., Bersick, M., & Corey, V. (1996). On the language specificity of the brain
response to syntactic anomalies: Is the syntactic positive shift a member of the P300 family. Journal of
Cognitive Neuroscience, 8(6), 507-526.
Osterhout, L., & Mobley, L. A. (1995). Event-related brain potentials elicited by failure to agree. Journal of
Memory and Language, 34, 739-773.
Osterhout, L., & Nicol, J. (1999). On the distinctiveness, independence, and time course of the brain
responses to syntactic and semantic anomalies. Language & Cognitive Processes, 14(3), 283-317.
Ostrosky-Solis, F., Rigalt, C., Perez, M., & Marcos, J. (1996). Brain potentials (ERPs) and syntactic
comprehension: Effects of thematic role order. Brain and Cognition, 30, 297-300.
Palladino, P., Cornoldi, C., De Beni, R., & Pazzaglia, F. (2001). Working memory and updating processes in
reading comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29(2), 344-354.
Pannekamp, A., Toepel, U., Alter, K., Hahne, A., & Friederici, A. D. (2005). Prosody-driven sentence
processing: An event-related brain potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(3), 407-421.
Patel, A. D. (1998). Syntactic processing in language and music: Different cognitive operations, similar neural
resources? Music Perception, 16(1), 27-42.
Patel, A. D., Gibson, E., Ratner, J., Besson, M., & Holcomb, P. J. (1998). Processing syntactic relations in
language and music: An event-related potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(6), 717733.
Paterson, K. B., Liversedge, S. P., & Underwood, G. (1999). The influence of focus operators on syntactic
processing of short relative clause sentences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,
52A(Human Experimental Psychology), 717-737.
Pearlmutter, N. J. (2000). Linear versus hierarchical agreement feature processing in comprehension. Journal
of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(1), 89-98.
Pearlmutter, N. J., Garnsey, S. M., & Bock, K. (1999). Agreement processes in sentence comprehension.
Journal of Memory & Language, 41(3), 427-456.
Pearlmutter, N. J., & Gibson, E. (2001). Recency in verb phrase attachment. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27(2), 574-590.
Pearlmutter, N. J., & Macdonald, M. C. (1995). Individual differences and probabilistic constraints in
syntactic ambiguity resolution. 34, 521-542.
Schafer, A., Carter, J., Clifton, C., & Frazier, L. (1996). Focus in relative clause construal. Language &
Cognitive Processes, 11(1-2), 135-163.
Schafer, A. J., Speer, S. R., Warren, P., & White, S. D. (2000). Intonational disambiguation in sentence
production and comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(2), 169-182.
Schiller, N. O., Munte, T. F., Horemans, I., & Jansma, B. M. (2003). The influence of semantic and
phonological factors on syntactic decisions: An event-related brain potential study. Psychophysiology,
40(6), 869-877.
Schlesewsky, M., & Bornkessel, I. (2003). Ungrammaticality detection and garden path strength: A
commentary on Meng and Bader's (2000) evidence for serial parsing. Language & Cognitive
Processes, 18(3), 299-311.
Schlesewsky, M., Bornkessel, I., & Meyer, M. (2002). Why a "word order difference" is not always a "word
order" difference: A reply to Weyerts, Penke, Munte, Heinze, and Clahsen. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 31(5), 437-445.
Schlosser, M. J., Aoyagi, N., Fulbright, R. K., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1998). Functional MRI studies of
auditory comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 6(1), 1-13.
Schmauder, A. R., & Egan, M. C. (1998). The influence of semantic fit on on-line sentence processing.
Memory & Cognition, 26(6), 1304-1312.
Schmauder, A. R., Kennision, S. M., & C. Clifton, J. (1991). On the conditions necessary for obtaining
argument structure complexity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition, 17, 1188-1192.
Schneider, D., & Phillips, C. (2001). Grammatical search and reanalysis. Journal of Memory & Language,
45(2), 308-336.
20
Scholes, R. J. (1971). On the spoken disambiguation of superficially ambiguous sentences. Language and
Speech, 14, 1-11.
Schriefers, H., Friederici, A. D., & Kuhn, K. (1995). The processing of locally ambiguous relative clauses in
German. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 499-520.
Schutze, C. T., & Gibson, E. (1999). Argumenthood and English prepositional phrase attachment. Journal of
Memory & Language, 40(3), 409-431.
