The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
School of Nursing
Total Program Systematic Evaluation Plan (TPSEP)
FA- Faculty Assembly
FC –Faculty Council
2008-09 – 2012-13
Results of Review FY 09-10
Reviewed during 10-11
Evaluation Component
Expected Outcome
Evaluation Data
STANDARD I - PROGRAM QUALITY: MISSION AND GOVERNANCE
1.1 Mission, goals and
Mission, goals and
SON mission, goals,
expected outcomes are
expected outcomes are
expected outcomes
consistent with
100% consistent with
AACN Professional
professional nursing
professional nursing
nursing standards:
standards and guidelines
standards.
BS MS. DNP
NTF (2008) criteria
1A
1.2 Mission, Goals, and
Expected Student
Outcomes of SON are
reviewed periodically to
ensure congruency with
HSC
HSC and SON mission,
goals and expected
outcomes are 100%
congruent
HSC and SON
Mission, goals, and
expected student
outcomes
Responsible for
Collection & Analysis
Curriculum Committee
for the Undergraduate
Program
Collection Schedule
Action Plan
Action Result
Location of Document
Every 5 years
or earlier as needed
SON mission, goals, expected
outcomes
AACN latest professional
nursing standards:
BS MS. DNP
NTF (2008) criteria
9/4/09
Review 201314
FC Agenda
Sept 2013
Faculty Assembly
Official minutes kept in
Dean’s Suite
9/4/09
Every 5 years
or earlier as needed
Crafted SON mission, goals
and expected outcomes to be
100% congruent with HSC
strategic plan 9/4/09
Review 201314
FC Agenda
Sept 2013
Faculty Assembly
Official minutes kept in
Dean’s Suite
9/4/09
Committee on Graduate
Studies
Faculty Assembly
Faculty Council
Actual Outcome
https://tracdat.uthscsa.edu/tracdat
1A
1.3 Mission, goals and
expected student outcomes
are reviewed periodically
and revised as appropriate
to reflect professional
nursing standards
Mission, goals and
expected student outcomes
are :
reviewed periodically and
revised to reflect
professional nursing
standards 100% of time
SON mission, goals ,
expected outcomes
Professional nursing
standards
Minutes of meetings
Total Program
Systematic Evaluation
Plan(TPSEP)
Curriculum Committee
for the Undergraduate
Program
Mission, goals and
expected outcomes are
reviewed periodically and
revised to reflect needs and
expectations of community
of interest 100% of time
SON mission, goals,
student outcomes
Needs and
expectations of
community of interest
Minutes of meetings
TPSEP
Faculty Council
SON expected faculty
outcomes in teaching,
scholarship, service and
practice are congruent with
mission, goals and
expected student outcomes
100% of time
SON mission, goals,
expected outcomes
SON expected faculty
outcomes in :
teaching, scholarship,
service, practice
Faculty Council
Faculty Assembly
1B
1.4 Mission goals and
expected outcomes are
reviewed periodically and
revised as appropriate to
reflect needs and
expectations of community
of interest
Annual - Sept
Committee on Graduate
Studies
COUS/COGS
Review 2011
Mission, goals and expected
outcomes were reviewed to
reflect needs and expectations
of community of interest
100% of time*
Teaching/Scholarship and
Organization Effectiveness
9/4/09 – next review 2012
Faculty Practice goals
currently being revised to
reflect community of interest
Faculty
Council 201112
SON faculty outcomes in
teaching, scholarship, service
and practice are congruent
with mission, goals and
expected student outcomes
66%
of time
9/4/09 – next review 20112
Review faculty
scholarship
outcomes in
light of HSC
PTAC 2009/10
FC Agenda
Sept
Faculty Assembly
Every 3 years
or earlier as needed
1B
1.5 Expected faculty
outcomes in teaching,
scholarship, service and
practice are congruent with
mission,, goals and
expected student outcomes
1C
Mission, goals and expected
student outcomes will be
reviewed by September each
year and revised to reflect
professional nursing standards
100% of time
Every 3 years
or earlier as needed
FC agenda
Sept 2012
FC agenda
Sept 2012
Faculty Assembly
Official minutes kept in
Dean’s Suite
9/4/09
Evaluation Component
Expected Outcome
Evaluation Data
STANDARD I - PROGRAM QUALITY: MISSION AND GOVERNANCE
1.6 Faculty and students
Faculty and students
Participation
participate in program
participate according to the documented in
governance
Faculty Assembly Bylaws
minutes of formal
1D 100% of the time
Faculty Assembly
Committees
Responsible for
Collection & Analysis
Collection Schedule
Actual Outcome
Action Plan
Chairs of Faculty
Assembly Committees
Annual - May
Faculty and student elections
held for 2010-11 per Faculty
Assembly Bylaws
FC agenda
May each year
1.7 Documents and
publications are accurate
and reflect program’s
offerings, outcomes,
accreditation/approval
status, academic calendar,
recruitment and admission
policies, transfer of credit
policies, grading policies,
degree completion
requirements, tuition, and
fees are accurate.
