CANADA FIRST RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FUND
File number: (leave blank)
APPLICATION FORM PART B:
SCIENTIFIC STRATEGY
The Canada First Research Excellence Fund (the Fund) application form for Competition 1 of the Fund consists
of two parts:
 Application Form Part A: Institutional Strategy and Proposal Summary
 Application Form Part B: Scientific Strategy
Completed applications must include one Part A and one or more parts B (one Part B for each scientific area
of focus). Each eligible institution can only submit one application.
The completed application form (parts A and B) must be uploaded in the Fund’s application portal by 9 p.m.
(eastern), March 2, 2015.
Institution:
Title of scientific strategy
Research Thematic Area(s)
Research thematic area(s):
Keywords:
Research Disciplines ("Click Here for List of Codes")
Primary code:
Discipline name:
Secondary code:
Discipline name :
Secondary code:
Discipline name :
Secondary code:
Discipline name :
Secondary code:
Discipline name :
PROTECTED WHEN COMPLETED
1
CANADA FIRST RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FUND
Proposal Summary
Provide a 100-word summary describing the scientific strategy that will enable the institution to excel globally in
this research area and create long-term economic advantages for Canada. Outline the main elements of
the proposed research initiative and the nature of the high-level activities to be funded. This summary will be
used in the peer review process, as well as for publicity and program communications purposes. Please use
plain language.
Alignment with Federal Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy Priority Research
Areas
Check the box(es) indicating the research area(s) and, if applicable, subarea(s) most relevant to your proposal.
Refer to the strategy website for further information on these priority areas.
Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy Priority Research areas
Environment and Agriculture
Water: Health, energy, security
Biotechnology
Aquaculture
Sustainable methods of accessing energy and mineral resources from unconventional sources
Food and food systems
Climate change research and technology
Disaster mitigation
Health and Life Sciences
Neuroscience and mental health
Regenerative medicine
Health in an aging population
Biomedical engineering and medical technologies
Natural Resources and Energy
Arctic: Responsible development and monitoring
Bioenergy, fuel cells and nuclear energy
Bio-products
Pipeline safety
PROTECTED WHEN COMPLETED
2
CANADA FIRST RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FUND
Information and Communications Technologies
New media, animation and games
Communications networks and services
Cybersecurity
Advanced data management and analysis
Machine-to-machine systems
Quantum computing
Advanced Manufacturing
Automation (including robotics)
Lightweight materials and technologies
Additive manufacturing
Quantum materials
Nanotechnology
Aerospace
Automotive
Partners
Please list all presently secured and potential partners for this scientific strategy. A partner is an institution or
organization, rather than an individual. Do not list every institution or organization with which a faculty member in
the area of research may have a professional relationship or with whom they have co-published. Partners are
contributing partners with a defined and very concrete role to play in the implementation of the strategy. These
roles reflect strategic alliances and collaborations at the institution level. Partners listed as potential partners in
the Notice of Intent (NOI) should now be secured. List as potential (e.g., international) partners only those that
have been approached and whose involvement is planned for the latter years of the initiative or is dependent on
completing earlier phases of the initiative. In their performance measurement plan, institutions must demonstrate
a process to monitor progress with secured partners and to secure the commitments of potential partners. A
reminder that competition 1 is aimed at those institutions that already have detailed plans in place to meet the
ambitious objectives of the Fund, and whose initiatives are fully developed and ready to implement. Competition
2 is available to institutions that need more time to develop their plans, proposals and partnerships.
PROTECTED WHEN COMPLETED
3
CANADA FIRST RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FUND
Secured Partners
Potential Partners
Canadian postsecondary institutions
eligible to the Fund:
Universities and their affiliated
institutions
Canadian postsecondary institutions
eligible to the Fund:
Colleges and Polytechnics:
Other Canadian Research
Organizations
Academic and Research Institutes
abroad (indicate name and country)
Private Sector in Canada and abroad
(including not-for-profit
organizations)
Public Sector in Canada and abroad
Philanthropic Organizations in
Canada and abroad
Other (specify)
PROTECTED WHEN COMPLETED
