The circuit below is used to control the lifting and lowering of a 5 kN load. The hydraulic cylinder has a blank side area of 1200 mm2 and a rod side area of 700 mm2. The circuit piping is of 25 mm diameter and the equivalent lengths for the segments and fittings at this diameter are given in the table below. The hydraulic fluid used has a density of 900 kg/m3 and a dynamic viscosity of 0.1 Pa.s 1. Assuming laminar flow is maintained up to ReD = 2000, find the maximum load speed, vc at which laminar flow conditions are maintained in the piping. 2. Determine the pump power and the overall efficiency during the lifting, lowering and holding states at a load speed of vc and of 2 vc 3. Suggest an alternative circuit design to improve efficiency during the lowering and the holding stages. Piping Segment / Fitting Equivalent Length (m) A–B 10 B–C 2 D–E 10 F-G 10 H–I 10 I–J 14 Pressure Relief Valve 20 Directional Control Valve 8 1 1. Maximum load speed for laminar flow: The pipe speed, π£π , which results in π ππ· = 2000 is calculated from the definition of π ππ· as: π ππ· = ππ£π π· π = 2000, π£π = ππ ππ· ππ· 0.1×2000 = 900×25×10−3 = 8.89 m/s We need to check that the π ππ· ≤ 2000 in the pipe connected to the blank side of the cylinder and to that connected to the rod side of the cylinder. Note that because the area of the blank side of the cylinder is larger than that of the rod side, the flow speed in the piping connected to the blank side is larger than that connected to the rod side for a given load speed. The load speed π£π that produces the value of π£π = 8.89 m/s in the pipe connected to the blank-side of the cylinder is calculated using continuity between the blank side of the cylinder and the piping connected to the blank side, π£π π΄π = π£π π΄π , π where π΄π = 1200 mm is the area of the blank side, and π΄π = 4 × 252 = 490.87 mm2 is the area of 2 the pipe. Thus, π΄π π£π = π£π π΄ = 8.89 × π 490.87 1200 = 3.64 m/s. Similarly, the value of π£π which produce π£π = 8.89 in the rod side piping is calculated using continuity between the rod side of the cylinder and the piping connected to the rod: π£π π΄π = π£π π΄π , π΄ π£π = π£π π΄π = 8.89 × π 490.87 700 = 6.23 m/s π£π = min(3.64 ,6.23) = 3.64 m/s A lower limit on π£π is necessary in order maintain laminar flow in the pipe connected to the blank side. When the piston moves at a speed π£π = 3.64 m/s, The speed of flow in the pipe connected to the blank side is π£π−π = 8.89 m/s as calculated above. The speed of flow in the pipe connected to the rod side, π£π−π is calculated from continuity based π£π = 3.64 as: π΄ 700 π£π−π = π£π π΄π = 3.64 × 490.87 = 5.19 m/s π 2.a Pump power and circuit efficiency during load lifting: Note that during lifting the pump flow is that of the rod-side of the cylinder. Pump power may be calculated from the product of the head and flow rate as: πππ’ππ = πππ’ππ βπ πππ’ππ = π£π π΄π = 3.64 × 700 × 10−6 = 2.55 × 10−3 m3/s βπ = πππ’π‘ − πππ , πππ = πππ‘π = 0, πππ’π‘ = ππ + ππππ π −π ππππ π −π = 32ππΏππ−π π£π−π π·π2 where ππ is the pressure in the rod side of the cylinder, ππππ π −π is the