MS Word Doc Format - The University of Texas at Dallas

advertisement
Title of Paper
A. N. AuthorOne1, A. N. AuthorTwo2
1
Institution, contact postal address,
Telephone: (international codes)
Email:
2
Institution, contact postal address
Telephone: (international codes)
Email:
1. Introduction
The purpose of providing these notes is to standardize the format of abstracts submitted
to Geocomputation 2015. These notes are reworked from the author guidelines for the
Geocomputation 2011 and 2013 conferences.
Each section of the paper should be numbered, as shown in this example. The section
heading should be left-aligned with bold type. Times New Roman 12pt font should be
used for the main text, and Arial font for the title and section headings (16pt for the title,
and 14pt for the section headings).
The main text should be full justified, as in this example. The first line of the first
paragraph in each section should not be indented. The rest of the paragraphs should be
indented by 0.5cm, as in this example.
Abstracts should be written in English, using US spelling. Authors are requested to
keep to the limit of 1,500 words. Submissions that fail to follow the specified format and
prescribed length will not be considered for inclusion.
1.1 Sub-sections
Sub-sections should be numbered as shown in this example. Each sub-section heading
should be left-aligned with bold Arial font (size 12pt). The use of sub-sub-sections is
discouraged.
2. Equations, Figures and Tables
Equations should be centred on a page, and numbered consecutively in the right-hand
margin as (1), (2), etc. They should be referred to in the text as, for example, equation 1.
Tables should be in the style shown here, or as close as possible to it, and should be
referenced as table 1, table 2, etc. Figures should be presented at relevant locations in the
text, and not at the end of the paper. They should be referred to as fig. 1, fig. 2, etc. Color
figures are acceptable, because contributions will be published exclusively in electronic
form. However, authors should ensure that figures are of a sufficient quality: 200dpi for
photographic images, and 300dpi for line drawings. Example placements for tables and
figures are as follows:
Year
1996
Location
Leeds
Country
UK
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2003
2005
2007
2009
2011
2013
2015
Otego
Bristol
Fredericksburg
Greenwich
Brisbane
Southampton
Ann Arbor
Maynooth
Sydney
London
Wuhan
Dallas
New Zealand
UK
USA
UK
Australia
UK
USA
Ireland
Australia
UK
China
USA
Table 1. Venues of Geocomputation conferences, 1996-2015.
Figure 1. The logo of the University of Texas at Dallas.
3. References and Citations
A list of references cited should be provided at the end of the paper. Citations of these
within the text should follow the Harvard system of referencing as follows—several good
papers about this topic are available (Authority 1973, Learned and Expert 1982),
although the work by Fudgit et al. (1997) is an exception.
The reference list should be formatted as in this example, using 10pt font and 1cm
hanging paragraphs for each reference.
4. File format
Abstracts should be submitted as files compatible with Microsoft Word (e.g., Word
document, Rich Text format) or Acrobat (pdf). Files larger than 3MB should be sent as
zipped archives. Abstracts should be submitted through EasyChair (the URL will be
available later). A submission should contain the following contact information for the
corresponding author: name, institution, postal address, telephone number, email address.
5. Deadline
The submission deadline is January 15, 2015. Authors will be notified about whether
their submission has been accepted for paper presentation or poster presentation by
February 15, 2015. Those accepted as poster presentations may be given the opportunity,
at a later date, of presenting in a paper session should some presenters withdraw.
Any questions regarding the submission and publication process should be addressed
to geocomputation2015@utdallas.edu.
6. Acknowledgements
Acknowledgement should be made of any funding bodies who have supported the work
reported in a paper, of those who have given permission for their work to be reproduced,
and/or of individuals whose particular assistance is due recognition.
7. References
Authority F, 1973, Stating the obvious: an interdisciplinary approach. Journal of Entirely Predictable
Results, 63(2):1037-1068.
Fudgit B, Publish HWP and Writer AB, 1997, Looming deadlines and how to deal with them. Partridge &
Co, Norwich, UK.
Learned C and Expert M, 1982, Reworking previous publications for fun and profit. In: Doctor K and
Professor B (eds), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Something You Thought Was
Relevant But Isn’t Really, Los Angeles, USA, 120-149.
Download