OH Response to Solar.. - California Institute of Technology

advertisement
Mid-latitude Atmospheric OH Response to the Most Recent 11-year Solar Cycle
1
2
3
Shuhui Wanga,1, King-Fai Lib,c, Thomas J. Pongettia, Stanley P. Sandera, Yuk L. Yungb, Mao-Chang Liangd,
4
Nathaniel J. Liveseya, Michelle L. Santeea, Jerald W. Hardere, Marty Snowe, and Franklin P. Millsc, f
5
6
a
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA
7
b
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA
8
c
Atomic and Molecular Physics Laboratories, Research School of Physics and Engineering, Australian National
9
University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
10
d
Research Center for Environmental Changes, Academia Sinica, TaiPei, 115, Taiwan
11
e
Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80303, USA
12
f
The Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia.
13
14
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
15
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission and has a prearranged editor.
16
1
17
Major Category: Physical Sciences
18
Minor Category: Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
19
Keywords: middle atmospheric chemistry, odd hydrogen, long-term variability
Corresponding author E-mail: Shuhui.Wang@jpl.nasa.gov
1
20
The hydroxyl radical (OH) plays an important role in middle atmospheric photochemistry, in
21
particular ozone (O3) chemistry. Because it is mainly produced through photolysis and has a short
22
chemical lifetime, OH is expected to show rapid responses to solar forcing (e.g., the 11-year solar
23
cycle), resulting in variabilities in related middle atmospheric O3 chemistry. Here we present the
24
first effort to investigate such OH variability using long-term observations (from space and the
25
surface) and model simulations. Ground-based measurements and data from the Microwave Limb
26
Sounder (MLS) on NASA’s Aura satellite suggest a ~7-10% decrease in OH column abundance
27
from solar maximum to solar minimum that is highly correlated with changes in total solar
28
irradiance (TSI), solar Mg II index, and Lyman-α during Solar Cycle 23. However, model
29
simulations using a commonly accepted solar UV variability parameterization give much smaller
30
OH variability (~3%). While this discrepancy could result partially from the limitations in our
31
current understanding of middle atmospheric chemistry, recently published solar spectral
32
irradiance data from the SOlar Radiation and Climate Experiment (SORCE) suggest a solar UV
33
variability that is much larger than previously believed. With a solar forcing derived from
34
SORCE data, modeled OH variability (~6-7%) agrees much better with observations. Model
35
simulations also reveal the detailed chemical mechanisms, suggesting that such OH variability and
36
the corresponding catalytic chemistry may dominate the O3 response to SC in the upper
37
stratosphere. Continuing measurements through Solar Cycle 24 are required to further
38
understand this OH variability and its impacts on O3.
39
2
40
\body
41
Quantifying effects of the solar cycle (SC) in Earth’s atmosphere helps differentiate relative
42
contributions of natural processes and anthropogenic activities to global climate change (1). From 11-
43
year SC maximum (max) to minimum (min), the total solar irradiance (TSI) varies by only ~0.1%.
44
However, changes in solar ultraviolet (UV) fluxes can be much larger (2). Thus, detectable SC impacts
45
on Earth’s climate are more likely to be linked to changes in middle and upper atmospheric composition
46
through photochemistry in the UV.
47
A number of observational and modeling studies have devoted to characterize SC modulations in
48
mesospheric and stratospheric chemistry, especially those in ozone (O3) (3-9). Changes in UV
49
absorption by O3 at low latitudes over the SC can lead to changes in thermal structures in the upper
50
atmosphere, affecting tropospheric and polar climates (10, 11) and may lead to changes in global
51
circulations. Accurate simulations of the O3 response to SC is therefore required for better understanding
52
the sun-climate relation (1). However, the SC signal in O3 simulated by different models show
53
quantitative differences, which may be due to differences in model resolutions, model parameterizations
54
related to dynamical processes, and/or photochemistry that have yet been examined in a definitive
55
manner (12-14). Diagnostic studies must involve not only O3 but also its major catalytic sink species
56
that are also photochemically active, such as odd-hydrogen (HOx = H + OH + HO2) (15-20).
57
OH, in particular, is a key species in HOx reaction cycles. It is mainly produced through direct
58
photolysis of water vapor (H2O) at ~120 and 170 – 205 nm and photolysis of O3 at ~200 – 330 nm
59
followed by reaction of O(1D) with H2O (21). Due to its short chemical lifetime, rapid response of OH to
60
SC can serve as a rapid indicator of solar-forcing-induced changes in atmospheric composition and
61
chemistry. Unfortunately, very few studies have been done on HOx response to SC and little attention
62
has been paid to the impacts of such changes on O3 (16). Moreover, Recent observations over the
3
63
declining phase of Solar Cycle 23 by the Solar Stellar Irradiance Comparison Experiment (SOLSTICE)
64
(22) and the Spectral Irradiance Monitor (SIM) (23) instruments aboard SORCE satellite suggest an
65
unexpectedly large decrease in solar UV irradiance, which has important implications for O3 and HOx
66
photochemistry (5). Such observations disagree with previous satellite observations and model
67
parameterizations, adding UV variability as another dimension of uncertainty for upper atmospheric
68
modeling.