pressure loss in the pipe connected to the rod side, and πΏππ−π is the equivalent length of the this pipe, πΏππ−π = 10 + 2 + 8 + 10 = 30 m 2 ππππ π −π = 32×0.1×30×5.19 (25×10−3 )2 = 796.4 kPa The value of ππ , may be calculated from a force balance on the piston. Assuming that the piston is moving with a constant speed upwards, we have ∑ πΉ = 0, ππ π΄π − ππ π΄π − π = 0, ππ = ππ π΄π +π π΄π where ππ is the pressure in the blank side of the piston, calculated as ππ = πππ‘π + ππππ π −π where ππππ π −π is the pressure loss in the pipe connected to the blank side of the piston. Considering gauge pressures, πππ‘π = 0, and calculating the equivalent length, πΏππ−π , of the blank side pipe: πΏππ−π = 10 + 8 + 10 + 14 = 42 m ππ = ππππ π −π = ππ = ππ π΄π +π π΄π = 32ππΏππ−π π£π−π π·π2 = 32×0.1×42×8.89 (25×10−3 )2 1911.47 ×103 ×1200×10−6 +5×103 700×10−6 = 1911.5 kPa = 10418.9 kPa The outlet pressure of the pump can then be calculated as πππ’π‘ = ππ + ππππ π −π = 10418.9 + 796.4 = 11215.3 kPa Pump power is then: πππ’ππ = πππ’ππ βπ = 2.55 × 10−3 × 11215.3 × 103 = 28.6 kW Circuit efficiency during lifting is therefore, π= πππ’π‘ πππ π×π£ =π ππ’ππ = 5000×3.64 28599 = 63.57% Alternative method to calculate pump power: πππ’ππ = πππ’π‘ + ππππ π −π + ππππ π −π Where ππππ π −π and ππππ π −π are the power losses in the piping connected to the blank-side and rodside of the cylinder, respectively, calculated as: ππππ π −π = ππππ π −π × ππ = 1911.5 × 103 × 4.36 × 10−3 = 8.34 kW ππππ π −π = ππππ π −π × ππ = 796.4 × 103 × 2.55 × 10−3 = 2.03 kW πππ’π‘ = 5000 × 3.64 = 18.2 kW πππ’ππ = 18.2 + 8.34 + 2.0 = 28.6 kW π= πππ’π‘ πππ π×π£ =π ππ’ππ = 5000×3.64 28599 = 63.57% The same approach may be used to calculate the efficiency for load speed π£π = 2π£π = 2 × 3.64 = 7.28 m/s. The outlet power in this case is πππ’π‘ = πΉ. π£ = 5000 × 7.28 = 36.4 kW 3 To calculate the power loss in the piping, the speed of flow in the blank-side and the rod-side piping π£π−π and π£π−π can be calculated from continuity as: π£π π΄π = π£π−π π΄π , π΄ 1200 π£π−π = π£π π΄π = 7.28 × 490.87 = 17.8 m/s π and π£π π΄π = π£π−π π΄π , π£π−π = π΄ π£π π π΄π = 7.28 × 700 490.87 = 10.38 m/s Reynolds numbers in the rod-side and the blank-side piping are calculated as: π ππ·−π = ππ£π−π π· 900 × 17.8 × 25 × 10−3 = = 4000 π 0.1 and π ππ·−π = ππ£π−π π· 900 × 10.38 × 25 × 10−3 = = 2336 π 0.1 Both π ππ·−π and π ππ·−π are above the critical value for laminar flow and the flow is turbulent in both pipes. Assuming a relative roughness of 0.01, the friction factors in the blank-side and the rod-side pipes are calculated using Haaland’s formula: −2 1.11 6.9 π ⁄π· π = (−1.8 log ( +( ) π π 3.7 )) From which we obtain: ππ = 0.05, ππ = 0.06 The frictional losses in the blank-side and rod-side pipes are therefore: ππππ π −π = ππ ππππ π −π = ππ 2 πΏππ−π ππ£π−π π·π ( 2 2 πΏππ−π ππ£π−π π·π ( 2 ) = 0.05 × 42 900×17.82 ( ) −3 25×10 2 30 = 11977 kPa 900×10.382 ) 2 ) = 0.06 × 25×10−3 ( = 3491 kPa The power loss in the blank side and rod-side piping is calculated as: ππππ π −π = ππππ π −π ππ = ππππ π −π (π£π−π π΄π ) = 11977 × 103 × (17.8 × 490.87 × 