4
CANADA FIRST RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FUND
Proposed Use of Funds
Budget for implementation of the scientific strategy
Indicate the sources of funding, and how funds will be used, among the two categories of eligible expenses
(direct and indirect costs) for the implementation of this scientific strategy. Note that funding requested for and
allocated to the institutional strategy must be outlined in the accompanying Application Form Part A: Institutional
Strategy and Proposal Summary. The amounts indicated in the table below should be rounded to the nearest
10,000, and should correspond to the total planned expenditures over the duration of the grant. Please refer to
the Canada First Research Excellence Fund website for details on eligible costs under each expense category.
Include planned expenses to be incurred as of September 1, 2015. Include contributions (one-time and ongoing)
committed and available as of September 1, 2015 (not retroactive). Other relevant contributions (one-time and
ongoing) committed and available prior to September 1, 2015, can be reflected in the attachments. Do not
include funds from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), Social Sciences and
Humanities Research Council (SSHRC), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), any tri-agency
program, or the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI).
PROTECTED WHEN COMPLETED
5
CANADA FIRST RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FUND
Scientific Strategy Budget Table (Part B): Direct Costs of Research
Category of expense
Funding
requested
from the Fund
Funding from
the lead
institution
Funding from
eligible
partner
institutions
Secured contributions from
other sources
Cash
In-kind
Direct costs of research (if applicable)
Compensationrelated expenses
$
$
$
$
$
Recruitment and
relocation
$
$
$
$
$
Travel and
subsistence
$
$
$
$
$
Sabbatical/research
leave
$
$
$
$
$
Equipment and
supplies
$
$
$
$
$
Computers and
electronic
communications
$
$
$
$
$
Dissemination of
research results
$
$
$
$
$
Services and
miscellaneous
expenses
$
$
$
$
$
Other direct cost
expense categories,
not eligible under
the Fund
$0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Subtotal (1)
PROTECTED WHEN COMPLETED
6
CANADA FIRST RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FUND
Scientific Strategy Budget Table (Part B): Indirect Costs of Research
Category of expense
Funding
requested
from the Fund
Funding from
the lead
institution
Funding from
eligible
partner
institutions
Secured contributions from
other sources
Cash
In-kind
Indirect costs of research (if applicable)
Research facilities
$
$
$
$
$
Research resources
$
$
$
$
$
Management and
administration of
research enterprise
$
$
$
$
$
Regulatory
requirements and
accreditation
$
$
$
$
$
Intellectual property
$
$
$
$
$
Other indirect cost
expense categories,
not eligible under
the Fund
$0
$
$
$
$
Subtotal (2)
$
$
$
$
$
Total Part B: Direct and Indirect Costs of Research
Category of expense
Total Part B
(Subtotals 1 + 2)
Funding
requested
from the Fund
Funding from
the lead
institution
Funding from
eligible
partner
institutions
$
$
$
Secured contributions from
other sources
Cash
$
In-kind
$
The total funding requested from the Fund for this scientific strategy must correspond to the total budget listed in
the accompanying Application Form Part A: Institutional Strategy and Proposal Summary.
The total funding requested to cover the indirect costs of research cannot exceed 25 per cent of the total grant
amount. However, the funding requested to cover the indirect costs of research in any of Part A and Part/parts B
can exceed 25 per cent of the total requested for that Part.
PROTECTED WHEN COMPLETED
7
CANADA FIRST RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FUND
Instructions for Completing Part B
1. Context
In Part B, institutions must present a scientific strategy that addresses the Fund’s selection criteria 1 and 2 (see
below). A scientific strategy must comprise a high-level research program or initiative in an institutional priority
research area of focus. Part B must describe in detail how the grant would be used to achieve the scientific
strategy’s stated objectives. It should demonstrate evidence of the institution’s existing strengths/capacity,
international position and reputation in the priority area, as well as the potential and promise of the program of
research over the duration of the award, in terms of scientific impact at a global level, societal (including
economic) impacts, as well as impact on the institution’s position of global excellence and global leadership in
the research area. Part B must also demonstrate alignment with the Government of Canada’s science,
technology and innovation priority areas.
Part B will be used to assess the elements related to selection criteria 1 and 2:
Criterion 1: Scientific merit and demonstrated capacity to lead on an international scale

