MARKETING MANAGEMENT BUS506 Case Study Analysis: Nina Kustura, Nadja Cekic, Selma Catovic International Burch University, Sarajevo MARKETING PROBLEM DEFINITION The problem is the fiscal 2005 was projected to be the fifth consecutive unprofitable year for Amber Inn & Suites Inc. There are three present issues in Amber Inn & Inc. The first issue is the allocation of media advertising dollars between the pleasure/vacation traveler and business traveler market. The second issue is the frontier strategy that was implemented in fiscal 2005, whether it should be carried forward through 2006. The third issue is whether or not to being offering weekend specials rather than free night stay. After years of continuous loss, the company must find a strategy that will lead the Ebidta (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization), to grow 7% in 2 years. COMPANY OVERVIEW Amber Inn & Suites, Inc is a 250-property hotel chain with various location in 10 western and Rocky Mountain States. The company started in 1979, and now owns 200 Amber Inn properties and 50 Amber Inn & Suites properties. Each property contains 120 room or suite units, totaling 30,000 rooms for all properties. The company projected revenues of $422,6 million and net loss of $15,7 million. The Company’s mission is to provide primarily business travelers with clean comfortable guest accommodations at a reasonable price. The hotel is a limited service hotel between economy and full service hotels. The company locates proprieties on premium sites on major highway close to suburban industrial and office complexes, airport and large regional shopping centers INDUSTRY OVERVIEW The US hotel industry recorded revenue of $113.7 billion and grossed $16.7 billion in pretax profit in 2004. In 2004 there were 4.4 million rooms in the United States. Two thirds of all US hotels rooms were affiliated with a brand. The remaining one third were independently owned and not brand affiliated. The US hotel industry is highly fragmented which means that there is no one company or brand controlling a majority of hotel groups. CONSUMER ANALYSIS Amber Inn customers are business travelers (79.8%) that stay in the hotel for 2.6 nights and COMPETITION POSITIONING Hotels compete on the basis of facilities, price and service. Price is often a function of service level offered. Full- service hotel offer food and beverage outlets, such as: restaurants and lounges; meeting, banquet and convention facilities; and concierge, luggage service, and room service. They range from luxury hotel, upscale hotels and midscale hotels with food and beverage. Limited-service hotels do not offer many of these facilities. Their main focus is room renting. They range from midscale without food and beverage to economy hotels. Amber Inn & Inc.’s competitors include all midscale and economy hotels that do not serve food and beverage. Exhibit 1: 10 Largest Hotels in United States 2004 Company Rooms Properties Cendant Corporation 439,279 5,622 Marriott International Inc 380,218 2,236 Hilton Hotels Corporation 357,332 2,184 Inter-Continental Hotel Group 337,643 2,523 Choice Hotels International, Inc. 313,982 3,982 Brands Amerihost Inn, Dazs Inn. Days Serviced Apartments, Howard Johnson, Howard Johnson Express, Knights Inn, Ramada, Ramada Limited, Super 8, Thriftlodge, Travelodge and Wingate Inn. Courtyard by Marriott, Fairfield Inn by Marriot, Marriott Conference Centers, Marriott Executive Apartments, Marriott Hotels and Resorts, Ramada Inn Conrad, Doubletree, Doubletree Club, Embassy Suites, Embassy Vacation Resort, Hampton Inn, Hampton Inn & Suites, Hilton, Hilton Gaming, Hilton Garden Inn, and Homewood Suites. Candlewood, Centra, Crowne Plaza, Forum Hotel, Holiday Inn, Holiday Inn Express, Holiday Inn Garden Court, Holiday Inn Select, Inter Continental, Parkroyal, Posthouse, Staybridge Suites by Holiday Inn and Sunspress Resorts. Clarion, Comfort Inn Hotel & Suites, Econo Lodge, MainStay Suites, Quality Inn, Hotel & Suites, Rodeway 1 Best Western International Accor North America 186,422 2,181 134,803 1,252 Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc. Carlson Hospitality Worldwide La Quinta 123,747 355 82,739 566 65,384 592 Inn and Sleep Inn Best Western Coralia, Hotel Novotel, Hotel Sofitel, Mercure Hotel, Motel 6, Red Roof Inn and Studio 6 Fourpoints Hotel by Sheration, Sheration, St. Regis/luxury Collecetion, W Hotels and Westin Country Inns & Suites byy Carlson, Park Inns & Suites, Park Plaza Suites, Radisson and Regent Hotels La Quinta Inns, La Quinta Inn & Suites, Baymount Inn & Suites and Woodfield Suites SWOT ANALYSIS EXTERNAL FACTORS INTERNAL FACTORS POSITIVE NEGATIVE STRENGTHS Location (premium sites: close to airports, office complexes, shopping centers) Good Promotions Good Service to Customers Good Price WEAKNESSES Pure business guests hotels Underperforming properties in the last few years Bad financials performance No correct ad politics No hotels in downtown location OPPORTUNITIES Increase the amount of leisure travelers during weekend Become a full service hotel Attract new first-time guests Increase the length of stay per visit THREATS Competition from other hotel chains Decrease of travel frequency Lower price strategy AVAILABLE ACTIONS There are three available actions for Amber Inn & Inc. 1. Focus on business travelers rather than vacation/pleasure travelers. End frontier strategy and promote weekend specials. 2. Focus on the vacation/pleasure travelers. 3. Do not change anything. POSSIBLE OUTCOMES (costs and benefits) 1. Business travelers are not price sensitive, therefore focusing on the mission and improving the quality of stay for customers. Present location of hotels fit business travelers. 2. Pleasure travelers are price sensitive, an increase in dollars change force a different choice in hotels. The benefit is an increase in occupancy in all rooms throughout the week. 3. The benefit of not changing anything, gives time to see if the Frontier Strategy can be successful. Business travelers are complaining of pleasure travelers. SOLUTION The locations of the properties of Amber Inn & Inc. Business travelers are less price-sensitive and are willing to pay more for staying. Their needs can be easily met through superior service. At the same time, they should increase promotions and internet-sales. The Internet can be key factor in increasing sales. Therefore more promotions on the company website are required. Then, the frontier strategy should not be continued because it focuses the increase in length of stay per visit. That should not be applied to business travelers since their stays are very short. The promotion of weekend specials on company website and e-mail notifications that would cut additional advertising costs and help increase the weekend occupancy of rooms. 2