SEPSG (13/14) 31 Induction Survey Survey Results January 2014 Final Version Author: Joshua Stapp Student Surveys Officer Joshua.stapp@ed.ac.uk Queries are to be directed to: Jennifer Murray & Kirstin Hunger Student Induction Team Induction@ed.ac.uk Induction Survey Summary Report – 2013/14 This was a collaborative survey between EUSA and the pre-induction & arrival team. The purpose of the survey was to further understand the experience of new students both before they arrived at University and during the first few weeks of semester, with the aim of identifying opportunities to enhance the induction experience. Prior to this survey, there was only limited information available on the induction experience which mainly related to international students. The survey was undertaken with students who were in the first year of their Undergraduate or Postgraduate course. This was done using two distinct surveys, each specifically targeted at either Undergraduates (Freshers’ Week & University Induction Survey) or Postgraduate (University Induction Survey) students. The surveys were initially sent out to students via an online surveys link on the 2nd of October 2013, and the link was closed to respondents on the 22nd of October 2013. A total of 1570 (24%) Undergraduate students and 1451 (32%) Postgraduate students completed the survey. This report provides a summary of the key findings with results by School included where possible. For further information on the survey, please contact the Induction Team. Key Findings Pre-arrival information: There is a high usage of webs resources by both UG and PG student prior to arrival at the University. New Student Webpages perform particularly well in terms of usefulness when compared to other web resources. EUSA web resources are perceived to be not as useful for PG students as they are for their UG counterparts. Twitter, whilst less likely to be used, is found to be relatively useful. Postgraduates are more likely to receive information via email, whereas Undergraduates by and large receive information in a paper format. Emails sent by the University are considered to be more useful than those sent by EUSA. Information that is being received is clear and concise, and Students do not feel overloaded with info from different departments. A low proportion of Students would like all communication by email, although email is a more popular option for Postgraduate Students. Events: Students feel that more activities could be hosted by their Schools. Postgraduates Students are less likely to get a Freshers’ Pass than their Undergraduate counterparts, but of those who do, a similar proportion would recommend one to others. 1 Satisfaction, Community and Belonging: By and large, both UG and PG students feel more positive than negative when they start University. Low proportions of both UG and PG samples said that they felt 'Confident I can cope with the academic demand of my course'. Students are generally satisfied with their experience so far. Feelings of community and belonging vary greatly by School. __________________________________________________________________________________ Summary report naming key For expediency, this report uses standard abbreviations in place of full School names. Please reference the table below as a key when reading this report. Biological Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, School of Business School Chemistry, School of Clinical Sciences, School of Divinity, School of Economics, School of Edinburgh College of Art Education, The Moray House School of Engineering, School of Geosciences, School of Health in Social Science, School of History, Classics and Archaeology, School of Informatics, School of Law, School of Literatures, Languages and Cultures, School of Mathematics, School of Medicine, College of Molecular, Genetic and Population Health Sciences, School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, School of Physics and Astronomy, School of Social and Political Science, School of Veterinary Studies, Royal (Dick) School of 2 BIO BMS BUS CHE CSC DIV ECN ECA EDU ENG GEO HEA HCA INF LAW LLC MAT MED MGP PPLS PHY SPS VET Demographics Samples, Schools and Students The Undergraduate focused Freshers’ Week & University Induction Survey saw 1570 completions, around 24% of the overall sample. The Postgraduate focused University Induction Survey had 1451 responses and generated a