How do we form new words? Derivational process- adding morphemes to a word to change it Coinage- any way to create a word to fit some process (Kodak, Vaseline, Kleenex, acrophopea) Eponyms- words coined from proper names (Earl “Sandwich” was named after Earl Sandwich who put his food between two slices of bread while he gambled…”Jumbo” is named after an elephant who was brought to the United States.) Back formation-words that enter a language because of an incorrect morphological analysis. (“Peddler” is known as a person who sells stuff in stores…the morpheme was confused by some people and later on the morpheme “peddl” was used as a person who peddles on their bike) Compound words- two or more words joined together to form a new word (doghouse, redcoat, smoke screen, gold-tail, blackbird) The right most word in a compound most of the time is the one that dominates (doghouse the right word “house” dominates, therefore “doghouse” is a house for dogs (not a dog for houses…)) If the word, however, contains a preposition the left most word dominates. (master of ceremonies, therefore means a master of ceremonies (not a ceremony of masters…)) Blends- similar to compounds; however unlike compounds, some of the words in the blend are deleted. (smog=smoke + fog (the “f” and “k” were deleted), brunch = breakfast + lunch) Reduced words- speakers tend to abbreviate in various ways to shorten a word Clippings- abbreviation of a normal word (gasoline gas, mathematics math) Acronyms- a word derived from initials of several words (AIDS, Scuba) Alphabetic abbreviations- Using letters exclusively to say the word. The difference between this and acronyms is here you actually said the letters (like HIV, NFL, UCLA, MRI) Inflectional morphemes- bound morphemes that mark number, tense, gender and case that have strict grammatical functions….They never change the syntactic category (like, likes, liking= they are all verbs…pretty, prettier, prettiest= they are all adjectives) Derivational morphemes- bound morphemes that change its syntactic category (“Test” = noun, “Testify”= verb) Suppletive- irregular form of words (like “foots”…) Chapter 4 Syntax- our knowledge of how we combine words into phrases and phrases into sentences Part of this is the knowledge of SVO Having knowledge of the grammatical relations/ grammatical functions (people understand the subject is the receiver of the action and the action is what is being done.) Which syntactic structure goes with which verb “ran up the bill” and “ran up the hill” are almost syntactically identical, but when put in a sentence the [constituents] are different. Constituents- natural groupings of a sentence Constituent structure- the hierarchically arranged syntactic units such as a noun phrase and verb phrase that underlie every sentence [Jack and Jill] [ran] [up the hill] and [Jack and Jill] [ran] [up] [the bill] To see if something is a constituent, do the constituency test… Stand Alone Test: if a group of words can stand alone then they can be a constituent Replacement by a pronoun tests: if the group of words can be replace by a pronoun then they can form a constituent Move as a unit test: if the group of words can be moved then they form a constituent. These tests do NOT always work!! These tests show that syntax is hierarchical, not from left to right! [Jack and Jill] [ran] [up the hill] = [Up the hill] Jack and Jill ran. [Jack and Jill] [ran] [up] [the bill] = [Jack and Jill] [ran] [the bill] [up] These tests do not always work because you cannot say: [Jack and Jill] [ran] [up] [the bill] If something is dominated by the same node it is a constituent Kayla bought a book [and a CD] yesterday Kayla bought a book yesterday [and a CD] Kayla bought a book [and] yesterday [a CD] In this sentence you broke up a constituent…a phrase under the same node is a constituent and can therefore be moved around in a sentence together-as one unit. However, in this sentence you split the constituent, which you are not allowed to do. This is an example of the hierarchical organization of syntaxit is not just linear! Restrictive relative clause- I hate politicians who lie I hate the politicians that lie. Unrestrictive relative clause- I hate politicians, who lie I hate all politicians and politicians lie Grammaticality is independent of a truth value. It does not have to be coherent (not an anomaly) in order to make the sentence grammatical. Colorless green ideas sleep furiously. Semantic anomaly- how can green be colorless? How can ideas (inanimate object) sleep? How can something sleep “furiously?” Regardless of all these problems with this sentence, this sentence is still grammatically correct. Grammaticality is independent of prescriptive grammar. A dictionary tells us the function (Prep, Adv, Adj, N, V) of a word “Toilet” in the dictionary would be a noun “I buy