Professor, Teaching Scholar, Self Assessment

advertisement
Office of BioMed Faculty Administration
233 Richmond St, Room 240
bmfa@brown.edu
Faculty Self-Assessment: Am I on track for promotion?
Professor | Teaching Scholar
Criteria for Professor, Teaching Scholar
The faculty member has obtained a national reputation as a teaching scholar in his/her discipline and has exceptional skills
as an educator. New or qualitatively different teaching activities since promotion or appointment to associate professor
should be documented. The individual will be evaluated by letters from outstanding faculty in the field outside Brown
University who are asked to compare the candidate with others in his/her national peer group and to indicate their support
for promotion or appointment. A continuing record of publications since promotion to the previous rank is expected.
Clinical skills, as well as contributions to the university or the hospital, will be considered positively. Appointment at this
rank is for renewable five-year terms.
Note: To add additional rows in any section, simply hit tab with the cursor in the last field of the chart.
Mentors
Current mentor
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Brown faculty appointments
Title
Dates
Associate professor
Assistant professor
Instructor
Other faculty appointments
Title
Institution
Dates
Education
Program
Location
Dates
Fellowship
Residency
Medical school
Area of study
Criterion #1
Faculty member has documented new or qualitatively different teaching activities since promotion or appointment to
associate professor.
Teaching responsibilities and leadership
Position/role (since last promotion)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Examples: site director, program director, residency/fellowship director, mock oral examiner
Faculty Self-Assessment | Professor | Teaching Scholar
rev 7/2015
1
Program/curriculum development
Program/curriculum (since last promotion)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
University courses taught
Course/role (since last promotion)
Examples: course/seminar instructor, section leader, lecturer, small group leader, facilitator, clerkship director/supervisor, elective
director, doctoring course, journal club organizer, longitudinal clerkship
Hospital courses taught/office-based teaching
Course/role (since last promotion)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Examples: attending, consult, preceptor, rotation director, hospital-based lectures/conferences/clinics, teaching faculty, teaching
rounds, clinical supervisor
Mentoring/advising
Trainee type
# current trainees
# past trainees
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Undergraduates
Medical students
Graduate students
Residents
Fellows
Postdocs
Other
Criterion #2
Faculty member has demonstrated exceptional skills as an educator.
Teaching awards and recognition
Award/honor
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Teaching evaluations
Scores/ratings (since last promotion)
Criterion #3
Faculty member has a national reputation as a teaching scholar in his/her discipline.
Journal reviewer
Journal (list or total #) ( (since last promotion)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Editorial boards
Journal/role (since last promotion)
Faculty Self-Assessment | Professor | Teaching Scholar
rev 7/2015
2
Professional societies/other organizations
Organization/role (since last promotion)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Examples: state or national health board or task force, industry task force, specialty board accrediting bodies, scientific advisory boards,
society session moderator
National institute reviewer/study sections
Institute/section (since last promotion)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Invited presentations
Presentation type
# since last promotion
# before last promotion
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Local/regional
Domestic
International
Criterion #4
Faculty member has a continuous record of scholarly productivity.
Publications
# since last promotion
(first/senior author)*
Publication type
# before last promotion
(first/senior author)*
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Original, peer-reviewed publications
Other peer-reviewed publications
Books/book chapters
Other non-peer-reviewed publications
Corporate authorships or multicenter trials
Scholarly work in other media
Other
*Enter total number, then number as first/senior author in parentheses. Example: 15 (5) indicates 15 publications with five of those as first or senior author.
Abstract presentations
# since last promotion
# before last promotion
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Grants (awarded)
Role
# since last promotion ($)^
# before last promotion ($)^
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
# before last promotion
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Principal investigator
Co-investigator
Other
^Include funding amount in parentheses
Grants (submitted/pending)
Role
# since last promotion
Principal investigator
Co-investigator
Other
Research awards and recognition
Award/honor
Faculty Self-Assessment | Professor | Teaching Scholar
rev 7/2015
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
3
Patents
Patents
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Criterion #5
Other clinical skills and service contributions to the university or hospital will be given positive consideration.
Clinical positions
Position title (since last promotion)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Examples: staff physician, director/chief of clinical service, attending, section chief
Clinical awards and recognition
Award/honor
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Examples: Top Physician/Best Doctors/Who’s Who listing, fellow in professional society, hospital award
University service
Service role/activity (since last promotion)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Examples: admissions, clinical faculty advisory committee
Hospital service
Service role/activity (since last promotion)
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Goal 1-2 years
Goal 3-4 years
Foundation service
Service role/activity (since last promotion)
Other service
Service role/activity (since last promotion)
Criterion #6
A minimum of eight external reviewers are required. Four must be selected by the department and four by the candidate.
All reviewers must be external to Brown and at the rank of full professor. Reviewers should be able to comment on the
quality of teaching and discuss the candidate’s stature compared to national peer group.
Potential local/regional external reviewers
Name
Institution
Rank
Field/area
Rank
Field/area
Potential national/international external reviewers
Name
Institution
Faculty Self-Assessment | Professor | Teaching Scholar
rev 7/2015
4
Download