level of excellence of the existing research underpinning the proposed initiative;

institution’s faculty research strength in the proposed area(s);

quality of the institution’s relevant research facilities, as well as of the opportunities and environments for
research training;

originality and positioning of the proposed research with respect to existing national and international
capacity;

potential for the proposed research to provide breakthrough impact on a global scale; and

potential for the institution to demonstrate global research leadership in the proposed area(s).
Criterion 2: Strategic relevance to Canada
 potential for the proposed research to create long-term economic advantages for Canada;
 alignment of the proposed initiative with the Government of Canada’s science, technology and innovation
priority research areas (note that only initiatives aligned with the Government’s priority research areas will
be funded);
 potential for the research results to foster innovation (e.g., to create or build upon commercial endeavours,
advance public policy or otherwise mobilize research discoveries); and
 ability of the proposed initiative to leverage additional resources and promote knowledge mobilization
through partnerships with:
o the private sector;
o international research institutions; and/or
o public sector, academic and philanthropic organizations, both in Canada and abroad.
The intended audience for Part B is experts in the areas of research.
2. General content instructions
Part B must include:
 this form;
 a maximum 12- to 15-page document that provides the details of the scientific strategy (see instructions in
section 3 below);
 a budget justification (maximum four pages; see instructions in section 4 below); and
PROTECTED WHEN COMPLETED
8
CANADA FIRST RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FUND
 letters of support from any partner, including other eligible Canadian postsecondary institutions, who will
play a concrete role in the implementation of the scientific strategy, if applicable.
All of the above must be uploaded in the Fund application portal by the application deadline (see instructions in
section 5 below).
3. Scientific strategy
Page limit
This attachment should normally be 12 pages, and (for larger-scale initiatives) must not exceed 15 pages. Any
extra pages or materials other than what is requested will be removed. Graphs, illustrations and scientific
references may be included, but will count as part of the page total. Either single- or double-column presentation
of text, graphs and illustrations is acceptable.
Presentation
The lead institution’s name must appear at the top of each page. Number all pages. Use 12-point or larger
Times New Roman font. Paper must be 8 ½” x 11” (21.5 cm x 28 cm). All page margins must be set at a
minimum of ¾” (1.87 cm).
Headings
Information must be provided under the six headings below. Provide the information requested, as well as any
other relevant information that relates to the criteria.
The scale of reference for all evidence, indicators and data is to demonstrate leadership in a global context.
Criterion 1: Scientific merit and demonstrated capacity to lead on an international scale
Heading 1: Existing Strengths/Capacity: This section must describe the institution’s existing
strengths/capacity, international position and reputation in the priority area. Address the following elements:
Level of excellence of the existing research. Demonstrate that the existing research underpinning the
proposed initiative is world-leading, as evidenced by the institution’s degree of commitment to foster and
enhance the proposed area over time and how this scientific strategy fits within confirmed strategic priorities of
the institution. For example:
 institutional investments in the research area over the past five years, such as the trend in the number of
current faculty positions, Canada Excellence Research Chairs, Canada Research Chairs, prestigious
industrial and endowed chairs and other similar positions devoted to this research area over the past five
years (provide a table of relevant trends in number of faculty and Chair positions in this research area and
the appropriate comparison data for other research areas of comparable size at the institution as well as
averages for the institution as a whole). Avoid subjective information (e.g., “have hired aggressively in this
area”) and provide concrete data and comparison data to demonstrate the extent to which excellence in
this area has been developed as a clear priority; and
 internal research support from the institution (in particular, competitively allocated and externally
reviewed).
Explain how your institution’s demonstrated priority and commitment to this area compares with that of
competing research centres globally (postsecondary or other) and with the support that these competitors have
access to (i.e., government priority funding; private sector commitments to a specific geography, etc.).
Existing faculty research strength. Outline the strengths of the institution’s faculty in the proposed area,
including (for example):
 key researchers involved in the research area(s); identify their sub-areas of focus, their most important
research contributions and any highly prestigious international prizes/awards;
 significant research issues in this area where researchers at your institution have provided insights,
contributions and advances in the last five years, situating your comments in a global context;
 current involvement in major national and international collaborations in this research area, including role
of key researchers and institutions; and
PROTECTED WHEN COMPLETED
9
CANADA FIRST RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FUND
 evidence of international leadership in the area, using indicators such as, for example, comparative
citation data on institutional publications in the research area where bibliometrics are appropriate (not all
research areas) and/or patents (in particular those that are being used), creation of novel products and
processes, spin-off companies, etc.
Quality of the institution’s relevant research facilities. Indicate the quality of the institution’s relevant
research facilities, as evidenced by, for example:
 institutional investment in the research facilities related to this area over the past five years (e.g.,
