INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
SYLLABUS
International Historic Preservation
—
34:970:522:01
XL 10:762:496:01
COURSE SYLLABUS
Spring 2015
Room 170 CSB
—
Monday, 9:50 – 12:30 (Italian time 15:30 – 18:30);
Room 170
Civic Square Building
33 Livingston Ave.
New Brunswick
PLANNING AND PUBLIC POLICY PROGRAM
EDWARD J. BLOUSTEIN SCHOOL OF PLANNING AND PUBLIC
POLICY RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY
PROFESSOR DAVID LISTOKIN
LISTOKIN@RCI.RUTGERS.EDU
732-932-3133 EXT. 5502)
Item
1) DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURE AND INDUSTRIAL
DESIGN, SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES (SUN)
2) REGION CENTRE FOR CULTURAL HERITAGE, ECOLOGY,
AND ECONOMY (BENECON). THIS IS A CONSORTIUM FOR
FOUR UNIVERSITIES IN THE CAMPANIA REGION (SUN,
UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II, UNIVERSITY OF
SALERNO, UNIVERSITY OF SANNIO).
DIRECTOR: PROF. ARCH. CARMINE GAMBARDELLA
COORDINATION: ARCH. ALESSANDRO CIAMBRONE
INTERNATIONAL.OFFICE@UNINA2.IT
0039-081-5010712
Page
1.
Course Objective and Framework
2
2.
Class Topics, Readings, and Dates
3.
Cross National Student Team Analysis
8
4.
Major Paper Topic
9
5.
Course Requirements
10
6.
Preservation Walking Tours
10
7.
Academic Integrity
11
8.
Office Hours/Communication
11
9.
Selected Additional Readings
11
4-8
1
INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
1.
SYLLABUS
COURSE OBJECTIVE AND FRAMEWORK
This class will consider the subject of development and preservation in large cities (and
other places) and will examine this interaction from an international perspective,
considering case studies in the United States (with an emphasis on New York City) and
Italy (with discussion of Naples and Pompeii). New York City has some of the leading
cases in the United States of development triumphing over preservation (e.g., demolition
of Penn Central Station) as well as opposite situations (e.g., preservation of Grand
Central Station). The same is true in Italy, including Naples and Pompeii.
The class will electronically link (via Skype/other means) Rutgers University in New
Jersey and the School of Architecture at the Second University of Naples (SUN) and the
Region Centre for Cultural Heritage, Ecology and Economy (BENECON). The class will
be taught in parallel by David Listokin (Rutgers) and faculty from SUN and BENECON.
The class will present:
1. Why – What are the forces respectfully driving development and preservation and
what is the larger historical framework of these two forces.
2. How – What is the regulatory framework for development (e.g., zoning, and
subdivision codes) and preservation (e.g., landmark designation, transfer of
development rights, and tax credits), with a focus on the latter.
3. “Historic” cases – These are notable past examples of development and
preservation cases. Two examples for New York City include:
a. Penn Central and Grand Central Stations – two iconic structures with
contrasting development/ preservation outcomes.
b. St. Bartholomew’s Church – landmarking of religious structure upheld and
stopped planned demolition, but fostered a counteraction against restraining
religious entities.
4. “Current” cases -- Ongoing preservation versus development situations. Potential
examples in New York City include Atlantic Yards (Brooklyn) and Saint
Vincent’s Hospital (Manhattan).
5. Future Policy and Planning – Based on the historic and current cases, what
planning and preservation policies and mechanisms can better synthesize
development and preservation.
To foster cross-national dialogue and understanding, students in this class will
work as joint teams (encompassing both Naples and Rutgers students) to study
historic preservation topics of mutual interest. For each topic, the student analysis
will: (1) summarize the existing preservation thinking/ application in each country
(Italy and the United States), (2) compare and contrast section (1) findings, and (3)
2
INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
SYLLABUS
discuss how each country can learn from one another on the given preservation
subject. (See page 8 in this syllabus for more details on the joint student research.)
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
At the conclusion of this class the student will understand (1) the background,
context and history of the historic preservation movement; (2) historic preservation
theory, mechanisms, and policies, ranging from landmark designation to tax incentives;
(3) economic, social, and other impacts of preservation; and (4), how (1) to (3) above
compare and contrast in the United States versus an international application, in Italy.
