In Confidence Not for further distribution Transport Review Discussion Paper Objective of Engaging with Stakeholders The objective of engaging with stakeholders is to gain knowledge and understanding of how transport services operate within the Commonwealth HACC Program. Specifically, the purpose of engagement is to seek and identify needs, preferences and perspectives on current services being offered, particularly on service delivery and funding models currently being used. The information collected through stakeholder engagement mechanisms (targeted discussions and the website questionnaire) will be used to inform the review of transport and provide advice to the Minister on the future transport services under the Commonwealth Home Support Program. To ensure that the entire scope of community transport is captured when engaging with stakeholders we are seeking the Transport Review Sub-Group’s input and advice on specific areas of community transport which would add further value to the transport review. Draft discussion prompts will be discussed at the Transport Review Sub-Group face-to-face meeting in June 2013. Engaging with Stakeholders for Targeted Discussions 1. Stakeholder discussion prompts The following questions have been identified as a starting point to ask consumers in targeted discussions sessions on community transport. The Transport Review SubGroup are asked to provide comment, additional input and appropriate wording on each of these areas of prompts. A) Clients (targeted discussion): How accessible and available is community transport in your neighborhood? Was the referral and assessment process effective and appropriate? What was the main purpose for you to access community transport? How frequently do you use community transport? What do you like about community transport? Are there any unique activities provided by Commonwealth HACC transport services? Are there payment options for you to choose from (including the use of vouchers)? Do you depend on community transport to remain living at home? In Confidence Not for further distribution B) Service Providers (targeted discussion and website questionnaire): How do you assess and prioritize clients? Is there a range of payment options for clients (including the use of vouchers)? Does your service have a fee structure? How do you manage service capacity and demand? Do you have a waiting list? What service activities are undertaken when delivering community transport? What are your services maximum and minimum length and time per trip? What is your services average cost per trip? What expenses are incurred with your community transport service? Does your service collect data on client purposes of each trip? What are the main purposes/demands for community transport ? Do you have any assurance/OH&S policies and procedures which ensure safety and quality of service to clients? Has your service invested in any technology innovation to achieve effective service delivery, especially in rural and remote areas? Does your service provide transport only or does it provide transport and other Commonwealth HACC Services? If so, what other Commonwealth HACC services? Does your service attract a specific type of client? If so what are these client characteristics? Does your service use a brokerage model to provide community transport services? Is this an effective model in your area/region? Is so why? Does your service attract and engage volunteers? If so, how many volunteers does your organization have and what training and other costs are involved? Does your service provide other Commonwealth HACC services i.e. centrebased day care, respite, social support? If so, how is community transport captured and recorded as part of service delivery Does your service currently receive other funding (other than Commonwealth funding) which is dependent to your service model? In Confidence Not for further distribution What sort of funding models could you envisage for the future? eg Community Passenger Networks, brokerage 2. Identifying Stakeholders The Transport Review Sub-Group are invited to provide comment and advice on the criteria on how to identify participants from each state and territory. Targeted discussions will be held with a range of clients, Commonwealth HACC service providers, peak bodies and state government service providers. It is envisaged that targeted discussions will be undertaken with 10-15 participants and any time, including the Contractor and a departmental representative. It is important that a diverse range of stakeholders are invited to attend the targeted discussions and thought needs to be given as to the criteria to identify participants. The following criteria is a starting point to assist discussion on selecting participants. This criteria needs to include how clients are involved in targeted discussions. Possible criteria: Metropolitan and regional mix; Funding mix from large, medium and small organisations; Innovative models of service delivery; Service providers that provide Commonwealth community transport and other Commonwealth HACC services providing transport as part of their service delivery; and Clients, Commonwealth HACC service providers, peak bodies and state government service provider participation. Please note: In addition to targeted stakeholder discussions, service providers providing Commonwealth HACC community transport will be given the opportunity to participate in the questionnaire on the Living Longer Living Better website. 