Sedivy, J. C. (2002). Invoking discourse-based contrast sets and resolving syntactic ambiguities. Journal of
Memory & Language, 46(2), 341-370.
Sedivy, J. C. (2003). Pragmatic versus form-based accounts of referential contrast: Evidence for effects of
informativity expectations. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(1), 3-23.
Sedivy, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., Chambers, C. G., & Carlson, G. N. (1999). Achieving incremental semantic
interpretation through contextual representation. Cognition, 71(2), 109-147.
Seidenberg, M. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (1999). A probabilistic constraints approach to language acquisition
and processing. Cognitive Science, 23(4), 569-588.
Shapiro, L. P. (2000). Charting the time-course of language processing. Brain & Language, 71(1), 224-226.
Shapiro, L. P., Brookins, B., Gordon, B., & Nagel, N. (1991). Verb effects during sentence processing.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 17, 983-996.
Shapiro, L. P., & Hestvik, A. (1995). On-line comprehension of VP-ellipsis: Syntactic reconstruction and
semantic influence. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 517-532.
Shapiro, L. P., Hestvik, A., Lesan, L., & Rachel Garcia, A. (2003). Charting the time-course of VP-ellipsis
sentence comprehension: Evidence for an initial and independent structural analysis. Journal of
Memory and Language, 49(1), 1-19.
Shapiro, L. P., Nagel, H. N., & Levine, B. A. (1993). Preferences for a verb's complements and their use in
sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 96-114.
Shapiro, L. P., Zurif, E., & Grimshaw, J. (1987). Sentence processing and the mental representation of verbs.
Cognition, 27, 219-246.
Shapiro, L. P., Zurif, E. B., & Grimshaw, J. (1989). Verb processing during sentence comprehension:
Contextual impenetrability. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18, 223-243.
Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., & Turk, A. E. (1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence
processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25(2), 193-247.
Shriberg, E., Bates, R., Stolcke, A., Taylor, P., Jurafsky, D., Ries, K., et al. (1998). Can prosody aid the
automatic classification of dialog acts in conversational speech? Language & Speech, 41(Part 3-4),
443-492.
Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. (2003). Using prosody to avoid ambiguity: Effects of speaker awareness and
referential context. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 103-130.
Snedeker, J., & Trueswell, J. C. (2004). The developing constraints on parsing decisions: The role of lexicalbiases and referential scenes in child and adult sentence processing. Cognitive Psychology, 49(3), 238299.
Speer, N. K., & Zacks, J. M. (2005). Temporal changes as event boundaries: Processing and memory
consequences of narrative time shifts. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 125-140.
Speer, S. R., & Clifton, C. (1998). Plausibility and argument structure in sentence comprehension. Memory &
Cognition, 26(5), 965-978.
Speer, S. R., Kjelgaard, M. M., & Dobroth, K. M. (1996). The influence of prosodic structure on the
resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguities. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25, 249271.
Spivey, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: Modeling the effects
of referential context and lexical frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,
& Cognition, 24(6), 1521-1543.
Spivey, M. J., Tanenhaus, M. K., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (2002). Eye movements and spoken
language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive
Psychology, 45(4), 447-481.
21
Spivey-Knowlton, M., & Sedivy, J. (1995). Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints.
Cognition, 55, 227-267.
Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1993). Context effects in syntactic ambiguity
resolution: Discourse and semantic influences in parsing reduced relative clauses. Canadian Journal of
Psychology, 47, 276-309.
St. John, M. F., & McClelland, J. L. (1990). Learning and applying contextual constraints in sentence
comprehension. Artificial Intelligence, 46, 217-257.
Steedman, M. (1999). Connectionist sentence processing in perspective. Cognitive Science, 23(4), 615-634.
Steinhauer, K. (2003). Electrophysiological correlates of prosody and punctuation. Brain & Language, 86(1),
142-164.
Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues
in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 191-195.
Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: The
closure positive shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(3), 267-295.
Steinhauer, K., Mecklinger, A., Friederici, A. D., & Meyer, M. (1997). Probability and strategy: An ERP
study on the processing of syntactic anomalies [in German]. Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle
Psychologie, 44(2), 305-331.