1E
100% documents, website
and publications are
accurate
Program offerings
Program outcomes
Accreditation Status
Academic calendar
Recruitment policies
Admission policies
Transfer credit
policies
Grading policies
Degree completion
requirements
Tuition
Fees
Associate Dean for
Admissions and Student
Services
Associate Deans-Grad
and Undergrad
Chairs of COUS, COGS
Every semester
review documents and
website for accuracy
Nov 10 new catalog on web
site
FC agenda
Sept each year
May each year
1.8 Academic policies of
SON are reviewed
periodically to ensure
congruency with HSC.
1F
Academic policies are
reviewed periodically and
congruent with HSC 95%
of time
SON Academic
policies and
HSC academic
policies:
Recruitment
Admission
Retention
Progression
TPSEP
Minutes of meetings
Faculty Council/
Associate Deans for U/G
& Graduate Nursing
Programs; Associate
Dean for Admissions &
Student Services
Annual - Dec
Dec 2010 template was
presented to Faculty Council
to review cultural
proficiencies to review
academic policies and
procedures – Examining
Policies and Practices: For
alignment with Culturally
proficient mission and values.
Looking at how to collect data
for students.
FC agenda
Dec each year
1.9 Differences in
policies are identified and
support achievement of
SON mission, goals and
expected outcomes
1F
1.10 Academic policies
are fair and equitable and
implemented consistently
100% of SON polices that
differ from HSC are
identified and support
mission, goals and
expected outcomes of SON
Policies that differ
COUS
COGS
Associate Deans for U/G
& Graduate Nursing
Programs
Annual - Dec
Graduate and undergraduate
admissions
Incompletes
March 2011
FC agenda
Dec each year
100% policies fair,
equitable and implemented
consistently
Academic policies in
SON Student
Guide
Graduate School
Handbook
HSC Catalog
Course Syllabi
Course Packets
Appeals process
Associate Deans – Grad
and Undergrad
Dean; Associate Dean for
Admissions & Student
Services
Annual - Dec
Present findings at Faculty
Council each Dec
FC agenda
Dec each year
1F
Action Result
Location of Document
Nomination Committee
minutes and committee
minutes for
COUS/COGS/COFSM
Minutes in Dean’s Suite
Evaluation Component
Expected Outcome
Evaluation Data
STANDARD I - PROGRAM QUALITY: MISSION AND GOVERNANCE
1.11 Academic policies
100% policies published
Academic policies
are published
Handbooks
1F
HSC Student Guide
HSC Viewbook
HSC Catalog
Faculty Advisors
Handbook
Faculty/Staff
Handbook
1.12 There are established 100% of FORMAL
Documentation of
policies by which the
COMPLAINTS will be
adherence to
nursing unit defines and
processed through formal
complaint process
reviews formal complaints
mechanisms
1G
Responsible for
Collection & Analysis
Collection Schedule
Actual Outcome
Action Plan
Associate Deans-Grad
and Undergrad;
Associate Dean for
Admissions & Student
Services
Annual- FC agenda
Dec each year
Will present findings at
Faculty Council each Dec
FC agenda
Dec each year
Appropriate Associate
Dean and Dean
Annual- Sept
Formal complaint book – no
complaints 09-10 and as of
2/21/11
FC agenda
Sept each year
Action Result
Location of Document
Evaluation Component
Responsible for
Collection & Analysis
STANDARD II - PROGRAM QUALITY: INSTITUTIONAL COMMITMENT AND RESOURCES
2.1 Fiscal and physical
Resources are adequate to
Physical resources and Dean
resources are sufficient to
meet the mission goals, and
fiscal resources
Assistant Dean for
enable the program to
expected outcomes.