3
INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
SYLLABUS
2. CLASS TOPICS, READINGS, AND DATES
The date and subject matter of each class and associated readings (readings for the United
States-based classes) are detailed in Tables 1-3 on pages 4-8.
Table 1
HISTORIC PRESERVATION: INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION
— CLASS SESSIONS, DATES, AND TOPICS —
Class
Date
Topic
1
January 26
Course overview (Prof. D. Listokin)
2
February 2
An historical overview of preservation in the United States (U.S.)
(Prof. D. Listokin)
3
February 9
U.S. federal government preservation programs (Prof. D. Listokin)
4
February 16
U.S. state government preservation programs and U.S. local
government historic preservation in the nation and New York City
(Prof. D. Listokin)
5
February 23
U.S. federal government financial preservation programs (e.g., tax
incentives and grants); U.S. property rights and developmentpreservation tensions in the nation and New York City. Also, housing,
economic development, and social impacts (Prof. D. Listokin)
6
March 2
Representation (Prof. C. Gambardella) and GIS (Prof. N. Piasacane)
7
March 9
Territorial Governance (Prof. C. De Biase) and Legislation (Prof. M.
Calabro)
March 16
No Class – Rutgers Spring Break, Note: Naples Easter Break is
week of April 6
8
March 23
Seismic (Prof. G. Faella) and Environment Security (Prof. L. Maffei)
9
March 30
Landscape (Prof. J. Capriglione) and Economic Evaluation (Prof. F.
Forte)
10
April 6
Community Case Study Draft Presentations (Rutgers class only)
11
April 13
History of Architecture (Prof. E. Manzo) and Cultural Heritage (arch.
Prof. A. Ciambrone)
12
April 20
Urban Design (Arch. O. Gambardella)
13
April 27
Cross-national student team presentations (Naples and Rutgers)
14
May 4
Cross-national student team presentations (Naples and Rutgers)
May 11
Final Community Case Study Paper due (Rutgers class only)
4
INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
SYLLABUS
Table 2
HISTORIC PRESERVATION: INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION
— CLASS READINGS (U.S.-BASED) BY CLASS NUMBER (see Tables 1 and 3) —
Class (see Table 1)
2
(Preservation History)
Reading Number
(see Table 3)
1
Preface - 34
3
1-10
6a-6b
3
(Federal Preservation
Programs)
4
(State and Local
Preservation Programs)
5
(Financing and Tax
Incentives)
Page
all
1
35-80
6c
5-27
6e
29-35
9
1-16 (omit state/local at 8-12)
10
For reference only
1
81-116; 117-156; 313-352
2
45 - 70
6c
28-38, 39-45
6e
35-38
12
all
14a
For reference only
14b
For reference only
1
279-351
4
skim
6e
Tax credits – 1-24; 38-43; Appendix Resource X-2, 1016; Appendix Resource X-3, 17-27 (skim appendix)
6e
Property Tax – 24-29; Appendix Resource X-4, 20-27
(skim appendix)
13
skim
(Continued on next page)
5
INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
5
(Legal Issues and
Housing, Economic
Development, and Social
Issues)
SYLLABUS
1
353-493
3
10-38 (skim)
5
all
6d
all (skim)
6e
Appendix Resource X-5, 28-81 (skim)
7
all (skim)
8
all (skim)
9
17-44
11
all
11a
all
14c
skim
6
INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
SYLLABUS
Table 3
HISTORIC PRESERVATION: INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION
—COURSE READINGS (U.S.-BASED)—
REQUIRED READINGS –
PURCHASE (Available at
Rutgers Bookstore)*
1. *Stipe, Robert E. 2003. A Richer Heritage. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
ISBN-10: 0807854514, ISBN-13: 978-0807854518
REQUIRED READINGS –
ON SAKAI ‘RESOURCES’
2. Beaumont, Constance. 1996. Smart States, Better Communities : How State Governments can
Help Citizens Preserve Their Communities. National Trust for Historic Preservation.
3. Conde, Sarah. 2007. “Striking a Match in the Historic District: Opposition to Historic
Preservation and Responsive Community Building.” Georgetown University Law Center.