Stevenson, S., & Merlo, P. (1997). Lexical structure and parsing complexity. Language & Cognitive
Processes, 12(2-3), 349-399.
Stewart, A. J., Pickering, M. J., & Sanford, A. J. (2000). The time course of the influence of implicit causality
information: Focusing versus integration accounts. Journal of Memory & Language, 42(3), 423-443.
Stirling, L., & Wales, R. (1996). Does prosody support or direct sentence processing? Language & Cognitive
Processes, 11(1-2), 193-212.
Stowe, L. A. (1986). Parsing WH-constructions: Evidence for on-line gap location. Language and Cognitive
Processes, 1, 227-245.
Stowe, L. A. (1988). Thematic structures and sentence comprehension. In G. N. Carlson & M. K. Tanenhaus
(Eds.), Linguistic structure in language processing (pp. 319-354). Dordrecht: Reidel.
Stowe, L. A., Broere, C. A. J., Paans, A. M. J., Wijers, A. A., Mulder, G., Vaalburg, W., et al. (1998).
Localizing components of a complex task: Sentence processing and working memory. Neuroreport,
9(13), 2995-2999.
Stowe, L. A., Paans, A. M. J., Wijers, A. A., & Zwarts, F. (2004). Activations of "motor" and other nonlanguage structures during sentence comprehension. Brain & Language, 89(2), 290-299.
Stowe, L. A., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Carlson, G. N. (1991). Filling gaps on-line: Use of lexical and semantic
information in sentence processing. Language and Speech, 34, 319-340.
Straub, K., Wilson, C., McCollum, C., & Badecker, W. (2001). Prosodic structure and wh-questions. Journal
of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(4), 379-394.
Streb, J., Hennighausen, E., & Rosler, F. (2004). Different anaphoric expressions are investigated by eventrelated brain potentials. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 33(3), 175-201.
Streb, J., Rosler, F., & Hennighausen, E. (1999). Event-related responses to pronoun and proper name
anaphors in parallel and nonparallel discourse structures. Brain & Language, 70(2), 273-286.
Stromswold, K., Caplan, D., Alpert, N., & S.Rauch. (1996). Localization of syntactic comprehension by
positron emission tomography. Brain & Language, 52, 452-473.
Sturt, P. (2003). A new look at the syntax-discourse interface: The use of binding principles in sentence
processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 32(2), 125-139.
Sturt, P. (2003). The time-course of the application of binding constraints in reference resolution. Journal of
Memory and Language, 48(3), 542-562.
Sturt, P., Costa, F., Lombardo, V., & Frasconi, P. (2003). Learning first-pass structural attachment preferences
with dynamic grammars and recursive neural networks. Cognition, 88(2), 133-169.
Sturt, P., & Crocker, M. W. (1996). Monotonic syntactic processing: A cross-linguistic study of attachment
and reanalysis. Language & Cognitive Processes, 11(5), 449-494.
22
Sturt, P., & Crocker, M. W. (1997). Thematic monotonicity. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26(3),
297-322.
Sturt, P., Pickering, M. J., & Crocker, M. W. (1999). Structural change and reanalysis difficulty in language
comprehension. Journal of Memory & Language, 40(1), 136-150.
Sturt, P., Pickering, M. J., & Crocker, M. W. (2000). Search strategies in syntactic reanalysis. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 29(2), 183-194.
Sturt, P., Pickering, M. J., Scheepers, C., & Crocker, M. W. (2001). The preservation of structure in language
comprehension: Is reanalysis the last resort? Journal of Memory & Language, 45(2), 283-307.
Sturt, P., Scheepers, C., & Pickering, M. (2002). Syntactic ambiguity resolution after initial misanalysis: The
role of recency. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 371-390.
Sussman, R. S., & Sedivy, J. C. (2003). The time-course of processing syntactic dependencies: Evidence from
eye movements. Language & Cognitive Processes, 18(2), 143-163.
Tabor, W., Galantucci, B., & Richardson, D. (2004). Effects of merely local syntactic coherence on sentence
processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 50(4), 355-370.
Tabor, W., & Hutchins, S. (2004). Evidence for self-organized sentence processing: Digging-in effects.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30(2), 431-450.
Tabor, W., Juliano, C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1997). Parsing in a dynamical system: An attractor-based
account of the interaction of lexical and structural constraints in sentence processing. Language &
Cognitive Processes, 12(2-3), 211-271.