Administration
fulfill its mission, goals,
Associate Deans
and expected outcomes.
Chairs
IIA
2.2 Adequacy of resources
is reviewed and resources
are modified as needed
Expected Outcome
Review process is
transparent and follows
university policies
Budgets prepared by
Chairs and Associate
Deans and Directors
Consultation with
student leadership
IIA
2.3 Academic support
services are sufficient to
ensure quality
Evaluation Data
Collection Schedule
Actual Outcome
Action Plan
Action Result
Location of
Document
Annual - Oct
Increase in base budget for
FY 2010
Review conducted of
physical space with
Admissions and Student
Services facilities revision
completed.
FC agenda
Oct each year
SON Business
Office
Dean
Assistant Dean for
Administration
Associate Deans
Chairs
Directors
Annual - Oct
Budgets were prepared by
Chairs and Associate Deans
and Directors
Student Leader luncheon –
SBO with Dean – 3/26/10 &
4/30/10
Class Officers meetings Semester 1 & 2 -2/6/10 &
4/8/10
Semester 3 & 4 - 3/26/10 &
4-8-10
Associate Dean for
Admissions and Student
Services created based on
consultation reports.
FC agenda
Oct each year
SoN Business Office
100% of Academic support
services were evaluated by
students. Survey of
academic service 2010.
Will do separate nursing
survey.
Need survey of
Academic
Services to be
completed by
faculty
Academic support services
are sufficient and a process
is in place to review and
assure quality improvement
in services
Student exit surveys
Alumni surveys
Consultants’ reports
Assoc Deans Grad and
Undergrad
Annually (Oct) or more
frequently as needed
100% of Academic support
services are evaluated
regularly
Evaluation data
Student and faculty
surveys
Chairs/Associate
Deans will develop
survey for faculty with
ACETs input
Annual - Sept
FC agenda
Oct each year
IIB
2.4 Academic support
services are evaluated on a
regular basis to meet
program and student needs
IIB
FC agenda
Sept each year
2.5 The chief nurse
administrator is a registered
nurse, holds graduate
degree is academically and
experientially qualified to
accomplish the mission,
goals and expected
outcomes
IIC
Meets criteria as stated
100% of time
Board of Nursing
license
Official transcripts
Dean’s CV
HSC President
Annual
Chief nurse appropriate
credentialed – no change
HSC President’s
Office
Evaluation Component
Responsible for
Collection & Analysis
STANDARD II - PROGRAM QUALITY: INSTITUTIONAL COMMITMENT AND RESOURCES
2.6 The chief nurse
100% congruence with
HSC Handbook of
HSC President
administrator is vested with other deans of schools
Operating Procedures
the administrative authority authority
to accomplish the mission,
goals, and expected student
and facultyoutcomes
IIC
2.7 The chief nurse
administrator provides
effective leadership to the
nursing unit in achieving its
mission, goals and
expected student and
faculty outcomes
IIC
2.8 There is sufficient
faculty to provide
attainment of SON goals.