69
The objectives of this work include: (i) providing observational evidence of SC-related changes
70
in OH column abundance (XOH) from a near-15-year ground-based measurement, augmented by 5-year
71
satellite OH measurements by the Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS) aboard Aura; (ii) quantifying the
72
impacts of using SORCE UV variability on XOH SC variability with a three-dimensional (3-D) whole
73
atmosphere community climate model (WACCM) (2) and a one-dimensional (1-D) photochemical
74
model (24, 25); and (iii) estimating sensitivity of stratospheric O3 to the SC-related OH changes
75
obtained in (ii). Note that previous studies on the O3 response to SC investigate the overall O3 variability
76
due to chemistry and radiation. Our objective (iii) is to illustrate the role of OH in the SC modulations of
77
O3 chemistry.
78
This study is the first effort of using long-term OH measurements from space and the surface to
79
investigate the OH response to the SC, providing a basis for simulating long-term variability of middle
80
atmospheric hydrogen chemistry.
81
82
Observational Evidences
83
Studies on SC-modulations of OH had been limited in the past by the lack of long-term
84
systematic observations. The only two long-term records are XOH measurements at NASA Jet
85
Propulsion Laboratory’s (JPL) Table Mountain Facility (TMF) in California (18, 26) and at NOAA Fritz
4
86
Peak Observatory (FPO) in Colorado (27). Based on the FPO XOH data during 1977 – 2000, an XOH
87
variability of ±4.2% (or 8.4%), was derived and believed to be associated with the 11-year SC (16). A
88
trend suggestive of a similar SC response in TMF XOH data during 1997 – 2001 was also reported (18),
89
but the robustness of such analysis was limited by the short period of the observation. In this study, we
90
update TMF XOH data to 1997 – 2011, covering most of the SC 23 and the rising SC 24.
91
XOH is measured by a high-resolution Fourier Transform Ultraviolet-Visible Spectrometer
92
(FTUVS) at TMF at an altitude of ~2.3 km in Wrightwood, California (34.4N, 117.7W) (26). FTUVS
93
makes diurnal XOH measurements during daytime. Two dominated natural variabilities of OH are the
94
diurnal cycle due to the change of solar zenith angle (SZA) over the course of a day and the seasonal
95
cycle which is a combined effect of varying SZA and sources of OH (16, 28). To focus on the SC signal,
96
we first minimize the diurnal effect by using daily max (Figure 1a) determined by a polynomial fit of the
97
diurnal pattern (see Figure S1; Supporting Information (SI)). The average time of daily max is close to
98
20:00 Universal Time (UT) (local noon). To minimize the seasonal effect, we applied a Fast Fourier
99
Transform (FFT) low-pass filter to the XOH daily max. The result of 2-year FFT (removing variations
100
with frequencies higher than once every two years) is selected to best represent the long-term variability
101
that is primarily due to the SC (Figure 1a, red). Further FFT filtering smears the SC signal, while less
102
FFT filtering retains additional interannual features that are not related to SC (e.g., 1-year FFT shown in
103
Figure 1a, green). We also applied a regression analysis using the long-term Lyman-α index as a proxy
104
for SC. The results are consistent with FFT analysis. All results are normalized by the all-time-mean
105
XOH (Figure 1c). The TMF XOH SC variability is found to be 10±3% from peak to valley, where the
106
uncertainty is estimated from the regression (9). This 10% variability agrees with that observed over
107
FPO (16), although the absolute values of XOH from FPO and TMF, both in mid-latitudes, have shown
108
statistical differences of several tens of percent (29).
5
109
Since the launch of Aura in July, 2004, daily global OH distribution has been measured by MLS
110
(30). Excellent quality of MLS OH data has been demonstrated through extensive validations with air-
111
borne and ground-based measurements and modeling (31-33). Nearly continuous MLS OH data are
112
available from 2004 (middle of the declining phase of SC 23) to the end of 2009 (start of SC 24). To
113
support TMF observations, we focus on MLS OH at TMF latitude (29.5N – 39.5N). Data between
114
21.5 – 0.0032 hPa are integrated to give an estimate of XOH, which covers ~90% of the total atmospheric
115
OH (33). Therefore such integration is expected to include most of the SC signal. Furthermore, the
116
average MLS overpass time at TMF during daytime is ~21:00 UT (33), making MLS XOH compared to
117
TMF daily max XOH (~20:00 UT). Figure 1b shows the zonal mean daily MLS XOH over TMF and the
118
annual average (mid-August to mid-August) in which the seasonal variation is removed. The first year
119
mean (Aug 2004 to Aug 2005) is used to normalize the annual mean XOH to obtain the relative
120
variability (Figure 1c, blue), which is primarily due to the SC, with small additional interannual
121
variations. It is in good agreement with that of TMF XOH, although only five annual mean MLS data
122
points are available and the slightly high MLS XOH during 2007 – 2008 may require further
123
investigation. Between 2004 and 2009, MLS annual mean XOH decreased by over 3%. Based on the
124
scale of TMF XOH variability, we estimate the total SC signal in MLS XOH to be ~7%.
