Student Teaching Evaluation and Narrative Assessment

advertisement
Bryn Mawr/Haverford Student Teaching Evaluation and Narrative Assessment
Student teacher’s name:
Your name:
Your role:
Student teaching start date:
Classes student teacher is
responsible for:
Select role:
Student teaching end date:
1.
2.
3. (if applicable)
Mid-Course Evaluation Conference Date:
Final Evaluation Conference Date:
The Student Teacher, Cooperating Teacher, and College Supervisor each complete this form at the mid-point and end of the 12-week student teaching
practicum, prior to the mid-point and final evaluation conferences. This form is meant to be the basis for the mid-point and final discussions about the student
teacher’s performance and progress.
Directions: Please select the evaluative term in the table below (Exemplary, Superior, etc.) that best describes the Student Teacher’s performance in each area and also
write a brief narrative in the text box. Use the same form for both the mid-course and final evaluations so that you can see how the Student Teacher’s performance has
changed over time. When you have completed this form – at the mid-point and again at the end of the practicum - please e-mail it to Heather Curl
(hcurl@brynmawr.edu), Instructor of the Practice Teaching Seminar, and Ann Brown (abrown@brynmawr.edu), Education Program Administrator. Refer to the box
below for criteria for the rating categories.
Category
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Criteria for
Rating
The candidate consistently and
thoroughly demonstrates
indicators of performance.
The candidate usually and
extensively demonstrates
indicators of performance.
The candidate sometimes and
adequately demonstrates
indicators of performance.
The candidate rarely or never and
inappropriately or superficially
demonstrates indicators of
performance.
Category I: Planning and Preparation – Student teacher/candidate demonstrates thorough knowledge of content and pedagogical skills in planning and
preparation. Student teacher makes plans and sets goals based on the content to be taught/learned, knowledge of assigned students, and the instructional
context.
Student teacher’s performance demonstrates:
I. A. Knowledge of and critical perspective on
content
At the midpoint of the student teaching experience
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
1
Unsatisfactory
At the end of student teaching experience
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Bryn Mawr/Haverford Student Teaching Evaluation and Narrative Assessment


How does the student teacher show evidence
of good working knowledge of (and critical
perspective on) subject matter?
How does the student teacher communicate
passion and respect for the subject matter
while also being open to and modeling
critical analysis of the subject matter?
I. B. Rationale for teaching




Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
How does the student teacher demonstrate
interest in and investigation of who his/her
students are as individuals?
How does the student teacher demonstrate
growth in his/her ability to design activities
to make subject matter accessible,
interesting, and relevant to students?
I.E. Use of resources, materials, or technology
available through the school or district

Satisfactory
Does the student teacher demonstrate that he
or she has integrated Pennsylvania’s K-12
Academic Standards into planning?
I.D. Knowledge of students and how to use this
knowledge in teaching

Superior
Is the student teacher able to articulate a
strong rationale for teaching his/her subject
matter and pedagogical approaches?
I. C. Knowledge of Pennsylvania’s K-12 Academic
Standards

Exemplary
Does the student teacher demonstrate
knowledge of available resources (books,
instructional materials, media, experts, etc.)?
Is there evidence of integrating materials and
perspectives from a range of sources?
What technological resources are drawn on
and used in the classroom?
I.F. Planning for differentiated instruction and
2
Bryn Mawr/Haverford Student Teaching Evaluation and Narrative Assessment
assessment




In what ways does the student teacher show
that she or he draws on educational /theories
in constructing lesson plans and setting
instructional goals?
Do instructional goals show a recognizable
sequence with adaptations for individual
student needs?
Are assessments aligned with the
instructional goals and adapted as required
for student needs?
Does the student teacher demonstrate
knowledge about students’ special education
designation/IEPs (if applicable)?
Category II: Classroom Environment - Student teacher/candidate establishes and maintains a purposeful and equitable environment for learning, in which
students feel safe, valued, and respected, by instituting routines and setting clear expectations for student behavior.
Student teacher’s performance demonstrates:
II. A. Expectations for student achievement with
value placed on the quality of student work


Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
What is the range of learning opportunities
that the student teacher provides for
students?
II. C. Appropriate interactions/rapport between
teacher and students and among students

At the end of student teaching experience
Does the student teacher communicate high
expectations for students?
How does the student teacher support
students to reach high expectations set in the
classroom?
II. B. Attention to equitable learning opportunities
for students

At the midpoint of the student teaching experience
Does the student teacher establish a positive,
supportive, respectful classroom
environment, both in terms of teacher respect
for students and students’ respect for one
3
Bryn Mawr/Haverford Student Teaching Evaluation and Narrative Assessment

another?
To what extent is the student teacher aware
of social dynamics in the classroom? How
does the teacher use this awareness /
intervene?
II. D. Effective classroom routines and procedures
resulting in little or no loss of instructional time




Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
What strategies and concrete approaches is
the student teacher developing to prevent
management problems?
What procedures for monitoring and
following up on student misbehavior does
the student teacher have?
II. F. Appropriate attention given to safety in the
classroom to the extent that it is under the control
of the student teacher

Superior
What routines and procedures are used in the
classroom?
What accounts for loss (or gain) of
instructional time?
Does student teacher ensure quality
transitions between activities?
II. E. Clear standards of conduct and effective
management of student behavior

Exemplary
How has the student teacher considered the
physical space of the room in terms of safety,
productivity, creativity, access to resources,
etc.?
Category III: Instruction - Student teacher/candidate, thorough knowledge of content, pedagogy and skill in instruction, engages students in learning by using
a variety of instructional strategies.
Student teacher’s performance demonstrates:
III. A. Use of knowledge of content and
pedagogical theory through his/her instructional
At the midpoint of the student teaching experience
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
4
Unsatisfactory
At the end of student teaching experience
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Bryn Mawr/Haverford Student Teaching Evaluation and Narrative Assessment
delivery


Are instructional and assessment decisions
congruent with student teacher’s espoused
educational philosophy and actual
instructional approaches?
For example: How does the student teacher
facilitate and support problem-solving and
critical thinking?In what ways does the
student teacher use and make explicit
approaches that promote metacognitive
awareness of learning?
III. B. Communication of procedures and clear
explanations of content





Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Does the student teacher clearly
communicate directions and procedures for
classroom activities and assignments?
III. C. Thoughtful pedagogy

Exemplary
Does the student teacher demonstrate a
willingness to take appropriate and
generative risks (modeling for students,
trying new activities, etc.)?
Is the student teacher developing a strong
teacher presence?
How does the student teacher take into
consideration the range of abilities of
students in their teaching?
What kinds of instructional materials are
used? Is there variety in these materials?
In what ways does the student teacher
consider, develop, and modify materials,
pedagogical approaches, and activities to
meet students' diverse needs, interests, and
goals?
III. D. Use of various strategies that encourage
many students to participate
5
Bryn Mawr/Haverford Student Teaching Evaluation and Narrative Assessment


Does the student teacher employ a variety of
pedagogical approaches (lectures, whole
class discussions, small-group work,
simulations, etc.)?
Does the student teacher ask questions at
varying levels of abstraction that elicit
experience-based responses as well as facts
and inferences?
III. E. Engagement of students in learning and
adequate pacing of instruction




Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
How does the student teacher use
assessments (both formative and summative)
and evaluations for further learning and
teaching?
Does the student teacher respond promptly
and constructively to student work?
III. G. Use of informal and formal assessments to
meet learning goals and to monitor student
learning

Superior
Does the student teacher incorporate
cooperative learning activities into
instruction?
Does the student teacher maintain
momentum in a lesson and/or revise a lesson
if it is not working?
What input do students have into the design
and content of lessons and assessment?
III. F. Feedback to students on their learning