Expected Outcome
Effective leadership is
demonstrated 100% of the
time.
100% of the faculty are
engaged in at least one of
the research/scholarship,
practice/service and ,
teaching missions of the
school
Evaluation Data
Annual evaluation by
HSC President
5 year comprehensive
(360) evaluation
Data from letters of
appointment which
includes FTE formula
for program
commitments
President
Department Chairs
Collection Schedule
Actual Outcome
Annual
100% congruence with other
Deans of schools authority.
Annual
Performance evaluation by
President resulted in merit
increase 10/09. Positive
evaluation for 2010 by
President – letter on file
5 years
5 year evaluation due 2013
Every semester
May
Dec
100% of the faculty are
engaged in at least one of
the research/scholarship,
practice/service and ,
teaching missions of the
school
IID
Student faculty ratio in
classroom and clinical
activities meet BON Rules
and Regulations and
National Standards 100% of
the time
2.9 Faculty members are
academically and
experientially qualified for
their teaching
responsibilities
IID
100% of Faculty have role
and functional preparation
in area of teaching;
academic background in
area of teaching.
Current CV
TX Board of Nursing
(BON) Report
Department Chairs
Annual - Oct
Student faculty ratio in
classroom and clinical
activities meet BON Rules
and Regulations and
National Standards 100% of
the time – ratio - 1 faculty
for 6 student undergrad/grad
combine
100% of faculty have role
and functional preparation in
area of teaching; academic
background in area of
teaching 9-10
Action Plan
Action Result
Location of
Document
HSC Handbook policy
Faculty
workload
calculations
reexamined in
2008 and
adopted in SON
May 2008
FC agenda
May each year
Dec each year
FC agenda
Oct each year
Workload
calculations
guidelines
were
implemented
08/09 and
reviewed 02/11
and approved
Faculty Workload
document completed
by Department
Chairs – distributed
to faculty 10/9/09
Documents housed
in Dean’s Suite
Evaluation Component
Expected Outcome
Evaluation Data
Responsible for
Collection & Analysis
STANDARD II - PROGRAM QUALITY: INSTITUTIONAL COMMITMENT AND RESOURCES
2.10 Preceptors are
100% preceptors prepared
Current CV
Assoc Deans – Grad
academically and
academically and
Clinical Agencies
and Undergrad
experientially prepared for
experientially
MOUs
Clinical Coordinator
role in assisting in
Department Chairs
achieving SON’s mission,
50% preceptors serving
goals and expected
more than two years hold
outcomes
Non paid Adjunct
IIE appointments w/o salary
Collection Schedule
Semester
May
Dec
Actual Outcome
100% preceptors prepared
academically and
experientially 08-09.
Reviewed 09-10 and
approved
Plan: 50% preceptors
serving more than two years
hold Non paid Adjunct
appointments w/o salary
Action Plan
7-10 Ad Hoc
Committee met
to establish
criteria &
review
Preceptor
credentials
02/11 HSC
academic
administration is
revising process
for academic
appointments
for the entire
HSC.
FC agenda
May each year
Dec each year
2.11 HSC and School
provide and support an
environment that
encourages faculty
teaching, scholarship,
services, and practice in
keeping with the mission,
goals, and expected
facultyoutcomes.