3. Potential Locations for Targeted Stakeholder Discussions (in particular regional discussions) Targeted discussions will take place in all capital cities (including Melbourne and Perth) as well as a regional location across each state and territory. In total there will be up to 16 state and territory targeted discussions for the transport review. The departments state and territory offices is a potential venue location in each capital city. Regional venue locations need to be confirmed based on advice from the Transport Review Sub-Group members. In Confidence Not for further distribution The Transport Review Sub-Group can provide advice and recommendations on appropriate regional venue locations for targeted stakeholder discussions in each state and territory. Invitation to Contribute Reports into the HACC Transport Review The Transport Review Sub-Group members and their contacts are invited to contribute any relevant HACC transport reports to the Literature Report and Data Analysis phases of the review by 14 June 2013. Please email contributions to bernadette.walker@health.gov.au In Confidence Not for further distribution Transport Literature and Relevant Documents Document Name State/ National Key pages/ Comments Aboriginal Transport Dreaming: Aboriginal NSW centric State Transport Conference 2010 (2010) Provides an overview of what the priorities of NSW indigenous Community Transport (CT) service providers are any ongoing issues/concerns. Community Transport in NSW: broadening the horizon (2011) NSW centric with US/NSW CT comparison An in-depth backgrounder on CT with focus on NSW. Covers CT for aged people, disability, health transport, mobility issues, + international CT models – USA & comparison with NSW system. Cost comparisons, service gaps etc. are also addressed. NSW This is the CTO’s response to a CT survey that was commission by the NSW Government to gauge the CT needs of CT service providers, consumers and other interested parties. NSW A report prepared by the CTO and NCOSS that focuses on CT accreditation for service providers across NSW. 105 CT NSW providers participated. Report - Helen Battellino & Kevin McClain Community Transport Authorisation Discussion Paper – NSW Government David Atkins & Helen Battellino Community Transport Organisation (CTO) (undated) Accreditation of Community Transport: A report on the impacts on Community Transport being included within the In Confidence Not for further distribution Passenger Transport Act NSW (2009) Council of Social Services of New South Wales & the Community Transport Organisation focuses on Accreditation for both Paid drivers as well as Volunteers. CTO ‘Productivity Commission: Caring for Older Australians’ response (2011) National & NSW This is the CTO’s response to the PC report. CT references on block funding recommendation p.2 and a whole section devoted to CT references in the PC report on p. 12. Exploring mobility of older people: a case study of Adelaide (2011) SA (specifically metropolitan – Adelaide) This paper explores mobility of older people in Metropolitan Adelaide using existing datasets together with data from a recent (2010) travel survey of older people. It looks at travel patterns for older people, the role of public transport, residential location, travel and distance travelled. National/ NSW + international A paper focusing on the mobility needs and travel patterns of individuals aged 65 years and over and international comparisons with similar OECD countries. National + International A research paper focusing on mobility issues for Elderly people around Australia with OECD comparisons. Long Tien Truong & Sekhar Somenahalli The mobility and accessibility expectations of Seniors in an Aging (sic) Population (2003) Rahaf Alsnih and David A. Hensher The Elderly and Mobility: a review of the literature (2006) Michelle Whelan, Jim Langford, Jennifer Oxley, Sjaanie Koppel, Judith Charlton In Confidence Not for further distribution Community Transport Stocktake July 2011 Victoria Prepared by Ipsos-Eureka Social Research Institute on behalf of the Victorian Community Transport Association to better understand who is delivering and receiving community transport services, and how those services are being delivered. Provided there’s Transport: Transport as a barrier to accessing health care in NSW NSW Examines transport in enabling access to healthcare in NSW CBT Queensland – Toolbox: ‘Communitybased transport from planning to action’ Queensland Designed to assist people looking at planning in a local area. Rural and remote NSW Considers the issues confronting community transport provision by HACC funded services in the rural and remote regions of NSW. NSW The paper examines the levels and types of transport options available to residents in aged care facilities. ACT Prepared by the ACT Office for Ageing in November 2009. Project Contact – Daniel Evans Helen Ferrier - 2006 HACC Community Transport in rural and remote NSW Valmar Support Services - 2010 On the Road, Again. The Transport Needs of People in Residential Aged Care Council of Social Service of NSW – December 2003 Report on the 2009 Consultations on a Strategic Plan for Positive Ageing 20102014 In Confidence Not for further distribution South Australian Community Transport Organisation Research and Development Project – Stage One Fuller – December 2008 South Australia An audit of current peak body models and research into the most appropriate research model to suit the South Australian community services environment.