Research Paper 7 Foundation Skills Prepared by Training and Tertiary Education Issues Paper – Foundation Skills © ACT Education and Training Directorate 2014 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, the work may be reproduced in whole or in part for study or training purposes, subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgment of the source. Reproduction for commercial use or sale requires prior written permission from the ACT Education and Training Directorate. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Directorate (see below). This publication is available from the Education and Training Directorate’s website at www.det.act.gov.au. If you require part or all of this publication in a different format, please contact the Directorate. Publications Inquiries: Training and Tertiary Education Education and Training Directorate Level 5, 220 Northbourne Ave, Braddon ACT 2612 GPO Box 158,Canberra ACT 2601 Tel: (02) 6205 8555 Email: actvet@act.gov.au An appropriate citation for this paper is: ACT Education and Training Directorate (2014) Skilled Capital Foundation Skills Issues Paper, Report 7 of 8, Canberra. Publish date: December 2014 ACT Education and Training Directorate Page 2 Prepared by Training and Tertiary Education Issues Paper – Foundation Skills Overview Under Skilled Capital, students will have access to foundation skills training and support needed to complete skills qualifications. This will be in the form of integrated vocational and foundation skills training or contextualised foundation skills training and learning support. As the main intent of Skilled Capital is to increase skills training participation and completion, stand alone foundation skills training will only be funded if it is considered to be gap training and is contextualised to the field of education the student is intending to enrol. All students who are eligible for Skilled Capital must undertake an initial skills assessment. Under Skilled Capital, registered training organisations (RTOs) will be required to align student’s foundation skill levels to the Australian Core Skills Framework (ACSF). RTOs will use this assessment to determine whether foundation skills training is required. All Skilled Capital students will be eligible for up to six units of competencies (UoCs) from approved foundation skills training courses. The cost of the training will be paid to the RTO on completion of each UoC and the submission of correct data to the ACT Government. Skilled Capital will identify specific foundation skills courses that will be approved to be funded. Additional support will be funded on application to the ACT Government for students who are identified as requiring learning support during skills training delivery. This support will be funded up to a maximum of $1,000 per student per qualification. All RTOs that apply to deliver training under Skilled Capital will need to demonstrate capability to provide foundation skills training and support for all vocational training delivery. There will be specific questions on the application regarding RTO strategies and these will be assessed by LLN specialists. If an RTO does not have scope of registration to deliver accredited foundation skills training, it will be required to sub-contract to an RTO that does have scope. There will be no student tuition fees for foundation skills training and the government funding will be 100 per cent of the published subsidy amount. To assist RTOs to develop foundation skills strategies and support for students, the ACT Government will provide professional development workshops. The purpose of this paper is to consider options for both delivery and funding models of foundation skills under Skilled Capital. The remainder of this paper is structured as follows: Section 1 discusses the background to delivering foundation skills in an entitlement model Section 2 examines the existing literature on the importance of providing foundation skills Section 3 sets out existing foundation skills programs, including those in the ACT, other jurisdictions and those run at the Commonwealth level across Australia Section 4 examines the merits of different models for foundation skills in Skilled Capital Based on the analysis in the above sections, Section 5 sets out the recommended approach. ACT Education and Training Directorate Page 3 Prepared by Training and Tertiary Education 1 Issues Paper – Foundation Skills Background Foundation skills are defined in the 2012 paper National Foundation Skills Strategy for Adults as the combination of: language, literacy and numeracy (LLN) – listening, speaking, reading, writing, digital literacy and use of mathematical ideas employability skills, such as collaboration, problem solving, self-management, learning and ICT skills required for participation in modern workplaces and contemporary life.1 Foundation skills exist on a continuum from very basic skills to highly-developed and specialist skills.2 These skills are critical for learning and work, particularly in today’s technology rich environment. Australian Governments, employers and Industry Skills Councils have voiced concerns about low levels of LLN skills, citing negative impacts on productivity, social participation, general