ART 497: Introduction to Research Methods Fall 2013 Instructor: Ed Stewart, PhD. Office: CVA 215C Office phone: (309) 438-7327 e-mail: eostewa@ilstu.edu http://www.ilstu.edu/~eostewa Office Hours: H 10:00 - 12:00 (or by appointment). This syllabus is subject to change as the instructor sees fit or necessary. TEXTBOOK: Patten, M. (2007). Understanding research methods. Glendale, CA: Pyrczak Publishing. Course Description: Introduction and survey of bibliography, methods of scholarly research, and critical evaluation of research and writing in the field. This material will be covered in the context of the thesis proposal writing process. The majority of readings will be from journal articles, actual grant proposals, and chapters in various texts. Objectives: 1. To understand the major types of research through a review of examples taken from the literature in art education, and other relevant sources. 2. To design and implement a research project. 5. To develop time lines and budget issues. 6. To demonstrate how to develop and implement needs assessment and evaluation procedures for research projects and grants (often a part of many funding agencies’ grant proposals). 7. To illustrate how to avoid pitfalls in implementing research. Course Requirements: 1. Familiarization of resources for research beyond art education journals. LIBRARY WORKSHEET (10%) 2. Familiarization and developing competence in use of APA format in writing papers and developing reference lists. REFERENCE LIST & ARTICLE REVIEWES (10%) 3. Review and critique of assigned articles throughout the semester. 8 RESEARCH REPORTS (30%) 4. Development of a proposal for a research project including a survey of literature on chosen topics for either a grant or a research project. RESEARCH PROPOSAL (30%) 5. Research proposal presentation and critique including asking/answering questions about the proposal. PROPOSAL PRESENTATION TO THE CLASS 6. Class participation. TAKE PART IN DISCUSSIONS AND REFLECTIONS COURSE SCHEDULE (10%) (10%) The professor reserves the right to alter the syllabus for better student learning. Week 1 Introduction types of research. how to skim articles. basic APA style. a little basic vocabulary. scavenger hunt. overview of proposal writing process. CITI Training go to https://www.citiprogram.org/ Week 2 Students will begin reading examples of different types of research from the art education literature. Please refer to your class bibliography for examples. Literature Reviews, Survey Research, & Historical Research Research Issues & Literature Reviews. Reaction papers and class discussion. All students will provide a report that includes: Overall response to the article; was the review clear in its intent? Was the review comprehensive...what limits were imposed in terms of types of studies, dates, content? What questions did it raise? What questions did it answer? Students will begin their own literature reviews. USE APA STYLE IN REPORTS Week 3 Experimental Research/Quasi-Experimental Research / Ex Post Facto. Week 4 Naturalistic/Ethnographic & Qualitative Week 5 Your Research Topic Week 6 Presentation of Research Proposals All papers should follow APA style guidelines. APA guidelines for most used formatting issues Headings: 111 Quotations: 117 Reference Citations in Text: 207 Reference List: 215 Manuscript prep: 283 Sample manuscript pages: 306 - 320 Sample of an article citation in Reference list: Authors last name, First initial. (year of publication). Title of article. Title of Publication, volume # italicized (number if each volume begins with page 1 in parenthesis), page #s. Order of Proposal / Thesis: 1. Title Page 2. Summary or Abstract* 3. Begin the paper with a brief Introduction which references some of the literature and sets up the purpose and need statements. 4. Purpose of the Study 5. Need for the Study 6. Research question 7. Sub questions 8. Research Hypothesis 9. Null Hypothesis (if applicable) 10. Terms 11. Survey of Literature (becomes review of literature in Thesis. 12. Procedures (Methods) participants treatment instrumentation data collection 13. Analysis (in proposal explain what the data will be, how it will be collected and how it will be used). 14. Conclusions (in the proposal what do you expect to find given what the literature says) 15. References 16. Appendix* *These sections will be in the thesis but not in the proposal. The most common error in proposals is the failure to follow APA formatting in citations in text and in references. Proposals are written in future tense (because you are explaining what you will do) except for the review of literature (because that is about what has been written). Art 497 Introduction to Research Methods Bibliography on Types of Studies from the Published Research Literature in Art Education compiled by Dr. F. E. Anderson HISTORICAL RESEARCH Bolin, P.E, (1995). Overlooked and obscured through history; The legislative bill proposed to amend the Massachusetts drawing act of 1870. Studies in Art Education, 37(1), 55-64. Bolin, P.E, Blandy, D., Congdon, K. G. (Eds.) (2000). Remembering others: Making invisible histories of art education visible. Reston, VA: National Art Education Association. Duncum, P. (1985). How children born between 1724 and 1900 learned to draw. . Studies in Art Education, 26(2), 93-99. Efland, A. (1988). Studies in art education: Fourth invited lecture: How art became a discipline: Looking at our recent history. Studies in Art Education, ??