Lesson 2.5- Aesthetics and Design 2 Beauty, Style, and Vision Architectural beauty: correct use of a design language Even uneducated viewer would see something is wrong Each order is designed to function as a system Surface sensation? Or perception of a deeper quality? … more abstract Image and Reality Ex). Elm tree: o Concepts exist forever o Remembering, recognizing that ideal tree Plato: beauty = “recognition” of transcendent ideal Platonic solids: cube, sphere, cone, cylinder, pyramid Idealism: earthly “beauty” just reflects “true” beauty Gothic Proportions: Villard de Honnecourt, 1230s Medieval design: geometry, proportion, and magic Numbers link design to the spiritual realm, religious symbolism Alberti: continues belief that numbers = beauty Alberti: In Search of the Orders Trying to understand order through: scholarship (Vitruvius) vs. empiricsm (what was in Rome already): the “truth???” Roman buildings: don’t match Vitruvius The Colosseum would be confusing to him: o Columns: front porches, flat wallpaper o Orders aren’t doing structural work: instead they are decorative Alberti and Beauty: What is good design? Use style in an authentic way… but what is authentic?? Beauty= powerful (preseves reputation): even protective Alberti’s definition: o Universal, important: lack = “offensive” (building without beauty is offensive) Poor values, disrespectful o Beauty: objective, absolute: aesthetics “perfected” over time o Harmony: proportion, geometry, bilateral symmetry o Ornament: (he distinguishes this): added on, “complements” beauty (order) Alberti’s designs: reveal his belief in geometry, proportion o Building can be beautiful just with these two ideas o “Beauty is that reasoned harmony of all the parts within a body, so that nothing may be added, taken away, or altered, but for the worse.” Ancient and Modern Renaissance style: modified hybrid Blends orders, ancient models, and abstract ideas of harmony Tempietto: old columns, new uses o Serlio said it was “as good as the ancients” o Bramante designed this in Rome Classicism Ancient-style architecture = new “standard” “Classic”: model, prototype that transcends time Architectural classicism: follows ancient model Power of association: banks and stability, treasure W. Strickland, Second Bank of the U.S., Philadelphia, Doric Temple Style Classical architecture: “outside” time and place o Like a bank in a strip mall; takes you somewhere timeless and dignified Mobile Architecture Books: take antiquity, All’antica style anywhere Measured drawings = build your own classical temple!!! Serlio’s most popular: the orders, ancient examples Spread classicism to Northern Europe (esp. France): everyone needs to appreciate ancient beauty… if you don’t its your fault!!! France: Be Sure We’re Sure French: first to officially adopt new Italian style Academy System: devoted to classical aesthetics o Louis 14th: authority, image, certainty, eternity He wanted to be sure everyone knew he was in authority, look at his portrait!!! o Vs: philosopher Rene Descartes: reason and truth, plain dude o French adademies used TRUTH The Rules Francois Blondel: first director, Academy of Architecture Background: mathematician, engineer, classicist (NOT architect) Course on Architecture (1675): o All great architecture derives from classical tradition Greeks and Romans o Bad: Medieval architecture, “individual fantasy” o One valid standard of “universal beauty” through proportions If you wanted a good building, follow the rules One Small Problem Serlio: The Five Orders (1537) Renaissance “doctrine”: five orders But: published drawings inconsistent French Academy said the Italains were wrong! o King sends emissaries to measure (Italians = “unreliable”) o French survey: still no “right” proportions Was there a right way to ensure that beauty was as perfect as possible? Perrault: WHO CARES!? Claude Perrault: doctor, scientist Rational solution: use the average of all known examples, stop worrying if it’s perfect Authority, perfection – impossible Renaissance “antiquity”: vague, huge French insistence on precision = uncertainty Which antiquity? “Classical” becomes more complex during the 1700s Birth of archaeology: scientific study of past New access to Greece: a different classicism o At least 2 very different and distinct flavors of classism Classical Confusion Temple of the Olympian Zeus, Athens vs. Temple of Concordia, Akragas (Siciliy) o Which of these temples is actually “Greek” o The Roman one!! Oh shit o Figuring out history: highly complicated! The Best Art Ever Architecture, you have to understand which field you’re studying Birth of Art History: analysis of style and culture …. Sculpture is huge here Johann Winckelmann, German Librarian, curator of Vatican sculpture collection History of Art of Antiquity (1764): Greek art = best Seeks “ideal” vs. “natural”, imperfect beauty Peak: 5th-4th C. BCE: “Classical” period Hellenistic and Roman art: “Art of the Imitators” Debate: Greece vs. Rome “Classicism”= not just one authoritative system; multiple, evolving uses of a flexible language Two alternate, competing measures of beauty Judging Classicism “Classical style” requires difficult decisions Is there anything stable, absolute left to use? What is really embodied by classical beauty? What made something beautiful was its overall form Classical Ideals Le Corbusier: obsessed with classicism, beauty, perfection Goal: capture abstract aesthetic essence of classicism Simple surfaces, pure volumes, harmonic proportions He hated all the decorative stuff in architecture “Architecture is the masterly, correct, and magnificent play of volumes in light.” – Le Corbusier Basically the Same Comparisons of Le Corbusier’s villa Garches and Palladio’s Villa Malcontenta from Colin Rowe, “The Mathematics of the Ideal Villa”, 1947 Act of design was still pursuit of qualities that resonate with the eyes and soul Beauty and Design Le Corbusier: beauty = result of “rationality” in design Maillart: concrete bridge design = strictly economical Saw the architect as an artist, their job was to make something beautiful, different Beauty: formula, or instinct? What about creativity?