health and well being. These concerns have also been confirmed in international studies such as the 2006 Adult Literacy and Lifeskills Survey (ALLS) and the 2012 Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC). In response to this, the Australian Government released the National Foundation Skills Strategy for Adults 2012-2022 (NFSS). The NFSS aims to bring a national focus to improving the foundation skills of Australian adults and identifies priority areas for action in the next 10 years to result in a productive and inclusive Australia. All jurisdictions are participating in implementing strategies to improve foundation skills. Jurisdictions also agreed to the National Partnership Agreement on Skills Reform (National Partnership) in 2012. The National Partnership aims to create a more accessible and equitable training system through introducing and strengthening a national entitlement to a government subsidised training place. These training places should be: accessible through any registered training organisation (RTO), public or private, which meets state-based criteria for access to the national training entitlement available as a minimum to all working age Australians (from post-school age to pension age) without a certificate lll or higher qualification, subject to meeting minimum entry requirements and state based criteria inclusive of foundation skills or lower qualifications contained within the certificate lll qualification. The ACT Implementation Plan for the National Partnership Agreement on Skills Reform commits the ACT Government to implementing an ACT Entitlement to a Training Place. The ACT Government has begun implementation through training initiatives such as the Priorities Support Program and Better Linkages between Employment and Training. RTOs wishing to deliver these initiatives are required to specify how they will assess and address foundation skill needs in their training programs. The ACT Government has also identified specific foundation skills courses and placed them on the ACT Skilled Capital Qualifications List to be funded. This aims to encourage the embedding or integrating foundation skills training into vocational education and training (VET). 1 Standing Council on Tertiary Education Skills and Employment, Commonwealth of Australia (2012), National Foundation Skills Strategy for Adults. 2 National Quality Council (2010) Foundation Skills in VET Products for the 21st Century. ACT Education and Training Directorate Page 4 Prepared by Training and Tertiary Education Issues Paper – Foundation Skills The ACT has a benefit in addressing the issue of levels of LLN skills because, as a whole, the ACT is starting from a comparatively high base. The PIAAC study results detailed in Appendix B show that the ACT has the highest proportion of its population at literacy level three or above (67 per cent), 11 percentage points above the nearest jurisdiction. In numeracy, the ACT has 59 per cent of its population at level three or above, 13 percentage points above the nearest jursidiction. Despite this high existing base of LLN skills, the ACT Government will still face some challenges including: how to meet the target set in the National Partnership how to encourage RTOs to provide integrated LLN and vocational training to students who need it allowing flexible funding availability for foundation skills training having a limited amount of funding for foundation skills training how to measure the effectiveness of the funding investment. 2 Benefits of foundation skills Over the past few years, government and industry bodies have released a number of publications to highlight the effects of low LLN in workplaces and vocational training across Australia. The Skills Australia paper Australian Workforce Futures acknowledges that while governments are providing programs specifically for LLN training, these have not improved adult LLN outcomes and more investment is required to make a discernable difference.3 That paper also highlights that while LLN skills are meant to be included in training packages, LLN levels have not improved. There is a concern that while the national policy supported a ‘built in not bolted on’ approach for embedding LLN skills in skills training, it has, in practice, buried LLN skills in the competency based model. This is due to factors such as staff delivering vocational training not having LLN skills themselves and lacking the funding or access to specialists to assist them. The Industry Skills Councils (ISC) have also identified similar issues in vocational training delivery: that many trainers lack LLN awareness there is a limited number of LLN specialists government funding of training programs does not allow for team teaching or access to a LLN specialist.4 The No More Excuses report proposes that for learners to gain the full benefit of VET, early assessment of their LLN level is essential to both inform the planning of the training program and to ensure that necessary learning support is identified.5 Pre-training assessments should be used by RTOs to identify any assistance the learner will require to successfully complete a skills qualification. However, learners find it difficult to self-determine their LLN skill level for both training and work environments.6 Moreover, both technical and core skills need to be continually updated to respond to 3 Skills Australia (2010) Australian Workforce Futures. Industry Skills Councils (2011) No More Excuses 5 Ibid. 6 Roberts, A & Wignall, L (2010) Briefing on Foundation Skills for the National VET Equity Advisory Council. 