4. Government Accountability Office. 2012. Limited Information on the Use and Enforcement of
Tax Effectiveness of Tax Expenditures Could be Mitigated by Congressional Action.
5. Listokin, David, Barbara Listokin and Michael Lahr. 1998. “The Contribution of Historic
Preservation to Housing and Economic Development.” Housing Policy Debate 9(3), 43-478.
6. David Listokin (Rutgers) and Michael Tomlan (Cornell). Draft Preservation Chapters:
a) Chapter 1 – “Mirror Over Time”
b) Chapter 2 – “A Different Way of Thinking”
c) Chapter 3 – “The Regulatory Framework”
d) Chapter 4 – “Historic and Economic Development”
e) Chapter 5 – “Financing Historic Preservation”
7. Listokin, David, Michael Lahr, Charles Heydt and David Stanek. 2010. First Annual Report of
the Economic Impact of the Federal Historic Tax Credit.
8. Mason, Randall. 2005. Economics and Historic Preservation. Brookings Institution Discussion
Paper.
9. Miller, Julia. 2004. A Layperson’s Guide to Historical Preservation Law. Washington D.C.
National Trust for Historic Preservation.
10. National Park Service, Cultural Resources. 2006. Federal Historic Preservation Laws. The
Official Compilation of U.S. Cultural Heritage Statues.
11. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. City of New York 438. U.S. 104 57
(Continued on next page)
7
INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
SYLLABUS
11a. Reap, James and Melvin Hill. 2005. “Law and the Historic Preservation Commission: What
Every Member Needs to Know.” Cultural Resources Partnership Notes, National Park
Service Heritage Preservation Services, Cultural Resources.
12. Roddewig, Richard 2000. Preparing a Historic Preservation Ordinance. Chicago, IL:
American Planning Association, Planning Advisory Service, Report Number 374.
13. Schwartz, Harry. 2010. “State Tax Credits for Historic Preservation.”
14a. Appendix Compilation – New Jersey Preservation Resources.
14b. Appendix Compilation – New York City Preservation Resources.
14c. Preservation Critiques and Commentary
3.
CROSS NATIONAL STUDENT TEAM ANALYSIS (NAPLES AND
RUTGERS)
As noted earlier, to foster cross-national dialogue and understanding, students in this
class will work as joint teams (encompassing both Naples and Rutgers students) to study
historic preservation topics of mutual interest. For each topic, the analysis will: (1)
summarize the existing preservation thinking/ application in each country (Italy and the
United States), (2) compare and contrast section (1) findings, and (3) discuss how each
country can learn from one another on the given preservation subject. This analysis
should be produced in a short paper (5-10 pages) and a PowerPoint presentation in the
last classes (April 27 and May 4).
To move this along, the student topics are found on Sakai under Resources.
Students should “sign-up” for the listed topics or create/join your own topics by no later
than class 4 (February 16). If you do not select a topic, you will be assigned one. Also,
we may move students from one team to another to foster balance in the number of
students participating on any one topic. Depending on mutual interest, students can
nominate their own topics not listed below.
The following are topics for the student cross-national study teams. It is likely that two
topics will be chosen.
Topic 1: New York City and Naples – Examples of Restoration and Adaptive
Reuse of Historic Properties
Topic 2: Italy the U.S. – Heritage Tourism— Magnitude, Profile, Economic
Contribution, Promotion and Challenges
Topic 3: Italy and the U.S. – Financial Mechanisms for Preservation
Topic 4: Italy and the U.S. – Preservation Regulatory Mechanisms, Survey, Listing,
Regulatory Review
8
INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
SYLLABUS
Topic 5: Italy and the U.S. – Preserving Sacred Structures— Special Issues in
Preserving Historic Churches and Similar Resources
Topic 6: Italy and the U.S. – Historic Preservation and Energy Conservation—
Synthesis and Challenges
Topic 7: Italy and the U.S. – Preservation as Applied in Two Major Cities (one
Italy and one U.S.)
Topic 8: Italy and the U.S. – Cruise Ships in Historic Ports— Naples or Venice and
Charleston, S.C.