more robust completion rate of around 32%. On a School-by-School basis, Undergraduate respondents were broadly representative of the overall sample. However, though there was some stand out figures. o A higher than average proportion of UG LLC students completed the survey (39%). o However, UG EDU students were under represented, achieving a response rate of just 12% of their overall sample. Postgraduate respondents were also by and large representative of the sample surveyed, with the majority of Schools achieving response rates in the high 20’s and low 30’s. o PG HCA students had a higher than average response rate, with 37% of students completing the survey. o Whilst PG LAW students were under represented as a result of low completion rate (17%). UG is a sample dominated by full-time students (98%), although the PG sample is only slightly behind at 95%. Accommodation, age and origin The majority of the UG respondents stated that they were living in University Accommodation (81%), compared to the PG survey where 37% indicated that this was the case. PG students had a higher average age (27) than their UG counterparts (19). The majority of Postgraduate students categorised themselves as being aged between 21 and 29 whereas UG respondents were most likely to be aged 16-20 (84%) In terms of National Origin, Scottish students were the largest group in the UG sample, making up around 31% of respondents. o The remainder of the UG survey respondents categorised themselves as originating from the following locations. - Rest of UK – 22%, E.U. – 22%, Rest of the World 26%. The majority of PG respondents classified themselves as from outside of the UK (E.U - 22%, Rest of the World 55%). o Scottish students make up around 14% of the PG sample, with Students from England, Wales or Northern Ireland accounting for 9%. It is worth noting that both UG and PG samples are broadly representative of the actual demographic composition of the University 3 Pre-arrival information Respondents were asked to provide details of their use of various UoE and EUSA web resources prior to their arrival at the University. Questions allowed for the respondent to state whether or not they had used a resource and, if they had done so, how useful they found it. Access High proportions of both UG and PG students had used UoE or EUSA websites or social media prior to their arrival at University (83% of Undergraduate students and 78% of PG students). o PHY Undergraduate students were the most likely to use these resources prior to their arrival, with 92% saying they had done so. o Other schools in which a high proportion of UG students had used either websites or social media were BIO (91%) and ECN (89%). o Looking at the PG sample, SPS were the most likely (89%). Other Schools where a high proportion of PG students used resources prior to arrival were PPLS (85%) and ECA (85%). o BUS UG students were least likely to use UoE or EUSA websites or social media prior to their arrival (74%) whereas the lowest proportion from the PG sample came from ENG (65%). Table 1.1 – UG &PG Students use of web resources Did you use any University of Edinburgh/EUSA websites or social media before you arrived at University? 83% 78% UG PG 22% 17% Yes No Of the 17% of UG and 22% OF PG students who did not access UoE or EUSA websites or social media prior to their arrival, the most common reason given for not doing so was 'I didn't know about them' (UG-67%, PG-61%) Other students suggested they already had the information they needed (26% of UG and 33% of PG students) or 'I didn't have enough time' (16% of UG and 14% of PG students). See appendixes UG.6, UG.7, PG.6 and PG.7 for further details. 4 Resource Use and Usefulness Overall, both UG and PG respondents gave similar responses with regards to which web resources they accessed prior to their arrival and how useful they found these websites to be. Results by School were broadly similar. 