investments in space, infrastructure, labs, libraries, databases, data repositories, etc.; overhead; special
administrative support);
 recruitment of researchers and trainees that is based primarily on access to these facilities;
 quality and suitability of current relevant research facilities (unique, leading-edge);
 use by researchers from other national and international research groups; and
 competitive/peer-reviewed allocation of access to these facilities.
Quality of the opportunities and environments for research training. Indicate the quality of the opportunities
and environments for research training as evidenced by the following, for example:
 Institutional investments in training in the research area over the past five years, such as new graduate
and undergraduate programs and courses, and innovative initiatives for enriched training environments
(e.g., multidisciplinary, technician training, etc.), such as mobility and hosting of trainees to experience
other research groups (public and private) and facilities (national, international and remote access where
applicable). To be cited, these initiatives should extend beyond cultural exchanges, study abroad or
standard co-op placements. They should involve high value-added training that set trainees apart in their
area (joint degrees, integrated modules of curriculum with partners, summer graduate schools, unique
facilities and know-how and joint supervision with world-leading groups, etc.).
 Data on research trainees enrolled and graduated per annum for five years (split by masters, PhD,
postdoctoral) in the research area, including information on highly prestigious student scholarships and
awards offered by the institution or held by trainees recruited to the institution.
 Data on placement of graduates (including employment) and recruitment of trainees both to and from
other world-leading research centres and groups (public and private).
Heading 2: Proposed Science, Technology and Innovation Strategy (i.e., scientific strategy): This section
must describe the high-level research initiative for the proposed research area(s) over the duration of the grant,
addressing the prospective elements below, and others as appropriate.
Originality and positioning of the proposed research. Provide information and insights on what makes the
proposed science original with respect to existing national and international capacity, including:
 originality of the research directions and the combined disciplines and expertise;
 how and why this research will set the institution apart;
 the institution’s comparative strength in the area, as evidenced by (for example):
o list those national and international institutions/centres that are comparable and/or key contenders
as leaders on an international scale in the research area;
o indicate what comparative advantages and disadvantages your institution has and will have in this
research area in relation to global competitors (provide evidence to back up statements); and
o describe the institution’s strategy and approach to research collaborations and to recruitment, for
example, as means to complement the institution’s comparative advantages/disadvantages relative
to global competitors.
Potential for the proposed research to provide breakthrough impact on a global scale. Provide insights
and evidence of the expected contributions and impacts on the research area(s), for example:
 Outline the future directions in research and development that will be enabled by the initiative.
 Describe the current state of the research area your institution is proposing and how this initiative has the
prospect of leading to transformative or paradigm shifting research activities and results.
 Provide a description of the expected impacts in science, technology and innovation at a global level, of
the proposed research program.
 Identify, as much as possible, the measurable research outcomes and impacts during and after the seven
years of the grant.
PROTECTED WHEN COMPLETED
10
CANADA FIRST RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FUND
Potential for the institution to demonstrate global research leadership in the proposed area(s). Describe
how the institution plans to build on its current strengths and provide evidence of the potential for this to
enhance/consolidate a leadership position in this research area(s).
Provide a high-level description of how the institution will use funds to maintain and enhance its position in this
priority research area of focus (do not duplicate content of the Budget Justification), for example:
 Describe how future plans for commitment of internal resources will enable the institution to achieve its
objectives and those of the Fund, explain to what extent these are incremental relative to the current state
described above under existing strengths;
 Outline talent management and succession plans over time for any key leadership in this area of
research;
 The space, infrastructure, research facilities and other support that the institution will secure/provide; and
 The expectations of the initiative in the training of students and researchers (consider competencies and
demand for highly qualified personnel in this research area and related sectors).
Indicate how your institution will seek to position itself in an enhanced leadership position in this research area
(within a time horizon of five to seven years), for example:
 the role of the initiative within the institution, group, and/or centre in relation to existing faculty within the
institution;
 how the current and any new faculty recruited in this particular research area are critical at this time to the
development of Canadian research in this area, in the context of international knowledge and activity; and
 the role of this science, technology and innovation strategy nationally and internationally.
Criterion 2: Strategic relevance to Canada
Heading 3: Potential for the proposed research area to create long-term economic advantages. Describe
the prospective benefits to Canada from the strategy proposed. Be as concrete and specific as possible. For
example:
 Indicate how the initiative will improve Canada’s research capacity (e.g., the extent to which a critical
mass would be built in the area, the competitive advantage that would be developed, how Canada’s
reputation as a magnet for talent and centre of research excellence would be strengthened).