125
As a robustness test, the XOH SC signals obtained above are compared with observations of
126
various solar parameters (Figure 2). Independent TSI measurements have been provided by a number of
127
satellite instruments since 1978. Due to calibration issues, TSI data from different instruments may show
128
similar trends but different absolute values. Based on these observations, various versions of TSI
129
composite have been constructed, e.g., ACRIM (primarily from measurements by 3 generations of
130
Active Cavity Radiometer Irradiance Monitor) (34, 35) and PMOD (from Physikalisch-
131
Meteorologisches Observatorium Davos World Radiation Center) (36). These composites, as well as the
6
132
most recent TSI measurement (2003 – 2011) by the Total Irradiance Monitor (TIM) (37) aboard SORCE,
133
are plotted in Figure 2a. Despite quantitative differences between ACRIM and PMOD which may be
134
due to uncorrected instrumental drifts (38), both composites clearly demonstrate a prolonged solar min
135
near the end of SC 23. SORCE TSI is annually averaged and the composites are smoothed to remove the
136
short-term variability. The extracted SC signals in XOH show excellent correlation with SORCE TSI
137
(Figure 2b) and generally follow the TSI composites (Figure 2c), with some differences in the ascending
138
phase of SC 23. While TSI is a good indicator of the integrated solar spectrum variability, short-
139
wavelength UV radiation may vary differently from longer-wavelength radiation. Therefore, we also
140
compare the observed XOH variability with those in solar Lyman- at 121.5 nm and the Magnesium
141
(Mg)-II index near 280 nm (composites from the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics and
142
NOAA, respectively), which are proxies for solar UV variations. They both well correlate with the
143
observed XOH variability over SC 23 (Figure 2d).
144
145
Model Results and Discussions
146
We simulate the SC modulation in XOH with WACCM, a 3-D global atmospheric model
147
extending from the surface to the thermosphere (2). The advantage of using WACCM is that chemistry,
148
radiation, and dynamics are fully coupled, providing a comprehensive simulation of SC effects on XOH
149
at mid-latitudes. Four 50-year-long WACCM runs with different prescriptions of solar UV variability (to
150
be described below) are carried out.
151
Most climate models with prescribed solar forcing use a parameterized solar spectral irradiance
152
(SSI) variability developed at the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) (39) primarily based on space-
153
borne UV measurements during 1991 – 2000 (40). Figure 3a shows the simulated annual mean XOH
154
from 1964 to 2010 using this NRL solar forcing. TMF and MLS XOH are represented by model OH
7
155
integrated from the upper mesosphere down to 2.3 km and 25 km, respectively. The average SC signal
156
in XOH is only ~3% from max to min, suggesting differences of a factor of ~3 between model and
157
observations (Figure 3b). Note that another run with the standard WACCM SC setting (parameterized
158
UV variability based on \observations in previous solar cycles (2)) shows similar results.
159
While the differences could be partially caused by limitations in our current understanding of
160
middle atmospheric HOx-O3 chemistry, the uncertainty in solar UV variability could be a dominate
161
source. Haigh et al. (5) reported the SORCE (SOLSTICE and SIM) SSI variability during April 2004 –
162
November 2007, which is significantly larger than that of NRL SSI and can better explain observed
163
atmospheric O3 changes (5, 6, 8, 9). Thus we use SORCE SSI to replace NRL as the solar forcing in
164
WACCM. To mimic a full SC, SORCE SSI data is extrapolated back to the max of SC 23 in January
165
2002 through a linear regression with the long-term record of Mg-II index. The resultant SSI variability
166
and its comparison with NRL are shown in Figure 4 (extrapolation scaling factor is shown in the inset).
167
The SORCE UV variability is generally larger than that from the NRL model. The relative difference is
168
~30% at Lyman- and much larger (factor of 2 – 6) at 200 – 280 nm. Considering the significant
169
difference between SOLSTICE and SIM SSI variability at 210 – 240 nm, we made two WACCM runs
170
using combined SSI variability from the two instruments with cutoffs at 240 nm and 210 nm,
171
respectively. Figure 3c shows the annual mean model XOH using SORCE SSI variability (SOLSTICE
172
below 240 nm; SIM above 240 nm). The XOH SC variability is ~6% (twice of that in Figure 3b) and
173
agrees much better with observations (10% for TMF; 7% for MLS); the difference between the
174
WACCM result and TMF observations is reduced to a factor of ~1.5 (Figure 3d). The other WACCM
175
run using 240 nm as cutoff between SOLSTICE and SIM data gives a slightly larger XOH variability of
176
~7%, reducing the difference between model and observations to a factor of ~1.3. Availability of longer
8
177
SORCE UV data covering the recent solar min (2008 – 2009) and the rising SC 24 in the future will help
178
make more robust conclusions.