'University School/College website' received a high usage rate from both UG and PG samples (UG-93%, PG-98%). o Lowest usage rate for this site came from EDU for UG (80%) and BIO for PG (90%), although these are both relatively high figures. o Both UG and PG students gave this resource a high average rating of usefulness, as 93% of Undergraduates and 95% of Postgraduates saying that it was either 'Very' or 'Somewhat useful'. A high proportion of both UG (91%) and PG (93%) students also used the 'New Student webpages on the University of Edinburgh website'. o Rates of usage across Schools were much more variable for this resource, ranging from 82% (BUS) to 97% (MAT) for UG and 85% (GEO) to 98% (SPS) for PG. o Ratings of usefulness were high for this resource, with 95% of UG's and 94% of PG's saying that it was in some way useful. o Students from all Schools gave this resource a usefulness rating of 90% or above in both the UG and PG samples. Other noticeable trends include – o University sites/social media are more likely to be used (UG-76%, PG-72%) than EUSA sites/social media (UG-58%, PG-45%), with particularly low levels of engagement with EUSA resources coming from GEO for UG (48%) and HEA for PG (38%) o UG students consider EUSA resources to more useful (81%) than their PG counterparts (74%), with particularly low ratings coming from PG BIO students (63% vs. 87% UG BIO). o There is a broad similarity in average ratings of use and usefulness for UoE resources across Schools and both samples (Used: UG-76%, PG-72%. Usefulness: UG-82%, PG81%). o The overall low usage and perceived usefulness of Twitter sites (University of Edinburgh Twitter - UG: Use-25%, Usefulness-50%. PG: Use-27%, Usefulness-57%. EUSA Twitter - UG: Use-20%, Usefulness-59%. PG: Use-22%, Usefulness-53%). o Positively, there appears to be no School with particularly low levels of engagement with web resources across both UG and PG samples. See appendixes UG.8, UG.9, PG.8 and PG.9 for further details. 5 Table 1.2 – UG Students’ ratings of usefulness for specific web resources. How useful did you find the following University of Edinburgh/ EUSA sites? - UG Used this site Very useful New Student webpa ges on the Uni vers i ty of Edi nburgh webs i te 91% 45% 50% 5% 0% Uni vers i ty of Edi nburgh Twi tter 25% 14% 36% 40% 9% 79% 34% 52% 13% 2% 44% 6% 1% Uni vers i ty of Edi nburgh Fa cebook pa ges Somewhat Not very useful useful Not at all useful Uni vers i ty School /Col l ege webs i te 93% 49% Uni vers i ty a ccommoda tion webs i te 88% 46% 40% 11% 2% Uni vers i ty s ervi ces webs i te (e.g. Fi na nce) 78% 30% 53% 15% 2% EUSA Fres hers ’ Week webs i te 87% 52% 40% 7% 1% EUSA Webs i te 72% 37% 52% 11% 1% 63% 36% 46% 15% 3% EUSA Fa cebook 48% 35% 48% 15% 3% EUSA Twi tter 20% 19% 40% 32% 9% EUSA Fres hers ’ Week Fa cebook pa ge Table 1.3 – PG Students’ ratings of usefulness for specific web resources. How useful did you find the following University of Edinburgh/ EUSA sites? - PG Used this site Very useful Somewhat Not very useful useful Not at all useful New Student webpa ges on the Uni vers i ty of Edi nburgh webs i te 93% 50% 44% 5% 1% Uni vers i ty of Edi nburgh Twi tter 27% 12% 44% 34% 9% Uni vers i ty of Edi nburgh Fa cebook pa ges 60% 26% 51% 19% 4% 35% 5% 1% Uni vers i ty School /Col l ege webs i te 98% 59% Uni vers i ty a ccommoda tion webs i te 69% 38% 40% 16% 5% Uni vers i ty s ervi ces webs i te (e.g. Fi na nce) 87% 38% 48% 11% 3% EUSA Fres hers ’ Week webs i te 66% 35% 49% 15% 2% EUSA Webs i te 66% 31% 54% 14% 2% EUSA Fres hers ’ Week Fa cebook pa ge 34% 27% 44% 24% 5% EUSA Fa cebook 36% 28% 47% 20% 5% EUSA Twi tter 22% 12% 41% 38% 9% Distribution and Formats Respondents were provided with a list of information sources and asked to select which format they received this information prior to their arrival at University – Printed copy, Email Version or Viewed Online. Whilst UG students were on average more likely to remember receiving a document than their PG counter parts (69% vs. 60%), there were high levels of variability when this figure was compared between Schools. The document Undergraduates were most likely to recall receiving was ‘An Application form for your University card’ (89% vs. PG 78%) o At a School level, UG Veterinary students were the most likely to recall receiving this (98%) . However, the School registering the lowest proportion for UG students was CHE, from which only 68% of respondents recalled receiving the application form for their University Card. o PG results ranged from 70% in EDU to 87% for INF. The document which the highest proportion for Postgraduates remember receiving was ‘A Registration form from Academic Registry’ (87% vs. UG 85%). o The proportion of PG's who recall receiving this document across the Schools were broadly similar, with results falling between 85% (PPLS) and 93% (ENG and BIO). 