MIT CAMPUS POLICE ASSOCIATION
LABOR RELATIONS UPDATE 2009/ # 2
DECEMBER 9, 2009
Earlier this year, we reported in our first edition of the Labor Relation
Update that contract negotiations between the MIT Campus Police Union and
MIT were stalled over salary and health care issues. Unfortunately, they
remain stalled over these same issues. Donning the threadbare robe of a
pauper, MIT asserts at the bargaining table that it has been victimized by the
national recession and rendered unable to afford reasonable salary and health
insurance proposals from the Association. However, the role of victim does not
well suit MIT. While crying poverty, it maintains vast financial reserves worth
billions of dollars. While it pleads for concessions by its rank and file
employees, it has recently lavished its already highly paid executives with
staggering salary increases for one year ranging from a “low” of 100% to a high
of 365%.1
These wildly generous salary increases awarded to its highest paid
executives belie any claim that MIT may make over an inability to fairly pay its
police officers. Indeed, to MIT the current economic climate means only that
its plentiful financial reserves will show a short term reduction in paper value;
as reflected by the generosity of executive pay increases there is hardly cause
for serious long-term concern. To the rank and file employee, the economic
downturn has for more serious consequences. For some, it means that
mortgage payments cannot be made. For others, decision-making is forced
between paying for the family’s food or the family’s clothing when there is not
enough to pay for both. For all, it has produced a heavy layer of anxiety that
weighs heavily and indiscriminately on their daily lives.
In short, as a matter of essential fairness, the current economic climate
calls for MIT to sustain its rank and file employees with reasonable pay
increases rather than forcing the brunt of the recession onto their shoulders.
How MIT responds to this call will say a great deal about its character as an
institution and the ethics of its leadership. If you agree that MIT is ethically
obligated to treat its police officers fairly PLEASE CALL OR E-MAIL ITS
DECISION-MAKERS WHOSE CONTACT INFORMATION IS LISTED ON THE
REVERSE SIDE OF THIS UPDATE. Also, please look soon for our Labor
Relations Update # 3 which will trace the programmed erosion by MIT of
critically important health insurance benefits, not only for police officers, but
also for all MIT employees.
Kudos to MIT’s student newspaper, The Tech, for this salary exposé in its
November 17, 2009 edition. For many of the executives, these increases
represent raises of more than $100,000 annually. Otherwise stated, for
approximately half of the single year increase paid to a single executive, MIT
could have funded a 3.5% increase for every member of the Association’s
bargaining unit for a whole year.
1
Please contact the following MIT leadership personnel and demand that MIT
bring the current police negotiations to a prompt and fair conclusion:
Susan Hockfield, President, (617-253-0148) (hockfiled@mit.edu)
Alison Alden, Vice President (617-253-6512) (aalden@mit.edu)
John DiFava, Director of Facilities, Operations and Facilities and Chief of Police
(617-252-1703) (jdifava@mit.edu)
Marianna Pierce, Director of Labor and Employee Relations (617-253-4268)
(mcpeirce@mit.edu
Jonathan E. Barnes, Manager of Labor Relations (617-258-8716)
(jebarnes@mit.edu)