The Effect of a Solution with Nutrients on Phytoplankton Background: In the past fifty years the amount of carbon dioxide being placed into the environment has exploded greatly. Scientists have found that a microscopic aquatic plant known as phytoplankton that can take in Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and water and produce oxygen. This process is known as photosynthesis and is one of the most important factors for animal life. Phytoplankton like all plant life, need phosphates and nitrates to live and grow better with iron. Phytoplankton are a big part in the aquatic food chain. Without these little buggers all other life aquatic life would not exist. Because of this, scientists need to find a way to keep these buggers alive, hence us. Hypothesis: If nutrients and iron are added to the solution containing phytoplankton then their growth rate will be higher than compared to the control and nutrients only experiments. If nutrients and iron are added to the solution containing phytoplankton then their growth rate will be higher than compared to the control but a lower count of phytoplankton then in the solution containing both nutrients and iron. If nothing is added to the solution containing phytoplankton then there will be mild success at first but then will decrease and will not have as much as the nutrient and iron solution and the nutrient solution. Materials - 10 mL of phytoplankton culture 50 mL of filtered seawater 50-250mL Erlenmeyer flask Cotton ball Available light source (sunny window is fine) - 3-300 µl pipettes Nitrate, Phosphate and Iron nutrient solutions Wax pencils Microscopes and microscope slides Spectrophotometer (if possible) Protocol Obtain three beakers, label them "Control", "+Nutrients", and "+Nutrients and Iron" Add 100mL of seawater to the labeled beakers Add the appropriate things to the corresponding beaker Place the beakers under a light source (sunny window is fine) Every day for 10 days, make observations and take notes in regards to the phytoplankton by using microscopes and the spectrophotometer. Data Amount of phytoplankton Spectrometer Data Conclusion In conclusion my hypothesis’s turned out to be correct slightly. My hypothesis’s stated the following. If nutrients and iron are added to the solution containing phytoplankton then their growth rate will be higher than compared to the control and nutrients only experiments. If nutrients and iron are added to the solution containing phytoplankton then their growth rate will be higher than compared to the control but a lower count of phytoplankton then in the solution containing both nutrients and iron. If nothing is added to the solution containing phytoplankton then there will be mild success at first but then will decrease and will not have as much as the nutrient and iron solution and the nutrient solution. Out of all the other groups shown on the data, the nutrients and iron added to the phytoplankton seemed to have the best result in the fact that it had the most phytoplankton growth. The statistics for the nutrients showed that the population jumps at some points but they mostly stayed at a range between 5-10 phytoplankton. The control though showed to be the least successful in cultivating phytoplankton. What I mostly got out of this lab is that nutrients are what keep phytoplankton alive. Keeping a large set of data makes for a more accurate conclusion and answer as it shows the average between the facts or false statements. This beneficial action turned out for the best. Although To my shock the group with the nutrient solution was almost in the same range as the control group for the Spectrometer measurements. This out could have been a careless mistake in my groups data collection while doing the procedure for that day. Every group with the same assignment as ours seemed to have the same conclusion. The numbers for each phytoplankton count also seemed to average ours. Looking at the data from each set of groups, iron fertilizing seemed to multiply more. This shows that iron is probably a large factor towards eutrophication. Though iron has helped make phytoplankton grow more, too much of it can damage life in the water as it can start an algal bloom.