Internal and external
sources of funding available
for faculty development in
research, instruction,
practice/service
Expected outcomes for
faculty role engagement are
clearly defined 100% of
Time
IIF
Consultants are regularly
utilized for program review
Funded faculty
research
Faculty development
programs
appointments
Consultants
Faculty Handbook has
faculty role
delineation, promotion
and tenure
Assoc Dean Research
Assoc Dean Grad and
Undergrad
Department Chairs
Faculty Assembly
Asst Dean for
Administration
Annual - Sept
Annual - Sept
FY 09-10 – Dean committed
a total $1,022,759 for
Faculty Development
FC agenda
Sept each year
Action Result
Location of
Document
Evaluation Component
Responsible for
Collection Schedule
Actual Outcome
Collection & Analysis
STANDARD III - PROGRAM QUALITY: CURRICULUM, TEACHING-LEARNING PRACTICES AND INDIVIDUAL STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
3.1 The curriculum is
Curricula are 100%
Minutes of Faculty
Faculty Assembly
Annual - Sept
Curricula revisions are
developed, implemented,
consistent with the SON
Assembly
Faculty Council
100% consistent with
and revised by the faculty
mission, goals, expected
Minutes of COUS
COUS
the SON mission, goals,
to reflect clear statements
outcomes and community
Minutes of COGS
COGS
expected outcomes and
of expected individual
needs assessment.
Minutes of GSBS
GSBS
community needs
student learning outcomes
Minutes of Faculty
Assoc Deans Grad and
assessment.
that are congruent with the
Curriculum reflects clear
Council
Undergrad
program’s mission, goals,
statements of individual
Course Syllabi
Curriculum reflects
and expected aggregate
student learning outcomes
Alumni surveys
clear statements of
student outcomes.
100% of time
Course evaluations
individual student
Community needs
learning outcomes
IIIA
assessment
100% of time
3.2 Expected individual
learning outcomes are
consistent with roles for
which programs preparing
graduates
IIIB
3.3 Curricula are
developed, implemented
and revised to reflect
relevant professional
nursing standards and
guidelines, which are
clearly evident within the
curriculum, expected
individual student learning
outcomes, and expected
aggregate student
outcomes.
IIIB
Expected Outcome
Evaluation Data
Action Plan
FC agenda
Sept each year
I00% of learning outcomes
are consistent with roles for
which program prepares
students
Expected learning
outcomes
Minutes of COUS and
COGS
Course syllabi
COUS
COGS
Annual - Sept
I00% of learning
outcomes are consistent
with roles for which
program prepares
students 10/09
FC agenda
Sept each year
100% Curricula are based
on:
Committee on
Undergraduate studies
Committee on
Graduate Studies
Course Syllabi
COUS
COGS
Associate Deans for the
Graduate &
Undergraduate programs
Annual - Sept
100% Curricula are
based on:
FC agenda
Sept each year
BSN:The Essentials for
Baccalaureate for
Professional Nursing
Education (AACN
1998:2008)
BSN: The Essentials for
Baccalaureate for
Professional Nursing
Education (AACN
1998:2008)
Specialty Standards, e.g.,
AWHONN
NAPNAP
Specialty Standards,
e.g., AWHONN
NAPNAP
Masters:The Essentials
Master’s of Education for
Advanced Practice
Nursing(AACN, 1996,
2009)
Masters: The Essentials
of Masters Education
for Advanced Practice
Nursing(AACN, 1996,
2009)
Masters:The white paper for
Clinical Nurse Leader
(AACN 2006)
Masters: The white
paper for Clinical Nurse
Leader (AACN 2006)
Masters and DNP:Criteria
for Evaluation for Nurse
Practitioner Programs
(NTF, 2008)
Masters and DNP:
Criteria for Evaluation
for Nurse Practitioner
Programs (NTF, 2008)
ANA standards of practice
(graduate and
undergraduate programs)
ANA standards of
practice (graduate and
undergraduate
programs)
Action Result
Location of Document
n/a
Undergraduate and
Graduate Deans office
Evaluation Component
Expected Outcome
Evaluation Data
Responsible for
Collection & Analysis
Collection Schedule
DNP: Essential of Doctoral