6 o Schools performance for UG students were far more varied, with 95% of BUS students recalling receiving the document, whilst just 68% of CHE students could confirm they had done so. UG respondents were more likely to received information in a paper format (62%) than their PG counterparts (38%). Postgraduates were also more likely to have received an email (44% vs. UG 34%) or viewed information online with (26% vs. UG 15%). The results would suggest that certain Schools favour specific methods of information distribution. o A higher than average proportion of ENG students say that they received their information by Email (UG-43%, PG-45%) or viewed it online (UG-22%, PG-39%) as opposed to receiving paper copies (UG-50%, PG-28%). o Whereas LAW students were more likely than average to receive information in a paper format (UG-71%, PG-45%). Whilst similar proportions of UG and PG students recall receiving UoE communications (both 68%), Undergraduate students were on average more likely to recall receiving EUSA communications (69%) than PG students (43%). o Both UG and PG BUS students demonstrated noticeably lower than average levels of engagement with EUSA communications (UG-63%, PG-35%). See appendixes UG.10, UG.11, PG.10 and PG.11 for further details. Usefulness Overall, communications from the University were either 'Very' or 'Somewhat' useful for high proportions of both UG (86%) and PG (89%) respondents. o In both the UG and PG samples, EDU students gave noticeably higher than average ratings of usefulness for University communications (UG-94%, PG-91%). The same can also be said of EUSA communication (82% for UG and PG), though the 'Congratulations email from EUSA' received by UG students (59%) was generally considered less useful. (This document was not circulated amongst Postgraduates). o Ratings of usefulness for EUSA communications were particularly high amongst UG ECA (90%) and EDU (89%) students and PG LLC and INF students (both 88%). On a School level, the majority of Students in both the UG and PG samples gave UoE communications a higher rating of usefulness when compared to communications originating from EUSA. In comparison to other communications, both UG and PG funding guides were given lower than average ratings of usefulness (UG-73%, PG-78). See appendixes UG.12 and PG.12 for further details. 7 Table 1.4 - UG Students’ ratings of usefulness for information received on arrival. How useful did you find this information? - UG Very useful Somewhat Not very useful useful Not at all useful Uni vers i ty Undergra dua te Wel come Gui de 35% 55% 9% 1% Interna tiona l Student Gui de 38% 47% 12% 2% A wel come l etter / pa ck from your School or Progra mme 35% 48% 15% 2% A Regi s tra tion form from Aca demi c Regi s try 56% 35% 7% 2% An Appl i ca tion form for your Uni vers i ty ca rd 67% 27% 5% 1% Fundi ng for Undergra dua te Students 2013-2014 bookl et 30% 44% 20% 7% Congra tul a tions ema i l from EUSA 20% 40% 31% 10% EUSA “Wha t’s On Gui de” 68% 26% 5% 1% EUSA “The Undergra dua te’s Survi va l Gui de” 43% 41% 13% 3% EUSA “Gui de to Soci eties ” 56% 37% 6% 1% Table 1.5 - PG Students’ ratings of usefulness for information received on arrival. How useful did you find this information? - PG Very useful Somewhat Not very useful useful Not at all useful Uni vers i ty Pos tgra dua te Wel come Gui de 39% 54% 7% 1% Interna tiona l Student Gui de 41% 47% 10% 2% A wel come l etter / pa ck from your School or Progra mme 44% 45% 10% 1% A Regi s tra tion form from Aca demi c Regi s try 57% 35% 6% 2% An Appl i ca tion form for your Uni vers i ty ca rd 66% 27% 5% 2% Fundi ng for Pos tgra dua te Students 2013-2014 bookl et 34% 44% 18% 4% EUSA “Wha t’s On Gui de” 31% 51% 15% 2% EUSA “Pos tgra dua te Gui de” 28% 54% 15% 2% EUSA “Gui de to Soci eties ” 30% 50% 17% 2% Nature of the information received Respondents were asked to state whether they agreed or disagreed with various statements concerning the information they had received prior to their arrival. Overall, Undergraduate and Postgraduate respondents demonstrated similar sentiments when asked to remark on a variety of statements concerning the nature of information they had received. As well as this, there was little variation of responses at a School level. Both UG and PG respondents were most likely to agree that 'The information I received was clear and concise'. ('Strongly agree' or 'Slightly agree' from 88% of Undergraduates and 86% of