 Explain how the proposed science, technology and innovation strategy will, where appropriate:
o improve Canada’s social, cultural and economic prosperity and resilience;
o improve the health and quality of life of Canadians; and
o result in economic advantages (e.g., the extent to which transfer of knowledge to the marketplace, the
building of a culture of innovation in business, facilitating the generation of wealth from
commercialization, etc., would occur).
 Describe how the strategy will improve Canada’s position and influence in the world.
 Indicate any other economic advantages to Canada.
 Discuss the longer-term prospects from this strategy, such as plans to sustain the momentum created by
the grant and capitalize on the advantage provided by the seven-year funding; and plans to extend the
reach of the institutional activities in this research area, during the tenure, and after the expiry, of the
grant. Be as concrete as possible in your plans, including any targets for growth and long-term funding
prospects, where possible providing firm financial commitments (salaries, infrastructure, etc.)
Heading 4: Alignment of the proposed initiative with the Government of Canada’s science, technology
and innovation priority research areas (note that only initiatives aligned with the Government’s priority
research areas will be funded).
o Describe how the proposed science, technology and innovation strategy will contribute to advancing
the Government of Canada’s science, technology and innovation priority research areas and/or subpriority areas;
o Describe the extent to which there is alignment with provincial and territorial priorities; and
o Explain what other Canadian groups and organizations (all sectors) are active in this research area,
the focus of those activities, and how your institutional initiative will relate to those activities.
PROTECTED WHEN COMPLETED
11
CANADA FIRST RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FUND
Heading 5: Potential for the research results to foster innovation. Provide information and insights on a
knowledge mobilization strategy including plans for innovation, commercialization, contribution to public policy,
etc. (e.g., to create or build upon commercial endeavours, advance public policy or otherwise mobilize research
discoveries).
o Outline how benefits will be realized and provide information on the institution’s track record. For
example:
 Describe the plans to engage with knowledge users at all stages of the research, from the
formulation of the research questions to the design of research projects to the transfer of
results;
 Identify the key receptors (firms, not-for-profits and governments) of the innovations and
insights from the research and describe existing institutional partnerships and linkages with
these receptors;
 Identify current challenges and barriers as well as opportunities to enhance the impact and
use of research findings in this area. Please comment with respect to factors that are
specific to this area, and specific to this institution and its major partners. Discuss the
institution’s plans to mitigate these challenges, overcome these barriers and seize these
opportunities;
 Explain how the institution will facilitate linkages with users of the research outputs and
outcomes; and
 Provide information on the track record of your institution in knowledge translation,
knowledge mobilization and/or technology transfer in this area. Describe what structures
and policies exist to facilitate interactions with external receptors—knowledge translation,
knowledge mobilization and/or technology transfer. Outline the institutional intellectual
property policy and its application in this area.
Heading 6: Ability of the proposed initiative to leverage additional resources and promote knowledge
mobilization through partnerships. Provide evidence of the potential to leverage contributions with the private
sector; international research institutions; and/or public sector, academic and philanthropic organizations, both in
Canada and abroad. Outline the institutional plan for leverage of additional resources during the tenure of the
grant and thereafter. For example:
o describe both secured and potential partners, and leveraged funding; and
o demonstrate that the initiative will have the appropriate resources to enable world-leading research
capacity.
Support your plan with information on the following:
1) Past success in leverage of funds for the institution as a whole and in this research area (targets set
and percentage met), including:
o externally sponsored research (provide data on sponsored research revenue for the past five years);
o external partner funding for the capital costs of relevant Canada Foundation for Innovation projects
acquired over the past five years; and
o endowed chairs and centres at your institution.
2) Prospective leverage in the research area:
o key partners who have expressed an interest in collaborating;
o federal (e.g., tri-agency and CFI) and non-federal funding sources and programs that will be
accessed for operating funds and used to build and strengthen the initiative. (Note: any funding from
NSERC, SSHRC, CIHR (including tri-agency programs) and CFI funds can be discussed here but
not included in the Proposed Use of Funds table in this Form as contributions from other sources);
o other funding sources; and
o outline overall expectations of leveraged funding for this science, technology and innovation
strategy.
Be as concrete as possible in your projections, indicating targets that the institution has set.
PROTECTED WHEN COMPLETED
12
CANADA FIRST RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FUND
4. Budget justification
Page limit
This attachment should not exceed four pages. Graphs and tables are encouraged. In some exceptional cases
(e.g., if a large number of partners are involved), the Chairs Secretariat may accept longer budget justifications.
Please contact the Secretariat to verify appropriateness before submitting a longer justification section.
Format
Information should be presented in the same order as in the budget table.
Presentation
The institution’s name must appear at the top of each page. Number all pages. Use 12-point or larger Times
New Roman font. Paper must be 8 ½” x 11” (21.5 cm x 28 cm). All page margins must be set at a minimum of ¾”
(1.87 cm).
Content
The budget justification should include the following (within page limit):




