Utah Success Story: Main Creek

advertisement
UTAH SUCCESS
STORY: MAIN
CREEK
7/8/2015
PHASE 1 RESTORATION EFFORTS DECREASE
TEMPERATURE AND POLLUTANT LOADING IN
WALLSBURG WATERSHED
Phase 1 restoration efforts in the Wallsburg Watershed have not
only led to a decrease in both phosphorous and E. coli, but now
Main Creek supports its cold water fishery designated use due to
lowered water temperature.
Utah Success Story: Main Creek
Utah Success Story: Main Creek
P H A S E 1 R E S T O RAT I O N E F F O RT S D E C R E A S E T E M P E R AT U R E A N D
P O L L U TA N T L OA D I N G I N WA L L S B U R G WAT E R S H E D
Summary
Main Creek is one of several tributaries to Deer Creek Reservoir located in northern Utah. This reservoir is an
important drinking water source to Salt Lake City and the Wasatch Front. Deer Creek Reservoir has experienced
low dissolved oxygen due to elevated water temperatures and excess algae growth as a result of nutrient loading.
Main Creek also has high levels of phosphorus and E. coli as well as elevated water temperature. In March 2007,
the local community initiated a watershed restoration strategy (Wasatch Conservation District, 2012) that
implemented several best management practices (BMPs) targeting nonpoint sources of pollution. The result of
these restoration activities not only led to a decrease in both phosphorus and E. coli, but now Main Creek supports
its cold water fishery designated use due to lowered water temperature.
Problem
The Wallsburg watershed covers approximately 45,000 acres in Wasatch County, Utah. Elevation ranges from
5,500 ft. at the inlet to Deer Creek Reservoir to the Wasatch Mountain peaks at 9,500 ft. There is a wide central
valley used primarily for agriculture and residential use. The watershed’s only town of Wallsburg covers 320
acres at the center of Round Valley and had a population of 274 in 2000. At approximately 14.6 miles, Main
Creek is the largest stream in the watershed and is fed by springs in the Wasatch Mountains. Irrigation ditches
convey water from Main Creek across the eastern edge of the valley. It is also a tributary to Deer Creek Reservoir.
Deer Creek Reservoir (UT-L-16020203-001) serves Utah and Salt Lake Counties by providing a significant
amount of drinking and irrigation water, as well as being a popular recreational destination. It was identified as
impaired on Utah’s 2000 303(d) List for failing to protect its cold water fishery designated use due to low
dissolved oxygen and elevated water temperatures. Water quality analyses were summarized in two reports:
Upper Provo River Management Plan (PSOMAS, 1999) and 2002 Deer Creek Reservoir Total Maximum Daily
Load (TMDL). The approved TMDL study (UDWQ, 2002) determined that the low oxygen levels were partially
caused by high total phosphorous (TP) concentrations. Phosphorous sources in the Deer Creek Reservoir
watershed include both point and nonpoint sources. The only point source that discharges to surface waters is the
Midway Fish Hatchery. Heber Valley Special Service District’s Wastewater Treatment Facility uses treated
effluent to irrigate corn and alfalfa fields in the summer and a rapid infiltration basin during other times of the
year. The nonpoint sources were categorized as being related to urban development and agricultural activities.
The Deer Creek Reservoir TMDL showed that in-lake phosphorus concentrations needed to be reduced to 0.025
mg/L and tributaries to 0.04 mg/L as well as a target TP load of 18,000 kg/yr to meet Utah’s water quality
standard of at least 50% of the water column having DO concentrations greater than 4 mg/L. The TMDL
identified a reduction of 865 kg/yr TP loading from agricultural sources.
Though Main Creek comprises only 8% of the inflow into Deer Creek Reservoir, it contributes 17% of the TP
load. Further assessments of Main Creek (UT16020203-009) placed it on the 2010 303(d) List for failing to
protect its infrequent recreational and cold water fishery uses due to elevated levels of E. coli and water
temperature respectively. Figure 1 shows that E. coli concentration in Main Creek often exceeded the water
Page 1
Utah Success Story: Main Creek
quality standard of 206 MPN/100 ml protective for infrequent recreation. For the 2010 303(d) listing, temperature
in Main Creek exceeded the 20º C water quality standard set to protect for cold water fisheries 18% of the time
between 2004-2008 (Figure 2).
