Kemp and Radda, 1994

advertisement
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
1
2
ATP Production from PCr Breakdown
3
The rate of ATP production from the breakdown of PCr through the CK reaction (ATP CK,
4
mM.min-1) was calculated from the change in PCr for each time point of the exercise period
5
(Kemp and Radda, 1994):
6
ATPCK = dPCr/dt
[A1]
7
8
ATP Production from Oxidative Phosphorylation
9
Based on the hyperbolic relationship between the oxidative ATP production rate (Q, mM.min -1)
10
and free cytosolic ADP concentration ([ADP]), the rate of mitochondrial ATP production
11
(ATPOX) was calculated as follows:
12
ATPOX = Qmax/(1+Km/[ADP])
[A2]
13
in which Km (the [ADP] at half-maximal oxidation rate) is ~30 μM in skeletal muscle (Kemp
14
and Radda, 1994) and Qmax is the maximal rate of oxidative ATP production. Qmax (in mM.min-
15
1
16
and [ADP] was measured at the end of exercise:
) was calculated using the initial rate of PCr synthesis (V recov PCr) during the recovery period
17
Qmax = Vrecov PCr (1+Km/[ADP]end)
[A3]
18
19
ATP Production from Anaerobic Glycolysis
20
Throughout the exercise period, glycogen breakdown to pyruvate and lactate, proton efflux,
21
buffering capacity, protons produced by oxidative phosphorylation and the consumption of
22
protons by the CK reaction lead to changes in intramuscular pH (Kemp and Radda, 1994).
23
Assuming that the glycogenolytic production of 1 mole of H+, when coupled to ATP hydrolysis,
24
yields 1.5 moles of ATP, the rate of ATP production from anaerobic glycolysis (ATPGLY) can be
25
deduced from the total number of protons produced throughout exercise (Hochachka and
26
Mommsen, 1983):
27
ATPGLY = HCK++Hβ+-HOX++Hefflux+
[A4]
28
HCK+ (in mM.min-1) was calculated from the changes in [PCr] and from the stoichiometric
29
coefficient (γ):
HCK+ = -γ  ATPCK
30
[A5]
31
where γ is the proton stoichiometric coefficient of the coupled Lohmann reaction as described
32
previously (Kushmerick, 1997).
33
Hβ+ (in mM.min-1) was calculated from the apparent buffering capacity βtotal (in slykes,
34
millimoles of acid added per unit change in pH) and from the rate of pH changes:
35
36
[A6]
βtotal = βnon-bicarbonate-non-Pi + βPi + βPME + βbicarbonate,
[A7]
βnon-bicarbonate-non-Pi = βa - (βPi + βPME)
[A8]
Where
37
38
Hβ+ = -βtotal  dpH/dt
where
39
40
in which βa was determined from the initial change in [PCr] (Δ[PCr] ini) and alkalinization of pH
41
(pHini) (2):
42
βa = γ  Δ[PCr]ini/ΔpHini
[A9]
43
βPi and βPME were determined based on the dissociation constant of the buffer (K) according to
44
the standard formula (Conley et al., 1998):
45
βx = (2.303  H+  K  [X])/(K + H+)2
[A10]
46
where X is either Pi or PME and K = 1.77  10–7 for Pi and 6.3  10–7 for PME.
47
In agreement with previous studies and assuming that muscle is a closed system during exercise
48
(Conley et al., 1998, Kemp et al., 1993), βbicarbonate was set to zero.
49
HOX+ (in mM.min-1) was calculated from the factor m = 0.16/[1 + 10(6.1 – pH)], which accounts for
50
the amount of protons produced through oxidative ATP production:
51
HOX+ = m  Q
[A11]
52
Hefflux+ (in mM.min-1) was calculated for each time point of exercise using the proportionality
53
constant λ relating proton efflux rate to ΔpHexo:
54
Hefflux+ = ΔpHexo
[A12]
55
This proportionality constant λ (in mM.min-1.pH.unit-1) was calculated during the recovery
56
period:
λ = -Veff/pH
57
[A13]
58
During this period, PCr is regenerated throughout the CK reaction as the consequence of
59
oxidative ATP production in mitochondria. Thus, Hefflux+ can be calculated from the rates of
60
proton production from the CK reaction (HCK+, in mM.min-1) and mitochondrial ATP
61
production (HOX+, in mM.min-1) on one side and the rate of pH changes on the other side. At this
62
time ATP production is exclusively aerobic, and lactate production is considered as negligible:
Veff = βtotal  dpH/dt + γ  Vrecov PCr + m  Q
63
[A14]
64
65
Total ATPase Rate
66
The total ATPase rate (ATPTOT, in mM.min-1) was calculated for each time point as:
67
ATPTOT = ATPOX + ATPCK + ATPGLY
[A15]
68
Energy cost of contraction (in mM.min-1.W-1) was also calculated as the ratio between ATPTOT
69
and power output (W). Aerobic ATP cost of contraction (ATPAER, in mM.min-1.W-1) was
70
calculated throughout the whole exercise period as the ratio between the mean amount of
71
ATPOX produced during the exercise and mean power output produced during the same period
72
of time. Anaerobic ATP cost of contraction was calculated similarly from ATP production by
73
CK reaction and glycolysis (ATPCK + ATPGLY).
Download