Practice Profile Foundations of Math COACH Name: MI^2 / Kate Fanelli Date: June 2015 Focused Practice: Support ongoing implementation and improvement of practices learned in Foundations of Math, including using number sense to communicate about, and build understanding of, mathematics in a coherent manner. Clearly Defined Outcome/s for this Practice: Consistent and sustained implementation of new practices with fidelity at the classroom level. Instruction aligned with implementation goals. Teachers using data and self-reflection to inform instructional decisions. Critical Component (non-negotiable) Ongoing participation in the implementation process Ideal “Gold Standard” of the Critical Component Participates in the full training (five full days and satisfactory scores on all assignments) whenever coachees go through the training. Emerging Practice (Acceptable Variation) of the Critical Component Participates in the full training (five full days and satisfactory scores on all assignments) whenever 3 or more of their coachees are going through the training. Unacceptable Variation of the Critical Component Does not participate in the full training. Does not receive satisfactory scores on all assignments. Sends groups of 3 or more teachers to the training on their own. All coaches are part of the implementation team. One or more coach is part of the implementation team. There are no coaches on the implementation team. Coaches on the implementation team attend 100% of the meetings and contribute to 100% of the implementation team meetings. Coaches on the implementation team attend 100% of the imeetings and contribute to at least 80% of the meetings, and when they cannot attend, make sure there is at least one coach (if applicable) who can attend. Coaches on the implementation team attend fewer than 80% of the implementation team meetings, and/or contribute to fewer than 80% of the meetings. In settings where some coaches are not on the implementation team, coaches not on the team communicate with the coach on the team to make sure all perspectives are being included. Uses course content to engage in reflective and collegial conversations during and after Uses course content to engage in reflective and collegial conversations during and after the Uses course content to engage in reflective and collegial conversations inconsistently or in the training, including 100% of coaching sessions. Critical Component (non-negotiable) Assist in goal setting and progress monitoring regarding instruction and how it relates to student outcomes and teacher behavior Ideal “Gold Standard” of the Critical Component Assists teachers in setting goals informed by data and that support school improvement or personal professional goals 100% of the time. Keeps discussion objective and non-judgmental 100% of the time (e.g. “I noticed that 2 students were not participating,” or “Every pair of students had something to share during the discussion.”) training, including 90% of coaching sessions. Emerging Practice (Acceptable Variation) of the Critical Component Assists teachers in setting goals informed by data and that support school improvement or personal professional goals 80% of the time. Keeps discussion objective and non-judgmental 80% of the time, with up to 20% of subjective conversation focused on the work, not the person. (e.g. “I thought the subtraction unit was confusing,” or “I like how the students stay engaged”) less than 90% of coaching sessions. Unacceptable Variation of the Critical Component Allows teachers to set goals without considering data, evidence, school improvement goals, or personal professional goals or does not utilize goal setting for coaching. Uses judgments or subjectivity more than 80% of the time when discussing goal setting and progress toward goals. Possesses strong mathematical understanding, and/or, when uncertain about mathematical authority, seeks to learn more. Offers feedback regarding math that is inaccurate. When mathematical errors, on the part of the teacher of student, are identified, corrections occur 100% of the time. Is unable to provide feedback related to The Components of Number Sense. Engages in difficult discussions Informs the teacher that he/she is not a math person and will not be able to comment on anything mathematical. Engages in difficult discussions Avoids or does not have difficult when conflict arises with the coachee 100% of the time. Critical Component (non-negotiable) Utilize the Partnership Principle in interactions with teachers (Unmistakable Impact, Jim Knight, 2011, Chapter 2) Critical Component (non-negotiable) Stay focused on fidelity of implementation around practices learned through new training Critical Component (non-negotiable) Maintain confidentiality in the coach/teacher relationship Ideal “Gold Standard” of the Critical Component Utilizes Partnership Principles 100% of the time. Ideal “Gold Standard” of the Critical Component Utilizes and/or refers to information, techniques, tools established and learned in the training during debriefs with coachee 100% of the time. Ideal “Gold Standard” of the Critical Component Coach maintains confidentiality, per the coaching agreement, 100% of the time, but may occasionally ask coachee’s permission to share information with others for educational when conflict arises with the coachee 90% of the time. Emerging Practice (Acceptable