It is noteworthy that this watershed contains 3 Utah Sensitive Species: the Leatherside Chub, the Bonneville
Cutthroat Trout, and the Columbia Spotted Frog.
FIGURE 1. AVERAGE ANNUAL E. COLI CONCENTRATION IN MAIN CREEK ABOVE DEER CREEK
RESERVOIR.
Average Yearly E. coli Concentrations in
Main Creek
E coli, MPN/100 ml
700.0
600.0
500.0
400.0
300.0
200.0
100.0
0.0
2007 2008
(n=12) (n=7)
2009
(n=2)
E coli
2010 2011 2012
(n=9) (n=10) (n=9)
2013 2014 2015
(n=3) (n=12) (n=7)
Water Quality Standard (206)
FIGURE 2. WATER TEMPERATURE READINGS IN MAIN CREEK ABOVE DEER CREEK RESERVOIR.
Water Temperature in Main Creek above
Deer Creek Reservoir
30
Temperature, C
25
20
15
10
5
0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014
May
Page 2
June
July
August
September
WQS (20C)
Utah Success Story: Main Creek
FIGURE 3. AVERAGE ANNUAL TOTAL PHOSPHOROUS CONCENTRATION IN MAIN CREEK ABOVE
DEER CREEK RESERVOIR.
TP (mg/l)
Total Phosphorous Concentration in Main
Creek
0.16
0.14
0.12
0.10
0.08
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
TP
TMDL Target (0.04)
The main anthropogenic nonpoint source of TP loading in the Wallsburg watershed is suspected to be from
animal waste (manure) and fertilizer. Another potential source is failing septic tanks. Nine percent of the septic
systems in the Deer Creek watershed are found in the Main Creek drainage. Agriculture compromises about 6%
of the watershed primarily along the valley bottom. Irrigation ditches covey water from Main Creek across the
valley intersecting several intermittent drainages leading to seasonal dewatering of Main Creek. Significant
natural sources of TP also exist. A recent study applying the Minnesota P Index, which assesses erosion, rainfall
and snowmelt runoff pathways, showed snowmelt runoff from forested and shrublands to be the most significant
pathway for dissolved phosphorus entering surface waters (Jones, Pearce, Robinson, & Hansen, 2015).
Project Highlights
In March 2007, the Wasatch Conservation District along with local stakeholders met to address resources
concerns in the Wallsburg Watershed. Using the Coordinated Resource Management (CRM) process,
stakeholders, landowners, and agency personnel evaluated local resources and the potential for actions to protect
and restore the watershed. Participants listed water conservation and water quality as the top two resource
concerns. Streambank restoration was identified in the Wallsburg CRMP as an effective way to lower water
temperature and reduce E. coli and TP loading to Main Creek and Deer Creek Reservoir. Streambanks are
characterized as highly erodible due to lack of riparian vegetation and access by livestock. The shortage of native
woody vegetation along the river also allows for higher instream temperature due to a lack of shading. It is
noteworthy that the watershed soils are naturally high in phosphorus so any disruption of soils will lead to higher
TP loading to the system causing eutrophication in Deer Creek Reservoir.
Streambank restoration projects began on Main Creek in September 2013. Several best management practices
(BMPs) have been implemented including fencing, soil lifts, off-site watering, native vegetation plantings, jhooks, water gaps, and riparian seeding. These BMPs are common practices associated with erosion control and
decreasing instream temperature.
Phase 1 concluded in December 2014 with 3.22 miles of stream restored. In some sections meanders were
reinstalled and banks were pulled back to a 3:1 slope. The disturbed areas were seeded with a wide assortment of
Page 3
Utah Success Story: Main Creek
riparian vegetation species. Other sections used soil lifts wrapped with coconut fiber mesh. A seed mixture was
spread below the fabric and native vegetation was planted. Over 10,000 willow cuttings were inserted through the
coconut fiber. Five miles of exclosure fencing has also been installed reducing unrestricted cattle access. Water
gaps and hardened crossings were installed to allow cattle selective water access and movement between pastures.
