AQCI I
Lecture: European Policy and Practice toward Ethnic Minorities
Lecturer: Antonin Mikes
Student: Elina Hiipakka
Date: October 14, 2015
Van den Berghe, Pierre: “Does race matter?”, text 9, Hutchinson, John, Smith Anthony, eds. (1996)
Ethnicity, Oxford- New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 57-63.
Cornell, Stephen, Hartmann, Douglas (1998) Ethnicity and Race. Making Identities in a Changing World,
Pine Forge Press/A Sage Publication Company, text on The definition of race, pp 21- 43,
1. CENTRAL QUOTATION. ”Both racial and ethnic groups are socially defined by real or putative
common descent, and the distiction between the two types of groups is merely in the relative salience of
biological or cultural markers of membership. My contention is that, in both cases, the social concern is with
common biological descent, even when the markers are primarily cultural.” (Van den Berghe 1996, 58)
2. ARGUMENT. Van den Berghe (1996) defines a social race as a group, which is sharing some phsysical
features. He theorizes from the evolutionary framework claiming that all social organisms are evolved to
behave altruistically towards others, who most likely share common ancestry. Nepotistic behavior towards
organisms, that are not related by kinship, is not biologically increasing the fitness of species. To maximise
one’s own fitness, according to Van den Berghe (1996), humans are using different markers to identify
individuals with supposed common ancestry. These markers are not only biological, but can be also cultural
and only hypothetical in the level of biology. The explanation behind using these markers lies in the fitness
maximization. This is one possible way to broaden the understanding of how social races have been formed.
3. QUESTION. Van den Berghe (1996) emphasizes the perspective of co-evolution of genes and culture to
be able fully understant society, human behavior and for example racism. According to him, evolutionary
framework complements other theories and offers broader generality to our understanding. This raises
questions though. In empirical level, how it is possible to separate the effects of genes and environment
(culture), when investigating human beings? And how to avoid the deterministic explanations?
4. EXPERIENTIAL CONNECTION. The theory of different biological or cultural markers of membership
doens’t exlude other theories or approaches being so vague and being based on evolution of species. This
way it is difficult to either agree or disagree with it, because it seems to explain everything and nothing
simultaneously.
5. TEXTUAL CONNECTION. Cornell, Stephen, Hartmann & Douglas (1998, 31) also illustrates how both
ethnicity and race result from the interaction between diverse populations. In this interaction there are
different aspects and questions to be solved. These contains the evaluations of the main diffrences between
us and them. Van den Berghe (1996) states that this originates from the ”need” to find biological or cultural
markers of membership. Cornell & al. (1998) emphasize in addition the questions of the material advantages
and political motives, that are included in the social construction of the racial and ethnic groups. Van den
Berghe would state that material and political point of views are part of social agenda, when it comes to
human behavior. Although social agenda also has in the end evolutionary explanation, fitness maximization.
6. IMPLICATIONS. Van den Berghe states that with the evolutionary explanation, it can be at least partly
explained when rasism would most likely wax and wane in common societies (when there’s more variance
between groups than within groups). Although this is deterministic point of view, it gives foundation to the
acknowledgement to the whole phenomena called racism, which is in some societies seen absent in structural
level. If there is an open conversation about racism between politicians, civil society and lay people, the
policies required for better encounters with different people is more likely to happen.
AQCI I
Lecture: European Policy and Practice toward Ethnic Minorities
Lecturer: Antonin Mikes
Student: Elina Hiipakka
Date: October 14, 2015
Sample Self assessment form
Department of Public and Social Policy, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University
AQCI ASSESSMENT FORM
Student’s
name:
Name of
assessor:
Magda Wolfová
Date:
14. 10. 2015
Essay title:
Excel
lent
1) Is the chosen quotation central to the
author’s argument?
Go
od
Aver
age
Not
accept
able
Comments
X
X
Argument described by
understandable language
X
Very interesting question
2) Has the main argument been fully
understood (including its ‘for’ and
‘against’ sides, if applicable)?
3a) Is the question raised
important/relevant/interesting?
3b) Has this question not been fully
answered in the text?
Po
or
X
X
(I agree with your statement)
4) Is the experiential connection
relevant/interesting?
X
5a) Is the textual connection
relevant/interesting?
5b) Has it been cited properly?
5c) Has it been adequately explained
how the present text's argument
contrasts with, contradicts, confirms,
clarifies, or elaborates the other text's
argument or point?
X
X
X
6) Have the implications been well
understood, can they have a practical
impact for policy making?
X
7) Expression/Presentation
a) Are the style, grammar and general
use of English adequate?
b) Is the AQCI professionally presented?
Essay grade: A
Further comments:
Textual connection is interesting
but less understandable
X
X