Ciara Barrett The Voice of a Girl: Adolescent Female Performance in Hollywood Musicals of the Late 1930s Presented at the Irish Screen Studies Seminar 2014. Full details at irishscreenstudies.ie Charting trend towards the juvenation of the female musical star over the course of the 1930s, which was both theoretical and literal Representational paradigm shift: trend towards the individuation of female musical stars with the concretization of the musical syntax predicated on the “Platonic ideal of integration” At the same time, increasingly conservative impulses of Hollywood filmmaking practices and ideology created the need to downplay the overt eroticism of female performances, thus the recourse to the girlchild whose erotic spectacularity can be disavowed by virtue of her ostensible pre-sexuality However, ultimately these girl-stars’s performances cannot fully be contained within a traditionally gendered politics of viewing o Temple explodes the myth of the spontaneous immanence of the talented female performer o Durbin and Garland’s representation show the instability of the adolescent girl star as a coherent sign of generic meaning: the visual and aural aspects of her performance-as-sign have continually to be reconciled via her filmic representation Between 1935 and 1938, when she was between the ages of six and ten, Shirley Temple was the most popular film star in Hollywood. In less than a decade, she generated hundreds of millions of dollars in box office receipts and merchandise and almost single-handedly rescued Twentieth Century Fox from bankruptcy during the Depression.1 As various film theorists and historians including Karen Lury, Lori Merish, and Nadine Wills have established, Temple’s rampant popularity during the mid- to late-1930s was indicative of a mass-cultural obsession with childhood and children developed during the Victorian era and reignited in Depression-era America. This trend towards “child-loving”, or fixation on childhood and children as subject matter in art and popular culture bordered on the latently paedophilic inasmuch as an obsession with, and desire for, children, images of children, and/or childlike attitudes and behaviours is understood as derived from children’s real or imagined association with innocence, freedom, and vulnerability. These qualities are “Other” to physical and sexual maturity and are therefore theoretically eroticizable and fetishizable in being constrained as “different.” Gaylyn Studlar has argued this in her analysis of the silent star Mary Pickford, “’Oh, Doll Divine!’ Mary Pickford, Masquerade, and the Paedophilic Gaze” from 2001. In this article, Studlar theorizes Pickford’s performative juvenation, or what can be described as a sort of protracted performance of youth and innocence both by Pickford in her films and extratextually in promotional discourses. Studlar theorizes that as a mature film star, Pickford willfully performed a juvenated version of herself in order to contain the potentially threatening aspects of her success as a woman within the film industry and maximize her popularity amongst both male and female audiences. In such a way, Pickford was able to make “safe” and accessible her spectacularity as a female star by feigning vulnerability, innocence, and self-effacement within a traditionally gendered – and now also age-attendant – politics of viewing.2 And of course, I am referencing a gendered politics of viewing associated with Classical Hollywood Cinema as theorized by Laura Mulvey by which the female is represented as “to-belooked-at” and visually spectacular. Using the example of Mary Pickford, Studlar has thus illustrated the crucial links between juvenility, vulnerability and femininity, which are convergent in the figure of the female child or child-like performer. And it is this theory I wish to put forward towards explaining the rise to prominence of the musical girl-star in Depression-era Hollywood cinema. 1 Temple put her studio $30 million into profit by the end of 1940. Anne Edwards, Shirley Temple: American Princess, (Glasgow: Fontana/Collins, 1989), 129. 2 Gaylyn Studlar, “Oh, ‘Doll Divine’: Mary Pickford, Masquerade and the Pedophilic Gaze,” in A Feminist Reader in Early Cinema, eds. Jennifer M. Bean and Diane Negra. Durham and London, Duke University Press, 2002. Shirley Temple Star image constructed around the Victorian ideal of the “priceless child”, as noted by Studlar Her talent both in films and in extratextual discourses is made to seem spontaneously immanent (preserving the “myth of spontaneity” Jane Feuer has theorised musicals try to develop around musicals) but also concealing the labour behind her performance, its constructedness; Temple’s whole image as a female star is about making her seem natural, as opposed to talented Her musical talent is fetishised and thereby contained within musical numbers in which she is seen singing to an adult male diegetic audience; the erotic aspects of her spectacular performance are, at the same time, ostensibly denied by the fact of her physical immaturity and her situation within the domestic However, Temple, as a pre-adolescent child, may be seen rapidly physically maturing by the end of the 1930s, as well as gaining awareness of herself as a peformer, which explodes the myth of her spontaneous immanence and exposes juvenation as performance Deanna Durbin and Judy Garland Their rise to stardom from around 1936 shows how the adolescent girlstar came to represent an idealised paradigm of femininity in the musical because, on the onset, she could be contained more reliably within a traditionally gendered politics of viewing: her body could be objectified and spectacularised in an erotic/traditional way, but everything else about her performance disavows this eroticism Popular discourses surrounding female performance in the 1930s musical shifted from a focus on the individual girl child to the fetishization of female adolescence. This paradigm shift functioned as a means of disavowing the essential problematics of female performative juvenation within the musical syntax. Replacing those articles that expressed wonder at the preponderance of “big pay babes” in movies from the middle of the decade,3 in 1938 there was an explosion of literature in fan magazines and trade journals on Hollywood’s so-called set of “young fry,” 4 adolescent stars like Mickey Rooney, Freddie Bartholomew, Deanna Durbin and Judy Garland. As Gaylyn Studlar has noted, this was a direct reflection of the extent to which the “teenager” had suddenly become an object of “cultural fascination” in America.5 The fetishization of adolescent stars in popular discourse sanctioned and sanitized the erotic appeal that had been denied or disavowed in the filmic representation of Shirley Temple. Their romantic entanglements were a frequent object of speculation in the press, functioning as an outlet for the expression of erotic interest in their image, while their characters’ narratives in films tended to confirm their pre-sexuality (if not their sexual interest) – a paradigm of representation determined and closely guarded by Joseph Breen and the PCA. In such a way, teenage stars of the late 1930s were fetishized for their liminality, their poisedness-between-stages of life both physical and emotional, between innocence and (sexual) precocity. This would be manifested in the rise to prominence of Deanna Durbin and Judy Garland as leading female musical stars at the end of the decade. Durbin: containing the excesses of the classically trained female voice through traditionally visually scopophilic means: Durbin’s physical maturity-cum-pre-sexuality allowed/made possible her solo individuation as a female musical performer within the phallogocentric structures and strictures of the genre. Garland: breakdown of the traditional visual representation of the great female singer, aural affect surpassing the visual 3 “A Quartet of Big Pay Babes,” Op. Cit.. Sally Reid, “Young Fry Society,” Photoplay (July 1939), 24. 5 Gaylyn Studlar, Precocious Charms: Stars Performing Girlhood in Classical Hollywood Cinema, Op. Cit., 95. 4