Lecture Recital
Student Name: First Last
Course Code: XYZ-123
Instructor: First Last
Performance Date: Select
Failed Attempt at
Standard
Below
Standard
Approaching
Standard
Meets
Standard
Exceeds
Standard
% Scaling
59
69
79
89
99
Thesis as an
organizing main
claim about the
material, and its
overarching
development
20
☐ Lecture lacks
any discernible
thesis, &/or
development of
any organizing
claim is either
lacking or illogical.
☐ Lecture thesis
lacks specific
insight, &/or its
development is
vague &/or at
times incorrect.
☐ Lecture thesis is
appropriately solid,
if basic, and its
development is
clearly logical and
accurate.
☐ Lecture thesis
is insightful and
forecasts the
descriptive and
reflective
development of
most or all claims.
☐ Lecture thesis is
truly unique, and
contained within it is
the essence of what is
mature development
of all claims.
20
☐ Scope of
content is not
reflective of the
thesis &/or is
characterized by
either irrelevant
detail or none at
all.
☐ Scope of
content is
generally
comprehensive of
the thesis but lacks
relevant specificity.
☐ Scope of
content is
comprehensive of
the thesis and
characterized by
relevant specificity.
☐ Scope of
content is
comprehensive of
the thesis and
characterized by
nuanced
specificity.
☐ Scope of content is
comprehensive of the
thesis and
characterized by
refreshing, or
unexpected,
specificity.
☐ Depth of
experience in all
aspects (creative,
performance,
scholarly) is
entirely shallow.
☐ Depth of
experience in any
one or more of all
aspects (creative,
performance,
scholarly) is largely
shallow.
☐ Depth of
experience in all
aspects (creative,
performance,
scholarly) is
developmentally
appropriate.
☐ Depth of
experience in all
aspects (creative,
performance,
scholarly) is
reflective of
maturation.
☐ Depth of
experience in all
aspects (creative,
performance,
scholarly) reflects
professional maturity.
☐ Register is
inappropriate to
purpose &/or
setting; diction and
any use of
figurative language
is characterized by
misappropriation/
misunderstanding;
grammar errors
are pervasive and
impede meaning.
☐ Register
fluctuates between
approp-riate and
inapprop-riate;
diction and any use
of figurative
language is
pedestrian, if not
trite; grammar
errors are
noticeable but do
not impede
meaning.
☐ Register is
appropriate to
general purpose
and fixed setting;
diction and the use
of figurative
language are apt;
any grammar
errors are of the
common/colloquial
variety so as to be
often overlooked
on hearing.
☐ Register is
appropriate to
specific purpose
and accounts for
the live setting;
diction and the
use of figurative
language is
mature; grammar
errors are few
and generally
attributable to
extemporaneity.
☐ Register is
appropriate to unique
purpose and
extremely responsive
to the live setting;
diction and the use of
figurative language is
fresh; grammar errors
are nearly nonexistent
or unnoticeable.
Criteria
Scope of content
researched and
covered, as
warranted by
the thesis and
considerations
for its
development
Depth of
experience with
the creative,
performance
&/or scholarly
aspects of the
material
Language use as
characterized by
register (for a
particular
purpose or in a
particular
setting); diction
and figurative
language; and
grammar
%
Weight
20
20
© 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Criteria
%
Weight
% Scaling
Credibility and
relevance of
expert sources
20
Failed Attempt at
Standard
Below
Standard
Approaching
Standard
Meets
Standard
Exceeds
Standard
59
69
79
89
99
☐ Some sources
are of questionable
credibility &/or
relevance.
☐ Primary and
secondary sources
are credible.
☐ All sources are
not only credible
but also varied.
☐ All sources are not
only authoritative and
varied but also
compelling.
☐ Lacks any
credible &/or
relevant sources.
Enter comments here.
e-Signature 1: Sign this form electronically.
Title:
Enter your title.
e-Signature 2: Sign this form electronically.
Title:
Enter your title.
e-Signature 3: Sign this form electronically.
Title:
Enter your title.
2