Philosophy of Physical Education, Exercise Science, and Sport The love, study, and pursuit of wisdom, knowledge, and truth Philosophy of Physical Education, Exercise Science, and Sport Philosophy is an attempt to understand the meaning of life by analyzing and synthesizing why people believe or act as they do; simply having a purpose and objectives. Developing a personal philosophy can improve your teaching effectiveness, influence your behavior, provide direction in program development, contribute to society’s awareness of the value of physical activity, and encourage a feeling of commonality among co-workers. Developing a philosophy helps you develop a Personal Code of Conduct. Philosophy of Physical Education/Exercise Science What is the responsibility of the physical education, exercise science, or sport professional or just personal? Responsibilities relative to moral values. Professional knowledge and expertise. Program content relative to standards. Delivery of instruction and distribution of information. Treatment of individuals from various socioeconomic backgrounds, ages, genders, ethnicities, or ability levels. Utilization of equipment and other resources. Personal health and well-being. Five Traditional Philosophies Idealism — a philosophical theory advocating that reality depends on the mind for existence and truth is universal and absolute Realism — the philosophical system stressing that the laws and order of the world as revealed by science are independent from human experiences Naturalism — a belief that the laws of nature govern life and individual goals are more important than societal goals Pragmatism — an American movement in philosophy emphasizing reality as the sum total of each individual’s experiences through practical experimentation Existentialism — a twentieth-century philosophy that centers on individual choices and advocates that truth and values are uniquely personal Idealism Since reasoning and mental processes are important in understanding truth, the physical therapist uses idealism in working with clients to set realistic goals, persist in their movement experiences, and realize that only by dealing with temporary discomfort can they recover as fully as possible. The idealist and the sport psychologist understand reality is more mental than physical, so helping elite athletes manage the mental side of putting a golf ball or kicking a field goal is vitally important. Idealism — Truth is universal and absolute The mind is critical to all understanding since only through reasoning and mental processes can truth emerges. Never-changing ideals comprise the ultimate reality. Ideals, virtues, and truths are universal and remain the same regardless of how individuals may interpret them. Idealism — Truth is universal and absolute The mind and the body are optimally developed simultaneously and as a whole, although physical activity is secondary to the development of the mind and thought processes. The idealist believes there is one correct way to perform sports skills. Realism The exercise physiologist uses the scientific method in investigating the effects of performanceenhancing drugs in order to understand positive and negative effects on the body. Prior to beginning an exercise program, a personal trainer will assess the capabilities of the client, and, as would a realist, continue to use measurements to determine progress made in achieving personal fitness goals. Realism — Scientific laws are independent of human experiences The scientific laws of nature determine what is truth. The scientific method provides the process for acquiring and applying truth ( i.e., knowledge originates in the physical world but emerges through experimentation). Realism — Scientific laws are independent of human experiences The physical education curriculum includes activities and experiences that enable students to understand the laws of the physical world. Learning is subject centered and includes progressions, drills, and objective evaluation. Naturalism Lakes, mountains, and other outdoor settings provide a wealth of opportunities where recreation specialists use natural settings as learning laboratories so individuals can expand their skills while enjoying leisure time. Physical education teachers agree with the philosophy of naturalism and a readiness to learn as they instruct students in developmentally appropriate movement activities. Naturalism — Laws of nature govern life and individual goals Truth and things valued exist within the physical realm of nature. “Everything according to nature” means students learn and develop in and through nature. Physical well-being enhances a readiness to learn mental, moral, and social skills. Naturalism — Laws of nature govern life and individual goals Individualized learning occurs through self-discovery and exploration of one’s capabilities and interests. Through problem-solving, students progress in skill development at their own rates. Pragmatism Athletic directors are quite pragmatic in understanding they must generate increased revenues from ticket sales, broadcast rights, corporate sponsorships, and private donations to adequately support their teams. Directors of recreational facilities realize participants are practical and pragmatic about use of leisure time as they seek to enjoy pleasurable, convenient activities with friends, such as playing on a softball team or using walking trails Pragmatism — Reality is a total of individual experiences Ultimate reality must be experienced and is ever-changing rather than absolute. Truth and values are functions of the consequences of the time and context. Social responsibilities are essential as every individual functions with and contributes to society. Pragmatism — Reality is a total of individual experiences Students develop social efficiency as they experience solving the problems of life and learn how to become better functioning members of society. A student-centered curriculum encourages students to develop social and interpersonal skills and set and achieve personal goals. Existentialism While health educators stress the importance of making selections of