179
To better understand the detailed mechanism of OH response to SC, we use a 1-D photochemical
180
model (24, 25) to study the vertical and spectral distribution of OH sensitivity to SSI changes. It has
181
advantages including the much higher computational efficiency and flexibility than WACCM, allowing
182
for a wide range of sensitivity studies to elucidate the underlying mechanisms responsible for the OH
183
response to SC. The spectral OH response, defined as the ratio of the relative change in model OH to the
184
relative change in solar photon flux at the top of the atmosphere (%-[OH] / %-photon flux) highlights
185
the important processes for OH photochemistry (Figure 5a): (i) OH enhancements at 65 – 90 km and 50
186
– 80 km occur at Lyman-α and 170 – 200 nm, where H2O photolysis is the major OH source; (ii)
187
Positive OH responses at 210 – 320 nm correspond to enhanced O3 photolysis followed by enhanced OH
188
production through the reaction of O(1D) (from O3 photolysis) with H2O; (iii) Negative OH responses at
189
above 80 km correspond to enhanced photolysis of O2 (160 – 200 nm) and O3 (255 – 290 nm), which
190
produces atomic oxygen, a sink species for OH. This effect is insignificant in XOH due to the very low
191
OH abundance at these altitudes; (iv) Negative response at 190 – 220 nm below 40 km is caused by a
192
shielding effect (18) resulted from enhanced UV reduction by the enhanced overhead O3 (O3 at higher
193
altitudes with a positive response to SC (5) absorbs more UV and weakens photolysis rates at lower
194
altitudes). It mostly cancels out with effect (ii) at these altitudes, leaving a small net negative response.
195
The vertical profile of model OH response to SC (OH]) (Figure 5b) is obtained by convolving
196
the spectral response in Figure 5a with SSI variability (black: using NRL; blue: using SORCE). An
197
earlier modeling work by Canty and Minschwaner (16) (orange ) using a solar forcing similar to that of
198
NRL is close to our model result using NRL SSI. Such OH] is the overall OH change due to changes
199
in photolysis and OH sources/sinks. OH] derived using SORCE SSI is generally larger than that using
9
200
NRL, owing to the greater solar UV variability from SORCE. It is up to 18% at 70 – 80 km, near 5% at
201
40 – 60 km, and slightly negative at 30 – 40 km. In particular, by using SORCE SSI, OH SC signal
202
increases by a factor of 2 at 40 – 60 km. The integrated XOH response derived using NRL SSI is 3.7%;
203
when SORCE SSI is used, the XOH response increases to 6.4%. These values agree well with those from
204
WACCM.
205
206
Implications
207
Catalytic O3 loss above ~40 km is primarily controlled by HOx reactions (17, 19, 20). O3 in this
208
region of the atmosphere is expected to show early signs of O3 layer recovery (41) and has a strong
209
impact on global stratospheric temperatures, circulation, and thus climate (42). Our findings of OH
210
response to SC have important implications on the O3 changes associated with HOx variability. Previous
211
studies on the O3 response to SC (5, 6, 8, 9) are for the overall O3 change ([O3]) including direct
212
changes through photolysis, indirect changes through O3-destroying catalysts (e.g., HOx), and possible
213
indirect changes through thermal structures and circulation. It is important to quantify the impact of each
214
individual process. Here we discuss the component of O3 that is solely due to [OH] (denoted by
215
∂[O3]). We made another set of 1-D model runs by constraining [OH] to values from above-discussed
216
runs using NRL and SORCE SSI and fixing UV flux (no other components of O3). All species other
217
than OH are allowed to vary until reaching steady state. The resultant O3 change represents ∂[O3]
218
(Figure 5c). Above 60 km, ∂[O3] = –[OH] holds approximately (16); The peak ∂[O3] at 75 km is –15%
219
and –18% for the runs using [OH] from NRL and SORCE SSI, respectively. Below 40 km, ∂[O3] is
220
negligibly small. Between 40 and 60 km, using [OH] from SORCE SSI instead of from NRL leads to
221
nearly doubled ∂[O3]. Merkel et al. (6) showed that WACCM modeled [O3] at 40 – 60 km increases
10
222
drastically from 0.5% to 1% when NRL SSI is replaced by SORCE SSI. Similar results are also obtained
223
using other models (5, 8). These changes in [O3] at 40 – 60 km is close to that in ∂[O3] alone,
224
suggesting that OH SC variability may be a dominant factor underlying the O3 response to SC in the
225
upper stratosphere. More quantitative diagnostic studies will help confirm it.
226
227
Concluding Remarks
228
Both 1-D and WACCM models using NRL SSI produce an XOH response to SC that is much
229
smaller than observed XOH at TMF. The use of SORCE SSI gives results much closer to observations.
230
Thus the uncertainty in SSI variability may be a primary limitation for accurate modeling of OH
231
variability and the corresponding catalytic O3 change. While the NRL model could have underestimated
232
the solar forcing in SC 23, several other factors involving the trends in OH sources/sinks could have
233
contributed to the larger observed OH variability.
234
One candidate is the trend in atmospheric H2O (43). Satellite and ground-based measurements
235
revealed a decreasing trend of a few %/year in H2O at 16 – 26 km during 2000 – 2005 (43, 44).
236
Remsberg (45) reported an increasing trend in mesospheric H2O of ~1%/year at 60 – 80 km (45). We
237
approximate the H2O trend at 26 – 60 km by linear interpolation and simulated the impact of these
238
trends on OH using the 1D model (Figure S3 in SI). The resultant change in XOH is only –0.2%/year.
239
The decreasing H2O trend (44) also stops since 2005, suggesting little impact on the observed XOH
240
decrease during 2005 – 2009.
