Publications and presentations Here you will find publications, presentations and master thesis related to the project 'Robust Regulation in the Petroleum Sector' Go to: Publications Presentations and seminars Master thesis accomplished within the project Publications Publications are presented according to the three main research goals: 1. Understand and conceptualize the robustness of the Norwegian risk regulation regime within the petroleum sector Rosness, R., Blakstad, H. and Forseth U. (2011) Exploring Power Perspective on Robust Regulation. SINTEF Report no. A21367 Forseth, U., Rosness, R. and Blakstad, H.C. (2010)”Arguments about safety in the Norwegian Petroleum Industry – Disciourse Analysis”. WorkingOnSafety, Røros. Lindøe, P.H. and G.S. Braut (2010) Risk Regulation in the North Sea: A common law perspective on Norwegian legislation, Safety Science Monitor Vol. 14, Issue. 1 art. 2. Lindøe, P.H. and G.S. Braut (2010) Risk Regulation in the North Sea: Robustness towards changing methods of operation? In Reliability, Risk and Safety. (Eds. Bris, Guedes & Martorell) pp. 2247-2253, Taylor & Francis Group, London. Lindøe, P.H. (2010) Complex roles and mixed norms – a dilemma for safety inspections?, WorkingOnSafety, Røros. Moen, A., Blakstad, H., Forseth, U. and Rosness, R. (2010) Disintegration and revival of tripartite collaboration on HSE in the Norwegian petroleum sector. In Reliability, Risk and Safety. (Eds. Bris, Guedes & Martorell) pp. 2191 - 2198, Taylor & Francis Group, London. Olsen. O.E. and P.H. Lindøe (2009). Risk on the Ramble: The International Transfer of Risk and Vulnerability. Safety Science, 47, 734 - 755. Lindøe, P.H. & O. E. Olsen (2009) Conflicting goals and regulators roles. Journal of Risk Research Vol. 12, nos. 3-4, April-June, 427-411 Moen, A. and P.H. Lindøe (2008) Acknowledgment of Compliance (AoC) – A mix of regulatory principles in the petroleum industry, WorkingOnSafety, September 30 October 4, 2008, Crete, Greece Lindøe, P. H. (2007) Safe offshore workers and unsafe fishermen – a system failure. Policy and Practise in Health and Safety. Vol. 05.2 2. Analyse other nations’ regulatory regimes of special importance for the development the Norwegian regime in an international context Lindøe, P.H., Engen, O.A. (2012), Offshore safety regimes – a contested terrain, Draft presented at WorkingOnSafety-conference 11-14 Sept., Sopot, Poland Lindøe, P.H., Baram, M. & Paterson, J. (2012), Robust Offshore Risk Regulation – an assessment of US, UK and Norwegian approaches, Paper presented at ESREL2012, 25-29 June, Helsinki Ryggvik, Helge. (2012) Dypt vann i horisonten. Regulering av sikkerhet i Norge og USA i lys av Deepwater Horizon-ulykken. Senter for Teknologi, innovasjon og kultur, UiO. Blakstad, H. S. (2011) SINTEF Report-A20542 Safety indicators used by authorities in the petroleum industry of UK US and Norway. Lindøe, P.H., Engen, O.A. & O. E. Olsen (2011) Response to Accidents in Different Industrial Sectors. Safety Science, 49, pp.90-97. Lindøe, P.H., Baram, M. & Braut, G.S. (2011) Empowered agents or empowered agencies? Assessing the Risk regulatory regimes in the Norwegian and US offshore oil and gas industry. Paper at ESREL-conference 19-22 Sept. Baram, M. (2010) "Preventing Accidents in Offshore Oil and Gas Operations: The U.S. Approach and Some Contrasting Features of the Norwegian Approach". Working Paper. Hellebust, Celma & Geir Sverre Braut (2010) Regulated Self-Regulation or External Control? A study of the effects of Different Legislative Approaches in the Petroleum Sector in Norway and Brazil. SPE-conference Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 12-14 April, Hellebust, Celma & Geir Sverre Braut (2010) A Comparason of Regulation on Work Related to Health in the Petroleum Sector in Brazil and Norway. Journal of Health Law, Vol.11, No 1. Pp.54-59. Ryggvik, H. (2010) ”The destiny of Norwegian offshore drivers. What can we learn? WorkingOnSafety, Røros Baram, M. (2009) ”Governance of Technological risks in the US”. Working paper. Ryggvik.H (2008) “Working conditions and safety for North Sea divers 1965-1990”. North Sea History Conference Stavanger 3. Assess the interface between the development of risk regulating regime and risk management systems and risk behaviour in the industry Lindøe, P.H., Stene, S. (2011). Chemical Hazards and Safety Barriers. A case study of the Norwegian offshore oil and gas industry. Safety Science Monitor, vol. 15, issue 1, art. 3. Ryggvik, H. (2010) ”BBS –creating underlying contradictions or the final step to reach 0. A historical approach”. WorkingOnSafety, Røros. Rosness, R., Blakstad, H. Dahl, T. & Årstad, I. (2008) Can the Quest for Good Corporate Governance Motivate Improved HSE Management? WorkingOnSafety, September 30 October 4, Crete, Greece