nutritious foods and physical educators emphasize engaging in daily physical activities, each individual makes choices with the full realization of the consequences of these choices on their health and well-being. While an athletic trainer can inform an athlete about the rehabilitation program to be completed, athletes must accept personal responsibility and demonstrate self-discipline to complete the exercises and adhere to the rehabilitation programs to return to competition. Existentialism — Truth and values are based on one’s experiences Human experiences and individual determinism (choices) construct reality. Each person’s experiences determine truth, which is uniquely personal. An individual’s value system, which is uniquely chosen, is tempered by an understanding of social responsibility. Existentialism — Truth and values are based on one’s experiences The desired educational outcome is the self-actualizing person, who must accept the consequences of actions taken. Individualized activities in physical education and sport encourage creativity and self-awareness and personal responsibility for learning. (Other Philosophies) Metaphysics: Nature of things, or how actions or events are related to one another. Metaphysical philosopher might answer the questions such as, “What is the nature of sport or play?” “How does creativity play a role in sport, play, or dance?” Axiology: Deals with the value of things and discovering whether actions, things, or circumstances are good and virtuous. Axiologist answers questions such as, “What should be the value of competitive sports?” “Is intentionally harming an opponent right?” (Other Philosophies) Epistemology: What people know and how and why they hold certain beliefs. Epistemologist might ask, “Does being a former successful athlete make this person an effective teacher of sport skills or a successful coach?” or “What understanding of a sport would a former athlete have that a nonathlete would not have?” Aesthetics: Focuses on the artistic, sensual, or beautiful aspects of anything, including movement. Questions might include, “What is the rhythm of the gymnast’s movement during a floor exercise routine?” The development of a personal philosophy causes you to think logically and rationally and to explain the worth and value of what you do and how you serve others. Too frequently, professionals fail to develop definite personal philosophies, resulting in a loss of direction and purpose. Eclecticism: Combination of theories and doctrines from several philosophies into a consistent compatible set of beliefs. For example, you may believe that the teacher should model correct skill performance (Idealist), yet encourage problem solving as the pragmatist and naturalist advocate. Importance of the Body Idealism — simultaneous development with the mind Realism — emphasis on the whole individual Naturalism — physical activity essential for optimal learning Pragmatism — variety of activities for the effective functioning in society Existentialism — freedom to choose activity and be creative Curricular Focus Idealism — teacher centered using examples as models; qualitative Realism — subject centered; quantitative Naturalism — individual readiness to learn Pragmatism — student centered; based on individual differences Existentialism — individual centered; based on self-realization Importance of the Teacher Idealism — model and example Realism — orderly presentation of facts; learning through drills Naturalism — guide and helper Pragmatism — motivator, especially through problem solving Existentialism — stimulator and counselor Objectives Idealism — developing personality and the mind Realism — preparing students to meet the realities of life Naturalism — developing the whole person Pragmatism — helping students to become better functioning members of society Existentialism — assisting students to become self-actualizing, independent beings Methodology Idealism — lecture; question-answer discussions Realism — use of real-world drills, lectures, and projects Naturalism — informal; problem solving Pragmatism — problem solving Existentialism — questions raised, thoughts provoked, and freedom of action encouraged by the teacher Evaluation Idealism — subjective; qualitative Realism — quantitative; using scientific means Naturalism — based on the attainment of individual goals Pragmatism — subjective and self-evaluation Existentialism — unimportant in the traditional sense Sport Ethics The Ineligible Player Tomorrow your school’s girls’ basketball team will play in the state championship game. Everyone in the school and your small town is excited. A telephone call you just received from the new athletic director (Stacy Miller) suddenly threatens to change everything. Miller tells you Jody, the 24-points per game star, is too old. In completing some required paperwork for the state athletic association, she realized what the previous athletic director had not reported, which is that Jody has been 20 years old all season, thus making her ineligible for high school sports. You are distraught because you know Jody is from a single-parent home and has had past academic and behavioral problems in school. But, she has overcome these and changed since she joined the basketball team. Miller is willing to keep this matter quiet, but says as coach you will have to decide whether to play Jody in the game or even to play the game. Understanding Ethics People learn and develop morally in six stages: Preconventional: 1. Obedient actions performed to avoid punishment. 2. Following rules for self-interest; individuals define what is right behavior. Conventional: 3. Suggests that people react to the expectations of parents, peers, and authority figures to gain their approval. 4. Assumes that people act in conformity to the social system and social order. Postconventional: 5. Expects people to fulfill the social contract and show a genuine interest in the welfare of others. 