241
Similarly, a non-SC O3 trend may also contribute to the observed XOH change. A recent study
242
using ground-based lidar measurement over TMF showed ~2%/decade O3 trend at 35 – 45 km after
11
243
1997. Unfortunately, there is no report of the trends at other altitudes. Assuming 2%/decade for all
244
altitudes, our 1-D model suggests negligibly small change in XOH of ~0.08%/decade.
245
Models using SORCE SSI variability produce an XOH response (6~7%) that agrees much better
246
with observed XOH (~10% from FTUVS; ~7% from MLS). The remaining small difference is within the
247
uncertainty range of TMF XOH, and could also originate from the above-mentioned small impacts of
248
H2O and O3 trends. In addition, the SORCE SSI variability in this study is extrapolated from 2004 –
249
2007 (5) back to the max of SC 23 in 2002, but the SSI in 2007 is expected to be slightly larger than the
250
real SC min (2008 – 2009). This could also lead to a slightly underestimated OH SC signal from the
251
model. Updated SORCE SSI data in the future could help to confirm this.
252
While models using SORCE SSI over SC 23 as solar forcing agree better with observations than
253
using NRL SSI, it is still early to conclude that climate models should switch from NRL to SORCE SSI.
254
Questions remain as to why previous SSI measurements during earlier SCs did not show such large
255
variability, whether SORCE SSI variability is applicable to other SCs, and whether the difference is at
256
least partially due to possible shortcomings in the NRL model and/or calibration issues of SORCE
257
instruments.
258
In any case, continuous long-term observations of solar SSI, OH, O3 and other related chemical
259
species through the SC 24 are crucial for further investigations to solve the above puzzle. While MLS
260
OH observations have been temporarily suspended at the end of 2009 to reserve its remaining lifetime,
261
month-long measurement in each summer in the next few years is planned to cover the peak of SC 24.
262
This unique data, in combination with the continuous ground-based FTIVS measurements, will provide
263
valuable information about the global and vertical distribution of the SC signal in OH. The latter, with
264
an accurately measured SSI variability, can rigorously test the photochemical mechanisms in current
265
models.
12
266
267
Methods
268
Ground-based FTUVS at TMF measures the total OH column under clear to lightly cloudy
269
conditions. The major systematic error is the uncertainty in the OH line center absorption cross section
270
(10%). The precision for a single data point (~15 minute interval) is generally within 10% and is
271
substantially improved when using the daily max determined from the polynomial fit of the diurnal
272
variation. The gaps in the time series are due to weather, instrument adjustments or upgrades, and
273
measurements for other species. When deriving the SC signal using regression, an index describing the
274
vertical propagation of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) in the stratosphere was also included in the
275
analysis, but was found to be insignificant. The effect of ENSO (El Niño/La Niña-Southern Oscillation)
276
was also found to be negligible.
277
MLS OH data used in this study are from v3.3 retrieval software. The systematic uncertainty is
278
within 8% over 32 – 0.0032 hPa (32). We use data at 21.5 – 0.0032 hPa to avoid the increasing noise
279
due to H2O absorption at higher pressures. The zonal mean around TMF [29.5N, 39.5N] are used. A
280
similar analysis using data from a 10×25 grid box at TMF was also performed. The results are similar
281
to those presented here.
282
WACCM uses MOZART3 as the chemical mechanism (2). Chemical species are all allowed to
283
vary during model runs. For each UV setting, the model is run from 1960 to 2010. The first 4 years are
284
ignored to allow the model for spin-up. We use the monthly mean output to derive the OH SC signal.
285
We also generated daily max outputs during solar max year and solar min year to compare with results
286
using monthly mean. The diurnal effect is found to be very small.
13
287
The 1-D model is a Caltech/JPL photochemical model that includes over 100 chemical species,
288
over 460 thermal and photochemical reactions, vertical transport (eddy, molecular, and thermal
289
diffusion), and coupled radiative transfer (24, 25). The chemical kinetics have been updated to JPL06-2
290
(46). A more recent update of JPL10-6 (47) does not introduce significant differences on major reactions
291
related to HOx chemistry. 65 layers are used to cover from the ground to 130 km. The OH fluxes at the
292
surface and the top of the atmosphere are fixed as zero. During model runs, chemical species are not
293
constrained unless otherwise stated. The temperature profile is fixed. The model has been applied to
294
study the diurnal cycle of OH (48). It produces realistic O3 vertical profiles at 30 – 100 km (25). Typical
295
model profiles of OH, O3, and related species are shown in Figure S2 (SI).
296
SORCE solar spectral data: The SOLSTICE measurement (22) has a spectral resolution of 0.1
297
nm and an absolute accuracy within 5%. The SIM measurement (23) has varying spectral resolution (~1
298
nm in UV) and an absolute accuracy within 2%.
299
300
Acknowledgements
301
We acknowledge the support of the NASA Aura Science Team, Upper Atmosphere Research, and
302
Tropospheric Chemistry programs. Work at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of
303
Technology, was done under contract to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Support
304
from an Australian Research Council Linkage International grant is gratefully acknowledged. We
305
acknowledge R. C. Willson for providing the ACRIM TSI composite (http://www.acrim.com/), L. Puga
306
and D. Bouwer for providing the latest Mg II index (http://sol.spacenvironment.net/), and the LASP
307
Interactive Solar Irradiance Datacenter (LISIRD) for Lyman- record (http://lasp.colorado.edu/lisird/).