Topic 9: Italy and the U.S. – Cross National Comparative topic (e.g., GIS in
Preservation; Transit Oriented Development and Preservation; Economic Recession
and Preservation; Minority Population Perspectives and Preservation, etc.); also,
joint study review of Naples annual conference on “International Forum of
Preservation Studies.”
4.
MAJOR PAPER (RUTGERS ONLY)
The Rutgers students will write a major paper on “Historic Preservation and PreservationDevelopment Conflicts and Resolution” in a major American city (other than New York
City). Possible candidates include Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, Miami, Philadelphia,
San Francisco, or Washington D.C. For the case study city (CSC) selected, the major
paper will comprise the following sections:
Section
Content/Guide
# of pages(approximate)
1. Executive Summary
Use bullet points and
short paragraphs to
synopsize findings
1–2
2. Overview of the Case
Study City (CSC)
Present brief history of the CSC and
summarize key population and
socioeconomic characteristics over time
0.5 – 1.0
3. CSC Historic
Preservation History
Overview the history of historic
preservation in the CSC and briefly
compare/contrast to the preservation
history nationally and in New York City
1–2
4. CSC Historic
Preservation System
Describe in detail the CSC’s historic
preservation regulatory and financial
mechanisms and compare/contrast to
a) federal preservation mechanisms and
b) New York City preservation
mechanisms.
4–6
(continued on next page)
9
INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
5. CSC Preservation
Development Tensions
Present 1-2 case studies of preservation
development challenges in your CSC and
compare/contrast to the cases presented
nationally and in New York City
6. Recommended Future
CSC Preservation
Changes and
Mechanisms
How would you improve the CSC’s
preservation regulations and financial
mechanisms (as well as its planning/land
use system) and how would this alleviate
preservation versus development
tensions. Draw on New York City, and
other cases as appropriate
SYLLABUS
1–2
3–5
Rutgers students should pick their CSC by no later than class 4 (February 16). Write
a 1-2 page proposal including the following brief sections: (1) name of CSC, (2) why the
CSC choice, and (3) a brief CSC-related preservation bibliography.
A partial draft of the major CSC paper is due April 6 and students will make a brief
(10-15 minute) PowerPoint presentation on the highlights of their paper on that day as
well. The final version of the paper is due May 11.
5.
COURSE REQUIREMENTS (RUTGERS ONLY)
Requirements include:
1. Cross National Student Analysis (Presentation— April 27 and May 4)
2. Individual Rutgers student paper (due April 6 [draft] and May 11 [final])
3. Class participation
The course grading considers the following related to the above requirements:
a. Cross National Student Analysis
20 points
b. Individual paper
70 points
c. Class participation
10 points
100 points
Late Assignments: Do not be late! It is more than a grade matter for it defeats the goal
of having a timely and mature dialogue with another university, and that means abiding
by deadlines. If you are having a problem, see me early on; delaying only aggravates
matters.
While attendance will not formally affect the final grade, you have a fundamental
responsibility to attend all class sessions and inter-university presentations.
10
INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
6.
SYLLABUS
PRESERVATION WALKING TOURS (RUTGERS ONLY)
The class will offer the following three Sunday walking tours. Participation is
optional but they are educational and fun! [Dates are tentative].
7.
February 22
Sunday Preservation Walking Tour – East Jersey Olde Towne (Piscataway)
March 8
Sunday Preservation Walking Tour – Newark
April 12
Sunday Preservation Walking Tour – New York City
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY
Please review the University’s Academic Integrity Policy here:
http://academicintegrity.rutgers.edu/integrity.shtml
I expect the highest level of academic integrity on citation and other matters.
8.
OFFICE HOURS/COMMUNICATION
I will have office hours after class (and by appointment) in Room 487. My office phone
is 732-932-3133 ext 550; fax is 732-932-2363. Email address is listokin@rci.rutgers.edu.
Feel free to contact me at any time on any matter.
9. SELECTED ADDITIONAL READINGS
Ballon, Hilary, and Kenneth Jackson. Robert Moses and the Modern City: The
Transformation of New York. New York: W. W. Norton, 2007.
Barthel, Diane. Historic Preservation. Rutgers UP, 1996.
Brolin, Brent C. “Epilogue” in The Battle of St. Bart’s. New York: William Morrow and
Company, Inc. 1988. pg 251-261.