Exemplary
Does the student teacher assess student work
and progress and check for student
understanding often and through various
traditional as well as alternative approaches
(i.e., through oral questioning, short written
activities, pairing/sharing, quizzes, games,
etc.)?
6
Bryn Mawr/Haverford Student Teaching Evaluation and Narrative Assessment
III. H. Flexibility and responsiveness in meeting
the learning needs of students


Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Is the student teacher flexible in changing
plans in response to student needs or other
relevant input?
In what ways does the student teacher
consider, develop, and modify materials,
pedagogical approaches, and activities to
meet students' diverse needs, interests, and
goals?
III. I. Integration of disciplines within the
educational curriculum

Exemplary
Does the student teacher design activities and
assignments that are interdisciplinary?
Category IV – Professionalism - Student teacher/candidate demonstrates qualities that characterize a professional person in aspects that occur in and beyond
the classroom/building.
Student teacher’s performance demonstrates:
IV. A. Knowledge of school and district procedures
and regulations related to attendance, punctuality
and the like

At the end of student teaching experience
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Does the student teacher demonstrate
organization and responsibility (e.g., by
being on time for all commitments, getting
all logistical and paper work done on time
and correctly, having lesson plans completed
before class, etc.)?
IV. B. Knowledge of school or district
requirements for maintaining accurate records
and communicating with families

At the midpoint of the student teaching experience
Does the student teacher maintain accurate
records (of student assignments, student
7
Bryn Mawr/Haverford Student Teaching Evaluation and Narrative Assessment
progress, parent conferences, etc.)?
IV. C. Knowledge of school and/or district events





Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
What opportunities and approaches does the
student teacher take to reflect on his/her own
teaching beliefs and practices?
Does the student teacher actively read,
reflect on, and integrate into their teaching
knowledge from professional books,
journals, and other sources of information?
Does the student teacher accurately appraise
his/her effectiveness as a teacher, identify
areas for growth, and demonstrate a
commitment to continued professional
development?
Does the student teacher seek and make
constructive use of criticism from students,
colleagues, supervisors, etc.?
IV. E. Integrity and ethical behavior, professional
conduct as stated in Pennsylvania Code of
Professional Practice and Conduct for Educators;
and local, state, and federal, laws and regulations

Superior
Does the student teacher participate in
departmental and faculty meetings and other
school/district events (i.e., board meetings)?
IV. D. Knowledge of district or college’s
professional growth and development
opportunities

Exemplary
Does the student teacher show equitable
treatment of students, colleagues, and parents
regardless of their race, nationality, ethnicity,
religion, sex or sexual orientation, marital
status, age, political beliefs, socioeconomic
status, disability, etc.?
Does the student teacher value diversity in
educational practice, having a range of
methodologies and tools for effective
8
Bryn Mawr/Haverford Student Teaching Evaluation and Narrative Assessment

teaching and learning?
Are student teacher’s oral and written
communications with parents, students, and
staff professional, respectful, and discreet?
IV. F. Effective communication, both oral and
written, with students, colleagues,
paraprofessionals, related service personnel, and
administrators


Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Exemplary
Superior
Satisfactory
Unsatisfactory
Does the student teacher demonstrate an
awareness of (and interest in collaborating
with) the range of professionals and aids
working in a school?
In what ways does the student teacher
contribute as a colleague to ongoing school
improvement, including the development
and/or maintenance of a school ethos that
values learning, equity, respect for diversity,
and personal integrity?
IV. H. Knowledge of Commonwealth requirements
for continuing professional development and
licensure

Superior
In what ways does the student teacher
communicate effectively to students, parents,
and administrators about student progress?
IV. G. Ability to cultivate professional
relationships with school colleagues

Exemplary
What understanding of the PA requirements
for continuing professional development and
licensure does the student teacher
demonstrate?
9
Download