Ryggvik, H. (2008) ” Adferd, teknologi og system – en sikkerhetshistorie”.Tapir akademiske forlag, Trondheim. Presentations and seminars Lindøe, P.H.: Robust regulation: A Case Study from the offshore oil and gas industry. Presentation at The 3rd Annual Regulatory Affairs International Symposium, March 30-31, London, 2011 Lindøe, P.H.: Internasjonale reguleringsregimer og sikkerheten HMS-forskning for norsk petroleumsvirksomhet. Stavanger 24. mai 2011 Presentations from seminars on legal issues. Three seminars addressing legal issues within risk regulation has been implemented. Arild Drechsle Ketil Karlsen Roy Erling May 2008 Furre Paul Bang Challenges seen from an industry viewpoint Robust regulation A union view on HSE regulations and inspections Challenges within the KMB-project seen from PSA`s point of view Michael Baram Governance of Technological Risk in the US Geir Sverre Nytt HMS-regelverk i petroleumsvirksomheten – en kollisjon Braut mellom ulike rettstradisjoner? (Revised regulation in the March 2009 petroleum sector – a collision between different legal traditions?) The success of the Norwegian petroleum safety regime, a self Tjelemeland – referential claim Knut Kaasen: Juristen og ingeniørens tilnærminger (The lawyers and engineers approache) Helge Ryggvik Dykking, regulering og vitenskap (Diving, regulation and Nov. 2009 science) Paul Bang og Betraktninger og erfaringer med regelverksutvikling Olaf Thuestad (Reflections and experience with developing regulation) Hanne Sofie Logstein Geir Sverre Braut Marius Stub Hvordan avhjelpe svakheter ved det etablerte regelverket. Makt og maktfordeling (How to set right weaknesses with the established regulation. Power and division of power) Samhandling mellom Petroleumstilsynet og Helsetilsynet– sett frå den eine sida Hva er tilsyn? Noen rettslige trekk ved tilsynsfeltet (What is ”tilsyn”? Some legal features within the area of ”tilsyn”) Hvor langt rekker tilsynsorganenes kontrolladgang (How far can the inspectorates access of control be stretched?) June 2010 Når treffer tilsynsorganer enkeltvedtak? (When does inspectorates make individual decisions?) Jacob Kringen: ”Kulturparagrafen” - en utfordring både for industrien og tilsynet? (”The culture section” a challenge for the industry as well as the PSA? Master thesis accomplished within the project This table holds links to the complete master theses and to Norwegian and English summaries. The complete master theses are not available in English. (Master thesis within Societal Safety in general can be found here) Period Name Master thesis Signe Stene Vern av arbeidstaker mot kjemisk eksponering offshore – en historie om forbedring Protection of workers against chemical exposure offshore - a history of improvement Tom Heine Nattarbeid Offshore Tysse Night Work Offshore Vigdis Iren Petroleumstilsynet – en endringsagent? En Spring 2009 Birkedal eksplorativ studie av læring i petroleumstilsynet Halvard Skeie Summary Norwegian English Norwegian English Norwegian English The Petroleum Safety Authority – an agent for change? Hvilke bidrag gir bransjestandarder til Norwegian HMS-styring i petroleumsvirksomheten i Norge? English How do industry standards contribute to HSE management in the Norwegian petroleum industry? Marita Eik Thomas Kjellevold Er dagens lovverk godt nok tilrettelagt til at livbåtprodusentene utvikler og produserer gode nok livbåter på norsk sokkel? ”The lifeboat case” Samhandling mellom fartøy og faste innretninger i petroleumsvirksomheten Safety in the interphase between offshoreand maritime regulation Martin Integrerte operasjoner. Et løft for Norwegian Bakken sikkerheten på norsk sokkel? Skjævestad English Integrated operations – a lift for safety on the Norwegian shelf? Kristin ”Hvorfor er det ulike oppfatninger av Norwegian Paulsen HMS-kulturen?” En studie av HMSKlem kulturen i Aker Well Service English Huseby “Why do people experience HSE-culture differently?” A study of HSE-culture in Aker Well Service Christel Ane Robust regulering – begrepsavklaring og Norwegian Thorsen sikker praksis i petroleumssektoren English Robust regulation – Concept clarification and safe practice in the petroleum sector Kim Frode Arbeidstakermedvirkning – vanskeligst når Norwegian Høili en trenger det mest? English Workers participation – most difficult when it is most needed? Marlén “Mangelfull risikoforståelse” – Norwegian Spring 2010 Jünge årsaksforklaring som betyr alt og ingenting. En studie av begrepsbruk i English Petroleumstilsynets granskningsrapporter og potensial for læring i petroleumsindustrien “Insufficient risk understanding” – the explanation that means all or nothing; A study of concept use in the Petroleum Safety Authority’s investigation reports and the potential for learning in the petroleum industry