4 ACT Education and Training Directorate Page 5 Prepared by Training and Tertiary Education Issues Paper – Foundation Skills changes in workplaces, technologies and work responsibilities. Training programs need to support this development of foundation skills for learners to adjust to changes in the workplace.7 A United Kingdom National Research and Development Centre (NRDC) report explains that learners are often motivated to learn new vocational skills for the purpose of gaining employment but may not be as motivated to improve their LLN skills.8 This was found to be particularly the case if they have previous negative schooling experiences. This study also found that the learners would have benefited from a better induction process to help them understand what the LLN demand was in vocational training programs. Students were found to be less likely to drop out of their vocational training program if the LLN was embedded in training delivery.9 An evaluation of a sample group found that learners in embedded courses had a 16 per cent higher completion rate than those who were in non-embedded courses. However the report acknowledged that the embedded models are resource intensive and that to be successful the following conditions need to be in place: both LLN and vocational teachers need access to plan training programs LLN teachers must be familiar with vocational area vocational teachers need to understand the LLN demands in both training and workplaces there needs to be team teaching opportunities professional development needs to be provided to all staff.10 Australian research into integrated LLN and skills training delivery models across Australia has defined ‘integrating LLN in vocation training’ as when: ‘LLN are taught not as separate or discrete skills, but contextualized or ‘situated’ within the process of learning vocational skills. Usually this concept finds form in various team teaching strategies, and it also stands in contrast to ‘stand-alone’ LLN provision in which the primary focus is improving LLN skills which may or may not be linked to the vocational contexts of learners’. In the integrated LLN model, the primary focus is vocational learning. 11 With the exception of the Course in Applied Vocational Study Skills (CAVSS) model in Western Australia, integrated programs are generally ad hoc and dependent upon the local teaching staff to develop a model to suit teachers, students and funding limitations. The current delivery models include: classes where both vocational and LLN teachers are in the classroom and LLN teacher is ‘hovering’ around students tag teaching between the LLN and vocational teacher shared delivery where students are enrolled into both an LLN and vocational course, delivered separately but a holistic program is planned together by both teachers LLN support provided by small group or individual tutoring. 7 Ibid. Casey, H., Cara, O., Eldred, J., Grief, S., Hodge, R., Ivanicv, R., Jupp, T., Lopez, D., McNeil, B., (2006) Embedding literacy, language and numeracy in post-16 vocational programmes, the impact on learning and achievement. 9 Ibid. 10 Ibid. 11 Ibid. 8 ACT Education and Training Directorate Page 6 Prepared by Training and Tertiary Education Issues Paper – Foundation Skills Research has questioned if this inconsistent practice is due to the lack of policy surrounding integrated delivery and that improvements in equity participation, completion and employment outcomes, teaching practice and LLN skills would be beneficial to all stakeholders in the skills training system.12 It has been suggested that there could be an opportunity for a fee-for-service model for LLN specialists if outcomes based funding models are introduced.13 However, as found in the NRDC report, there are funding and implementation challenges to consider – initial assessment, time for teachers to plan and establish good working relationships, curriculum or training package pressures and remote or flexible delivery support: ‘the competitive nature of VET and the contestability funding models that are currently favoured, can lead to pressures to complete courses quickly and at the minimum costs, which works against VET providers building in additional costs for integrated LLN’.14 The recent Australian Industry Group paper Getting it Right: Foundation Skills for the Workforce raises concerns about the PIAAC results for Australian workplaces and the impact that low levels of LLN has on productivity for businesses.15 The paper makes a number of recommendations including introducing integrated training combining LLN with occupationally specific training and encouraging RTOs to include the Foundation Skills Training Package on their scope of delivery. It also further recommends the further development of a national online LLN diagnostic tool based on the Australian Core Skills Framework and used in the process of either self