Name:______________________________________________ Date:__________________ Worked with:_______________________________________________________________________ SO513 – Atmospheric and Oceanic Processes (Honors) Lab 3: The Atmospheric Boundary Layer and Ekman Solutions (100 pts) Brief Review of Lesson 5 Notes: Consider an ocean with no interior flow and a horizontal wind field imposing a wind stress along the surface ocean (ππ₯ , ππ¦ ). Assuming a steady state, homogenous fluid with no pressure gradient, the following set of equations represents the flow field in the surface Ekman layer: π2π’ −ππ£ = ππ£ 2 ππ§ π2π£ ππ’ = ππ£ 2 ππ§ (Eq. 1) Unless otherwise specified, this lab follows the notation used in the Lesson 5 notes. The upper boundary forcing at z = 0 is from the wind stress: ππ€ ππ£ ππ£ = ππ¦ ππ§ ππ€ ππ£ ππ’ = ππ₯ ππ§ (Eq. 2) By substituting the upper boundary condition from Equation (2) into Equation (1) the surface ocean Ekman Layer equations become: −ππ€ ππ£ = ππ€ ππ’ = πππ₯ ππ§ πππ¦ ππ§ (Eq. 3) With prescribed upper (Equation 2) and lower (u, v = 0 and z = -∞) boundary conditions, the solution to Equation (3) in the Northern Hemisphere is: π’= πΏπΈ √2 πΏ π§ π π π πΈ [ππ₯ cos (πΏπΈ π§ − ) − ππ¦ sin (πΏπΈ π§ − )] ππ€ π 4 4 π£= πΏπΈ √2 πΏ π§ π π π πΈ [ππ₯ sin (πΏπΈ π§ − ) + ππ¦ cos (πΏπΈ π§ − )] ππ€ π 4 4 (Eq. 4) Part 1: Show that for purely zonal winds, the Ekman in Equation (4) solution above matches the solution in Equation (9) of the Lesson 5 class notes. Part 2: In the turbulent atmospheric boundary layer, the surface stress in the x and y directions are: ππ₯π§ = −ππ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ π′π₯ π′π§ ππ¦π§ = −ππ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ π′π¦ π′π§ (Eq. 5) where ππ is the density of air and capital U and V denote atmospheric winds while lowercase u and v denote ocean currents. Note that going forward, we will drop the tensor notation and represent the Reynolds stresses as follows: ππ₯ = ππ₯π§ and ππ¦ = ππ¦π§ . However, obtaining reliable measurement of turbulent fluxes in the marine atmospheric boundary layer (often on a moving ship in heavy seas) has proven difficult. Instead, scientists use the bulk formula to relate the momentum flux at the ocean surface to more easily measured variables via the dimensionless drag coefficient, πΆπ . The bulk formulae for the zonal and meridional wind components are: ππ₯ = ππ π∗ |π∗ | = ππ πΆππ₯ (π − ππ )|π − ππ | ππ₯ = ππ π∗ |π∗ | = ππ πΆππ¦ (π − ππ )|π − ππ | (Eq. 6) where π and π are the wind speeds at height (often taken at 10 meters above the surface) and ππ and ππ are the surface wind speeds, assumed to be zero for our application. The bars | | denote absolute values. The flux scales π∗ and π∗ in Equation (6) are commonly referred to as the “shear” or “friction” velocities and, assuming the processes are isotropic, they are related to the covariance of the turbulent fluctuations in the Reynolds stress equation by: Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ π∗ |π∗ | = −π′ π₯ π′π§ ′ π′ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ Μ π∗ |π∗ | = −π π¦ π§ (Eq. 7) You will find the functional form for the drag coefficient in the following paper. We will assume a neutrally buoyant atmosphere. Hence use the neutral drag coefficient. Kevin E. Trenberth, William G. Large, and Jerry G. Olson, 1989: The Effective Drag Coefficient for Evaluating Wind Stress over the Oceans. J. Climate, 2, 1507–1516. We will make two addition modifications to the neutral drag coefficient parameterization given by Trenberth, Large, and Olson, (1989): ο· If the wind speed is zero, set the drag coefficient to zero (for simplicity). ο· Recent scientific studies have shown that at moderate wind speeds, the amplitude and period of the wind driven, surface gravity waves augments the atmospheric boundary layer flow by physically decoupling it from the wavy sea surface. This phenomenon reduces the drag imposed by the sea surface on atmospheric boundary layer flow field by altering the roughness length. Hence, for wind speeds greater than or equal to 20 m/s, the drag coefficient saturates and is approximately constant, πΆπ = 1.8x10-3. Using your notes and the information provided here, complete the following tasks: 1. Make an array of wind speeds from 0.5 to 30 m/s. Using this array, calculate and plot the drag coefficient and wind stress. You will find an appropriate estimated value for the density of air in the text of Trenberth, Large, and Olson, (1989). 