Postgraduates). o At a School level, PG results were broadly similar, ranging from 83% for LLC to 92% for HEA. o UG responses were more diverse, ranging from 77% for INF to 98% for LAW. Low proportions of both samples agreed with the statement 'I received information from too many different departments' (UG-35%, PG-40%). Around three quarters of both the UG and PG samples agreed that 'The information I received made it clear what actions I needed to take (if any)' (UG - 73%, PG - 75%). o UG MAT students (85%) and PG HEA students (89%) were particularly agreeable to this statement. Approximately 1 in 4 PG students (23%), and 1 in 5 UG students, (18%) agreed with the statement 'I received contradictory or incomplete information'. 8 The proportion of PG respondents who agreed with the statement 'In future, the University should only send information by email' (36%) was noticeably higher than the proportion of their UG counterparts who found this statement to be agreeable (19%). o The School with the highest proportion of students who disagreed with this statement from the UG sample was LAW with 70%, whilst the highest from the PG sample was 52% from BIO. UG students were almost twice as likely to disagree with the statement 'In future, EUSA should only send information by email (51%) than they were to agree with it (27%). However, the opposite is true for PG respondents (44% agree, 27% disagree). See appendixes UG.13 and PG.13 for further details Table 1.6 - UG & PG responses to statements regarding Communications 88% 86% UG 67% 73% 75% 71% PG 65% 61% 57% 40% 40% 37% 35% 36% 20% 16% 15% 18% 17% 44% 38% 51% 27% 27% 23% 19% 6% 8% Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree Disagree The information I I received information It was clear how to The information I received was clear and from too many contact someone if I received made it clear concise different departments had a query what actions I needed to take (if any) Agree Disagree I received contradictory or incomplete information Agree Disagree Agree Disagree In future, the In future, EUSA should University should only only send information send information by by email email Events UoE and EUSA events Respondents were provided with a list of events and activities run by both the University and EUSA in the first weeks of term and were asked if they had attended this event, and if so how useful they had found it. The average event attendance rate was similar for Undergraduate (45%) and Postgraduate (42%) samples. o Both samples showed similar levels of variation at a School level, with the UG sample ranging from 34% (VET) to 52% (ENG), and the PG sample falling between 32% (PPLS) and 54% (BUS). On average, both UG and PG students found the events that they attended to be of similar levels of perceived usefulness, with an average of 82% of Undergraduates and 85% of Postgraduates saying that they were either 'Very useful' or 'Somewhat useful'. The most attended event for both UG and PG students was 'Meeting my Personal Tutor or Supervisor', with 95% of UG students and 91% of PG students stating that they attended. Of these 86% of UG students and 91% of PG students found useful. 9 o The UG sample saw a particularly high level of attendance at PT meetings from BIO, from which only 1% of respondents stated that they did not attend. Of the 99% who did attend, 86% found it useful. o A high proportion of UG students from VET (23%) and MED (42%) did not attend this meeting. Whilst of the UG VET students who did attend, 68% found it useful - the lowest proportion of the UG sample - 92% of the UG MED attendees rated the event as either 'Very useful' or 'Somewhat useful', the second highest in the UG sample behind PHY's 98%. o Respondents from HCA were the most likely group from the PG sample to attend this event, with just 1% indicating that they had not done so. o PG HCA student also rated the event highly in terms of usefulness (96%), falling just short of PPLS at 98%. o Approximately 1 in 5 PG LAW students (22%) did not attend a 'Meeting my Personal Tutor or Supervisor. 