Queens College Tenure, CCE, Promotion Process
Candidate’s Curriculum Vitae and Personal Statement
Version 6/12/2012
NAME:
COLLEGE: Queens
(Throughout this document, headings are in Bold. Enter information in normal font.)
HIGHER EDUCATION
A. Degrees (most recent first):
Institution
Dates Attended
Degree/Major
Dates Conferred
B. Additional Higher Education and/or Education in Progress:
Institution Dates Attended
Courses, Etc.
EXPERIENCE (most recent first)
A. Teaching (include part- and full-time experience at Queens College)
Institution
Dates
Rank
Department
B. Other Than Teaching (include experience at Queens College)
Institution
Dates
Title
Candidate’s Name
RECORD OF APPOINTMENT IN EACH TITLE AT QUEENS COLLEGE
(in chronological order; most recent first; include date of tenure, if awarded)
Dates
Rank
ACADEMIC AND PROFESSIONAL HONORS
MEMBERSHIP IN PROFESSIONAL SOCIETIES (last five years only)
Candidate’s Name
TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS
(short form : for class evaluations from spring 2010-present)

STUDENT EVALUATION
Please also remember to include all course evaluation written comments along with course evaluation
scores below.
 Insert the candidates’ scores on the Queens College student evaluation forms for the last four semesters in the
table below. If the department conducts its own student evaluations, those should also be reported on an
additional page. Note: Data for each instructor by course name can be found in http://courses.qc.cuny.edu.
(For several of the questions in sections A and B: 1=Strongly disagree, 2= Disagree, 3= Somewhat disagree,
4= Agree and 5=Strongly agree)
Question
Sem. 1
Sem. 2
Sem. 3
Sem. 4
A.
A. General Questions
1. Did you receive a detailed syllabus during the first week of
class? (Yes/No)
2. The instructor presents the course material in a clear and
lucid manner (1=Strongly disagree, 5=Strongly agree)
3. The instructor interacts well with students. (1=Strongly
disagree, 5=Strongly agree)
4. The instructor provides useful feedback (e.g., comments on
written work and exams, informal feedback inside/outside
class). (1=Strongly disagree; 5=Strongly agree)
5. The instructor returns assignments/exams in a timely
fashion. (1=Strongly disagree; 5=Strongly agree)
6. The instructor is available outside of class. (1=Strongly
disagree; 5=Strongly agree)
7. Reading assignments were valuable. (1=Strongly disagree;
5=Strongly agree)
8. How difficult is the course? ( 1= Not at all difficult, 5=
Extremely difficult)
9. What is your overall evaluation of the Instructor, as distinct
from the course?(1=Poor, 5= Excellent)
10. What is your overall evaluation of the Course, as distinct
from the Instructor?(1=Poor, 5= Excellent))
B. Writing Intensive Related Questions
11. The instructor provided opportunity for the revision of
writing assignments. ( 1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly agree)
12.Class time is devoted to teaching elements of writing(
argument, evidence, analysis, narrative, description, etc.) and the
writing process(brainstorming, drafting, revising, etc.) (
1=Strongly disagree, 5= Strongly agree)
13. The instructor assigned approximately how many pages of
formal writing(essays, lab reports, narratives, etc.)? (1= 0-9
pages, 5= 26 or more pages)
14. Compared to the amount of formal writing you did in this
course, how much informal writing (journals, blogs, freewriting
etc.) did you do? (1=None, 5= Much more)
Provide below information on the courses referred to in the table above.
Course
Year/Semester
# Students Registered
Semester 1
Semester 2
Semester 3
Semester 4
# Respondents
Candidate’s Name
TEACHING EFFECTIVENESS
( long form : for class evaluations before spring 2010 semester)
STUDENT EVALUATION
Insert the candidates’ scores on the Queens College student 22-question student evaluations for the last
four semesters in the table below. If the department conducts its own student evaluations, those should
also be reported on an additional page.
(For questions 1 – 15: 1=Strongly disagree; 5=Strongly agree; 6=Not applicable.)
Question
Sem. 1
Sem. 2
Sem. 3
1. The instructor presented course requirements and objectives
early in the semester.
2. The instructor’s presentations were clear.
3. The instructor’s command of spoken English is good.
4. The instructor is enthusiastic about the course material.
5. The instructor made it clear what the exams would cover.
6. The instructor provides useful comments on assignments and
exams.
7. The instructor returns assignments/exams within a reasonable
time.
8. Reading assignments were valuable.
9. Other assignments (e.g., written, oral, artistic) were valuable.
10. The instructor is respectful of students.
11. The instructor is concerned about students’ progress.
12. The instructor is available outside of class.
13. The instructor encourages students to ask and answer
questions.
