Senior Executive Service
Performance and Development Assessment
2012-13
Name:
Position:
Department:
Performance assessment approval:
Performance Assessment 2012-13
Approved by Director-General
Endorsed/ Not Endorsed
Approved / Not Approved
[Insert name]
[Insert name of Supervisor]
[Insert position]
[Insert name]
Director-General of [insert name of department]
Date:
Date:
Date:
Version 2, August 2012
Part 1: Performance Self-Assessment
Information included in this table is provided by the SES Officer
Performance Objectives
Balanced
Scorecard
Perspective
Performance Objectives
Evidence that the Objective has been achieved
1. Financially sustainable service
delivery
Financial
Perspective
2. A financially sustainable
workforce
3. Revitalised frontline and/or
customer services
Stakeholder
/Outcome
Perspective
Internal
Business
Perspective
Learning &
Growth
Perspective
4. Benefits to business and/or the
community through red tape
reduction
5. Implementation of government
priorities and commitments
6. A streamlined organisational
structure
7. An efficient organisation that
identifies and reduces waste
8. A capable, high-performing
workforce
9. A customer-focussed
organisational culture
Rating Scale:
5 Far exceeds expectations
4 Exceeds expectations
3 Meets expectations
2 Partially meets expectations
1 Requires development
Version 2, August 2012
Improved critical and essential services to the
community and/or improved services to customers in
three to five areas identified by the chief executive:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Self-Assessment
Self-Assessment
Rating (1-5)
Summary of achievements
(Includes response to any issues raised in mid-year performance check)
Part 2: Performance Assessment - This section is completed by the Supervisor, for consideration by the Director-General
Performance Objectives
Balanced
Scorecard
Perspective
Financial
Perspective
Performance Objectives
Assessment
Assessment Summary
(Rationale for performance assessment rating)
Weighting
Performance Score (rating x
weighting)
Financially sustainable service
delivery
15%
/75
A financially sustainable
workforce
15%
/75
Rating (1-5)
Total for Financial Perspective
Stakeholder &
Outcome
Perspective
/150
Revitalised frontline and/or
customer services
10%
/50
Benefits to business and/or the
community through red tape
reduction
Implementation of government
priorities and commitments
10%
/50
10%
/50
Total for Stakeholder & Outcome Perspective
Internal
Business
Perspective
/150
A streamlined organisational
structure
10%
/50
An efficient organisation that
identifies and reduces waste
10%
/50
Total for Internal Business Perspective
Learning &
Growth
Perspective
/100
A capable, high-performing
workforce
10%
/50
A customer-focussed
organisational culture
10%
/50
Total for Learning & Growth Perspective
/100
Supervisor comments:
Performance Score
Version 2, August 2012
/500
Part 3: End-of-year development assessment (July 2013)
The officer completes a traffic-light self- assessment and summary of their development achievements; the supervisor completes a traffic light assessment and comments section.
Development Priorities
End of Year Development Assessment
Assessment
(traffic light)
Development Objectives for 2012-13:
Vision #
Officer’s summary of development achievements / Supervisor’s comments
Officer:
Supervisor:
Results #
Officer:
Supervisor:
Accountability #
Officer:
Supervisor:
Other
Officer:
Supervisor:
Traffic light development check:
Version 2, August 2012
Strong development progress being made (green) 
Development ongoing (amber) 
Requires additional support (red) 