assessment or initial assessment of LLN skills.16 3 Current foundation skills 3.1 Other states and territories All states and territories are currently at various stages of implementing training entitlement systems but all these systems include funding for foundation skills training. All jurisdictions are alike in that they are limiting the range of foundation skills courses funded under entitlement and have identified LLN and employability skills courses. Most jurisdictions have published the subsidised price they will pay RTOs to deliver the foundation skills training. This subsidy ranges from 75 per cent up to 100 per cent of the price of training. South Australia is fully funding identified foundation skills courses, but other states such as Queensland, Victoria and NSW are funding a published subsidised price per qualification. Appendix A contains a more detailed jurisdictional comparison. 12 Black, S and Yasukawa, K (2011), Working Together: Integrated Language, Literacy and Numeracy Support in Vocational Education and Training, pg 8. 13 Black, S and Yasukawa, K (2011), Working Together: Integrated Language, Literacy and Numeracy Support in Vocational Education and Training, pg 8. 14 Ibid, p40. 15 Australian Industry Group (2013), Getting it Right: Foundation Skills for the Workforce. 16 Australian Workforce and Productivity Agency(2013), Future focus: 2013 National Workforce Development Strategy. ACT Education and Training Directorate Page 7 Prepared by Training and Tertiary Education 3.2 Issues Paper – Foundation Skills Commonwealth programs The Commonwealth Department of Industry currently administers three stand alone LLN programs. The first is the Adult Migrant English Program (AMEP), a national settlement program that provides English language tuition for eligible migrants and humanitarian entrants. AMEP offers up to 510 hours of free English language tuition to eligible adult permanent migrants and humanitarian entrants. A second program, the Special Preparatory Program, offers additional tuition to humanitarian entrants with low levels of schooling or who have had difficult pre-migration experiences, such as torture and or trauma. Another program is the Skills for Education and Employment (SEE), which seeks to improve participants’ LLN with the expectation that such improvements will enable them to participate more effectively in training or in the labour force and lead to greater gains for society in the longer term. SEE provides up to 800 hours of accredited training for jobseekers whose LLN skills are below the level considered necessary to secure sustainable employment. The closure of two other foundation skills programs, the Workplace English Language and Literacy (WELL) program and the Australian Apprenticeship Access (Access) program, were announced as part of the 2014 Federal Budget. Table 1, below, shows the investment in these programs to assist both jobseekers and existing workers with foundation skills development. Table 1: Expenditure on Commonwealth LLN programs Year Program Budget allocation (million) 2013/14 AMEP $264.475 2014/15 AMEP $236.035 2013/14 SEE $135.110 2014/15 SEE $152.518 2013/14 WELL $24.020 2014/15 WELL $8.267 2013/14 Access $32.615 2014/15 Access $5.712 Source: Portfolio Budget Statement 2014-15 Department of Industry and Government to Government Shared Information (2013) ACT Education and Training Directorate Page 8 Prepared by Training and Tertiary Education 3.3 Issues Paper – Foundation Skills ACT programs Table 2, below, sets out the current Foundation Skills programs in the ACT. Table 2: Current ACT foundation skills programs Stand Alone LLN programs AMEP – Canberra Institute of Technology (CIT) SEE – CIT, TAFE NSW Illawarra Foundation Skills Training Package – CIT ACCESS 10 – CIT ESL classes – CIT 3.4 Integrated vocational and foundation skills training programs Priorities Support Program (PSP) Better Linkages Foundation Skills Workforce Development projects CIT pilot programs Additional support funding programs PSP User Choice Learning Support – CIT Drop in Centres - CIT Informal LLN programs Adult and Community Education (ACE) Volunteer programs at libraries and community centres Online Foundation Skills Assessment Tools While there are a number of online assessment tools RTOs can use to assess a student’s LLN, the Department of Industry is developing an interactive online Foundation Skills Assessment Tool (FSAT) to identify and measure an individual’s foundation skill levels. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) has been contracted to develop this tool, building on ACER’s Vocational Indicator. The tool will be freely available to assist learners, job seekers, trainers, educators and employment services practitioners to assess their own or a client’s foundation skill levels, and identify any gaps in skills and knowledge. It will use the theoretical underpinnings of the Australian Core Skills Framework (ACSF) and the Core Skills for Work Developmental Framework. The tool will assist in targeting foundation skill interventions to a maximum benefit and enable reporting on foundation skills training in a consistent way. The project is expected to be completed in 2015. An advantage of having an online tool means that a record is maintained to ensure the student is enrolled in an appropriate level of training as well as identifying any LLN support needs they may have. However, it is possible that such an assessment may mean that students are excluded from training if their support needs are considered to be too difficult for the RTO. 4 Possible models Given current research and examples from other jurisdictions, Table 3 sets out the models that have been considered for foundation skills funding and training options for the ACT Entitlement model, as well as their relative benefits and drawbacks. ACT Education and Training Directorate Page 9 Prepared by Training and Tertiary Education Issues Paper – Foundation Skills Table 3: Possible models for foundation skills provision under Skilled Capital Model Open Market This would be a student demand driven training environment. Students who are entitled to Foundation Skills training would choose the course and RTO of their choice. Advantages The funding stays with the student and they determine their training needs. Disadvantages Preferred Supplier List This model is similar to the User Choice model where RTOs have been approved by the ACT Government to deliver specific qualifications. Students may not have the skills to choose courses independently and funding becomes RTO driven. The ACT Government will need to have a method to determine who needs foundation skills, probably during the initial skills assessment. Research shows that students tend not to seek foundation skills training. The ACT Government could publish a list of RTOs who are registered to deliver foundation skills in ACT. Selected RTOs could be used as a key preferred supplier due to their qualified and experienced LLN teachers. There are 72 RTOs who have Foundation Skills Training Package on their scope of registration in the ACT. This model is logistically difficult for students who may end up at one RTO for foundation skills and another for their qualification. Stand Alone Foundation Skills training This model is to deliver language, literacy, numeracy or employability skills training based on student needs. Because of its focus on general LLN or employability needs, this model is very useful for low level skill for preparatory learning. There is no definite pathway from foundation skills training to vocational training. This is often due to the outcomes required by the funded program, in particular Commonwealth programs. Stand Alone Foundation Skills contextualised to vocational area This model is to deliver language, literacy, numeracy or employability skills training that focused on a specific industry or vocational area. This model makes the LLN training relevant to students who want to complete a qualification. This model ensures that vocational pathways are in place for students. Because of the ACT’s size, it would be difficult to have the numbers of students required for a sustainable contextualised LLN model. ACT Education and Training Directorate Page 10 Prepared by Training and Tertiary Education Issues Paper – Foundation Skills Model Advantages Integrated or blended LLN and vocational delivery This model supports a team teaching approach to training delivery by the vocational teacher and LLN specialist working together. LLN Support This model is where an RTO provides additional learning support to the student. 5 Disadvantages The integration of this model means that all students receive contextualised foundation skills training integrated with vocational training. The current research and LLN practices support both the team teaching delivery and the outcomes of this model. CIT have been conducting pilot projects of foundation skills integrated with vocational training during 2013 and could leverage these learnings in the future implementation of this model. There are 47 RTOs who have the Foundation Skills Training Package on their scope of registration in the ACT. WA has been delivering the team teaching model through Course in Applied Vocational Study Skills (CAVSS) since 1999. In CAVSS, the vocational teacher determines when additional LLN support is required. RTOs only have to apply when student requires specific LLN support to complete training. This model is already being used in User Choice and Priorities Support Program. CIT provides learning support and drop in learning centres for vocational students. RTOs may not have the expertise to deliver this model. Teachers need time and resources to develop and implement this model effectively. Vocational teachers and LLN specialist teachers may be resistant to working outside their traditional areas. The ACT Government will have to assess each application, creating an administrative burden. RTOs may not have the skills to identify the LLN support needs of the student. RTOs would need to access LLN specialists for the support. Recommendations Under Skilled Capital, students undertaking vocational training should have foundation skills training and support available to them. This can be in the form of informal training, learning support or integrated LLN training. As the main intent of Skilled Capital is to increase training participation and completion, stand alone LLN training should only be funded if it is considered gap training and is contextualised to the vocational area the student is intending to enrol in. The integrated model would be funded as an add on (not replacement) using either the Foundation Skills Training Package or a specified range of courses. Learning support would be funded as Additional Support Funding where ACT Education and Training Directorate Page 11 Prepared by Training and Tertiary Education Issues Paper – Foundation Skills RTOs will apply to the ACT Government individually when they have identified a student requires the support (see the Additional Support Issues Paper for more details). 