Grade 8 TCAP Writing Assessment Results Data from February 2013 Writing Assessment: Table 1: Scores by trait (1-4 scale) Focus/Organization Support/Elaboration 8th grade Language/Style Conventions Average % scoring a 3 or 4 Average % scoring a 3 or 4 Average % scoring a 3 or 4 Average % scoring a 3 or 4 2.46 45.5% 2.09 23.3% 2.57 50.3% 2.69 57.4% Other 8th grade testing information: Number of test takers: 74,200 Number/percentage of students scoring at least a 3 on all traits: 16,155 (21.8% of all 8th grade students) Number of students receiving condition code D: “Too limited to evaluate” (scored as a zero in all four traits): 4,596 Prompt and standards alignment: Students were asked to read two complex informational texts—one about the early European settlers of America and one about the possibilities of humans colonizing space—and write an informational/explanatory essay “comparing and contrasting how reasons for colonization have changed from settling America to attempting to settle space.” The assessment addressed the following Common Core State Standards: Reading: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.8.1 Cite the textual evidence that most strongly supports an analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as inferences drawn from the text. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.8.9 Analyze a case in which two or more texts provide conflicting information on the same topic and identify where the texts disagree on matters of fact or interpretation. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.RI.8.10 By the end of the year, read and comprehend literary nonfiction at the high end of the grades 6–8 text complexity band independently and proficiently. Writing: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.8.2 Write informative/explanatory texts to examine a topic and convey ideas, concepts, and information through the selection, organization, and analysis of relevant content. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.8.4 Produce clear and coherent writing in which the development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.W.8.9 Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. Language: CCSS.ELA-Literacy.L.8.1 Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English grammar and usage when writing or speaking. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.L.8.2 Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English capitalization, punctuation, and spelling when writing. CCSS.ELA-Literacy.L.8.3 Use knowledge of language and its conventions when writing, speaking, reading, or listening. Necessary skills: In order to succeed with this prompt, students needed to be able to: Read and comprehend complex informational texts Compare and contrast information from multiple texts Synthesize ideas from multiple texts into a coherent explanation and analysis Write an organized, focused, clear, and coherent essay Incorporate textual evidence (e.g. key ideas, supporting details, quotes, facts) from multiple texts into their prose Explain and elaborate upon textual evidence and draw connections between evidence and their main idea Demonstrate command of style, language, and tone to accomplish their task Demonstrate command of the conventions of standard written English For a more complete overview of what skills were assessed during scoring, see the 2012-13 informational/explanatory rubric (please note that Tennessee has revised the rubrics for the 2013-14 school year). Results analysis: Focus/Organization: Overall, this was the second lowest scoring trait for 8th grade students. 45.5% of students scored a 3 or 4 in focus/organization. Students struggling in focus/organization tend to have trouble crafting paragraphs or separating their thoughts into coherent sections. They may also lack focus in their writing, either insufficiently establishing their topic or meandering off topic as they write. Success on this trait is also inextricably linked with “demonstrating sufficient understanding of the stimulus material.” Students who are able to understand and follow the key ideas, arguments, and purposes of both texts are in a better position to write an essay with relevant content. Support/Elaboration: Overall, this was the lowest scoring trait for 8th grade students, by quite a wide margin. Only 23.3 % of students scored a 3 or 4 in support/elaboration. Because support/elaboration measures a student’s ability to provide textual evidence to support his analysis, students who struggle in this trait either do not provide sufficient textual evidence in their essays or do not elaborate upon the evidence, linking it to their ideas. Again, students who struggle with reading comprehension may also struggle with this trait, since the quality of evidence is linked directly to the writer’s grasp of the text’s presentation of ideas. The ability to develop one’s writing with textual evidence is perhaps the single most important skill required for success on PARCC writing prompts. Language/Style: This was the second highest scoring trait for 8th graders. 50.3% of students scored a 3 or 4 in language/style. Students scoring well in this trait are able to demonstrate an advanced sense of style, writing with a variety of precise, effective words and sentences and an appropriate tone for formal essays. As a measure of form (how a student writes) as opposed to content (what a student writes), it is entirely possible (and this trend was observed in many student papers) for a student to score highly on this trait, as well as on conventions, while not doing well on support/elaboration and focus/organization. Conventions: Conventions was the highest scoring trait for 8th graders, although only 57.4% of students scored a three or four. As with the other traits, conventions is measured independently. Whether a student can use evidence, organize his thoughts, or write with advanced syntax or diction will have no bearing on his conventions score (another aspect of form), which measures his ability to command grammar, usage, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation. Instructional implications: 1) Since 8th grade students generally experienced more success with form, more emphasis could be placed on improving content (as measured by the Support/Elaboration and Focus/Organization traits). A writing emphasis can be driven by mini-lessons, focused writing prompts, and targeted feedback from teachers and peers. However, students still need practice in all traits. 2) 8th grade students appear to need more practice in the skill of writing to sources, including: Selecting relevant and significant details and ideas from a text Supporting explanations with specific evidence from texts Synthesizing textual evidence from multiple sources into a coherent explanation Students can benefit from mini-lessons targeting the above skills, including direct instruction and teacher modeling of writing strategies through think-alouds, discussion and reflection, and exemplar essays (from both students and teachers). 3) There may be many different issues at play for students with unscorable responses. Teachers may consider diagnosing and providing intervention and support in the following skill areas: Reading foundational skills and comprehension Structuring a paragraph that provides textual evidence Practice with the format of online testing A plan for the 8th grade PLC: Step one: Step two: Step three: Step four: Step five: Print the 8th grade and work through it yourself as a learner. Consider the skills and capacities necessary for your students to succeed with the prompt. Secure your teacher/grade level data from the MI portal (may require access information from your school’s or district’s testing coordinator). Review and analyze data from your school or students from last year. Look for strengths and weaknesses across traits. What trends do you notice? In light of the prompt and the data, identify specific points where your students most likely experienced difficulty. Things to consider might be: What are the texts about, and what are the reading demands? What are students being asked to write, and what must they do with each text? In what ways were the students required to use textual evidence? What would a successful response to the task look like? Build a series of close reading lessons with complex informational texts and culminating assessments with writing-to-sources prompts (or use some of the resources listed below). Collect student work from at least three students who are in different places in their learning, score it using the revised 2013-14 rubrics, and share with colleagues. Consider the following questions: What evidence can you draw from these student samples about your students’ capabilities? What are areas of deficits for your students when it comes to reading complex texts and responding to them in writing? What are some strategies you can use to help bridge those deficits and improve student writing? Tennessee resources to support students with PARCC-style writing tasks: Practice assessment tasks at http://tncore.org//english_language_arts/assessment/sample_assessments/grades6-8.aspx: o 6-8 Phase I sample writing task o 6-8 Writing Research Simulation tasks (to be posted in March 2014) Common Core units at http://tncore.org/english_language_arts/curricular_resources/68/text_unit_6-8.aspx: o 8th grade informational text unit (to be posted in December 2013) Close reading tasks with writing-to-sources prompts as culminating assessments at http://tncore.org/english_language_arts/curricular_resources/6-8/tasks68.aspx: o 6-8 Amelia Earhart task o 6-8 Dust Bowl task Resources to support teachers in understanding the Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and instructional shifts and in creating their own materials: o Text-dependent questions o Text complexity o 6-8 summer training materials