Education for ANP (AACN
2006)
3.4 The curriculum is
logically structured to
achieve expected individual
and aggregate student
outcomes
IIIC
100% of the baccalaureate
curriculum builds upon a
foundation of the arts,
sciences, and humanities
100% of the master’s
curricula build on a
foundation comparable to
baccalaureate level nursing
knowledge
90% of students rate
teaching learning
experiences sufficient to
achieve expected student
learning outcomes for each
course
Action Plan
DNP: Essential of
Doctoral Education for
ANP (AACN 2006)
Program’s course
sequence
Minutes of meetings
NCLEX ,
certifications,
graduation/retention
rates
Faculty Assembly
COUS
COGS
Assoc Deans –Undergrad
and Grad
Faculty Council
Annually - October
100% of the
baccalaureate
curriculum builds upon
a foundation of the arts,
sciences, and
humanities – Oct 09
FC agenda
Oct each year
100% of the master’s
curricula build on a
foundation comparable
to baccalaureate level
nursing knowledge–
Oct 09
100% of the DNP curricula
build on a baccalaureate
and/or master’s foundation,
depending on the level of
entry of the student
3.5 Teaching-learning
practices and environments
support achievement of
individual student learning
outcomes and aggregate
student outcomes
IIID
Actual Outcome
100% of the DNP
curricula build on a
baccalaureate and/or
master’s foundation,
depending on the level
of entry of the student–
Oct 09
Student course
evaluations
(classroom, clinical,
teacher)
Assoc Deans – Grad and
Undergrad – analysis and
evaluation
Department chairs –
collection and aggregate
teaching evaluations for
each department and give
to Associate Deans
Semester
May
Dec
Fall 09 -100% of
responding students rate
teaching learning
experiences sufficient
to achieve expected
student learning
outcomes for each
course
Spring 10 - 100% of
responding students rate
teaching learning
experiences sufficient
to achieve expected
student learning
outcomes for each
course
Course ratings of at
least 4.0 on 5 point
scale
FC agenda
May each year
Dec each year
Action Result
Location of Document
Evaluation Component
Expected Outcome
3.6 Curriculum and
teaching learning practices
consider needs and
expectations of identified
community of interest
IIIE
90% of students, faculty,
and employers agree that
teaching-learning practices
meet their needs and
expectations for each
program
Evaluation Data
Student exit surveys
Alumni evaluation of
program
Employer Surveys
Faculty course
evaluations
Student course
evaluations
Responsible for
Collection & Analysis
Assoc Deans –Grad,
Undergrad, and
Admissions and Student
Collection Schedule
Semester
May
Dec
Actual Outcome
Fall 09 -100% of
responding students,
faculty, and employers
agree that teachinglearning practices meet
their needs and
expectations for each
program
Action Plan
FC agenda
May each year
Dec each year
Spring 10 - 100% of
responding students,
faculty, and employers
agree that teachinglearning practices meet
their needs and
expectations for each
program
3.7 Individual student
performance is evaluated
by faculty and reflects
achievement of expected
learning outcomes
IIIF
Faculty evaluate student
performance 100% of the
time
100% of faculty evaluations
of students reflect
achievement of expected
student learning outcomes.
Course syllabievaluation criteria
Examines learning
activities, and clinical
evaluation tools are
reflective of expected
learning outcomes
COUS
COGS
Every term
May
Dec
Fall 09 Faculty evaluate
student performance
100% of the time
100% of faculty
evaluations of students
reflect achievement of
expected student
learning outcomes.
Spring10 Faculty
evaluate student
performance 100% of
the time
100% of faculty
evaluations of students
reflect achievement of
expected student
learning outcomes.
Summer10 Faculty
evaluate student
performance 100% of
the time
100% of faculty
evaluations of students
reflect achievement of
expected student
learning outcomes.
