University Code of Practice Production of Transcripts of Academic Record/European Diploma Supplements/Higher Education Achievement Record for students on collaborative programmes Document Reference: Identifier: Version: Collaborative Provision: Production of Transcripts QH: K 12 Version 1 04 Date: Aug 15 Approved By: Originator: ULTAC LEAP Responsibilities: Partner institutions University faculties Student Administrative Services LEAP Application to collaborative provision: Mandatory Contacts: Applications for exemptions to: Report Exemptions to: quality@hull.ac.uk ULTAC ULTAC Further Guidance: UK Quality Code for Higher Education, Chapter B10: Managing higher education provision with others (Dec 2012). Summary/ Description: This code of practice sets out the University’s expectations governing the production of transcripts of academic record/European Diploma Supplements/Higher Education Achievement Record for students on programmes delivered by partner institutions leading to the University’s awards. It sets out the processes that partner institutions and University faculties/departments must follow to ensure that consistent and accurate transcripts are issued to students. Version 1 04 (Aug 15) includes the following changes: Updates references to external documents and replaces Head of Quality with Quality Manager Version 1 03 (Sep 11) includes the following changes: Updates responsibility of some tasks to the Head of Quality Strengthens the requirement for the Partner to check accuracy of data prior to sending to University (para 13) Clarifies sample of transcripts to be checked This university Code has been written in accordance with the approach approved by QSC to enhance clarity (Quality Handbook section A2) involving the following terminology: must = mandatory should = advisable may = desirable. Where these terms are used they are emphasised in bold Collaborative Provision: Production of Transcripts LEAP Version 1 04 – Aug 15 Document1 QH:K12:1 This document is available in alternative formats from Learning Enhancement and Academic Practice Collaborative Provision: Production of Transcripts LEAP Version 1 04 – Aug 15 Document1 QH:K12:2 Code of practice for the production of Transcripts of Academic Record/European Diploma Supplements/Higher Education Achievement Record for students on collaborative programmes INTRODUCTION 1. There are a number of external requirements that the University must consider regarding the production of transcripts. The UK Quality Code, Chapter B10 Managing Higher Education with Others states that “When degree-awarding bodies make arrangements for the delivery of learning opportunities with others, they ensure that they retain authority for awarding certificates and issuing detailed records of study in relation to student achievement” (QAA, 2013: 35). 2. In addition, the UK government has signed up to the Bologna Process, which aims to improve the mobility of students within Europe, setting out a standard pattern of HE provision, and a method of understanding the awards made in the constituent countries. As part of this, the European Diploma Supplement (EDS) has been introduced for HE. The EDS consists of a standard set of information that normally accompanies, or is part of, the HE transcript. It adds further information to the transcript, which will help institutions outside the UK to understand the context in which the award has been made. Currently, the EDS forms one page of the University of Hull’s standard transcript with an accompanying descriptive leaflet. To ensure that the document is of use to the student in the future, the University has taken the approach of giving the minimum amount of information whilst still meeting the requirements. 3. In October 2007 the report from the Burgess Group ‘Beyond the honours degree classification’ recommended that Universities in the UK issue students with an enhanced transcript to be called a Higher Education Achievement Report (HEAR). The University of Hull will provide a Higher Education Achievement Report (HEAR) to all undergraduate students who commence their studies from September 2011. The first HEARs will therefore be issued in summer 2012 to third year direct entrant students. The UK Quality Code, Chapter B10 Managing Higher Education with Others makes clear that the University is responsible for the security and accuracy of transcripts issued in its name “The ultimate responsibility for the security and accuracy of certificates and transcripts/records of achievement lies with the body in whose name they are issued. If the degree-awarding body wishes to delegate the issue of these documents to a delivery organisation, it ensures that it has retained the means to exercise proper control over the process. In the case of joint awards, the responsibility for issuing a single certificate is shared” 4. Currently, with the exception of Bishop Burton College, data required to produce a transcript includes detailed information which the University does not usually hold for students on directly-funded University awards delivered by partner institutions, such as individual module marks. As a consequence, the University has devolved the responsibility to partner institutions to initiate the production of the transcripts for these students whilst retaining the authority to monitor the accuracy of the data prior to being despatched to the students. Collaborative Provision: Production of Transcripts LEAP Version 1 04 – Aug 15 Document1 QH:K12:3 PURPOSE OF THE CODE 5. The purpose of this code is to ensure that students on directly-funded collaborative programmes receive consistent and accurate information with regard to their award and enable the University to meet external expectations set out above. AUTHORITY 6. The University Learning, Teaching and Assessment Committee is the final arbiter of the interpretation and application of this code. PRIOR TO THE PRODUCTION OF TRANSCRIPTS 7. Each partner institution must nominate one individual to act as the contact person for any queries or issues regarding transcripts/EDS/HEAR, to co-ordinate activities at the partner institution and to liaise with the Head of Student Administrative Services, the University’s contact, accordingly. 8. The partner institution must agree with the Head of Student Administrative Services, prior to the production of the transcripts, a template transcript to be used for all students receiving University of Hull awards. The template transcript must clearly record the name and location of the partner institution engaged in the delivery of the programme of study. To ensure consistency across all collaborative programmes, the University’s transcript/EDS/HEAR should be adopted with appropriate modifications to meet the requirements of the partner institution. Any amendments to the template require the approval of the Head of Student Administrative Services. 9. The partner institution must also agree with the Head of Student Administrative Services the letterhead that the transcript/EDS/HEAR will be printed on. The visual identities of both institutions must be included on the letterhead. 10. Once both the transcript/EDS template and the letterhead have been agreed, the Head of Student Administrative Services will circulate copies to University faculties/departments for information. PRODUCTION OF THE TRANSCRIPTS RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTNER INSTITUTION 11. Transcripts must not be produced prior to the ratification of results by the University’s Student Progress Committee. 12. The partner institution must produce the transcripts in accordance with the template as agreed above using the appropriate letterhead. The partner institution must have their own mechanisms for checking the accuracy of the data and not rely on the University’s monitoring processes. 13. The partner institution must ensure that the award, programme title and module titles are identical to those approved by the University’s Programme Approvals Committee (or equivalent) in the original programme approval documentation and/or any subsequent agreed major/minor amendments. 14. The partner institution should keep a copy of each transcript for their own records and send the batch of transcripts to the University faculty/department contact. Collaborative Provision: Production of Transcripts LEAP Version 1 04 – Aug 15 Document1 QH:K12:4 CHECKING THE TRANSCRIPTS RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE UNIVERSITY 15. The University faculty/department contact must check that the partner institution is using the template and letterhead agreed by the Quality Manager. Any anomalies should be reported to the Quality Manager. 16. Using the relevant Board of Examiners’ documentation, as a minimum, the University faculty/department contact must check the following on all transcripts: 17. Student name and registration number Programme title Final award i.e. 2:1, 2:2 etc. The University faculty/department contact should also check a sample of the following: Module titles and marks Period of study 18. The University faculty/department contact should keep a copy of each transcript for their own records and either send the transcript directly out to each student within 5 working days of receipt from the partner institution, or agree the transcript and inform the partner that they may issue the transcript. 19. Any recurrent issues should be reported to the Quality Manager and if appropriate the matter should be discussed at the relevant Joint Board of Studies and, if necessary, the Joint Development Board. ISSUING THE TRANSCRIPTS RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PARTNER INSTITUTION 20. The approved version of the transcript should be issued to the students within two weeks of approval by the University. Collaborative Provision: Production of Transcripts LEAP Version 1 04 – Aug 15 Document1 QH:K12:5