Caro, Robert. The Power Broker: Robert Moses and the Fall of New York. New York:
Knopf, 1974.
Cavillo, Daniel T. “From Penn Central to United Artists’ I and II: The Rise to Immunity
of Preservation Designation from Successful Takings Challenges.” Boston College
Environmental Affairs Law Review; Spring95, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p593, 30p.
Costonis, John J. 1989. Icons and Aliens: Law Aesthetics, and Environmental Change.
Chicago: Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois.
11
INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
SYLLABUS
Duerksen, Christopher J. A Handbook on Historic Preservation Law. Baltimore, MD:
Conservation Foundation, 1983. 351-376.
Duerksen, Christopher J. and Richard J. Roddewig. 1994. Takings Law in Plain English.
Washington, DC: National Trust for Historic Preservation/Clarion Associates.
Faller, Christine. “Economic Hardship and Historic Preservation of NonProfits: Balancing Individual Burden with Community Benefit” Georgetown Law
Center. 2008.
Includes a few case studies including Penn, St. Bart's and a few others.
http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029&context=hpps_
papers
Fishman, Robert. Robert Moses and the Modern City. New York: W.W. Norton, 2007.
Fitch, James Marston. 1996. Historic Preservation: Curatorial Management of the Built
World. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia.
Flint, Anthony. Wrestling with Moses: How Jane Jacobs Took on New York’s Master
Builder and Transformed the American City. New York: Random House, 2009.
Foundation for San Francisco’s Architectural Heritage. “A Preservation strategy for
downtown San Francisco.” National Trust. 1982.
"Grand Central Terminal." New York Architecture Images. 10 May 2008
<http://www.nyc-architecture.com/MID/MID031.htm>.
Hosmer, Charles B. 1965. Presence of the Past: A History of the Preservation
Movement in the United States before Williamsburg. New York: Putnam’s Sons.
Hershman, Mendes. “Critical Legal Issues in Historic Preservation” 12 Urb. Law. 19
(1980)
http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/urban12&div=10&g_sent=1&colle
ction=journals
Jacobs, Jane. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House,
1961.
Kayden, Jerold S. "Celebrating Penn Central." Planning Magazine. June 2003.
Lang, Glenna, and Marjory Wunsch. Genius of Common Sense: Jane Jacobs and the
Story of The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Boston: David R. Godine, 2009.
Lang, Margaret V. “Penn Central Transportation Co. V. NYC: Fairness and
Accommodation Show the Way Out of the Takings Corner” 13 Urb. Law. 89 (1981)
http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/urban13&div=14&g_sent=1&colle
ction=journals
12
INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
SYLLABUS
Lichfield N. (1988) Economics in Urban Conservation, Cambridge University Press.
Listokin, David. 1997. Growth Management and Historic Preservation: Best Practices
for Synthesis. The Urban Lawyer 29(2):199-213
Listokin, David, et. al,. 1982. Landmark Preservation and the Property Tax: Assessing
Landmark Buildings for Real Taxation Purposes. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban
Policy Research and New York Landmarks Conservancy.
Listokin D, Listokin B and Lahr M (1998) The Contributions of Historic Preservation to
Housing and Economic Development, Housing Policy Debate, 9(3),431-478
Loflin, John J. et. al,. “Historic Preservation in the American City: A New York Case
Study.” Law and Contemporary Problems, Vol. 36, No. 3, Historic Preservation
(Summer, 1971), pp. 362-385
Marcus, Norman. “Grand Slam Grand Central Terminal Decision: A Euclid for
Landmarks, Favorable Notice for TDR and a Resolution of the Regulatory/Taking
Impasse.” 7 Ecology L.Q. 731 (1978-1979)
http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/eclawq7&div=24&g_sent=1&coll
ection=journals
Mason R (2005) Economics and Historic Preservation a; A Guide and Review of the
Literature, The Brookings Institution Metropolitan Policy Program, Discussion Paper.
Miller, Julia H. A Layperson's Guide to Historic Preservation Law. Washington D.C.:
National Trust, 2000. 22-27.
Morris, Marya. Innovative Tools for Historic Preservation. Planning Advisory Service
Report Number 438. Chicago: American Planning Association, 1992.
