1 Supporting Information 2 3 Effects of humic acid and solution chemistry on the retention and transport of cerium 4 dioxide nanoparticles in saturated porous media 5 6 Xueyan Lv1, Bin Gao2, Yuanyuan Sun1*, Xiaoqing Shi1, Hongxia Xu1, Jichun Wu1* 7 8 1. Key Laboratory of Surficial Geochemisty, Ministry of Education, School of Earth Sciences 9 and Engineering, Hydrosciences Department, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China 10 2. Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 11 32611 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 __________________________ 20 * 21 E-mail address: sunyy@nju.edu.cn (Y.Y. Sun), jcwu@nju.edu.cn (J.C. Wu). Corresponding authors. Tel.: +86 25 89680835; fax: +86 25 83686016. 1 S1. XDLVO theory The distinct effect of HA on the transport of CeO2 NPs cannot be neglected due to the adsorption density of HA to the particles. Additional steric repulsive interactions were provided by the adsorbed HA on CeO2 NPs (G. X. Chen et al. 2012). In our study, XDLVO theory was utilized to investigate the interaction energy between the CeO2 NPs and sand grain by combining the retarded van der Waals attraction, electrical double layer repulsion and steric repulsion(osmotic repulsion (Vosm) and elastic-steric repulsion (Velas)). However, the DLVO theory was originally developed to estimate the interaction energy for spherical particles and no theory has been developed for a rod-shaped particle. Tian et al. (2011) used either the length or diameter as an effective size to explore the interactions between carbon nanotubes and porous media. In this study, XDLVO energy was estimated by treating the NPs–NPs system as a sphere–sphere interaction and the NPs–collector system as a sphere–plate interaction. The retarded van der forces (ππ£ππ€ ) and electrical double layer forces (πππ ) for a spheresphere and sphere-plate system can be written as (Hogg et al. 1966): π΄131 ππ ππ2 ππ£ππ€ = − 6β2 (π π1 +ππ1 ) [1 − 5.32β π π ln(1 + 5.32)]−1 (1) ππ£ππ€ = − π΄132 ππ 6β [1 + (1 + 14β π )] −1 (2) Where ππ1 and ππ2 refer to the radii of the two interacting spherical CeO2 NPs (Eq. (1)), and ππ refers to the radius of the NPs (Eq. (2)); h is the separation distance between the two CeO2 NPs (Eq. (1)) or between CeO2 NPs and plate surface (Eq. (2)); π is the characteristic wavelength 2 of interaction (100 nm) (Jiang et al. 2012); π΄131 is the Hamaker constant for substances ‘‘1’ in the presence of medium ‘‘3’’, and π΄132 is the Hamaker constant for substances ‘‘1’’and ‘‘2’’ in the presence of medium ‘‘3’’, which can be determined from the Hamaker constant of individual material (K. L. Chen and Elimelech 2007; Bergendahl and Grasso 1999): π΄131 = (√π΄11 − √π΄33 ) 2 (3) π΄132 = (√π΄11 − √π΄33 )(√π΄22 − √π΄33 ) (4) where A11 is the Hamaker constant for CeO2 NPs. The value of Hamaker constant for CeO2 NPs in the absence of HA is 5.57·10 -20J (Karimian and Babaluo 2007). Adsorption of HA to the CeO2 NPs would occur when HA is present in the aqueous solutions, thus the Hamaker constant for HA (4.85·10-20J) is employed to represent the Hamaker constant for CeO2 NPs when HA is present in the solutions (Hu et al. 2010). A22 is the Hamaker constant for sand grains and is taken from Bergstrom as 8.86 × 10-20J (Bergstrom 1997). A33 is the Hamaker constant for water and is taken from Israelachvili as 3.7 × 10-20J (Israelachvili 2011). ππ1 ππ2 πππ = πππ π0 (π π1 +ππ2 ) 1+exp(−π β) {2ππ1 ππ2 ππ [1−exp(−π β)] + (ππ1 2 + ππ2 2 )ππ[1 − exp(−2π β)]} πππ = πππ π0 ππ {2ππ ππ ππ [ 1+exp(−π β) 1−exp(−π β) ] + (ππ 2 + ππ 2 )ππ[1 − exp(−2π β)]} π π π π π 0 π΅ π −1 = √ 2π πΌπ 2 π΄ (5) (6) (7) Where ππ is the dielectric constant of the medium; π0 is the vacuum permittivity; π is the electron charge; ππ1 and ππ2 (Eq. (5)), and ππ and are ππ (Eq. (6)) are the Zeta potentials of particles and sand grains, respectively; π is the reciprocal of the Debye length; ππ΄ is the 3 Avogadro constant; πΌ is the ionic strength; ππ΅ is the Boltzmann’s constant; T is the absolute temperature; e is the electron charge. For HA absorbed CeO2 NPs, steric repulsion including osmotic repulsion (Vosm) and elasticsteric repulsion (Velas) must be considered. Overlap of the HA layer on two segment concentration and thus increases the local