10−6 ) = 104.65 kW ππππ π −π = ππππ π −π ππ = ππππ π −π (π£π−π π΄π ) = 3491 × 103 × (10.38 × 490.87 × 10−6 ) = 17.79 kW πππ’ππ = πππ’π‘ + ππππ π −π + ππππ π −π πππ’ππ = 36.4 + 104.65 + 17.79 = 158.8 kW π= πππ’π‘ πππ 36.4 = 158.8 = 5000×3.64 28599 = 22.9 % 4 2.b Pump power and circuit efficiency during load lowering: Using the expression above for the power produced by the pump, πππ’ππ = πππ’ππ βπ, and observing that during the lowering of the load, pump flow is directed to the blank-side of the cylinder, πππ’ππ and βπ are calculated as: πππ’ππ = π£π π΄π = 3.64 × 1200 × 10−6 = 4.37 × 10−3 m3/s βπ = πππ’π‘ − πππ , πππ = πππ‘π = 0, πππ’π‘ = ππ + ππππ π −π ππππ π −π = 32ππΏππ−π π£π−π π·π2 where ππ is the pressure in the blank side of the cylinder, ππππ π −π is the pressure loss in the pipe connected to the rod side, and πΏππ−π is the equivalent length of the pipe connected to the blank side, calculated as πΏππ−π = 10 + 2 + 8 + 10 = 30 m. ππππ π −π = 32×0.1×30×8.89 (25×10−3 )2 = 1365.5 kPa The value of ππ may be calculated using a force balance on the piston as above. Assuming that the piston is moving with a constant speed downward, we have ∑ πΉ = 0, ππ π΄π − ππ π΄π − π = 0, ππ = ππ π΄π −π π΄π where ππ is the pressure in the rod side of the piston, calculated as ππ = πππ‘π + ππππ π −π = 0 + 32ππΏππ−π π£π−π π·π2 Considering gauge pressures, πππ‘π = 0, as above. The value of πΏππ−π , is: πΏππ−π = πΉπΊ + πΊπ» + π»πΌ + πΌπ½ = 10 + 8 + 10 + 14 = 42 m. Thus, ππ = ππ = ππ π΄π −π π΄π = 32×0.1×42×5.19 (25×10−3 )2 = 1116.1 kPa 1116.1×103 ×700×10−6 −5000 1200×10−6 = −3515.6 kPa πππ’π‘ = ππ + ππππ π −π = −3515.6 + 1365.5 = −2150.1 kPa πππ’ππ = πππ’ππ (πππ’π‘ − πππ ) = 4.37 × 10−3 × (−2150.1 × 103 − 0) = −9.4 kW The ‘power output’ at the load side is: πππ’π‘ = πΉ. π£ = −5000 × 3.64 = −18.2 kW The minus sign in the equation above indicates that the direction of the force is opposite to the load speed. Note that since both signs are negative, the output power of the system is at the pump side, and the input power is at the load. The efficiency therefore is: π= πππ’π‘ πππ 9.4 = 18.2 = 51.6 % 5 Calculations of the pump power and circuit efficiency when the load speed π£π = 2π£π = 7.28 m/s may proceed by considering the input power (at the load) to be: πππππ = πΉ. π£π = 5000 × 7.28 = 36.4 kW Power loss in the piping is calculated as above using π£π−π = 17.8 m/s and π£π−π = 10.38 m/s which give π ππ·−π = 4000 π ππ·−π = 2336, ππ = 0.05, and ππ = 0.06. The frictional losses in the blank-side and rod-side pipes are therefore: ππππ π −π = ππ ππππ π −π = ππ 2 πΏππ−π ππ£π−π π·π ( 2 2 πΏππ−π ππ£π−π π·π ( 2 900×17.82 ) 2 = 8554.7 kPa 900×10.382 ) 2 = 4887.3 kPa 30 ) = 0.05 × 25×10−3 ( 42 ) = 0.06 × 25×10−3 ( The power loss in the blank side and rod-side piping is calculated as: ππππ π −π = ππππ π −π ππ = ππππ π −π (π£π−π π΄π ) = 8554.7 × 103 × (17.8 × 490.87 × 10−6 ) = 74.75 kW ππππ π −π = ππππ π −π ππ = ππππ π −π (π£π−π π΄π ) = 4887.3 × 103 × (10.38 × 490.87 × 10−6 ) = 24.9 kW The power at the pump side is now the output power and is calculated as πππ’ππ = πππππ − ππππ π −π − ππππ π −π πππ’ππ = 36.4 − 74.75 − 24.9 = −63.25 kW π= πππ’π‘ πππ = −63.25 36.4 = 5000×3.64 28599 = −174 % The negative sign indicates that power is delivered to the system at both the load side and the pump side during the lowering state. This power is lost in the piping due to turbulent friction. 