88% of those that did attend found it to be useful, just below the PG average of 91%. The Societies Fair was also highly attended by UG students, with just 87% signalling that they attended this event in comparison to the PG samples corresponding proportion of 55%. o Of the proportion who did attend this event, 95% of UG students found it useful in comparison to the 88% of PG students who felt the same way. o A particularly high proportion of UG PHY students signalled that they attended the Societies Fair, with just 2% saying that they did not attend this event. A relatively low percentage of UG students who used the 'Pay my fees/discuss finance query' and 'collect my Student Card' services offered by Adam House (18% and 42%). o However, those that did gave these services higher than average usefulness ratings (87% and 86% respectively). 35% of UG respondents thought the University Welcome Ceremony was either not very or at all useful. The Trade Fair and the Making the most of IT sessions were the next lowest rated in terms of usefulness (74% and 77% respectively). For PG respondents the PhD Movie (70%), Trade Fair (76%) and Welcome Ceremony (79%) were the three events rated least useful. On average, University run events had a higher attendance rate (54%) amongst Postgraduates than those organised by EUSA (25%). o PG HEA students exhibited a particularly low level of engagement with EUSA events (17% attended vs. 45% attended for UoE events). See appendixes UG.14, UG.15, PG.14 and PG.15 for further details 10 Table 1.7 - UG ratings of usefulness for events attended. Very useful How useful did you find this event? - UG Somewhat Not very useful useful Not at all useful Interna tiona l Wel come Da y 32% 52% 12% 4% Uni vers i ty Wel come Ceremony 21% 43% 24% 11% School /Progra mme wel come tal k 39% 44% 14% 4% Addi tiona l School Induction events 32% 52% 13% 3% Meeting my Pers ona l Tutor 52% 34% 10% 4% Vi s i ting Students Wel come meeting (Huma ni ties & Soci a l Sci ences ) 41% 45% 11% 3% Vi s i ting Students Wel come meeting (Sci ence & Engi neeri ng) 42% 46% 10% 3% Aca demi c Fa i r 35% 43% 16% 6% Li bra ry Tours 37% 43% 14% 6% Getti ng Connected drop-i n s es s i ons offered by Informa tion Servi ces 43% 41% 11% 4% Ma ki ng the Mos t of IT optiona l works hop 33% 44% 16% 7% Vi s i ting Ada m Hous e to pa y my fees /di s cus s fi na nce query 43% 44% 11% 2% Vi s i ting Ada m Hous e to col l ect my Student Ca rd 54% 32% 11% 3% Soci eties Fa i r 61% 34% 4% 1% Tra de Fa i r 36% 37% 17% 9% Table 1.8 - PG ratings of usefulness for events attended. Very useful How useful did you find this event? - PG Somewhat Not very useful useful Not at all useful Interna tiona l Da y 36% 53% 10% 1% Uni vers i ty Wel come Ceremony 32% 47% 17% 4% Introduction to Pos tgra dua te Res ea rch Study 40% 45% 12% 3% Introduction to Pos tgra dua te Ta ught Study 42% 47% 8% 3% Studyi ng a t a Scotti s h Uni vers i ty 29% 53% 15% 2% School /Progra mme wel come tal k 53% 39% 7% 2% Addi tiona l School Induction events 46% 45% 8% 1% Meeting my Pers ona l Tutor or Supervi s or 65% 26% 7% 2% Li bra ry Tours 41% 42% 14% 3% "Get Connected" drop-i n s es s i ons offered by Informa tion Servi ces 44% 39% 14% 3% "Ma ki ng the Mos t of IT" optiona l works hop 37% 43% 15% 5% Vi s i ting Ada m Hous e to pa y my fees /di s cus s fi na nce query 53% 35% 9% 4% Vi s i ting Ada m Hous e to col l ect my Student Ca rd 64% 29% 5% 1% Soci eties Fa i r 45% 43% 9% 3% Tra de Fa i r 31% 45% 17% 7% Ma na gi ng your Supervi s or for PhD s tudents 39% 45% 13% 3% PG Speed Networki ng 32% 49% 16% 3% Ma ture Students a t Edi nburgh event 35% 50% 13% 3% PG Res ea rch Wi ne Reception 40% 44% 12% 4% PG a nd Ma ture Students Cei l i dh 47% 41% 9% 3% PG a nd Ma ture Students Wi ne Reception 41% 43% 13% 3% The PhD Movi e 26% 43% 22% 9% The number of events Students were asked whether they were satisfied with the amount of events provided by the university, their school and EUSA during Induction Week. Students were most likely to suggest there were too few 'Activities hosted by your school' (UG - 38%, PG - 31%). o Looking at the UG sample, close to half (48%) of GEO and PPLS students felt that too few events were hosted by their School, whilst just 14% of MED and 8% of VET students felt the same way. o Conversely, just 15% of PG GEO students felt that too few events were hosted by their School, whilst the figure for PG PPLS (42%) was closer to its UG counterpart. 