5.1 Student assessment Students must undertake an initial skills assessment to be eligible for Skilled Capital. This is part of the Standard 2.4 of the ACT Standards for Delivery of Training and is a mandatory standard for all RTOs that have an ACT Funding Agreement (ACTFA). Part of the initial skills assesment is the determination of a student’s LLN level. It is recommended that RTOs use this assessment to determine the next step for students. Figure 1 sets out the learning pathways for a student following the initial skills assessment. This shows that if a student does not require foundation skills support to undertake training, they continue with their qualification. However if a student needs foundation skills support, RTOs have four options (see flowchart below) to offer the student: 1. Refer to a stand alone LLN training program 2. RTO provides contextualised foundation skills training prior to the vocational qualification 3. RTO provides integrated foundation skills and vocational training 4. RTO provides individual learning support through Additional Support. If an RTO determines that a student requires additional learning support, it can apply to the ACT Government for Additional Support. (refer to the Additional Support Issues Paper for further information). This support must be provided by a qualified LLN specialist. Figure 1: Learning pathway ACT Education and Training Directorate Page 12 Prepared by Training and Tertiary Education 5.2 Issues Paper – Foundation Skills RTO requirements It is recommended that all RTOs that apply to deliver training under Skilled Capital would need to demonstrate capability to provide foundation skills training and support for all skills training delivery. There will be specific questions on the application regarding RTO strategies and these will be assessed by LLN specialists. If an RTO does not have scope of registration to deliver accredited foundation skills training, it will be required to sub-contract with an RTO that does have scope. The funding would go to the RTO delivering the vocational qualification and they would have a sub-contracting arrangement with the RTO providing the foundation skills training. To ensure RTOs do not claim foundation skills training that is not necessary, it is recommended that an RTO that has received Foundation Skills funding through Skilled Capital will be required to show evidence at the time of audit. This would include the LLN assessment conducted as part of the initial skills assessment and documented evidence that this has been aligned to the ACSF. Similar requirements should also be in place for RTOs receiving Additional Support. 5.3 Funded courses All funding for foundation skills training will be in addition to the vocational training funded under Skilled Capital. All Skilled Capital students will be eligible for up to six units of competency (UoCs) from approved foundation skills training courses. The training will be paid to the RTO on completion of each UOC and the submission of correct data to the ACT Government. The ACT Skilled Capital Qualifications List identifies specific foundation skills courses that will be approved to be funded. Courses being considered are: Foundation Skills Training Package Course in Preliminary Spoken and Written English Certificates I, II and III in Spoken and Written English Certificate IV in Spoken and Written English – Further Studies Certificate IV in Spoken and Written English – Employment There will be no student tuition fees for foundation skills training and the funding will be 100 per cent of the published subsidy amount. 5.4 ACT Government progress The ACT Government has begun piloting certain aspects of the ACT entitlement model within the PSP in 2014. All applications were required to specify how they assess and address foundation skill needs in training programs. Applications were evaluated for the appropriateness and relevance of the offered foundation skills support. In PSP 2014, RTOs were encouraged to provide foundation skills support either by integrating foundation skills units of competencies with the vocational training or by providing non-accredited foundation skills support. The Priorities Support Program Qualification List 2014 identified 26 foundation skill courses and listed the prices per unit of competency for RTOs to apply for funding to integrate foundation skills into their vocational training. To assist RTOs to develop foundation skills strategies and support for students, the ACT Government will provide professional development workshops. In 2014 this will include funding RTO staff to ACT Education and Training Directorate Page 