SOCIAL & CULTURAL SUSTAINABILITY Excellence level answers from past examination questions 2011 Sample paper Q Explain why it is important for Air NZ to encourage social and cultural sustainability in New Zealand. A As a national airline, largely owned by the NZ government Air NZ has a responsibility to respect and act responsibly by linking and promoting social and cultural initiatives. They need to be a reputable brand and since they represent NZ to the world they need to encourage behaviours that lead to sustainability. They need to be understanding of diversity, NZ’s bicultural heritage and their impacts on NZ and global society. It is necessary for them to do this to survive as a 21st century business. Q Fully explain how the suggested disregard for Maori culture may negatively impact on Air NZ. A It can portray Air NZ as insensitive to Maori culture and could cast doubt on their attitude towards other cultures. As a result, customers may not want to do business with them and go elsewhere. Similarly, employees could also be offended and leave to work elsewhere. This would impact negatively on their overall reputation and brand image as a national airline. Q A strategic response means a business-wide reaction at multiple levels. Evaluate a strategic response that Air NZ could implement to address this criticism, and to prevent similar criticism in the future. In your answer you should: Explain the suggested response Fully explain the negative and positive impacts of the strategic response Come to a justified conclusion on the likely success of the suggested strategic response A Air NZ needs to address all stakeholders. It can use the media to apologise publicly to all its customers and fully explain their choice of uniform and that their intention was not Page 1 to be offensive. The CEO can meet with staff to discuss the company’s objectives and intentions and answer to any feedback questions, to satisfy and support employees. They can order a review of the uniform as a result of the feedback and this time invite appropriate Maori feedback and advice as to how best to portray the symbols. At an international level they can let the global market know via a media low-key magazine article that they are overcoming some uniform issues and are excited about the review. A positive impact could be that all parties appreciate honesty and respond favourably to an apology and explanation. Negative impacts could be loss of time, increased costs in carrying out the response, as well as risk of not regaining the reputation. Overall, the benefits of the response succeeding in terms of repairing the reputation, engaging with social and cultural groups, being a responsible employer and caring about its customers, justify going ahead with the strategic response. 2012 paper Q Explain why social and cultural sustainability are seen as important. A Social and cultural sustainability ensures the things that are important to us now are still important for future generations. Some stakeholders will regard social and cultural sustainability as important because they believe it allows us to understand how we are both similar and distinct from one another/or that they value and wish to retain the customs that their community has developed. Social and cultural sustainability means that businesses take care of the community and their employees, and ensures that their values, beliefs and customs are respected and maintained for future generations. Q A strategic response means a business-wide reaction at multiple levels (size, scope, timeframe). Name a business operating in a global context that you have studied in depth. Evaluate a strategic response that your named business has taken or could take to support social and cultural sustainability. In your answer you should: Explain one social and/or cultural issue and the strategic response by the business Fully explain one positive and one negative impact to the business of the strategic response Draw a justified conclusion on the success or likely success of the strategic response A (answer given for Heinz Watties) New Zealanders feel quite strongly about some food items. When Heinz took over Watties, it maintained its brands rather than sell under its own brand names, as it does elsewhere. This required maintaining production, marketing and sales functions in New Zealand. One positive impact is that it has maintained sales of its products, due to the brand loyalty shown by many consumers. One negative impact is that marketing economies of scale are lost. Heinz must market their Watties range separately from their international Heinz range of foodstuffs. This raises costs and makes them less profitable. The policy may be successful in the short term, however as New Zealanders become more aware of Heinz products the benefits of maintaining the Watties line of products may diminish. Page 2