Moy, Cindy. 1996. “Reformulating the New York City Landmarks Preservation Law’s
Financial Hardship Provision: Preserving the Big Apple”
https://litigationessentials.lexisnexis.com/webcd/app?action=DocumentDisplay&crawlid=1&doctype=cit
e&docid=14+Cardozo+Arts+%26+Ent+LJ+447&srctype=smi&srcid=3B15&key=0e995
9213dd6118e6f07710a7e08660e
Murtaugh, William J. 1997. Keeping Time. New York: McGraw Hill.
New York City Charter, 3020. Governing the establishment and regulation of landmarks,
landmark sites, interior landmarks, scenic landmarks and historic districts. [It is the last
chapter in the document, Chapter 74, pg. 331-335].
http://www.nyc.gov/html/charter/downloads/pdf/citycharter2004.pdf
The NYC Landmarks Preservation Commission Rules, 1998. Updated 2003.
13
INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
SYLLABUS
http://www.nyc.gov/html/lpc/downloads/pdf/pubs/rules.pdf
New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission website.
Maps - http://www.nyc.gov/html/lpc/html/maps/historic_district.shtml
Publications Page - http://www.nyc.gov/html/lpc/html/forms/publications.shtml
Includes the New York City Landmarks Book, various master plans for several historic
districts
New York City Independent Budget Office. “Impact of Historic Districts on Residential
Property Value.”
http://www.nylandmarks.org/maps/historic_properties_fund/
"New York Preservation Archive Project :: Archives - Grand Central Terminal." NYPAP
New York Preservation Archive Project. Web. 08 Sept. 2009.
<http://www.nypap.org/archives/110>.
NYTimes Online. “Ask about Preserving New York’s Historic Districts.” Q&A with
Simeon Bankoff, executive director of the Historic Districts Council.
http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/23/ask-about-preserving-new-yorks-historicdistricts/
PENN CENTRAL TRANSP. CO. V. NEW YORK CITY. No. 438 U.S. 104. US
Supreme Court. 26 June 1978.
[Downloadable from WestLaw—follow this link
http://www.libraries.rutgers.edu/cms/indexes/descriptions/westlaw and be sure to allow
pop-ups for the Westlaw Site. You will not be able to download anything without doing
so.]
Pogrebin, Robin. “Looking at Landmarks.” NYTimes online.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2008/11/25/arts/2008_LANDMARK_FEATURE.ht
ml
Four part series on preservation-development in New York from the New York Times
that ran in 2008. Includes interactive map.
“Preservation Law." Eastern Michigan University. Web. 08 Sept. 2009.
<http://www.emich.edu/public/geo/preservlaw.html>.
“Robert Moses and the Modern City: Remaking the Metropolis.” The Museum of the
City of New York Exhibition Materials.
“Robert Moses and the Modern City: The Road to Recreation.” Queens Museum of Art
Exhibition Materials.
“Robert Moses and the Modern City: Slum Clearance and the Superblock Solution.”
Columbia University’s Miriam and Ira D. Wallach Art Gallery Exhibition Materials.
14
INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
SYLLABUS
Robinson S and Peterman J.E. (1989) Fiscal Incentives for Historic Preservation,
Government Finance Officers Association, Washington.
Roddewig, Richard J. Preparing a Historic Preservation Ordinance. American Planning
Association (February 1983)
Rypkema D. (2005) The Economics of Historic Preservation: A Community Leaders
Guide, National Trust for Historic Preservation, Washington DC,2nd Ed.
Schlichting, Kurt C. Grand Central Terminal: Railroads, Engineering, and Architecture
in New York City. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2001.
Sheehy, John A. "Religious Landmark Preservation under the First and Fifth
Amendments: St. Bartholomew’s Church v. City of New York." St. John's Law Review
(1991): 553-76.
Steinberg, Theodore. “Chapter 5 - Three-D Deeds: The Rise of Air Rights in New York
[Penn Central and Beyond]” in Slide Mountain: Or, The Folly of Owning Nature.
University of California Press. 1995.
Stipe, Robert E., and Antoinette J. Lee. 1987. The American Mosaic: Preserving a
Nation’s Heritage. International Council on Monuments and Sites. Preservation Press.