11 Just 9% of both UG and PG samples felt that there were too few central induction activities on offer, as similar proportions selected just enough (UG-83%, PG-77%) o The School with the highest proportion of UG students who felt that there were just enough Central Induction activities was VET (98%), whilst just 73% of UG ECN students felt the same way. The perception of EUSA events was broadly similar across both samples and Schools with around three quarters suggesting the amount of events was just right. o EUSA daytime events - Too few: UG-19%, PG-16%. Too many: UG-11%, PG-13%. Just enough: UG-70%, PG-71%. o EUSA evening events - Too few: UG-16%, PG-15%. Too many: UG-12%, PG-12%. Just enough: UG-72%, PG-73%. See appendixes UG.16 and PG.16 for further details Table 1.9 - UG & PG responses regarding amounts of events available from specified suppliers UG 83% PG 77% 72% 73% 70% 71% 66% 58% 38% 31% 9% 9% Too few 7% 19% 16% 14% 11% 13% 16% 15% 12% 12% 4% 3% Just Too many Too few Just Too many Too few Just Too many Too few Just Too many enough enough enough enough Central Induction activities (e.g. University Welcome, International Day, Academic Fair) Activities hosted by your School EUSA daytime events (e.g. see the city tours, societies events) EUSA evening events (e.g. clubnights, comedy) Non-academic events and Freshers' Pass. Undergraduate students were more than twice as likely to attend a non-academic event as Postgraduate students (43% vs. 19%). o INF students were the most likely from the PG sample to attend a non-academic event (28%), though the proportion that did was still short of their UG counterparts (40%). o Both UG and PG students were most likely to have attended a society event (UG67%, PG-38%). A particularly high level of HCA students from both samples signalling they attended this type of event (UG-78%, PG-53%) Postgraduates were over four times as likely as their Undergraduate counterparts to indicate that they had not attended any of the listed event options (43% to UG's 11%). o Almost 2 out of 3 PG HEA students saying that this was the case (64%) in comparison to the UG high of 28% from VET. 12 An average of 52% of Undergraduates bought a Freshers’ Week Pass in comparison to just 3% of Postgraduates. o Just 20% OF UG VET students opted to purchase a Freshers' pass, the lowest proportion for a specific School. UG's who bought a pass did so either 'Before arriving' or 'During Freshers' Week' on a roughly 50-50 basis, whilst PG's were slightly more likely to do so during Fresher's Week (56% to 44% who bought it before arriving). The proportion of UG's who bought a Pass and would recommend was 60%, only marginally higher than the 54% of PG's who do the same. See appendixes UG.17, UG.18, PG.17 and PG.18 for further details Satisfaction, Community and Belonging First impressions When Undergraduate Students were provided with list of feelings and asked which described how they were feeling a few weeks into the semester, positive feelings (43%) were on average chosen more often than negative feelings (27%). o Looking at the UG sample, the School with the highest average for positive feelings was MED (54%) and the lowest was BUS (32%). The most common response from UG students was 'Excited about living independently' (49%). o On a School by School basis, twice the proportion of UG MED students felt this way (67%) than their UG EDU counterparts (32%). The most common response that could be considered to be negative was 'Worried about money'. 38% of Undergraduates identified with this. o UG VET students were slightly more likely to be concerned about money (55%). Conversely, this appeared to be less of a concern amongst UG MED and ENG students (27%). Whilst Postgraduate students were, on average, almost as likely to have negative feelings a few weeks into the semester as Undergraduates (25%), positive emotions were, on average, selected slightly less (38%) than they were by the UG sample. o PG GEO students were the most likely to select positive emotions (48%) whilst PG PPLS students were the most likely to select negative ones (31%). PG students were less likely than their UG counterparts to choose 'Excited' (37% to UG 46%) and 'Confident'(24% vs. UG 35%) as being representative of how they were feeling. o PG EDU students provide particularly low scores in both of these areas (25% and 14% respectively). PG students were also less likely to be 'Concerned about making friends’ (21% vs. UG 28%), with only 13% of PG PPLS students expressing this concern. Similarly low proportions of both UG and PG samples said that they felt 'Confident I can cope with the academic demand of my course' (UG-35%, PG-36%). o A particularly low proportion of EDU students from both samples felt this way (UG20%, PG-28%). 