FC agenda
May each year
Dec each year
Action Result
Location of Document
Evaluation Component
Expected Outcome
Evaluation Data
3.8 Evaluation policies and
procedures are defined and
consistently applied
IIIF
100% of evaluation policies
are written, clearly
communicated to students
and applied consistently
Course syllabi clearly
define grading criteria
and evaluation
procedures
Student evaluation of
courses
Course minutes
Student performance
evaluations
Examples of student
work
3.9 Curriculum and
teaching learning practices
are evaluated at regularly
scheduled intervals
100 % of curriculum and
teaching learning practices
are evaluated regularly
Total evaluation plan
Course meeting
minutes
Student evaluations
COUS minutes
COGS minutes
IIIG
Responsible for
Collection & Analysis
COUS
COGS
Faculty Council
Faculty Assembly
COUS
COGS
Collection Schedule
Actual Outcome
Action Plan
Annually – Oct
100% of evaluation
policies are written,
clearly communicated
to students and applied
consistently
FC agenda
Oct each year
Annual - Oct
100 % of curriculum
and teaching learning
practices are evaluated
annually
FC agenda
Oct each year
Action Result
Location of Document
Evaluation Component
Expected Outcome
Responsible for
Collection Schedule
Actual Outcome
Collection & Analysis
STANDARD IV -PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS: AGGREGATE STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND FACULTY ACCOMPLISHMENTS
4.1 Surveys and other data Surveys and other data
Aggregate data include Department chairs –
Student course
Surveys and other data
sources are used to collect
sources are used to collect
but are not limited to
distribute student course
evaluations every
sources are used
information about student,
aggregate outcome
graduation rates,
evaluations
semester
according to collection
alumni, employer
information at their
NCLEX_RN pass
Assoc Dean – Grad and
schedule
satisfaction and
scheduled time.
rates, certification pass
Undergrad – analyze
Student exit surveys –
demonstrated graduate
rates, employment
student surveys and
semester
achievement
rates, graduate
conduct exit alumni
IVA
achievement
employer surveys
Alumni surveys – year 1
Recruitment/admission/
and year 3
Retention activities
Assoc Dean-Admissions
Employer survey every 3
responsible for
years
retention/admission and
recruitment
4.2 Aggregate student
Expectations for aggregate
Exit Surveys
Assoc Deans – Grad,
Annual – academic year
Expectations for
outcome data are analyzed
student outcome data:
Alumni surveys
Undergrad, and
or more frequently as
aggregate student
and compared with
Recruitment efforts,
Employer surveys
Admissions analyze data
needed
outcome data:
expected student outcomes
admission data of cohorts
American Nurses
and report to COUS,
Recruitment efforts,
admitted, advisement,
Credentialing Center
COGS and Faculty
admission data of
student engagement in
Pediatric
Assembly
cohorts admitted,
IVB leader activities and
Critical Care
Faculty Council
advisement, student
professional development
NCLEX
engagement in leader
National Council of
activities and
100% of Student, alumni
State Boards
professional
and employer satisfaction
development
outcome data are analyzed
and compared with
100% of Student,
expected student outcomes.
alumni and employer
satisfaction outcome
Expected outcome is
data are analyzed and
greater than 90% for
compared with expected
employer and alumni data.
student outcomes.