308
We
309
(http://www.pmodwrc.ch/pmod.php?topic=tsi/composite/SolarConstant), and acknowledge unpublished
also
acknowledge
receipt
of
dataset
from
PMOD/WRC,
Davos,
Switzerland
14
310
data from VIRGO (the Variability of solar IRradiance and Gravity Oscillations on board the SOlar and
311
Heliospheric Observatory). Some early years FTUVS OH data were collected by R. P. Cageao. We
312
thank H. M. Pickett, the PI (retired) for the MLS OH measurements and a NASA Aura Science Team
313
project. We also thank R.-L. Shia and S. Newman for help with the models and insightful discussions.
314
315
Author contributions
316
S. Wang, K.-F. Li, S. P. Sander, Y. L. Yung, and F. P. Mills designed the research. S. Wang carried out
317
the observational data analysis and investigations. K.-F. Li carried out the 1-D model runs and
318
contributed to the investigations under the guidance of Y. L. Yung and F. P. Mills. Under the guidance
319
of S. P. Sander, T. J. Pongetti made most TMF measurements. M.-C. Liang carried out the WACCM
320
model runs. N. J. Livesey and M. L. Santee contributed to MLS data quality analysis. J. W. Harder and
321
M. Snow provided SORCE SSI data. The manuscript was mainly written by S. Wang, with the 1-D
322
model section contributed from K.-F. Li. All authors contributed comments on the manuscript.
323
324
Additional information
325
The authors declare no competing financial interests. Correspondence and requests for materials should
326
be addressed to S. Wang.
327
15
328
Figure Legends
329
Figure 1. Daily max OH column at TMF and its SC variability.
330
(a) Daily max FTUVS XOH (black) and its long-term variability based on FFT (red and green). (b) Daily
331
zonal mean MLS XOH around TMF latitude (black) and its annual mean (blue). (c) Long-term FTUVS
332
XOH variability normalized to all-time-mean (red and green: from FFT; gray: from regression) and the
333
comparable variability in MLS XOH (blue).
334
335
Figure 2. OH SC variability correlates well with solar parameters.
336
(a) Daily mean TSI from SORCE (black), PMOD composite (purple), and ACRIM composite (green).
337
(b) FTUVS (red) and MLS (blue) XOH variability (see Figure 1) in comparison with variability in annual
338
mean SORCE TSI (black). (c) Same as (b), but replacing SORCE TSI with smoothed ACRIM and
339
PMOD composites. The PMOD TSI was adjusted by 4.7 W/m2. (d) XOH variability in comparison with
340
variabilities in Lyman-α (gray) and Mg II (cyan).
341
342
Figure 3. Comparison of OH SC variabilities from WACCM and observations.
343
(a) Modeled variability of annual mean XOH (using NRL solar forcing) integrated over the altitude
344
ranges for FTUVS (red) and MLS (blue) XOH. (b) Model XOH variability is increased by a factor of 3
345
(gray) to compare with observed XOH SC signal (red and blue). The gray band indicates the scatter range
346
of model XOH variability over the simulated SCs. (c) and (d) are equivalent to (a) and (b) but for model
347
results using SORCE SSI.
348
349
Figure 4. Solar UV spectral variability derived from SORCE SSI.
350
The blue and orange lines correspond to SSI data from SOLSTICE and SIM, respectively. The purple
16
351
line shows the mean of the two at 210 – 240 nm. The black line is the NRL SSI variation. All spectra
352
have been convolved to the model grid. The inset shows the spectral scaling factors for extrapolating the
353
observed SSI (April 2004 – November 2007) to the solar max in January 2002. For above 340 nm (not
354
important for OH chemistry), an arbitrary factor of 3.5 is applied (dashed).
355
356
Figure 5. Vertical profile of OH SC signal and its implications for O3.
357
(a) The spectral response of OH to changes in wavelength-resolved solar irradiance (the relative change
358
in OH divided by the relative change in the photon flux) from the 1-D model. The reference UV
359
spectrum for perturbation is constructed with SOLSTICE data below 210 nm, SIM data above 240 nm,
360
and the mean of SOLSTICE and SIM at 210 – 240 nm where they disagree (see Figure 4). (b) Vertical
361
profiles of OH SC signal from the model run using NRL SSI (black), using SORCE SSI (blue; shade
362
representing the upper and lower limits of results derived by using SOLSTICE or SIM data at 210 – 240
363
nm.), and from Canty and Minschwaner (16) (orange). (c) The corresponding O3 variability (solely due
364
to the changes in OH in panel (b)).
365
366
References
367
368
1. Gray LJ, et al. (2010) Solar influences on climate. Rev Geophys 48:RG4001 10.1029/2009RG000282.
369
370
2. Marsh DR, et al. (2007) Modeling the whole atmosphere response to solar cycle changes in radiative and
geomagnetic forcing. J Geophys Res-Atmos 112:D23306 10.1029/2006JD008306.
