beyond HEVC

advertisement
BEYOND HEVC:
[BH1] J. Chen et al, “Coding tools investigation for next generation video coding based on
HEVC”, [9599 – 47], SPIE. Optics + photonics, San Diego, California, USA, 9 – 13, Aug. 2015.
[BH2] A. Alshin et al, “Coding efficiency improvements beyond HEVC with known tools,” [959948], SPIE. Optics + photonics, San Diego, California, USA, 9 – 13, Aug. 2015. References [2] through [8]
describe various proposals related to NGVC (beyond HEVC) as ISO / IEC JTC – VC documents presented in
Warsaw, Poland, June 2015. Several Projects can be implemented / explored based on [BH2] and these
references.
Projects on BEYOND HEVC:
[BH-P1] In [BH2] several tools (some of these are straight forward extensions of those adopted in HVEC)
are considered in NGVC (beyond HEVC). Some of these are increasing CU and TU sizes, upto 64 adaptive
intra directional predictions, multi – hypothesis probability estimation for CABAC, bi-directional optical
flow, secondary transform, rotational transform and multi-parameter intra prediction. Go through [BH2]
in detail and evaluate the performance of each new tool, for all – intra, random access, low delay B and
low delay P (see Table 1). Compare the computational complexity of each tool with that of HEVC.
[BH-P2] See [BH-P1]. Evaluate performance impact of enlarging CU and TU sizes (see Table 2). Also
consider computational complexity.
[BH-P3] See [BH-P1]. Evaluate performance impact of fine granularity Intra prediction vs HEVC with
enlarged CU and TU sizes (see Table 3). Also consider computational complexity.
[BH-P4] See [BH-P1]. Evaluate performance impact of multi-hypothesis probability estimation vs HEVC
with enlarged CU and TU sizes (see Table 4). Also consider computational complexity.
[BH-P5] See [BH-P1]. Evaluate performance impact of bi-directional optical flow vs HEVC with enlarged
CU and TU sizes (see Table 6). Also consider computational complexity.
[BH-P6] See [BH-P1]. Evaluate performance impact of implicit secondary transform vs HEVC with
enlarged CU and TU sizes (see Table 7). Also consider computational complexity.
[BH-P7] See [BH-P1]. Evaluate performance impact of explicit secondary transform vs HEVC with
enlarged CU and TU sizes (see Table 9). Also consider computational complexity.
[BH-P8] See [BH-P1]. Evaluate performance impact of multi-parameter Intra prediction vs HEVC with
enlarged CU and TU sizes (see Table 11). Also consider computational complexity.
[BH-P9] See [BH-P1]. Evaluate Joint performance impact of all tested tools on top of HEVC (see Table 6).
Also consider computational complexity.
Download