each program
Expected outcome is
Graduation rates for each
greater than 90% for
program are greater than
employer and alumni
90%
data for each program
NCLEX-RN pass rates are
greater than 90%
Certification examination
pass rates by specialty are
greater than 90%
Employments rates for each
program are 1 yr 90%, 3 yrs
80%
Other aggregate data –
student assessment of
learning outcomes – greater
than 90%
Evaluation Data
Graduation rates for
each program are
greater than 90%
U/G grad rate for
Spring 09: _76%___
Fall 09: _81%___
Masters grad rate for
Spring 09: _86%_
Fall 09: _85%__
NCLEX-RN pass rates
are greater than _87_%
Action Plan
FC agenda
Dec each year
May each year
FC agenda
Sept each year
Action Result
Location of Document
Evaluation Component
Expected Outcome
Evaluation Data
Responsible for
Collection Schedule
Actual Outcome
Collection & Analysis
STANDARD IV -PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS: AGGREGATE STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND FACULTY ACCOMPLISHMENTS
May 09
Action Plan
Certification
examination pass rates
by specialty are greater
than 90% May 09
4.3 Aggregate student
outcome data provides
evidence of program
effectiveness in meeting
mission, goals and
expected outcomes
IVC
Annually, aggregate student
outcome data are reported
to Faculty Assembly in
September evidencing
evaluation of the program’s
effectiveness in achieving
mission, goals and expected
outcomes at 90%
Data identified in 4.3
plus other survey data
as appropriate
Assoc Deans provide
reports at September
Faculty Assembly
Each September
4.4 Aggregate student
outcome data are used to
foster ongoing program
improvement
IVD
Program adjustments to
foster ongoing
improvement related to
actual student outcome data
100% of time
Program adjustments are
deliberate and congruent
with program’s mission,
goals and expected
outcomes
COUS minutes
COGS minutes
Course minutes
Faculty Assembly
minutes
Assoc Dean – grad,
undergrad, admission
Faculty Council
Faculty Assembly
Annual - Jan
Employment rates for
each program are 1 yr
90%, 3 yrs 80%
Other aggregate data –
student assessment of
learning outcomes –
greater
than 90%
Annually, aggregate
student outcome data
are reported to Faculty
Assembly in September
evidencing evaluation
of the program’s
effectiveness in
achieving mission,
goals and expected
outcomes at 90%
Program adjustments to
foster ongoing
improvement related to
actual student outcome
data 100% of time – 3rd
semester undergrad
Program adjustments
are deliberate and
congruent with
program’s mission,
goals and expected
outcomes. Addition of
CNL and DNP and
revision of
administrative
management master’s
major, phase out of
GNP and medical
surgical nursing CNS
major; and
undergraduate revision
of traditional and
development of true
accelerated track , phase
out of LVN to BSN
track.
FC agenda
Sept each year
FC agenda
Jan each year
Action Result
Location of Document
Evaluation Component
Expected Outcome
Evaluation Data
Responsible for
Collection Schedule
Collection & Analysis
STANDARD IV -PROGRAM EFFECTIVENESS: AGGREGATE STUDENT PERFORMANCE AND FACULTY ACCOMPLISHMENTS
4.5 Aggregate faculty
outcomes are consistent
with and contribute to the
program’s mission, goals
and expected student
outcomes
IVE
100% of faculty’s teaching
is evaluated annually.
Faculty effectiveness is
rated by students with a
minimum mean of 4.0 or
higher on a 1 – 5 scale with
5 being highest
Aggregate faculty data
as relates to teaching
effectiveness, scholarly
activity and faculty
practice
Department Chairs
Associate Dean for
Research
Associate Dean for
Practice
Annual - Jan
100% of faculty with
greater than 50%
appointments are engaged
in scholarly activity and/or
practice/service activities.
4.6 Information from
formal complaints is used
as appropriate to foster
ongoing improvement
IVF
100% of formal complaints
that indicate a need for
program improvement
result in appropriate faculty
or administrative action
being taken
Actual Outcome
100% of faculty’s
teaching is evaluated
annually. Faculty
effectiveness is rated by
students with a
minimum mean of 4.0
or higher on a 1 – 5
scale with 5 being
highest
Action Plan
FC agenda
Jan each year
100% of faculty with
greater than 50%
appointments are
engaged in scholarly
activity and/or
practice/service
activities.
Formal complaints
Faculty/administrative
action taken
Faculty
Administration
Annual - Sept
100% of formal
complaints that indicate
a need for program
improvement result in
appropriate faculty or
administrative action
being taken (3rd
semester changes)
5/13/09
Approved by Faculty Assembly 9/4/09
7/20/10 – Bev Robinson Edits
Revised 2/24/11lj
\\sonfile\FILE DEPOT\Office of the Dean\LJames\My Documents\Word\Web site - original documents\Total Program Systematic Evaluation Plan as of 2-24-11.doc
FC agenda
Sept each year
Action Result
Location of Document