13 Also notable is the relative proximity of responses for 'Worried about money' (UG-38%, PG35%) as this suggests similar levels of concern across both groups. See appendixes UG.19 and PG.19 for further details Table 1.10 - UG & PG feelings early in the semester UG 57% 49% 48% 46% 37% 29% 38% 35% 33% 24% 15% Excited Nervous Confused 35% 35% 36% 28% 25% 21% 18% 16% Confident Concerned about making friends Worried about money Excited about my classes Confident I can Missing home cope with the academic demands of my course Excited about living independently (UG only) Satisfaction with experience so far When asked 'How satisfied are you with your experience of the University so far?', 89% of both UG and PG samples said that they were either 'Very' or 'Fairly' satisfied. o Levels of satisfaction were particularly high amongst UG MED (95%) and PG GEO students (98%), whilst being low for UG ENG (82%) and PG EDU (77%) Undergraduates had a slightly higher satisfaction rating overall, with 45% feeling 'Very Satisfied' in comparison to the Postgraduate rating of 38%. Encouragingly, levels of dissatisfaction were very low in both samples, with 3% expressing dissatisfaction and just less that 1% saying that they were 'Very dissatisfied'. See appendixes UG.20 and PG.20 for further details Table 1.11 - UG & PG levels of general satisfaction 50% 45% 44% 38% UG PG 8% 8% 2% Very satisfied PG Fairly satisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 14 2% Fairly dissatisfied 1% 1% Very dissatisfied Community Stark differences between UG and PG students, both in general and at a School level, emerged when students were asked about the communities they feel they belong too. Whilst both UG and PG respondents are most likely to say that they feel they belong to the 'University of Edinburgh' (UG - 76%, PG - 66%), there is a clear difference between the two samples at a School level. o The UG sample ranges from a low of 45% (VET) to a high of 90% (CHE), whereas the PG sample scores fall between 59% (ECA) and 86% (HEA). On average, Undergraduates were more likely to express a sense of belonging to the 'Clubs or societies I am involved in' (45%) and 'My accommodation site' (50%) than their Schools (43%) or subject area (41%). However, it is worth noting that there is a large amount of variation of these figures at a School level. o UG affiliation to 'Clubs or societies I am involved in' ranged from as low as 32% (EDU), to as high as 61% (MED) o The proportion of UG students expressing a sense of belonging to 'My accommodation site' ranged from 25% (VET) to 63% (PHY) o Whilst UG VET was the School with the highest proportion of students expressing belonging to their School (90% vs. UG LLC's low of 20%), they had the lowest proportion of students who felt they belonged to their subject area (18% vs. UG MED's high of 63% UG LLC’s close to average 45%) o An above average proportion of UG MED students felt affiliation towards the 'University of Edinburgh' (80% vs. UG average 76%), their School (69% vs. UG average 43%), their subject area (63% vs. UG average 41%), societies (61% vs. UG average 45%), and their accommodation site (58% vs. UG average 50%) Postgraduate students felt a stronger sense of belonging to their School (59%) and subject area (52%) than the 'Clubs or societies I am involved in' (17%) or 'My accommodation site' (24%). o Looking at responses School-by-School, the proportion of PG students who feel an association with their School is between 47% (HEA and LLC) and 81% (BUS). o PG affiliation to subject area almost reverses this trend, with BUS becoming the School with the lowest proportion of students feeling an association with this area (29%) and LLC becoming the second highest (72% vs. PPLS's high of 73%). o Whilst no School had a particularly high proportion of PG students state an affiliation with clubs or societies, the highest (INF - 35%) is over 7 times that offered by the School with the lowest (HEA - 6%). See appendixes UG.21 and PG.21 for further details 15 Table 1.12 - UG & PG sense of belonging to specific groups 76% UG 66% 59% 52% 43% 41% PG 50% 45% 35% 32% 24% 17% 4% University of Edinburgh My School (i.e. My specific Clubs or societies I My Business, Subject Area (i.e. am involved in accommodation Edinburgh College English Literature, site of Art, Biologic Spanish, 16 The City of Edinburgh 3% None of the above