2. Based on your understanding of Trenberth, Large, and Olson, (1989), specifically the airsea temperature difference discussion surrounding Figure (1) in that paper, in which months (generally) would you expect the drag coefficient off the Mid Atlantic coast to be greater than and less than the neutral drag coefficient (i.e. the solid βπ = 0 line in Figure 1)? Using the code from Question 1, calculate the u and v Ekman spiral components for U = 10.0 m/s, V = 5.0 m/s and a latitude of 40 degrees North. Remember z is positive upward. Plot the 3D Ekman spiral using the plot3 MATLAB function. Your vertical scale should range z = 0 m to z = -500 m using a vertical grid spacing of 1 m. Rotate the 3D Ekman spiral to only show the “top” view or the hodograph view. Type help plot3 into MATLAB for more information about that function. Does the spiral rotate the correct direction for the Northern Hemisphere? Furthermore, plot the vertical u and v component profiles with respect to πΏπΈ π§. At what depth to u and v go to zero? Constrain the vertical axis in the plot to this depth. Part 3: In equation (3), the derivate of the wind stress is only with respect to the vertical, z-direction. Hence, the partial derivatives are effectively full derivatives allowing Equation (3) to be written: −ππ€ ππ£ ππ§ = πππ₯ ππ€ ππ’ ππ§ = πππ¦ (Eq. 7) In Equation (7), ππ€ ππ’ ππ§ is the mass flowing per second in the x-direction through an area defined by the vertical depth ππ§ and one meter width area in the y-direction (similarly for mass flowing in the y-direction). Hence, total mass following in the x- and y-directions (respectively) from the level z to the surface is: 0 0 πππ₯ = ∫ ππ€ ππ’ ππ§ = ∫ πππ¦ π§ π§ 0 0 πππ¦ = − ∫ ππ€ ππ£ ππ§ = − ∫ πππ₯ π§ π§ (Eq. 8) In your Lesson 5 notes, you learned that the analytical solutions for Equation (8) are as follows, where the mass transport is perpendicular to the surface wind stress: ππ₯ = ππ¦ π ππ¦ = − ππ₯ π (Eq. 9) Using Equation (9), calculate analytical the horizontal mass transport in the x and y directions for U = 10.0 m/s, V = 5.0 m/s, and a latitude of 40 degrees North. Compare the analytical solution with a numerical solution calculated using only the u and v Ekman spiral solutions in Equation (6) with the trapz MATLAB numerical integration function. First, calculate the u and v components of the Ekman spiral and numerically integrated these solutions using a vertical grid spacing of 20m. Afterward, complete the numerical integration with 1m grid spacing. Did the grid spacing improve numerical solution with respect to the analytical solution? Why (Hint: you will ned to know how trapz work mathematically)? Part 4: 1. Plot the zonal and meridional wind speeds from the Reanalysis data file which can be access using the following MATLAB commands: Ydrivepath = 'Y:\Mids Share\Oceanography\Data\Models\REANALYSIS\'; filename = 'NPac_AvgWinds_01_25_2015_to_01_30_2015.mat'; load(strcat(Ydrivepath,filename)) The wind is averaged over January 25-30, 2015. The gridded, zonal and meridional components of the wind are found in the variables Uwind and Vwind, respectively. Likewise, the gridded longitude and latitudes are found in windxgrid and windygrid, respectively. Your plots should look like this: 2. Using the analytical solutions for the horizontal mass transport in Equation (9), plot the resulting horizontal mass transport components from the Reanalysis wind field. Along the Pacific Northwest coast, do you expect upwelling or downwelling? Why? Recalling the physical-biological interactions you studied in SO272, what impact could this have on local fisheries?