Current Topics in Genomics and Epigenomics Course Introduction The rapid progress of the next-generation sequencing technology significantly advances the studies in human genome structures and functions. At the same time, we have much deeper understandings of the mechanisms and functions of the epigenome (DNA methlyation, histone modification, chromatin structure, etc.). This course will introduce the current frontiers in genomics and epigenomics, including the new concepts in the related fields and the new computational and experimental techniques. Course Structure This short course will comprise of both lecture and paper discussion, focusing on seven related topic areas. During the first half of the class meeting, a general introduction will be given to a particular topic. This is followed by a student-led paper discussion in the second half. This course employs problem-based learning as a teaching tool. Topics Apr 15, 10:00-12:00 A decade of genome sequencing Apr 17, 10:00-12:00 Transcriptional control elements in the genome Paper discussion: Thurman et al., Nature 2012 (Student Group #1) Apr 19, 10:00-12:00 Chromatin modifications and dynamics Paper discussion: Zhu et al., Cell 2013 (Student Group #2) Apr 22, 10:00-12:00 Transcriptional landscape and Non-coding RNAs in the genome Paper discussion: Djebali et al. Nature 2012 (Student Group #3) Apr 24, 10:00-12:00 DNA methylation analysis Paper discussion: Stadler et al., Nature 2011 (Student Group #4) Apr 26, 10:00-12:00 Analysis of higher order chromatin structure Paper discussion: Nora et al. Nature 2012 (Student Group #5) Apr 29, 10:00-12:00 Genomic Analysis of Stem Cell Pluripotency Paper discussion: Chen et al., Cell 2008 (Student Group #6) Apr 30, 10:00-12:00 PBL presentations Problem Based Learning Exercise Overview: Small groups (four - five students each) will be assigned to work on a project. Students within each group will work together to learn about their assigned subject (see below) and decide on a specific aspect to develop into a group presentation. At the end of the course, each group will give a 5-minute ‘mini-talk’ as part of an integrated group presentation, with a total of no more than 25 minutes. The goals of this exercise will be to promote self-directed study, collaborative interactions and oral presentation skills. Tasks: The humans and mice diverged from their common ancestors over 70 million years ago. During this period, much of the genome sequences have diverged, with nucleotide sequences at many functional sequences exhibiting considerable degree of conservation. Now, the ENCODE consortium has generated comprehensive maps of transcription, histone modifications, chromatin accessibility and transcription factor binding in both human and mouse genomes (http://genome.ucsc.edu/ENCODE/). Comparative analysis of these maps of biochemical activities between the two species should reveal both conserved biological processes and pathways that undergo rapid evolution. The goal of this problem based learning exercise is to learn more about the functional sequences in each mammalian genome via comparative analysis. 1. Each group will be assembled around one of the following aspects: ● ● ● ● ● ● Sequence comparison Transcription profiles and transcriptome landscape Cis regulatory landscapes Chromatin accessibility maps Epigenomic profiles Chromatin architecture 2. Each group should propose to ask some questions, such as: What are the datasets available for a specific biochemical assay from each species? What are the similarities and differences in the two species for a specific biochemical activity? Are there biological explanation for the similarities and differences? What mechanisms could be driving the similarities or differences? 3. Based on the initial collection of information, the group should decide on a specific aspect to explore. The group should then divide up this topic into specific components for ‘minitalks’. The group will then organize the talks to present to the class as a whole. The first speaker for each group will give a general overview and outline of the talks. Evaluation: At the end of this course, each student will be given an evaluation score (“good”, “excellent” and “outstanding”) based on the following criteria Contents: need to be up to date and accurate; Questions: appropriateness and creativeness will receive high scores; Presentation: needs to be logic, clear, and on time.