Climate Modeling – You be the climate scientist! What about the future? What will happen if we keep emitting CO2? Goals: Students will be able to explain why models used for climate predictions are reliable. Students will use the very simple climate model to compare future climate temperature based on different CO2 emissions scenarios. Hook: Minilesson Refer to the graphs countering skeptics’ statements and ask: How do scientists predict the future? Ask students to make a prediction about future temperature in Colorado. What is a model? Show example equation from Dennis Sheah and from very simple climate model. Explain that models are built on existing knowledge of physics and chemistry and other science and predict what will happen. Scientists must put information into the model. Show graph of temp and CO2 – what relationship do you see? Show visual of sinks and output of CO2. Could also show the bathtub model (see link below) How do we know these models are any good? Explain calibration Explain cross reference to other models Show how model is calibrated to fit observed data records (calibration on very simple climate model). Practice Students calibrate with teacher direction on the projector (whole class) or teacher demonstrates calibration Explain simple carbon model and how it relates to atmospheric fraction Explain climate sensitivity – how responsive temperature is to changes Debrief/ next mini lesson Are you convinced the models are reliable? Skeptic statement: Models are unreliable. Show a few graphs with data from many models on one graph with confidence levels What would you tell a climate skeptic about the accuracy of models for future climate predictions? (students write a short response in their journals) Hook: Part 2 Mini lesson You be the climate scientist. What do you predict about the future? Are you optimistic? What changes need to happen? Brainstorm in a small group, share out as a class – what factors will affect CO2 emissions? Explain different scenarios. Use bathtub interactive for lower level students Students try a scenario where emissions increase until 2050 and then decrease Students test their own scenario. Practice Students use very simple climate model to look at different scenarios (high, medium, low) Students record what happened to CO2 and temp over time Which scenario had the least warming? Which had the most? Very general overview of IPCC scenarios Provide some meaning to the different numbers, future co2 emissions vs current, levels in atmosphere and meaning of a 2˚ C temp. increase Debrief: What do you predict for the future climate? (which scenario) How do you feel about climate change? Next day - What is predicted for the future of Colorado? Resources Need computer lab http://climate.nasa.gov/interactives/ temperature data, shows how several models show the same trends http://www.climateinteractive.org/simulations/bathtub/the-climate-bathtub-animation (bathtub simulation for co2 emissions and levels for video, could show first 2-3 min to explain model at beginning and show 6:45 – 7:30 at end before very simple climate model, could use this later to show what needs to change example of code http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/~shea/zm_conv.F90 Additional overview of IPCC scenarios Type of energy use – all fossil fuel or all alternative Amount of energy use – high and low Population – high and low Global connection - more equity across the globe versus regionally isolated strategies Students relate temp increase to co2 levels Students compare/contrast all fossil fuel vs all non fossil fuel Students compare/contrast high energy use vs low energy use Students compare/contrast high vs low population (what does this mean for co2 emissions Advanced level = which factor do you think plays a greater role, pop or energy use Teacher Reference The Main Characteristics of the Four SRES Storylines and Scenario Families By 2100 the world will have changed in ways that are hard to imagine - as hard as it would have been at the end of the 19th century to imagine the changes of the 100 years since. Each storyline assumes a distinctly different direction for future developments, such that the four storylines differ in increasingly irreversible ways. Together they describe divergent futures that encompass a significant portion of the underlying uncertainties in the main driving forces. They cover a wide range of key "future" characteristics such as population growth, economic development, and technological change. For this reason, their plausibility or feasibility should not be considered solely on the basis of an extrapolation of current economic, technological, and social trends. The A1 storyline and scenario family describes a future world of very rapid economic growth, low population growth, and the rapid introduction of new and more efficient technologies. Major underlying themes are convergence among regions, capacity building, and increased cultural and social interactions, with a substantial reduction in regional differences in per capita income. The A1 scenario family develops into four groups that describe alternative directions of technological change in the energy system. Two of the fossil-intensive groups were merged in the SPM. The A2 storyline and scenario family describes a very heterogeneous world. The underlying theme is self-reliance and preservation of local identities. Fertility patterns across regions converge very slowly, which results in high population growth. Economic development is primarily regionally oriented and per capita economic growth and technological change are more fragmented and slower than in other storylines. The B1 storyline and scenario family describes a convergent world with the same low population growth as in the A1 storyline, but with rapid changes in economic structures toward a service and information economy, with reductions in material intensity, and the introduction of clean and resource-efficient technologies. The emphasis is on global solutions to economic, social, and environmental sustainability, including improved equity, but without additional climate initiatives. The B2 storyline and scenario family describes a world in which the emphasis is on local solutions to economic, social, and environmental sustainability. It is a world with moderate population growth, intermediate levels of economic development, and less rapid and more diverse technological change than in the B1 and A1 storylines. While the scenario is also oriented toward environmental protection and social equity, it focuses on local and regional levels. After determining the basic features and driving forces for each of the four storylines, the team began modeling and quantifying the storylines. This resulted in 40 scenarios, each of which constitutes an alternative interpretation and quantification of a storyline. All the interpretations and quantifications associated with a single storyline are called a scenario family (see Chapter 1 for terminology and Chapter 4 for further details). Name: Date: A Very Very Simple Climate Model http://eo.ucar.edu/staff/rrussell/climate/modeling/co2_climate_model.html Brainstorm Factors that Affect CO2 emissions Test the scenarios on the back and record results 1. Switch the temperature to Fahrenheit in the drop down menu underneath the graph. 2. Choose a value for carbon dioxide emissions and click play. Discussion Questions 1. Which scenario had the most warming? How hot was the average global temperature? 2. Which scenario had the least warming? How hot was the average global temperature? 3. Is some global warming inevitable? Scenarios to test with the Model Scenario CO2 Emissions (Gt/year) What this means Current 9 Same fossil fuel usage High 18 High economic growth, increased fossil fuel usage Medium 11 Steady economic growth, slightly increased fossil fuel usage Low 4 Decreased fossil fuel usage Current until 2050, then decrease 8, then 4 Your choice How does atmospheric CO2 change? How does temperature change?