Radiography
2 dimensional (2D) view
Shadow image
All structures superimposed
Must angulate multiple images to infer 3D information
High resolution images
2D Radiography
Foreign Objects
Buccal Object Rule
Vertical Angulation
Radiographs vs. CBCT
Advantages:
Three-dimensional view
Direct measurements possible
Can see osseous lesions better than radiographs
Disadvantages:
Poorer resolution than radiographs
Increased radiation dosage to patients
Increased cost
Learning curve
Liability of the reader o Send out to radiologist
3D Radiography
Fan Beam Computed Tomography o Medical Imaging
Cone Beam Computed Tomography o Medical and Dental Imaging
Micro-Computed Tomography o research only to date
Fan Beam vs Cone Beam
Voxel – 3 dimensional pixel (volume pixel)
Planes of View
Sagittal
Coronal
Axial
Field of View - The Volume that is Imaged
Large FOV o Medical
Medium FOV o Medical and Dental o iCAT
Small FOV o Dental o Kodak 9000 (CareStream) o Veraviewepocs 3D (J. Morita)
Endodontics = Small FOV
Small FOV
Advantages
Higher resolution image
Lower radiation dosage
Lower cost
Less liability
Disadvantages
Difficult to image the entire jaw
Unsuitable for orthodontics or extensive implant case
Cannot make panoramic view
Resolution
Smaller voxel size = Higher resolution
Limited number of voxels that can be manipulated with commonly occurring computer processing power
Smaller FOV uses the same number of voxels as larger FOV but in a smaller space
Therefore smaller FOV = smaller voxels = greater resolution
Relative Effective Dosages
•Annual background radiation
•4 BW (Digital or F-speed, Rectangular Collimation)
•FMX (Digital or F-speed, Rectangular Collimation)
•FMX (D-speed, Round Collimation)
•Panoramic (Digital 2 brands)
•Chest Radiograph
•Lower GI Tract Radiograph
•CT Chest
3100 µSv
5 µSv
35 µSv
388 µSv
14-24 µSv
100 µSv
8000 µSv
7000 µSv
•CT (Maxillofacial Large FOV* 4 brands)
•CT (Maxillofacial Medium FOV* 8 brands)
•CT (Maxillofacial Small FOV* 5 brands)
•Airplane Round Trip to Florida
•Radon Gas (in our homes)
74-569 µSv
69-860 µSv
23-488 µSv
30 µSv
2000 µSv
Liability
“…the clinician can be liable for a missed diagnosis, even if it is outside his/her area of practice.” - AAE/AAOMR Position Statement
Should I take one on Every Patient?
“CBCT should only be used when the question for which imaging is required cannot be answered adequately by lower dose conventional dental radiography or alternate imaging modalities.” - AAE/AAOMR Position Statement
Software Interface
Clinical Outcomes
Assessment Criteria
Healed (Success)
Healing (Questionable)
Disease (Failure)
Healed (Success)
No PA Radiolucency
Asymptomatic
Clinical Signs WNL
Healing (Questionable)
PA Radiolucency Reduced
Asymptomatic
Clinical Signs WNL
OR
No Pa Radiolucency
Clinical Signs WNL
Mild Symptoms
Disease (Failure)
Overt Signs of Infection o Sinus Tract o Swelling o Increased Size of Radiolucency
Symptoms
Difficulty with Outcomes Assessments
Difficulty in setting up double blinded RCT’s
Large variation in pre-existing patient factors
Prevents randomization process
Blinding clinician difficult
Blinding patient may be unethical
Validity of Outcomes Studies in Question
Radiographic Assessment vs CBCT
Outcomes Criteria o Radiographic
Strindberg Criteria
Periapical Index (PAI) o CBCT
???
Indications
Difficult Diagnosis
Treatment Planning
Resorption o Internal or External? o Extensive or Limited? o Prognosis?