2.c Pump power and circuit efficiency during load holding: The power at the load side in this case is zero and so is the efficiency. The power consumed by the pump is calculated using πππ’ππ = πππ’ππ βπ = πππ’ππ (πππ’π‘ − πππ ) where πππ = πππ‘π = 0 and πππ’π‘ is estimated by assuming that pressure relief valve opens when the pressure at its inlet reached a certain margin above the maximum pump value calculated during the lifting of the load. This margin is called the shutoff margin for the pressure relief valve and we will assume it to be 110%. Assuming that the system is set to operate at a maximum load speed π£π = 2π£π and recalling that the rod side pressure loss calculate in section 2.a for this case was ππππ π −π = 3491 kPa, πππ’π‘ is found to be πππ’π‘ = 1.1 × (ππ + ππππ π −π ) = 1.1 × (10418.9 + 3491) = 15301 kPa Using πππ’ππ = 2.55 × 10−3 m3/s as above, the power consumed by the pump in this case is: πππ’ππ = πππ’ππ βπ = 2.55 × 10−3 × 15301 × 103 = 39kW We need to check that the pressure generated upstream the pressure relief valve is sufficient to overcome the resistance of the fully open pressure relief valve (equivalent length = 20 m) and segment I-J (equivalent length = 14 m). The pressure upstream the relief valve is πππ£ = πππ’π‘ − ππππ π −π΄π΅ where ππππ π −π΄π΅ is the pressure loss in segment AB, and is found to be: 6 ππππ π −π΄π΅ = ππ 2 πΏππ−π΄π΅ ππ£π−π π·π ( 2 ) = 0.06 × 10 900×10.382 ( ) 25×10−3 2 = 1163.7 kPa πππ£ = πππ’π‘ − ππππ π −π΄π΅ = 15301 − 1163.7 = 14137.3 kPa The friction factor and the fluid speed in the rod-side piping were used above. The pressure loss in the piping segment B-I-J pressure relief valve is calculated using the ππππ π −π΅πΌπ½ = ππ 2 πΏππ−π΅πΌπ½ ππ£π−π π·π ( 2 20+14 900×10.382 ) 2 ) = 0.06 × 25×10−3 ( = 3956.4 kPa As ππππ π −π΅πΌπ½ < πππ£ , the pressure loss in the piping B-I-J when the relief valve is fully open is less than the pressure the valve is set to open. The relief valve will thus open partially and is considered somehow oversized for this application. 3. Proposed Methods for Improving Efficiency: The table below lists and compares a number of proposed methods for improving the efficiency of the circuit. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Method Decrease the length of the piping Increase the piping area Use an open center directional control valve Use a variable displacement pump Use an unloading valve Notes May not be feasible due to location constraints. Reduces the critical load speed π£π at which the flow becomes turbulent. Cause an adverse effect if the circuit is designed to operate in the laminar region. Ok. But causes difficulties if more than one lifting station is to be installed on the same pump. Good solution. May increase the initial cost Best solution. Little effect on the initial cost 7