osmotic pressure in the overlap region (Vosm). Vosm can be written as below (Fritz et al. 2002; Phenrat et al. 2008): πππ π πΎπ΅ π πππ π ππ΅ π πππ π ππ΅ π =0 = = ππ 4π π1 ππ 4π π1 2π ≤ β β 2 1 ππ2 (2 − π) (π − 2) 1 β π ≤ β < 2π 1 β ππ2 (2 − π) π 2 (2π − 4 − ππ (π)) β<π (8) where χ is the Flory-Huggins solvency parameter, which is assumed to be 0.45 for HA/water interaction; π1 is the volume of a solvent molecule (0.03 nm3) (Wang et al. 2012). ππ is fractional HA surface coverage (Li and Chen 2012); d is the thickness of the adsorbed HA layer (Li and Chen 2012). Any compression of the adsorbed HA layer below the thickness of the unperturbed layer (d) leads to a loss of entropy and gives rise to the elastic repulsion (Velas). Velas can be expressed as (Fritz et al. 2002): πππππ ππ΅ π πππππ ππ΅ π =0 = 2πππ ππ π≤β 2 β β 3− ππ π ππ [π ππ (π ( 2 β π 2 ) ) − 6 ππ ( 3− 2 β π β 2 ) + 3 (1 + π) ] π>β (9) 4 where MW is the molecular weight of the HA (Hong and Elimelech 1997), and ππ is its density. The total extended DLVO interaction energy (ππ ) is: ππ = ππ£ππ€ + πππ + πππ π + πππππ (10) 5 References Bergendahl, J., & Grasso, D. (1999). Prediction of colloid detachment in a model porous media: Thermodynamics. Aiche Journal, 45(3), 475-484. Bergstrom, L. (1997). Hamaker constants of inorganic materials. Advances In Colloid And Interface Science, 70, 125-169. Chen, G. X., Liu, X. Y., & Su, C. M. (2012). Distinct Effects of Humic Acid on Transport and Retention of TiO2 Rutile Nanoparticles in Saturated Sand Columns. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(13), 7142-7150. Chen, K. L., & Elimelech, M. (2007). Influence of humic acid on the aggregation kinetics of fullerene (C-60) nanoparticles in monovalent and divalent electrolyte solutions. Journal Of Colloid And Interface Science, 309(1), 126-134. Fritz, G., Schadler, V., Willenbacher, N., & Wagner, N. J. (2002). Electrosteric stabilization of colloidal dispersions. Langmuir, 18(16), 6381-6390. Hogg, R., Healy, T. W., & Fuersten.Dw (1966). Mutual Coagulation of Colloidal Dispersions. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 62(522P), 1638-&. Hong, S. K., & Elimelech, M. (1997). Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. Journal Of Membrane Science, 132(2), 159-181. 6 Hu, J. D., Zevi, Y., Kou, X. M., Xiao, J., Wang, X. J., & Jin, Y. (2010). Effect of dissolved organic matter on the stability of magnetite nanoparticles under different pH and ionic strength conditions. Science Of The Total Environment, 408(16), 3477-3489. Israelachvili, J. N. (2011). Intermolecular and surface forces. San Diego, Calif.: Elsevier Science Publ. Jiang, X. J., Tong, M. P., & Kim, H. (2012). Influence of natural organic matter on the transport and deposition of zinc oxide nanoparticles in saturated porous media. Journal Of Colloid And Interface Science, 386, 34-43, doi:DOI 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.07.002. Karimian, H., & Babaluo, A. A. (2007). Halos mechanism in stabilizing of colloidal suspensions: Nanoparticle weight fraction and pH effects. Journal Of The European Ceramic Society, 27(1), 19-25. Li, K. G., & Chen, Y. S. (2012). Effect of natural organic matter on the aggregation kinetics of CeO2 nanoparticles in KCl and CaCl2 solutions: Measurements and modeling. Journal Of Hazardous Materials, 209, 264-270. Phenrat, T., Saleh, N., Sirk, K., Kim, H. J., Tilton, R. D., & Lowry, G. V. (2008). Stabilization of aqueous nanoscale zerovalent iron dispersions by anionic polyelectrolytes: adsorbed anionic polyelectrolyte layer properties and their effect on aggregation and sedimentation. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10(5), 795-814, doi:DOI 10.1007/s11051-007-9315-6. 7 Tian, Y. A., Gao, B., & Ziegler, K. J. (2011). High mobility of SDBS-dispersed single-walled carbon nanotubes in saturated and unsaturated porous media. Journal Of Hazardous Materials, 186(2-3), 1766-1772, doi:DOI 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.12.072. Wang, D. J., Bradford, S. A., Harvey, R. W., Gao, B., Cang, L., & Zhou, D. M. (2012). Humic Acid Facilitates the Transport of ARS-Labeled Hydroxyapatite Nanoparticles in Iron Oxyhydroxide-Coated Sand. Environmental Science & Technology, 46(5), 2738-2745, doi:Doi 10.1021/Es203784u. 8