toilet paper.” Now, toilet, in this sentence is an adjective-not a noun. A dictionary may give us the most common syntactic category to use each word, but it really depends HOW we use each word in the sentence. Syntactic category- a group of expressions that can substitute for one another without a loss of grammaticality The boy went to the store, the girl went to the store, they went to the store. Phrasal Category- NP, VP, PP, AdjP Lexical Category- N, V, P, Adj Functional Category- Aux, Det, C (conjunction) Determiner (Det) - “counting words” such as a/the/this/that/each/two etc…/every; also contains names and a noun without a determiner (like “boys”) Auxiliary- helping verbs; always carries the tense I am teaching You are teaching He is teaching If there is no Auxiliary then the verb takes the tense He runs I run You run Modals tell you if it is progressive (still going) or perfect (finished). It also tells you about the sentence (whether it is a declarative, imperative sentence etc…) Modals include: may/might/can/could/must/shall/should/would/will. There are 3 types of auxiliaries Expresses the progressive (in progress now) aspect (is/to be/are…) Expresses perfect aspect (action that has been completed) I have eaten I have ridden a bike I have done my homework Modal - expresses conditional aspect, mood, and intention I can eat I may eat I shall eat Complementizer (VERY different than a compliment)-any words that starts off or comes before an embedded clause- a clause with another clause I saw the move that you recommended S V C O Embedded clause- CP C S Embedded Sentence/clause Transitive verb- a verb that requires an NP compliment (like “find”) Intransitive verb- a verb that cannot take an NP compliment (like “slept”) Phrase structure tree- an illustration of our syntactic knowledge; it represents the LINEAR order of words- You DO read it from left to right (**look at the PS tree for the sentence “The child found the dog”) Syntactic categories Structure/function of these syntactic categories RULES S NP VP S Adv S NP Det Nl NP Nl NP NP’s Nl NP NP PP Nl N Nl Adj Nl VP V VP V NP VP V CP VP Aux VP VP VP PP VP Adv VP VP VP Adv PP P NP CP C S TP NP Tl NP NP coordP Tl T XP (When XP= AdjP, PP, NP) CoordP Coord NP This knowledge is unconscious By using these rules we can produce an infinite number of sentences The child found the dog S NP Det The VP N child V found NP Det Nl the dog **If you read these words form left to right it does produce the sentence “The child found the dog,” proving that some parts of syntax IS linear The S node dominates everything below it S Node Immediate domination- directly below each node (The NP immediately dominates the determinate and the N) Sisters- Any category immediately dominated by the same node (The determinate and N are sisters…) Recursion rule- A repeating of one of the categories This proves that there are an infinite number of possibilities to make sentences with these finite syntax rules S NP VP V NP NP PP P NP Every language has heads and complements; this is part of Universal grammar. A native speaker had to have learned the parameters of their specific language when born, for example English has head initial, but Japanese has head final. Every phrase has a head and complement. Head- a word whose lexical category defines the type of phrase NP N…VP V…PP P… CPC… A verb can occur in a NP, but this depends on the properties of that verb. The English language has six verbs VL – linking verb Intransitive- must have some sort of NP Be – be (copular) after it telling you who is receiving the action Vi – intransitive Vt – transitive Transitive- cannot have an NP after it Vg – distransitive Vc – direct object Linking verbs- link subject to what it is, including the following words: is, or, are, was, were, be, being, been, sound, look, smell, taste, feel, turn, became, appear, grow, seem, stay, remain. I feel upset I smell I see Be (copular)- is, am, are, was, were, be, being, been I am happy He is sensitive We are friends Special things about the verb “Be”: Most used verb in the English language Has 8 ways of conjugations and forms including participles, which is the greatest number. Other verbs have 4 ways of conjugation including participles (he plays, he will play, he played) Unique because it does not occur in other languages Verbs can take predicate nouns, predicate adjectives, but only a “be” verb can take a predicate noun, predicate adjective, and a predicate verb. Transitive- must have some sort of NP after it telling you who is receiving the action I gave apples to my mother. I eat apples. Intransitive- cannot have an NP after it I jump. I sleep. Distransitive verb- requires a direct object and indirect object I consider the democratic candidate to be smart. I consider the democratic candidate to be friendly. They elected Bush president.