Variation) of the Critical Component Utilizes Partnership Principles 90% of the time. Emerging Practice (Acceptable Variation) of the Critical Component Utilizes and/or refers to information, techniques, tools established and learned in the training during debriefs with coachee 80% of the time. Emerging Practice (Acceptable Variation) of the Critical Component conversations when conflict arises with the coachee. Unacceptable Variation of the Critical Component Utilizes Partnership Principles less than 90% of the time. Unacceptable Variation of the Critical Component Utilizes and/or refers to information, techniques, tools established and learned in the training during debriefs with coachee less than 80% of the time. Unacceptable Variation of the Critical Component Coach does not maintain confidentiality, per the coaching agreement, 100% of the time. purposes. Critical Component (non-negotiable) Meets regularly with the principals Ideal “Gold Standard” of the Critical Component Meets regularly (minimally once a month) with the building administrator to see where coach(es) and staff may need support and make sure the partnership agreement is being maintained. Emerging Practice (Acceptable Variation) of the Critical Component Meets regularly (minimally every other month) with the building administrator to see where coach(es) and staff may need support and make sure the partnership agreement is being maintained. Unacceptable Variation of the Critical Component Principal is coach Makes a standing appointment with the building administrator but does not always keep them, or cuts them short. Uses the appointment to evaluate teachers. Signs a coaching agreement with Signs a coaching agreement with the building administrator and the building administrator and meets the conditions in it 100% meets the conditions in it 90%. of the time. Critical Component (non-negotiable) Regularly meets with coachee Emerging Practice (Acceptable Variation) of the Critical Component Coaches engage in coaching Coaches engage in coaching sessions twice a month for sessions once a month for approximately 80 minutes approximately 80 minutes including pre-conference (20 including pre-conference (20 minutes), observation (full minutes), observation (full lesson, lesson, times will vary), and post- times will vary), and postconference (20 minutes). conference (20 minutes). Ideal “Gold Standard” of the Critical Component Is assigned to a building administrator but either does not sign, or does not meet conditions in, a coaching agreement. Unacceptable Variation of the Critical Component Coaches meet less than once a month and/or for less than 80 minutes. Meetings do not include a preconference, observation, and postconference. 100% of the teachers are engaged in the coaching process. Critical Component (non-negotiable) Maintains clearly defined roles with coachees and principals Ideal “Gold Standard” of the Critical Component Establishes roles before coaching begins and maintains roles throughout the coaching. 80% of the teachers are engaged in the coaching process. Emerging Practice (Acceptable Variation) of the Critical Component Establishes and maintains roles by the end of the first coaching session and maintains roles throughout the coaching. Coach works with fewer than 80% of the participants. Unacceptable Variation of the Critical Component Establishes and maintains roles informally, or does not define the roles. Collects necessary signatures on Collects necessary signatures on the Coaching Agreement before the Coaching Agreement by the coaching begins. end of the first coaching session. May distribute the Coaching Agreement, but does not collect necessary signatures on it. Always engages in difficult conversations when roles deviate from the coaching agreement (does so 100% of the time). Usually engages in difficult conversations when roles deviate from the coaching agreement (does so 80% of the time), but maintains professionalism and adheres to the Coaching Agreement 100% of the time. Rarely engages in difficult conversations when roles deviate from the coaching agreement (does so less than 80% of the time), and/or maintains professionalism and adheres to the Coaching Agreement less than 100% of the time. Critical Ideal “Gold Standard” of Component the Critical Component (non-negotiable) Participates in Attends 100% of (Mi)2 coaching ongoing training with events. (Mi)^2 to receive and operationalize Reflects on professional practice Emerging Practice (Acceptable Variation) of the Critical Component Attends 90% of (Mi)2 coaching events. Attends fewer than 90% of (Mi)2 coaching events. Reflects on professional practice Reflects on professional practice Unacceptable Variation of the Critical Component feedback and contributes to a community of learners via the Coaches Network monthly. and contributes to a community of learners via the Coaches Network bi-monthly. and contributes to a community of learners via the Coaches Network less than bi-monthly. Receives feedback on his/her coaching in a constructive manner, including adjusting practice where applicable, 100% of the time. Receives feedback on his/her coaching in a constructive manner, including adjusting practice where applicable, 90%, or more, of the time. Receives feedback on his/her coaching in a constructive manner, including adjusting practice where applicable, less than 90% of the time.