6. Universal ethical principles and the individual conscience serve as the basis for all actions. Understanding Ethics Ethics is the study of moral values or the doing of good toward others or oneself; the study of the principles of human duty; the study of all moral qualities that distinguish an individual relative to others Moral pertains to an individual’s motives, intentions, and actions as right or wrong, virtuous or vicious, or good or bad Values are anything having relative worth Moral values are the relative worth placed on virtuous behaviors. Principles are universal rules of conduct that identify what kinds of actions, intentions, and motives are valued. Moral reasoning is the systematic process of evaluating personal values and developing a consistent and an impartial set of moral principles by which to live. Example of Moral Values and Principles Justice (treating others with fairness) Do not violate the rules of the game Honesty (being trustworthy) Do not cheat or lie Responsibility (fulfilling duty) Do not act irresponsibly Beneficence (fair play or doing good) Do not harm an opponent Moral Justification* Try to make it seem that the unethical action is really ethical, such as by claiming there is no rule against it, no one will ever know, or everyone else does it. State that the action is not unethical since the action harmed no one or no foul was called or penalty assessed. Argue that while a rule was violated, the situation along with the amount of good accomplished overshadowed the small amount of harm; that is, the end justifies the means. Ethical Theories Teleological or consequential (utilitarianism) theories focus on the end results or consequences of processes or occurrences; the ultimate standard of what is morally right is dependent on the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of people. Deontological or non-consequential (Kantian) theories state that actions must conform to absolute rules of moral behavior; there is an inherent rightness apart from all consequences. Ethical Principles Moral duties are prescriptive and independent of consequences. Fair play means playing within the letter and spirit of the rules. Seeking to win is acceptable only if the letter and spirit of the rules are followed. An opponent is not the enemy but a worthy athlete deserving to be treated exactly as everyone would wish to be treated. Ethical Principles Retribution is never acceptable regardless of the unfairness or violence of the initial action. Games are not played to intimidate; the ideal purpose is a mutual quest for excellence through challenge. Sportsmanship requires modesty, humility in victory, praise for the winners, and self-respect in defeat. Is This Conduct Ethical? A defensive back is beaten by the opposing wide receiver, resulting in a big play for the offense. On a subsequent play, the defensive back “takes out” his opponent with vicious blind side hit to the knees, even though he is not involved with action near the ball. Is this hit ethical? If not, how should this intimidation be punished? Is This Conduct Ethical? In his first at-bat after his grand-slam home run, Mike is prepared for a brush-back pitch. He is not ready for the inside fast ball aimed straight at his head. He attempts to bail out of the batter’s box but is hit by a pitch on the arm. He jumps up and charges the mound; bat in hand, as both benches clear. The ensuing brawl results in the ejection of several players from the game. Why is the brush back pitch seemingly an acceptable form of gamesmanship in baseball? Does a ball thrown at a batter’s head justify his charging the mound? Why are teammates expected to join in the fray? Is This Conduct Ethical? The shoving match underneath the basket has escalated without any fouls being called. Finally, Mary has had enough. The next time Pat pushes her to clear the lane; Mary grabs her and refuses to give ground. Pat retaliates by hitting Mary. Before the referees can break up the scuffle, punches from several players have landed. Who is violating the rules of the game and sportsmanship in this situation? Is the absence of a whistle calling a foul on Mary, Pat, or both tantamount to condoning their intimidation of each other? Ethical Choices in Sports 1. Should every child get an opportunity to play all positions in youth sports? 2. Should a coach have the right to require that an athlete (at any age) compete in only one sport? 3. Should an athlete be required to pass all school subjects in order to play on a team? 4. Should a coach teach athletes how to violate a sports rule to gain a competitive advantage? 5. When, if ever, should a team “run up the score” on an opposing team? 6. Should taunting an opponent be penalized or allowed and why? Problems with the Moral Reasoning of Athletes The longer athletes participate in sport, the lower their moral reasoning. Males have lower levels of moral reasoning than do females. Team sport athletes show lower levels of moral reasoning than do individual sport athletes. The moral reasoning of interscholastic athletes is less consistent, impartial, and reflective than is that of non-athletes. Character Counts! Six pillars of character Trustworthiness — be honest; do not cheat; be reliable; have the courage to do the right thing Respect — be considerate of the feelings of others; do not threaten, hit, or hurt anyone Responsibility — do what you are supposed to do; be self-disciplined Fairness — play by the rules; do not take advantage of others Caring — be kind; be compassionate; show you care Citizenship—be cooperative; obey laws and rules National Association of Intercollegiate Athletics — Champions of Character Instill an understanding of character values in sport Core values Respect Responsibility Integrity Servant leadership Sportsmanship Provide practical tools for student-athletes, coaches, and parents to use in modeling exemplary character traits It Really Is Not Only about Winning! Olympic Creed — "The most important thing in the Olympic Games is not to win but to take part just as the most important thing in life is not the triumph, but the struggle. The essential thing is not to have conquered, but to have fought well." “For when the One Great Scorer comes to mark against your name, He writes not that you won or lost but how you played the Game.” (Grantland Rice)