Wallsburg Watershed Restoration Phase 1 included the first five landowners upstream from Deer Creek
Reservoir. Four of the five landowners completed stream restoration projects on their property along Main Creek.
Subsequent phases will focus on finishing up mainstem Main Creek, Spring Creek and Little Hobble Creek
restoration and bank stabilization projects. Phase 2 began in October 2014 which included the Phase 1 fifth
landowner along Main Creek and two additional upstream landowners on Little Hobble Creek. Depending on the
availability of project funds, the Wasatch Conservation plans to assist additional landowners along Spring Creek
for Phase 3 beginning in the fall of 2015.
FIGURE 4. MAIN CREEK PRIOR TO PHASE 1 RESTORATION.
Page 4
Utah Success Story: Main Creek
FIGURE 5. UTAH DIVISION OF WILDLIFE RESOURCES’ RIPARIAN TEAM SLOPING MAIN CREEK
BANKS BACK TO A 3:1 SLOPE.
FIGURE 6. CROSS VANE INSTALLATION AND ROCK PLACEMENT ALONG MAIN CREEK.
Page 5
Utah Success Story: Main Creek
FIGURE 7. VOLUNTEERS PLANTING WILLOW POLE CUTTINGS ALONG MAIN CREEK.
FIGURE 8. MAIN CREEK (SAME REACH FIGURE 4) AFTER PHASE 1 IMPLEMENTATION.
Page 6
Utah Success Story: Main Creek
Results
Following the Main Creek Sampling and Analysis Plan, partners collected a host of data to measure NPS project
effectiveness. Data collection included biological, chemistry, chemical, and visual aspects of this project. As a
result, the stream now meets its cold water fishery designated use to due to lowered instream temperature and will
be removed from Utah’s 303(d) in 2016. Both E. coli and TP loading have also been reduced since
implementation work commenced. Monitoring efforts will continue until three years post project work.
Assessment of 2004-2008 temperature data triggered an impairment listing in 2010 with an 18% exceedance of
the water quality standard (WQS) of 20oC required to protect cold water fisheries (Figure 2). Utah’s assessment
methodology allows for 10% exceedance of the water quality standard. The most recent data assessment (2010 –
2014) indicates only a 4% exceedance. Main Creek is now considered to be fully supporting its cold water fishery
designated use and will be delisted in 2016.
Trend analysis of TP concentration shows a general decrease over time however concentrations are still above the
TMDL target of 0.04 mg/L. Stable concentrations point to natural sources of pollution. There is a positive
correlation between flow and concentration indicating that erosion and transport of TP during high flows is a
dominant process in the watershed. TP loading has decreased by 63% after Phase 1 restoration.
FIGURE 9. GRAPH INDICATES A DOWNWARD TREND IN TP CONCENTRATION OVER TIME
THOUGH STILL EXCEEDING THE TMDL TARGET OF 0.04 MG/L.
TP Concentration in Main Creek
TMDL Target
Linear (Value)
0.5
0.45
0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
4/20/2014
4/20/2012
4/20/2010
4/20/2008
4/20/2006
4/20/2004
4/20/2002
4/20/2000
4/20/1998
4/20/1996
4/20/1994
4/20/1992
4/20/1990
4/20/1988
4/20/1986
4/20/1984
4/20/1982
4/20/1980
y = -4E-06x + 0.2038
R² = 0.0692
4/20/1978
TP (mg/L)
Value
Page 7
Utah Success Story: Main Creek
FIGURE 10. BAR GRAPH INDICATES A 63% REDUCTION IN TP LOADING AFTER MAIN CREEK PHASE
1 RESTORATION WAS COMPLETED.
TP Loading in Main Creek Before and
After Phase 1
844
900
TP Loading (kg/yr)
800
700
600
500
400
312
300
200
100
0
Before (2007 - 2012)
After (2013-2014)
Figure 1 shows a downward trend in E. coli concentration in Main Creek as well. When comparing data before
and after Phase 1 work, there is a 24% reduction in concentration (Figure 11) though levels still exceed the WQS
of 206 MPN/100ml for infrequent contact recreational use. Figure 12 displays a 79% reduction in E. coli loading
before and after Phase 1 project work. Note that 2014 was a dry water year which could overestimate the percent
reduction.