Tabor, W., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1999). Dynamical models of sentence processing. Cognitive Science, 23(4),
491-515.
Takazawa, S., Takahashi, N., Nakagome, K., Kanno, O., Hagiwara, H., Nakajima, H., et al. (2002). Early
components of event-related potentials related to semantic and syntactic processes in the Japanese
language. Brain Topography, 14(3), 169-177.
Tamaoka, K., Sakai, H., Kawahara, J., & Miyaoka, Y. (2003). The effects of phrase-length order and
scrambling in the processing of visually presented Japanese sentences. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 32(4), 431-454.
Tamaoka, K., Sakai, H., Kawahara, J., Miyaoka, Y., Lim, H., & Koizumi, M. (2005). Priority information
used for the processing of Japanese sentences: Thematic roles, case particles or grammatical
functions? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34(3), 281-332.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and
linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268(5217), 1632-1634.
Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1988). Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence
processing: Influences of cont-based expectation. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 597-563.
Thornton, R., MacDonald, M. C., & Arnold, J. E. (2000). The concomitant effects of phrase length and
informational content in sentence comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(2), 195203.
Thornton, R., MacDonald, M. C., & Gil, M. (1999). Pragmatic constraint on the interpretation of complex
noun phrases in Spanish and English. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, &
Cognition, 25(6), 1347-1365.
Tong, Y. X., Gandour, J., Talavage, T., Wong, D., Dzemidzic, M., Xu, Y. S., et al. (2005). Neural circuitry
underlying sentence-level linguistic prosody. Neuroimage, 28(2), 417-428.
Traxler, M. J. (2002). Plausibility and subcategorization preference in children's processing of temporarily
ambiguous sentences: Evidence from self-paced reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental
Psychology, 55A, 75-96.
Traxler, M. J. (2005). Plausibility and verb subcategorization in temporarily ambiguous sentences: Evidence
from self-paced reading. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34(1), 1-30.
Traxler, M. J., Bybee, M. D., & Pickering, M. J. (1997). Influence of connectives on language
comprehension: Eye-tracking evidence for incremental interpretation. Quarterly Journal of
Experimental Psychology, 50A, 481-497.
23
Traxler, M. J., McElree, B., Williams, R. S., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). Context effects in coercion: Evidence
from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(1), 1-25.
Traxler, M. J., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E. (2002). Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence
from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(1), 69-90.
Traxler, M. J., & Pickering, M. J. (1996a). Case-marking in the parsing of complement sentences: Evidence
from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A(Human Experimental
Psychology), 991-1004.
Traxler, M. J., & Pickering, M. J. (1996b). Plausibility and the processing of unbounded dependencies: An
eye-tracking study. Journal of Memory & Language, 35(3), 454-475.
Traxler, M. J., Pickering, M. J., & Clifton, C. (1998). Adjunct attachment is not a form of lexical ambiguity
resolution. Journal of Memory & Language, 39(4), 558-592.
Traxler, M. J., Pickering, M. J., & McElree, B. (2002). Coercion in sentence processing: evidence from eyemovements and self-paced reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 47(4), 530-547.
Traxler, M. J., Sanford, A. J., Aked, J. P., & Moxey, L. M. (1997). Processing causal and diagnostic
statements in discourse. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23(1),
88-101.
Traxler, M. J., Williams, R. S., Blozis, S. A., & Morris, R. K. (2005). Working memory, animacy, and verb
class in the processing of relative clauses. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(2), 204-224.
Tree, J. E. F., & Meijer, P. J. A. (2000). Untrained speakers' use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation and
listeners' interpretations. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 63(1), 1-13.
Trueswell, J. C. (1996). The role of lexical frequency in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory
and Language, 35, 566-585.
Trueswell, J. C., & Kim, A. E. (1998). How to prune a garden path by nipping it in the bud: Fast priming of
verb argument structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 102-123.
Trueswell, J. C., Sekerina, I., Hill, N. M., & Logrip, M. L. (1999). The kindergarten-path effect: studying online sentence processing in young children. Cognition, 73(2), 89-134.
