Assignment Task for Unit: Problem Solving and Decision Making Centre Number R82027 Centre Name University of Cambridge Candidate Registration No Candidate Name TASK Identify a workplace problem facing you or your team. Investigate the problem and identify ways to resolve it. Plan how you will implement the chosen resolution. For the purposes of this assignment, ‘problem’ may be interpreted as: something that is not working as expected (a deviation from the norm) OR an opportunity to make an improvement OR a potential or anticipated problem. NOTES Select a topic in your own organisation and/or area of work. You are advised to discuss your task with your tutor and/or your line manager before doing too much work on it. They should be able to advise you on the suitability of the topic as a means of meeting the assessment criteria. The 'nominal' word count for this assignment is 1200 words: the suggested range is between 1000 and 2000 words. Use these headings to structure your assignment Assessment Criteria Introduction to your organisation This aspect is not assessed, it is to help the assessor understand the context of the information you provide throughout this assignment. Briefly describing your organisation, what it does, and your role within it. You could include an organisation chart and show your role within it. Section 1: Describe the problem, it’s nature, scope and impact Describe: What the problem is and what may have caused it Its scope (e.g. how widespread, how often, how much, etc.) Who, how and what it affects in the workplace/team (its impact) What you are trying to achieve by solving this problem What the result would be if no action is taken. ILM Level 3 Award in L&M AC 1.1 Describe the problem, its nature, scope and impact (12 marks) Sufficiency descriptors The assessor will use these to decide if you need to do further work (a Referral) or if you gain a Pass or Good Pass for each Assessment criteria. Referral [5 or less] The problem or improvement opportunity is ill-defined and so is vague or unclear There is limited or no consideration of the problem’s scope or impact Problem Solving and Decision Making Assignment Pass [6 to 8] The problem or improvement opportunity is described, including both scope (how widespread, how often, etc.) and impact (who, how and/or what it affects) although the description may be limited Good Pass [9 or more] The problem or improvement opportunity is well defined and described in detail and both scope and impact are thoroughly described and, if appropriate, quantified January 2014 Section 2: Gather and interpret information to identify possible solutions to the problem Gather and interpret information about the problem to help identify possible solutions. The information you gather should be fact supported by evidence and not just your opinion. Describe all the possible options for solving the problem. AC 2.1 Gather and interpret information to identify possible solutions to a problem (24 marks) AC 2.2. Prepare a summary of the options providing facts and evidence (16 marks) Section 3: Evaluate the possible options to make a decision Evaluate the possible solutions using a simple decision-making technique to arrive at the best solution. Your evaluation should include human, material and financial resources. When you have evaluated the options, state your chosen solution clearly and concisely with your reasons. ILM Level 3 Award in L&M AC 3.1 Apply a simple decision making technique to evaluate options to arrive at the best solution (24 marks) Referral [11 or less] Little or no evidence of oral or written information having been gathered Reference is made to gathering information but that information is not given in the submission Information has been gathered and is provided but is not relevant to identifying possible solutions; or merely further describes the problem instead of helping to identify possible solutions; or there is no interpretation to identify possible solutions Pass [12 to 17] Evidence is provided in the submission that oral and/or written information has been gathered to identify possible solutions, and, although the interpretation may be limited, the information is effectively interpreted to identify at least two possible solutions (not including ‘doing nothing”) Good Pass [18 or more] Evidence is provided that substantial oral and/or written information has been collected from a variety of sources in order to effectively identify possible solutions The gathered information is presented in detail and thoroughly interpreted to clearly identify several possible solutions Referral [7 or less] No options are given Options are merely listed as opposed to summarised Option summaries are minimal and/or too subjective and not based on facts and/or evidence Pass [8 to 11] At least two options (not including the option of ‘doing nothing’) are summarised, and not merely listed, with the options based on facts and evidence Good Pass [12 or more] A range of varied options are thoroughly summarised or described The options are clearly based on facts and evidence explicitly arising out of the interpretation of the problem Referral [11 or less] The best solution is isolated but is not one of the options or a combination of them A solution is given but is merely stated with no evidence of evaluation by using a decision-making technique; and/or no consideration of resource implications in either the option summaries or the decision-making technique Pass [12 to 17] A simple decision-making technique has been used to evaluate options individually or together; and the decision-making criteria are identified although they may be limited; and the simple decision-making technique is correctly used to isolate the best solution with some reference to facts to support the decision; and although it may be limited, resource implications are briefly considered in either the option summaries or the decision-making technique Good Pass [18 or more] A decision-making technique has been used to thoroughly evaluate options, individually or together, with the decision-making criteria described Options are weighted and ranked to arrive at the best solution with facts to fully support the decision-making, the weightings and rankings Resource implications are detailed in both the option summaries and the decisionmaking technique Problem Solving and Decision Making Assignment January 2014 Section 4: Plan, monitor and review the implementation and communication of decision Provide an action plan for the implementation and communication of the solution. Your action plan should include actions, time-scales and required resources including people and finance. Explain how you will communicate the plan to all who need to know about it. Briefly describe the monitoring and review processes/techniques you could use to evaluate the effectiveness of your chosen solution. Describe how these will work and how they will be able to show that the plans are working effectively. AC 4.1 Plan the implementation and communication of the decision (16 marks) AC 4.2 Describe which monitoring and review techniques which could be used to evaluate outcomes (8 marks) Referral [7 or less] Little or no planning is provided The implementation and communication of the decision are merely described as opposed to actually planned A plan is given but contains no timescales and/or no resources required to implement Implementation is planned or communication is planned but not both Pass [8 to 11] An action plan is provided that plans both the implementation and communication of the decision, although one or other may be limited; and the plan includes time scales and responsibilities and some consideration of the resources required (including people and finance) although this may be limited Good Pass [12 or more] A detailed and SMART action plan(s) is provided that fully plans both the implementation and communication of the decision, thoroughly describes responsibilities and details resource requirements (including people and finance) Referral [3 or less] Less than two monitoring and review techniques are provided At least two monitoring and review techniques are given but are merely identified, as opposed to described, and/or are inappropriate or minimal Pass [4 to 5] A description, as opposed to a mere identification, is given of at least two monitoring and review techniques that could be used to evaluate outcome, although the description may be limited Good Pass [6 or more] Several appropriate monitoring and review techniques are thoroughly described Clear measures of the effectiveness of the outcome are provided, such as milestones By submitting I confirm that this assignment is my own work ILM Level 3 Award in L&M Problem Solving and Decision Making Assignment January 2014