14. I learned a great deal in this course.
15. I enjoyed the course.
16. How difficult was the course? (1=Not Difficult; 5=Extremely)
17. The pace at which the instructor covered the material. (1=Too
Slow; 5=Too Fast)
18. The workload for this course. (1=Very Light;5=Very Heavy)
19. Is this course required for your major or minor? (1=Yes;
2=No)
20. What is your class level? (1=Fresh.; 2=Soph.; 3=Junior;
4=Senior; 5=Grad. / Certificate Student; 6=Non-Degree)
21. Grade you expect to receive in this course. (1=A; 4=D; 5=P;
6=NC/F; 7=INC; 8=Other)
22. What is your current Grade Point Average? (1=Less than 2.0;
5=3.5 or above)
Sem. 4
Provide below information on the courses referred to in the table above.
Course
Semester 1
Semester 2
Semester 3
Semester 4
Year/Semester
# Students Registered
# Respondents
Candidate’s Name
WORKLOAD DATA
List all course assignments at Queens College and the Graduate Center for the last four semesters. Indicate all
reassigned time and its source (contractual, grants, dissertation supervision, etc.). In addition, provide
information on multiple positions, if any, held by the candidate.
Semester/Year
Discipline &
Hrs./Cr.
Course #
Course Title
Candidate’s Name
SCHOLARSHIP AND CREATIVE WORK
List completed work using the following guidelines:
(1)
Works that are edited, co-authored, translated, compiled, etc. should be clearly indicated as such. In the
case of co-authored works or projects, information should be provided as to the specific contributions
of the candidate.
(2)
Categories should be further subdivided as necessary to present different types of publications and
creative works clearly.
(3)
A reprinting or translation of a work should immediately follow that work's primary entry, and should
be clearly indicated as such.
(4)
Works that are “in press” or “accepted for publication” should be included in Sections A-C as
appropriate, but must be clearly indicated and verifications must be supplied.
(5)
Single-space entries; double-space between all entries.
(6)
Include complete (beginning and ending) page numbers for all publications.
(7)
Within each section, list latest works first.
(A) BOOKS and other MONOGRAPHS
1. Published since most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
2. Published prior to most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
(B) JOURNAL ARTICLES Indicate refereed journals with *.
1. Since most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
2. Prior to most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
(C)
CHAPTERS IN BOOKS/ANTHOLOGIES
1. Since most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
2. Prior to most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
(D) ARTICLES IN CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS Indicate refereed proceedings with *. In case
of joint authorship, indicate the presenting author by # sign.
1. Since most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
2. Prior to most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
(E) EXHIBITIONS, PERFORMANCES
1. Since most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
2. Prior to most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
Candidate’s Name
(F) REVIEWS (by the candidate, of others’ performances or scholarly works)
1. Since most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
2. Prior to most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
(G) REVIEWS (by others, of the candidate’s performances or scholarly works)
1. Since most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
2. Prior to most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
(H) ORAL PRESENTATIONS, ADDRESSES, AND MASTER CLASSES Indicate whether these
were refereed (*), or invited (**). In case of joint presentations, indicate presenting author by # sign.
Do not list presentations included in (D). In case of joint presentations, indicate presenting author by
# sign.)
1. Since most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
2. Prior to most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
(I)
REPORTS AND OTHER WORKS(e.g., Posters, Encyclopedia Entries)
1. Since most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
2. Prior to most recent of: initial appointment or last promotion.
(J) SUBMITTED WORKS AND WORKS IN PROGRESS. Specify stage of progress and
magnitude of work. Include number of manuscript pages for each submitted work.
Candidate’s Name
GRANTS
For each grant, include: title, author(s), granting agency, originating institution (the one submitting the
proposal); grant period (start and end year and month); role of candidate in the grant (sole Principle
Investigator; co-PI; sub-contractor, consultant, etc); total funding over the grant period and amount provided
to candidate (which will differ if there are multiple PI’s, subcontracts, etc).
List separately research grants, in support of the candidate’s scholarly research, and institutional grants, in
support of the college’s infrastructure, shared-use equipment, instruction, student stipends and scholarships,
and similar programs.
(1) Grants Pending
Research
Institutional
(2) Grants in Progress
Research
Institutional
(3) Grants Completed
Research
Institutional
(4) Grants Submitted, but not Funded
Research
Institutional
Candidate’s Name
SERVICE
(A) COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY. Include dates of each service activity.
(B) PROFESSION. Include dates of each service activity.
(C)
COMMUNITY. Last five years only. Include dates for each service activity. Examples: unpaid
member of board of trustees for school or library; activities in non-college or university
settings; unpaid consultantships.
Candidate’s Name
STATEMENT OF CANDIDATE
(Maximum of two pages, single-spaced)
Use this space to put your scholarship/creative activities into proper context and expand on your teaching.
Describe the evolution of your scholarship, referring to specific items in the “Scholarship and Professional
Growth” section. Discuss any curriculum development that you have participated in, as well as your teaching
activities (techniques, course materials, area of expertise, etc.). Where appropriate, please describe curricular
innovations for which you have been responsible. It would also be helpful to know how you view the
relationship between teaching and scholarship. If service plays an important role in your case, you may use
this space to augment the “Service” section.