371
372
373
3. Beig G, Fadnavis S, Schmidt H, & Brasseur GP (2012) Inter-comparison of 11-year solar cycle response in
mesospheric ozone and temperature obtained by HALOE satellite data and HAMMONIA model. J Geophys
Res-Atmos 117 10.1029/2011JD015697.
374
375
376
4. Soukharev BE & Hood LL (2006) Solar cycle variation of stratospheric ozone: Multiple regression analysis of
long-term satellite data sets and comparisons with models. J Geophys Res-Atmos 111:D20314
10.1029/2006JD007107.
377
378
5. Haigh JD, Winning AR, Toumi R, & Harder JW (2010) An influence of solar spectral variations on radiative
forcing of climate. Nature 467:696-699 10.1038/nature09426.
17
379
380
6. Merkel AW, et al. (2011) The impact of solar spectral irradiance variability on middle atmospheric ozone.
Geophys Res Lett 38:L13802 10.1029/2011GL047561.
381
382
7. Randel WJ & Wu F (2007) A stratospheric ozone profile data set for 1979-2005: Variability, trends, and
comparisons with column ozone data. J Geophys Res-Atmos 112:D06313 10.1029/2006JD007339.
383
384
385
8. Swartz WH, Stolarski RS, Oman LD, Fleming EL, & Jackman CH (2012) Middle atmosphere response to
different descriptions of the 11-yr solar cycle in spectral irradiance in a chemistry-climate model. Atmos.
Chem. Phys. Discuss. 12:7039-7071 10.5194/acpd-12-7039-2012.
386
387
9. Li K-F, Jiang X, Liang M-C, & Yung YL (2012) Simulation of solar-cycle response in tropical total column ozone
using SORCE irradiance. Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. 12:1867-1893 10.5194/acpd-12-1867-2012.
388
389
10. Haigh JD, Blackburn M, & Day R (2005) The response of tropospheric circulation to perturbations in lowerstratospheric temperature. J Climate 18:3672-3685 10.1175/JCLI3472.1.
390
391
11. Kodera K & Kuroda Y (2002) Dynamical response to the solar cycle. J Geophys Res-Atmos 107:4749
10.1029/2002JD002224.
392
393
12. Brasseur GP (1993) The response of the middle atmosphere to long-term and short-term solar variability: a
2-dimensional model. J Geophys Res-Atmos 98:23079-23090 10.1029/93JD02406.
394
395
13. Austin J, et al. (2008) Coupled chemistry climate model simulations of the solar cycle in ozone and
temperature. J Geophys Res-Atmos 113:D11306 10.1029/2007JD009391.
396
397
14. Hood LL, Soukharev BE, & McCormack JP (2010) Decadal variability of the tropical stratosphere: Secondary
influence of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation. J Geophys Res-Atmos 115:D11113 10.1029/2009JD012291.
398
399
15. Sandor BJ & Clancy RT (1998) Mesospheric HOx chemistry from diurnal microwave observations of HO2, O3,
and H2O. J Geophys Res-Atmos 103:13337-13351 10.1029/98JD00432.
400
401
16. Canty T & Minschwaner K (2002) Seasonal and solar cycle variability of OH in the middle atmosphere. J
Geophys Res-Atmos 107:4737 10.1029/2002JD002278.
402
403
17. McElroy MB & Salawitch RJ (1989) Changing Composition of the Global Stratosphere. Science 243:763-770
10.1126/science.243.4892.763.
404
405
406
18. Mills FP, et al. (2003) OH column abundance over Table Mountain Facility, California: Intra-annual variations
and comparisons to model predictions for 1997-2001. J Geophys Res-Atmos 108:4785
10.1029/2003JD003481.
407
408
19. Osterman GB, et al. (1997) Balloon-borne measurements of stratospheric radicals and their precursors:
Implications for the production and Loss of ozone. Geophys Res Lett 24:1107-1110 10.1029/97GL00921.
409
410
20. Salawitch RJ, et al. (2005) Sensitivity of ozone to bromine in the lower stratosphere. Geophys Res Lett
32:L05811 10.1029/2004GL021504.
411
412
21. Pickett HM & Peterson DB (1996) Comparison of measured stratospheric OH with prediction. J Geophys ResAtmos 101:16789-16796 10.1029/96JD01168.
413
414
415
22. Snow M, McClintock WE, Rottman G, & Woods TN (2005) Solar-Stellar Irradiance Comparison Experiment II
(SOLSTICE II): Examination of the solar-stellar comparison technique. Sol Phys 230:295-324 10.1007/s11207005-8763-3.
416
417
23. Harder JW, et al. (2010) The SORCE SIM Solar Spectrum: Comparison with Recent Observations. Sol Phys
263:3-24 10.1007/s11207-010-9555-y.
18
418
419
24. Allen M, Yung YL, & Waters JW (1981) Vertical Transport and Photochemistry in the Terrestrial Mesosphere
and Lower Thermosphere (50-120 km). J Geophys Res-Space Phys 86:3617-3627 10.1029/JA086iA05p03617.