Clarification concerning the timing of specific planned expenditures (e.g., if certain costs are expected to
be defrayed at the beginning of the grant only). The Secretariat recommends including a table
summarizing the planned expenditures on an annual basis.
Detailed descriptions of partners’ contributions (cash or in-kind), including the timing and duration of
such contributions. The Secretariat recommends including a table summarizing the annual planned
contributions of partners and other sources.
Clarification concerning whether internal resources to be committed are incremental to the current state.
If the lead institution plans to transfer a portion of the grant to other Canadian postsecondary institutions
that are eligible under the Fund, a clear outline of the timelines and the amounts to be transferred.
5. Submitting the application
The application must be uploaded in the Canada First Research Excellence Fund application portal by 9 p.m.
eastern, March 2, 2015. Each Part B Form (without instructions pages 7 to 14) and its attachments (see section
2 above) must consist of a single, integrated true PDF document (i.e., a searchable document—not a scanned
image) titled: Part B-Institution Name-Title or Research Area.
6. Suggested reviewers (optional)
If applicable, to request that the Secretariat not invite an individual(s) to review the application, send an email to
information@cfref-apogee.gc.ca with a clear subject line, referencing the institution and the relevant Part B
proposal.
The institution may suggest up to three potential reviewers for each scientific strategy, if these differ from the
suggestions already provided at the Notice of Intent stage. Provide the information outlined in the table below on
a separate page, identifying clearly the institution and the relevant Part B proposal.
Submission: an attachment with suggested reviewers must not be included in the single integrated PDF
document for Part B. It must be uploaded as a separate PDF document entitled: Part B-Institution Name-Title or
Research Area-Suggested Reviewers.
Reviewers cannot:
 be a faculty member at a Canadian institution (excluding adjunct professors);

be affiliated with the applicant institution(s) (including hospitals and research institutes) or with an
organization receiving financial support from that institution;

have held a position at the institution(s) applying to the program in the last five years;
PROTECTED WHEN COMPLETED
13
CANADA FIRST RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FUND

be involved in the proposed program of research;

be a potential recruit for this Scientific Strategy; or

be in a position to directly benefit from the outcome.
Reviewers should be able to evaluate the full application (Part A and the relevant Part B), in the language in
which it is written. The program’s administration reserves the right to make the final selection of reviewers for
any Part B (scientific strategy), and may opt not to use any of the suggested reviewers.
Surname or family name:
Given name and initials:
Department/faculty/division:
Title or position:
Institution:
Country:
Area of expertise:
Email address:
Surname or family name:
Given name and initials:
Department/faculty/division:
Title or position:
Institution:
Country:
Area of expertise:
Email address:
Surname or family name:
Given name and initials:
Department/faculty/division:
Title or position:
Institution:
Country:
Area of expertise:
Email address:
PROTECTED WHEN COMPLETED
14