FIGURE 11. BAR GRAPH INDICATES A 24% REDUCTION IN E. COLI CONCENTRATION AFTER MAIN
CREEK PHASE 1 RESTORATION WAS COMPLETED THOUGH LEVELS STILL EXCEED THE 206
MPN/100ML WQS.
24% in E. coli Concentration After Main Creek
Phase 1 Restoration
400.0
E coli (MPN/100ml)
350.0
300.0
250.0
200.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
Pre Project (2007 - 2012)
E. coli
Page 8
Post (2013-2015)
Water Quality Standard (206)
Utah Success Story: Main Creek
FIGURE 12. BAR GRAPH INDICATES A 79% REDUCTION IN E. COLI LOADING AFTER MAIN CREEK
PHASE 1 RESTORATION WAS COMPLETED.
79% Reduction E. coli Loading After Main
Creek Phase 1 Restoration
E coli Loading (#/d/100ml)
1.60E+11
1.40E+11
1.37E+11
1.20E+11
1.00E+11
8.00E+10
6.00E+10
2.93E+10
4.00E+10
2.00E+10
0.00E+00
Pre Project (2007 - 2012)
Post (2013-2015)
Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) has monitored fish populations in the Wallsburg Watershed for
many years. The estimated population density, biomass, and age structure of Southern Leatherside Chub captured
in 2013 were compared to data from past years and were combined with the 2012 monitoring data to evaluate
recent population trends. The 2012 and 2013 data suggest that Southern Leatherside Chub have experienced an
increase in population density in Main Creek. On average, 2013 population densities of Southern Leatherside
Chub were roughly seven times higher than 2007-2010. Due to lack of habitat and high water temperatures, trout
population estimates are not significant enough to report. UDWR anticipates the restoration practices
implemented will create deeper pools and eventually cooler water due to willow shading. In-stream conditions
will improve for cutthroat trout, but the smaller fish (like Chub) will most likely be the first to respond and take
advantage of improved habitat conditions.
Par tners and Funding *
*Following information relates only to Phase 1 of Wallsburg Watershed Restoration
One of the biggest successes of this project was the support that was provided by various agencies. The overall
cost of the Main Creek Restoration Project was $1,076,199 (see Table 1 for funding breakdown). Funding sources
include landowners, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Natural Resource Conservation Service , Utah
Department of Agriculture and Food, Utah Division of Water Quality, Provo River Watershed Council (PRWC),
and Watershed Restoration Initiative (WRI), Wasatch County, and Wasatch Conservation District. Other project
partners include volunteers, Utah State University, Brigham Young University, Utah Association of Conservation
Districts, and the Utah Reclamation, Mitigation and Conservation Commission.
Page 9
Utah Success Story: Main Creek
Table 1. Funding Sources of Wallsburg Watershed Restoration: Phase 1.
Entity
EPA (Section 319)
NRCS (EQIP)
UDWQ (State NPS)
UDAF (GIP)
UDWR (WRI)
Landowners (In-kind)
PRWC
Wasatch County
Wasatch CD
Funding Amount
$150,000
$366,422
$238,000
$125,874
$85,000
$57,527
$50,000
$3,000
$376
Total
$1,076,199
REFERENCES
Jones, J., Pearce, A., Robinson, D., & Hansen, N. (2015). Applying a Phosphorous Risk Index in a Mixed
Mountain Watershed. Provo: BYU.
PSOMAS. (1999). Upper Provo River Water Quality Management Plan. Salt Lake City.
UDWQ. (2002). Deer Creek Reservoir Drainage TMDL Study. Salt Lake City.
Wasatch Conservation District. (2012). Wallsburg Coordinated Resource Management Plan. Provo.
Page 10
Download