Trueswell, J. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1994). Toward a lexicalist framework for constraint-based syntactic
ambiguity resolution. In C. Clifton, K. Rayner & L. Frazier (Eds.), Perspectives on sentence
processing (pp. 155-180). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Trueswell, J. C., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Kello, C. (1993). Verb-specific constraints in sentence processing:
Separating effects of lexical preference from garden-paths. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 528-553.
Trueswell, J. T., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Garnsey, S. M. (1994). Semantic influences on parsing: Use of
thematic role information in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory & Language, 33, 285318.
Tyler, L. K., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (1977). The on-line effects of semantic context on syntactic
processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 683-692.
Uehara, K. (1997). Judgments of processing load in Japanese: The effect of NP-ga sequences. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 255-263.
Ueno, M., & Kluender, R. (2003). Event-related brain indices of Japanese scrambling. Brain & Language,
86(2), 243-271.
Ullman, M. T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 30(1), 37-69.
Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: the declarative/procedural model
[Review]. Cognition, 92(1-2), 231-270.
van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1999a). Early referential context effects in sentence
processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory & Language, 41(2), 147182.
van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., & Hagoort, P. (1999b). When does gender constrain parsing? Evidence
from ERPs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28(5), 555-571.
24
van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Hagoort, P., & Zwitserlood, P. (2003). Event-related brain potentials
reflect discourse-referential ambiguity in spoken language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 40(2),
235-248.
van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating
upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times [Review]. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31(3), 443-467.
van Berkum, J. J. A., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (1999). Semantic integration in sentences and discourse:
Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(6), 657-671.
van Berkum, J. J. A., Zwisterlood, P., Hagoort, P., & Brown, C. M. (2003). When and how do listeners relate
a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Cognitive Brain Research, 17(3),
701-718.
van Dyke, J. A., & Lewis, R. L. (2003). Distinguishing effects of structure and decay on attachment and
repair: A cue-based parsing account of recovery from misanalyzed ambiguities. Journal of Memory
and Language, 49(3), 285-316.
van Gompel, R. P. G., & Majid, A. (2004). Antecedent frequency effects during the processing of pronouns.
Cognition, 90(3), 255-264.
van Gompel, R. P. G., & Pickering, M. J. (2001). Reanalysis in sentence processing: Evidence against current
constraint-based and two-stage models. Journal of Memory & Language, 45(2), 225-258.
van Gompel, R. P. G., Pickering, M. J., Pearson, J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). Evidence against competition
during syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(2), 284-307.
van Herten, M., Kolk, H. H. J., & Chwilla, D. J. (2005). An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic
anomalies. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(2), 241-255.
Van Petten, C., & Bloom, P. (1999). Speech boundaries, syntax and the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 2(2),
103-104.
Vandenberghe, R., Nobre, A. C., & Price, C. J. (2002). The response of left temporal cortex to sentences.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(4), 550-560.
Vos, S. H., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Intersentential syntactic context effects on comprehension: the role of
working memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 16(1), 111-122.
Vos, S. H., Gunter, T. C., Kolk, H. H. J., & Mulder, G. (2001). Working memory constraints on syntactic
processing: An electrophysiological investigation. Psychophysiology, 38(1), 41-63.
Vos, S. H., Gunter, T. C., Schriefers, H., & Friederici, A. D. (2001). Syntactic parsing and working memory:
The effects of syntactic complexity, reading span, and concurrent load. Language & Cognitive
Processes, 16(1), 65-103.
Vosse, T., & Kempen, G. (2000). Syntactic structure assembly in human parsing: A computational model
based on competitive inhibition and a lexicalist grammar. Cognition, 75(2), 105-143.
Wales, R., & Toner, H. (1979). Intonation and ambiguity. In W. E. Cooper & E. C. T. Walker (Eds.), Sentence
processing (pp. 136-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Walker, E. (1976). Some grammatical relations among words. In R. J. Wales & E. Walker (Eds.), New
approaches to language mechanisms (pp. 183-201). Amsterdam: North Holland.
Walker, J. P., Fongemie, K., & Daigle, T. (2001). Prosodic facilitation in the resolution of syntactic
ambiguities in subjects with left and right hemisphere damage. Brain & Language, 78(2), 169-196.
Wanner, E. (1980). The ATN and the sausage machine: Which one is baloney? Cognition, 8, 209-225.
Warner, J., & Glass, A. (1987). Context and distance-to-disambiguation effects in ambiguity resolution.
Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 714-738.
Warren, P. (1996). Prosody and parsing: An introduction. Language & Cognitive Processes, 11(1-2), 1-16.
Warren, T., & Gibson, E. (2002). The influence of referential processing on sentence complexity. Cognition,
85(1), 79-112.
Warren, T., & Gibson, E. (2005). Effects of NP type in reading cleft sentences in English. Language &
Cognitive Processes, 20(6), 751-767.
Wartenburger, I., Heekeren, H. R., Burchert, F., Heinemann, S., De Bleser, R., & Villringer, A. (2004).
Neural correlates of syntactic transformations. Human Brain Mapping, 22(1), 72-81.
25
Waters, G., Caplan, D., Alpert, N., & Stanczak, L. (2003). Individual differences in rCBF correlates of
syntactic processing in sentence comprehension: effects of working memory and speed of processing.
Neuroimage, 19(1), 101-112.
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996a). The capacity theory of sentence comprehension - Critique of Just and
Carpenter (1992). Psychological Review, 103(4), 761-772.
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996b). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to
reading comprehension. 49, 51-79.
Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996c). Processing resource capacity and the comprehension of garden path
sentences. 24, 342-355.
Waters, G. S., Caplan, D., & Dufault, C. (2000). The relationship between working memory capacity and
online sentence processing efficiency in patients with DAT. Brain & Language, 74(3), 332-334.
Watson, D., & Gibson, E. (2005). Intonational phrasing and constituency in language production and
comprehension. Studia Linguistica, 59(2-3), 279-300.
Watt, S. M., & Murray, W. S. (1996). Prosodic form and parsing commitments. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 25, 291-318.
Weber, A., Grice, M., & Crocker, M. W. (2006). The role of prosody in the interpretation of structural
ambiguities: A study of anticipatory eye movements. Cognition, In Press, Corrected Proof.
Weckerly, J., & Kutas, M. (1999). An electrophysiological analysis of animacy effects in the processing of
object relative sentences. Psychophysiology, 36(5), 559-570.
Weiss, S., & Mueller, H. M. (2003). The contribution of EEG coherence to the investigation of language.
Brain & Language, 85(2), 325-343.
Weyerts, H., Penke, M., Munte, T. F., Heinze, H. J., & Clahsen, H. (2002). Word order in sentence
processing: An experimental study of verb placement in German. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 31(3), 211-268.
Whaley, C. P. (1979). Predictive analysis vs. segmentational analysis in sentence perception. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 8, 523-542.
Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related
brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish
sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1272-1288.
Wingfield, A. (1975). The intonation-syntax interaction: Prosodic features in perceptual processing of
sentences. In A. Cohen & S. G. Nooteboom (Eds.), Structure and processing in speech perception (pp.
146-156). Berlin: Springer.
Wolf, F., Gibson, E., & Desmet, T. (2004). Discourse coherence and pronoun resolution. Language &
Cognitive Processes, 19(6), 665-675.
Xu, J., Kemeny, S., Park, G., Frattali, C., & Braun, A. (2005). Language in context: emergent features of
word, sentence, and narrative comprehension. Neuroimage, 25(3), 1002-1015.
Yamashita, H. (1995). The use of verb argument information used in a pro-drop language. Journal of
Psycholinguistic Research, 24, 333-347.
Yamashita, H. (1997). The effects of word-order and case marking information on the processing of Japanese.
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 26, 163-188.
Yamashita, H. (2000). Structural computation and the role of morphological markings in the processing of
Japanese. Language & Speech, 43(Part 4), 429-459.
Yang, C. L., Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Hue, C. W. (2003). Constraining the comprehension of
pronominal expressions in Chinese. Cognition, 86(3), 283-315.
Yang, C. L., Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., Wu, J. T., & Chou, T. L. (2001). The processing of coreference for
reduced expressions in discourse integration. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30(1), 21-35.
Yerkovich, F. R., Walker, C. H., & Blackman, H. S. (1979). The role of presupposed and focal information in
integrating sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning, 18, 535-548.
Zagar, D., Pynte, J., & Raviteau, S. (1997). Evidence for early-closure attachment on first-pass reading times
in French. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, 421-438.
Zurif, E. B. (2000). Syntactic and semantic composition. Brain & Language, 71(1), 261-263.
26