(?), 262-274. Kader, T. (2000). The bible of art history: Gardner’s art through the ages. Studies in Art Education, 41(2), 164-177. McNutt, J. K. (1990). Plaster casts after antique sculpture: Their role in the elevation of public taste and in American art instruction. Studies in Art Education, 31(3), 158-167. Peers, C. (2002). Tracing an approach to art teaching: A historical study of an art education documentary film. Studies in Art Education, 43(3), 264-277. Sproll, P. A.C. (1994). Matters of taste and matters of commerce: British government intervention in art education in 1835. Studies in Art Education, 35(2), 105-133. SURVEY RESEARCH (STATUS STUDIES) Anderson, F. E. (1976). The arts and the elderly: An assessment of interest and attitude. Studies in Art Education, 18(2), 30-38. Anderson, F. E. and Landgartten, H. (1975). Art in mental health. Studies in Art Education, 15(3), 45-56 Freedman, K. and Wood, J.. (1999). Reconsidering critical response: Student judgments of purpose, interpretation, and relationships in visual culture, Studies in Art Education, 40(2), 128-142. Glenn, D. D. and Sherman, A. (1983). The status of women art education faculty in higher education. Studies in Art Education, 24(3), 184-186. Jeffers, C. S. (1996). Professional development in art education today: A survey of Kansas art teachers. Studies in Art Education, 37(2), 101-114. Lampela, L. (1994). A description of art text books used in Ohio. Studies in Art Education, 35(4), 228-236. (description survey research). Luftig, R. (2003). So what are you doing after college? An investigation of individuals studying the arts at the post-secondary level, their job aspirations and levels of realism, Studies in Art Education, 45(1), 5-19. LITERATURE REVIEWS (STATUS STUDIES AND META ANALYSIS) Anderson, F. E. (1983). Approaches to cross-cultural research in arts education. Studies in Art Education, 21(1), 21-31 Barret, D.B. (1993). Art programming for older adults: What’s out there. Studies in Art Education, 34(3), 133-140. Haanstra, F. (1996). Effects of art education on visual-spatial ability and aesthetic perception: A quantitative review. Studies in Art Education, 37 (4), 197-209. Jones, J. E. (1993). The influence of age on self-directed learning in university and community adult art students. Studies in Art Education, 34 (3), 158-166. Sullivan, G. (1993). Art-based art education: Learning that is meaningful, authentic, critical, and pluralist. Studies in Art Education, 35(1), 5-21. Tomhave, R. (1992). Value bases underlying conceptions of multicultural education: An analysis of selected literature in art education. Studies in Art Education, 34(1), 48-60. EX POST FACTO STUDIES (Causal-Comparative) (STATUS STUDIES ) Anderson, F. E. (1971). Aesthetic sensitivity, dogmatism and the Eisner art inventories. Studies in Art Education, 12(2), 23-34. Anderson, F. E. (1969). Aesthetic sensitivity, previous art experiences, and participation in the scholastic art awards. Studies in Art Education, 10(3), 34-44. Clark, G. A. (1993). Judging childrens’ drawings as measures of art abilities.. Studies in Art Education, 34(2), 77-81. Dalton, K. (1995). Childrens’ use of baselines: Influences of a circular format. Studies in Art Education, 36(2), 105-113. Nelson, P. Lavern, Martin, Sue S. & Baldwin, Vernoice G. (1998). Drawing skills and science concepts in young children: A study of relationships. Studies in Art Education, 39(3), 262-269. Neprud, R. W. & Stuhr, P, L. (1993). Cross cultural valuing of Wisconsin Indian art by Indians and non-indians. Studies in Art Education, 34(4), 362-369. QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES American Legion Magazine (1994). Studies show that prayer after surgery leads to faster healing. August, 20-21. Erickson, M. (1995). Second and sixth grade students’ art historical interpretation abilities: A one-year study. Studies in Art Education, 37(1), 19-28. Luftig, R. L. (2000). An investigation of an arts infusion program on creative thinking, academic achievement, affective functioning, and arts appreciation of children at three grade levels. Studies in Art Education, 41(3), 208-227. EXPERIMENTAL Carson, N. F. (1998). Interactive multi media. An alternative context for studying works of art. Studies in Art Education, 39(4), 336-349. Brewer, T M. & Colbert, C. B. (1992). The effect of contrasting instructional strategies on seventh-grade students’ ceramic vessels. Studies in Art Education, 34(1), 18-27. Brewer, T. M. (1998). The relation of art instruction, grade level, and gender on third and seventh-grade student drawings. Studies in Art Education, 38(1), 132-146. Hardima, G. W. and Zernich, T. (1984). Subjective responses to paintings as originals, colored slides, and colored prints. Studies in Art Education, 25(2), 104-114. QUALITATIVE STUDIES (CASE STUDIES: CONTENT ANALYSIS AND ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDIES) Anglin, J. M. (1993). Three views of middle school art curriculum. Studies in Art Education, 35(1), 55-64. (content analysis of documents and interviews, and ethnographic observations). Grauer, K. (1998). Beliefs of pre-service teachers toward art. Studies in Art Education, 39(4), 350-370. (case study) Wolf, P. (1997). A really good art teacher would be like you, Mrs. C.: A qualitative study of an art teacher and her artistically gifted middle school students. Studies in Art Education, 38(4), 232-245. Zimmerman, E. ((1992). A comparative study of two painting teachers of talented adolescents. Studies in Art Education, 33(3), 174-185 QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES Anderson, F. E. (1991). Evaluating the very special arts festival programs nationwide: An attempt at combining subjective and quantitative approaches.. Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal, 14(3), 109-114. ARTICLES/CHAPTERS ABOUT RESEARCH ISSUES Bresler, Liora. (1998). Ethical issues in the conduct and communication of ethnographic classroom issues. Studies in Art Education, 38(), -. Rubin, J. A. (1981). Research in art with the handicapped: Problems and promises. Studies in Art Education, 23(1), 7-11. Rush, J. C. & Krathochwill, T. R. (1981). Time series strategies for studying behavior change: Implications for research in visual arts education. Studies in Art Education, 22(1), 57-67.