13 Prepared by Training and Tertiary Education Issues Paper – Foundation Skills undertake TAALLN411 Address adult language, literacy and numeracy skills. Other workshops will include how to use the Foundation Skills Training Package effectively when integrating this training with skills training. ACT Education and Training Directorate Page 14 Appendix A – Jurisdictional Comparison Table 4:Comparison of foundation skills included in vocational training across different states and territories New South Wales Implementation Victoria South Australia Queensland Western Australia January 2015 2008 2012 2013 Age requirements 15 or over without a certificate IV or above Over 15 16 and over 15 or over, no longer at school Range of courses Identified foundation skill qualifications, published on website Identified foundation skill qualifications, published on website Identified foundation skill qualifications, published on website Identified foundation skill qualifications, published on website CAVSS, USIQ and other identified foundation skill qualifications Foundation skills courses, certificate I and II courses and courses in priority areas are student fee free Set by RTO and concessions apply Set by WA Government and concessions apply Courses limit Student fees January 2014 Tasmania 2014 Over 15 17 and over, no longer at school Identified foundation skill qualifications, published on website Certificate III in General Education for Adults 2 courses per year Set by NSW Government and concessions apply Set by RTO and concessions apply Northern Territory Page 15 Issues Paper – Foundation Skills New South Wales Victoria South Australia Queensland Western Australia Funding mechanisms Approved RTOs will be paid a loading on top of the base price for training disadvantaged students, on a per qualification basis Funding is paid per hour of training delivery and higher subsidies are provided for foundation skill qualifications Funding is paid at an hourly rate per unit of competency Funding is provided per qualification and the Queensland Government will pay a higher subsidy for any participant requiring literacy and numeracy training Foundation skills courses and qualifications will receive the highest proportion of government subsidy – for example CAVSS and USIQ are subsidised 100 per cent and other identified foundation skill qualifications subsidised at 99 per cent RTOs Entitlement training (selected foundation skills, certificate II and III) will be a demand driven model; government funding for the training will follow the student to their choice of approved RTO Fully contestable open market model Increased contestability, working towards full contestability From July 2014 funding for entitlement training will be fully contestable. Foundation skills and Access programs only at TAFE ACT Education and Training Directorate Page 16 Tasmania Northern Territory Only public RTOs at this stage Page 16 Issues Paper – Foundation Skills New South Wales Other information Foundation skills training through TAFE NSW and ACE will give students basic language, literacy, numeracy and computer skills ACT Education and Training Directorate Victoria South Australia Certificate I in Education and Skills Development (SA state based LLN course) is one of the top 10 growth qualifications in TAFE SA and has increased course enrolments by 1362 people in 2012 Queensland The Certificate III Guarantee will support any students requiring foundation skills – language, literacy or numeracy. Enrolment in these courses may occur in parallel with the qualification above being undertaken and will not affect a student’s entitlement to a certificate III level qualification Page 17 Western Australia Caps on qualification numbers Tasmania The 26TEN Adult Literacy Plan provides $1 million per year for programs in the workplace and communities. There is a register of qualified teachers for employers and RTOs to access Page 17 Northern Territory Prepared by Training and Tertiary Education Issues Paper – Foundation Skills Appendix B – PIAAC Data This appendix sets out data from Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), Australia. There were small differences in the proficiency scores for the three domains by state or territory, with the exception of the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) which had a larger proportion of people at higher levels in all domains. In the ACT, 67 per cent were at literacy Level 3 or above, followed by 56 per cent in Queensland. The numeracy figures were led by the ACT with 59 per cent at Level 3 or above, followed by Queensland with 46 per cent. The ACT also scored highest for problem solving in technology rich environment (PSTRE) with 44 per cent at Level 2 or above, followed by Victoria with 29 per cent. Figure 2: Proportion at literacy Level 3 or above, by jurisdiction of usual residence and sex, 2011-12 ACT Education and Training Directorate Page 18 Prepared by Training and Tertiary Education Issues Paper – Foundation Skills Figure 3: Proportion at numeracy Level 3 or above, by jurisdiction of usual residence and sex—2011–12 Figure 4: Proportion at PSTRE Level 2 or above, by jurisdiction of usual residence and sex—2011–12 ACT Education and Training Directorate Page 19