Tyler, Norman. Historic Preservation An Introduction to Its History, Principles, and
Practice. Boston: W. W. Norton & Company, 1999.
Van Oers R. “Towards new international guidelines for the conservation of historic urban
landscapes (HUL)s” City & Time 3 (3): 3. [online] URL: http://www.cecibr.org/novo/revista/docs2008/CT-2008-113.pdf Accessed January 22, 2010
White, Bradford J. and Richard J. Roddewig. (1994) Preparing a Historic Preservation
Plan, American Planning Association, National Trust for Historic Preservation,
Washington
Wood, Anthony. 2008. Preserving New York: Winning the Right to Protect a City’s
Landmarks. New York: Routledge.
Online Resources:
*Historic Preservation Law 101 for New York Lawyers (includes city, state, and national
policies and law)
Gives a solid context for what sorts of constraints New York City preservationists are
contending with in terms of law. Short and sweet.
http://www.nysba.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDi
splay.cfm&CONTENTID=29928
Public Access Portal to the Laws of the City of New York
Searchable index for the Laws of NY.
15
INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
SYLLABUS
http://24.97.137.100/nyc/
World Heritage Cities
This site has links to all of the international charters involving preservation.
http://www.ovpm.org/index.php?module=pagesetter&func=viewpub&tid=1&pid=30&m
m=1038
Housing Policy Debate, Special Issue 9(3), 1998
http://www.mi.vt.edu/web/page/794/sectionid/580/pagelevel/2/parentid/580/interi
orHPD.asp
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
http://www.achp.gov/economic-general.html
National Trust for Historic Preservation
http://www.preservationnation.org/
ICOMOS
http://www.international.icomos.org/home.htm
UNESCO – World Heritage Sites
http://whc.unesco.org/en/list
Case Study on Bethesda Terrace and Arcade Restoration in Central Park
Small case study from a preservation firm’s portfolio
http://www.spsrepair.com/Case%20Study/tabid/530/contentid/591/Default.aspx
Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation homepage
Extremely useful site with interactive maps, lists of current, proposed and past projects.
http://www.gvshp.org/_gvshp/index.htm
Friends of Moynihan Station – website with history, description, and archived articles.
http://www.moynihanstation.org/newsite/
Times article on the proposed Moynihan Station
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/02/opinion/02fri3.html?ex=1351742400&en=903e6b3
60a7b952e&ei=5124&partner=permalink&exprod=permalink
Various Cases:
All of these cases should be downloadable from WestLaw—follow this link
http://www.libraries.rutgers.edu/cms/indexes/descriptions/westlaw and be sure to allow
pop-ups for the Westlaw Site. You will not be able to download anything without doing
so.
16
INTERNATIONAL PRESERVATION – SPRING 2015
SYLLABUS
Manhattan Club v. Landmarks Preservation Commission of the City of New York, 51
Misc. 2d 556, 559- 560 (1966)
Penn Central Transp. Co. v. City of New York, 438 U.S. 104, 114 (1978)
Lutheran Church in America v. City of New York, 35 N.Y.2d 121 (1974)
Church of St. Paul and St. Andrew v. Kent L. Barwick, et al, Landmarks Preservation
Commission, 67 N.Y.2d 510 (1986)
Shubert Organization, Inc. v. Landmarks Preservation Com'n of the City of New York,
N.Y.A.D. 1 Dep't., 1991
St. Bart’s v. New York:
Article from 1990 after case was decided.
http://www.nytimes.com/1990/09/13/nyregion/church-s-landmark-status-isupheld.html?scp=9&sq=%22st.+bartholomew%27s+church%22&st=nyt
Judge Rules in Lawsuit on Building of Tower
http://www.nytimes.com/1987/07/11/nyregion/judge-rules-in-lawsuit-on-building-oftower.html?scp=7&sq=%22st.+bartholomew%27s+church%22&st=nyt
Court Backs St. Bart's in Tower Legal Battle - April 29, 1987
http://www.nytimes.com/1987/04/29/nyregion/court-backs-st-bart-s-in-tower-legalbattle.html?scp=8&sq=%22st.+bartholomew%27s+church%22&st=nyt
17