420
421
25. Allen M, Lunine JI, & Yung YL (1984) The Vertical Distribution of Ozone in the Mesosphere and Lower
Thermosphere. J Geophys Res-Atmos 89:4841-4872 10.1029/JD089iD03p04841.
422
423
424
26. Cageao RP, et al. (2001) High-Resolution Fourier-Transform Ultraviolet-Visible Spectrometer for the
Measurement of Atmospheric Trace Species: Application to OH. Appl Opt 40:2024-2030
10.1364/AO.40.002024.
425
426
427
27. Minschwaner K, Canty T, & Burnett CR (2003) Hydroxyl column abundance measurements: PEPSIOS
instrumentation at the Fritz Peak Observatory and data analysis techniques. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 65:335344 10.1016/S1364-6826(02)00297-3.
428
429
28. Li KF, et al. (2005) OH column abundance over Table Mountain Facility, California: AM-PM diurnal
asymmetry. Geophys Res Lett 32:L13813 10.1029/2005GL022521.
430
431
29. Mills FP, Cageao RP, Nemtchinov V, Jiang Y, & Sander SP (2002) OH column abundance over Table Mountain
Facility, California: Annual average 1997-2000. Geophys Res Lett 29:1742 10.1029/2001GL014151.
432
433
30. Pickett HM (2006) Microwave Limb Sounder THz module on Aura. IEEE T Geosci Remote Sensing 44:11221130 10.1109/TGRS.2005.862667.
434
435
31. Canty T, et al. (2006) Stratospheric and mesospheric HOx: results from aura MLS and FIRS-2. Geophys Res
Lett 33:L12802 10.1029/2006GL025964.
436
437
32. Pickett HM, et al. (2008) Validation of Aura Microwave Limb Sounder OH and HO2 measurements. J Geophys
Res-Atmos 113:D16S30 10.1029/2007JD008775.
438
439
440
33. Wang S, et al. (2008) Validation of Aura Microwave Limb Sounder OH measurements with Fourier Transform
Ultra-Violet Spectrometer total OH column measurements at Table Mountain, California. J Geophys ResAtmos 113:D22301 10.1029/2008JD009883.
441
442
34. Scafetta N & Willson RC (2009) ACRIM-gap and TSI trend issue resolved using a surface magnetic flux TSI
proxy model. Geophys Res Lett 36:L05701 10.1029/2008GL036307.
443
444
35. Willson RC & Mordvinov AV (2003) Secular total solar irradiance trend during solar cycles 21-23. Geophys
Res Lett 30:1199 10.1029/2002GL016038.
445
446
36. Froehlich C (2006) Solar irradiance variability since 1978 - Revision of the PMOD composite during solar
cycle 21. Space Sci Rev 125:53-65 10.1007/s11214-006-9046-5.
447
448
37. Kopp G, Lawrence G, & Rottman G (2005) The Total Irradiance Monitor (TIM): Science results. Sol Phys
230:129-139 10.1007/s11207-005-7433-9.
449
450
38. Kopp G & Lean JL (2011) A new, lower value of total solar irradiance: Evidence and climate significance.
Geophys Res Lett 38:L01706 10.1029/2010GL045777.
451
452
39. Lean J (2000) Evolution of the sun's spectral irradiance since the Maunder Minimum. Geophys Res Lett
27:2425-2428 10.1029/2000GL000043.
453
454
40. Lean JL, et al. (1997) Detection and parameterization of variations in solar mid- and near-ultraviolet
radiation (200-400 nm). J Geophys Res-Atmos 102:29939-29956 10.1029/97JD02092.
455
456
41. Newchurch MJ, et al. (2003) Evidence for slowdown in stratospheric ozone loss: First stage of ozone
recovery. J Geophys Res-Atmos 108:4507 10.1029/2003JD003471.
19
457
458
459
42. Müller R & Salawitch RJ (1999) Upper stratospheric processes, in Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion:
1998, WMO Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project - Report No. 44 (World Meteorological
Organization, Geneva), pp 6.1– 6.44.
460
461
43. Solomon S, et al. (2010) Contributions of Stratospheric Water Vapor to Decadal Changes in the Rate of
Global Warming. Science 327:1219-1223 10.1126/science.1182488.
462
463
44. Hurst DF, et al. (2011) Stratospheric water vapor trends over Boulder, Colorado: Analysis of the 30 year
Boulder record. J Geophys Res-Atmos 116:D02306 10.1029/2010JD015065.
464
465
45. Remsberg E (2010) Observed seasonal to decadal scale responses in mesospheric water vapor. J Geophys
Res-Atmos 115:D06306 10.1029/2009JD012904.
466
467
46. Sander SP, et al. (2006) Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies Evaluation
No. 15, Tech Report JPL Publ 06-2 (Jet Propulsion Laboratory).
468
469
47. Sander SP, et al. (2011) Chemical Kinetics and Photochemical Data for Use in Atmospheric Studies Evaluation
No. 17, Tech Report JPL Publ 10-6 (Jet Propulsion Laboratory).
470
471
48. Pickett HM, Read WG, Lee KK, & Yung YL (2006) Observation of night OH in the mesosphere. Geophys Res
Lett 33:L19808 10.1029/2006GL026910.
472
473
20
Download